Stocks/FDUS

FDUS

Fidus Investment Corporation
Financial Services·Asset Management
$18.88
$717M market cap
Claude Rating
5/10HOLD
Revenue
$133.6M
Free Cash Flow
$-142.0M
Rev Growth
+16.8%
FCF Margin
-106.3%
P/FCF
--
EV/FCF
--
Fwd EV/EBITDA
12.9x
Fair Value
$18.00
Upside
-4.7%

Fidus Investment Corporation is a business development company. It specializing in leveraged buyouts, refinancings, change of ownership transactions, recapitalizations, strategic acquisitions, mezzanine, growth capital, business expansion, lower middle market investments, debt investments, subordinated and second lien loans, senior secured and unitranche debt, preferred equity, warrants, subordinated debt, senior subordinated notes, junior secured loans, and unitranche loans. It does not invest

2-Year Price History

$18.63+15.4%
$16$17$18$19$20volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q138.525.8--19.3---7.7-0.0-56.4----------
Est2027-Q440.027.6--21.6---40.0-0.0-48.7----------
Est2027-Q338.025.7--19.4---11.4-0.0-8.7----------
Est2027-Q239.026.5--20.7--7.8-0.02.7----------
Est2027-Q137.525.1--18.8---15.0-0.0-5.1----------
Est2026-Q439.527.3--21.3---31.6-0.09.9----------
Est2026-Q337.024.8--19.2--11.1-0.041.5----------
Est2026-Q238.526.2--21.2---19.3-0.030.4----------
Act2026-Q135.329.829.919.913.013.0-0.049.7668.138.011.6%3.0x16.8x
Act2025-Q433.00.00.09.8-186.0-186.0-0.070.0230.637.00.0%0.0x13.1x
Act2025-Q329.820.020.019.15.85.8-0.062.3185.035.714.7%2.9x9.5x
Act2025-Q235.525.425.425.325.125.1-0.091.2195.635.219.6%3.6x9.7x
Act2025-Q130.221.521.519.78.08.0-0.067.5534.134.19.3%3.5x14.3x
Act2024-Q427.219.319.317.620.520.5-0.057.2474.933.99.2%3.4x13.1x
Act2024-Q324.517.117.116.519.819.8-0.054.4471.433.48.5%3.1x11.8x
Act2024-Q233.725.825.824.116.716.7-0.048.3465.032.312.7%4.6x10.7x
Act2024-Q128.220.120.120.17.87.8-0.027.1454.830.811.2%3.7x12.2x
Act2023-Q435.227.527.526.423.523.5-0.0119.1466.530.414.9%5.1x11.5x
Act2023-Q331.724.324.324.325.225.2-0.080.3444.926.614.9%4.5x12.9x
Act2023-Q219.512.512.510.9-16.8-16.8-0.038.0469.125.07.1%2.5x16.3x
Act2023-Q122.215.515.515.5-5.6-5.6-0.036.4437.124.810.6%3.3x17.0x
Act2022-Q423.016.416.44.712.012.0-0.062.4410.124.67.7%3.7x16.4x
Act2022-Q317.211.411.411.4-24.3-24.3-0.040.4390.224.48.6%2.8x--
Act2022-Q214.18.28.28.0-2.5-2.5-0.072.5386.924.45.9%2.0x--
Act2022-Q117.411.611.611.7-90.7-90.7-0.086.1387.124.48.5%3.0x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202212.7066.5%4816.4×n/m12.0×6.0×
202315.22+51.6%73.5%8011.5×34.9×7.4×5.3×
202418.36+4.7%72.3%8213.1×16.6×8.4×5.8×
202518.75+13.1%52.1%6713.1×n/m9.7×5.6×
TTM18.88+15.5%56.3%750.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E18.88+15.6%0.7%10.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude5/10HOLDFV: $18.00

Fidus is a well-managed lower middle market BDC trading near NAV ($19.55) with an attractive 10.8% dividend yield, but several factors temper enthusiasm. The Q1 2026 earnings beat was driven by a one-time $6.97M fee that won't recur, masking modest underlying NII trends as base rates potentially compress. The 32% portfolio concentration in software/IT services creates sector risk, and 11.4% annual dilution from equity issuance is a significant drag on per-share value creation. Realized losses have been meaningful ($12.2M and $14.4M in recent quarters), and the entire portfolio is valued using Level 3 inputs, making NAV inherently uncertain. The externally managed structure creates fee conflicts. While the base dividend appears well-covered, the stock's premium-to-NAV pricing leaves limited margin of safety. At current prices (~$19.75), investors are essentially buying at NAV with a yield that is competitive but not exceptional relative to internally managed peers like MAIN or larger BDCs like ARCC that offer better liquidity and diversification.

Catalyst Acceleration of M&A activity in the lower middle market as private equity sponsors seek exits, potentially driving origination volume and fee income higher; realization of the $41M unrealized gain in Pfanstiehl Inc.
Risk Portfolio concentration in software/IT (32%) combined with rising AI disruption risk and 100% Level 3 valuations means NAV could be overstated if credit conditions deteriorate in this segment, triggering a negative spiral of markdowns, dividend cuts, and stock price decline.
Trend
STABLE
Mgmt
6/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
-2.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) delivered robust Q1 2026 results, reporting adjusted net investment income of $0.62 per share, comfortably covering its $0.43 base dividend. Total investment income reached $47.5 million, driven by a significant $6.97 million one-time refinancing fee from American Always and a 13.1% year-over-year increase in interest income. The company’s portfolio remains healthy, with fair value totaling $1.4 billion and only one company on non-accrual, representing less than 1% of the portfolio. Management successfully exited its investment in Pseudo Connector, realizing a $15.8 million loss but effectively cleaning up the balance sheet of non-performing assets. Originations reached $118.7 million, with a continued strategic focus on first-lien debt, which now represents 87% of the debt portfolio. Despite a lackluster M&A environment influenced by geopolitical volatility, CEO Edward H. Ross expressed confidence in a decent pipeline and the resilience of the lower middle market. The firm also highlighted its Software and IT sector exposure, noting high structural protections and no adverse effects from AI. With $244.2 million in total liquidity and a 0.9x net debt-to-equity ratio, Fidus is well-positioned for the remainder of 2026, declaring a total Q2 dividend of $0.62 per share.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$18.88
Market Cap$717M
Enterprise Value$1.3B
P/S Ratio5.4x
P/FCF--
EV/FCF--
FCF Margin (TTM)-106.3%
FCF Yield-19.8%
Dividend Yield (TTM)9.0%
Annual Dilution11.4%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$133.6M
Net Income$74.1M
Free Cash Flow$-142.0M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+16.8%
EBITDA Margin56.3%
Net Margin55.4%
FCF Margin-106.3%
CapEx % of Revenue0.0%
SBC % of Revenue0.0%
ROIC11.5%
WC Change % Rev14.1%
Interest Coverage2.3x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$-1.15
-106.1% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$-437M
− Net Debt$618M
= Fair Equity$-44M
Revenue Growth2.0% → 3.0%
FCF Margin-106.3% → 45.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float2.1%
Short Shares0.8M
Days to Cover3.7
Change (vs Prior)+8.0%
Short % Float History
2.10%+1.80pp
0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)35%
Put IV (ATM)--
ATM Spread18.0%
Call $OI (near money)$42K
Put $OI (near money)$22K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$17.5
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$7.50$9.60/$12.900--/$0.750
$10.00$6.70/$10.300--/$0.750
$12.50$4.20/$7.801--/$0.750
$15.00$2.30/$5.301--/$0.750
$17.50$0.05/$3.400--/$1.704
$20.00--/$0.500$0.50/$3.600
$22.50--/$0.750$2.65/$5.600
$25.00--/$0.750$5.10/$8.300
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+14.1%
Forward FCF Margin-35.9%
Forward EBITDA Margin67.8%
Forward P/FCF--
Forward EV/FCF--
Forward Int. Coverage2.5x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds4%
Est. Borrow Rate6.8%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth3.0%
LT FCF Margin45.0%

Cash Runway

4.2months
CRITICAL

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 2.8% of float, sold 1.6%.

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+1.2% of float (net)
Bought 2.8% · Sold 1.6%
96 filers reported (last quarter: 151)

Ownership composition

Active
23.5%(-1.1% YoY)
139 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
0.3%(-0.1% YoY)
1 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.2%(-0.1% YoY)
2 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC$14.0M$18.30+$1.2M−$2.3M-0.0%$322.69B
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP$12.4M$15.37−$2.4M−$878K+0.8%$133.17B
ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT INC$9.5M$16.96+$438K+$3.9M-0.2%$367.84B
Cetera Investment Advisers$9.4M$17.05+$325K+$3.6M-0.2%$93.23B
Columbus Macro, LLC$8.8M$18.53+$345K+$3.8M+0.0%$932M
UBS Group AG$7.4M$18.42−$297K+$3.9M-0.3%$562.11B
Baird Financial Group, Inc.$7.1M$18.43+$363K+$2.1M-0.2%$63.96B
Muzinich & Co., Inc.$6.1M$18.51+$21K+$4.5M-1.6%$286M
MORGAN STANLEY$5.1M$15.21+$778K−$193K-0.3%$1.65T
Legal & General Group Plc$5.0M$15.90+$558K+$1.0M-0.1%$432.24B
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$4.8M$16.03−$1.9M−$2.2M-0.9%$117.03B
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc.$3.7M$18.41+$0+$2.1M+1.8%$154.47B
NOVARE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$3.6M$15.27+$21K+$296K-0.1%$1.26B
MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC$3.6M$15.47−$752K+$2.7M-0.5%$127.40B
PFG Advisors$3.3M$13.52+$64K+$105K-0.0%$2.04B
Ethos Financial Group, LLC$2.7M$18.32+$0+$73K-0.8%$1.37B
FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC$2.7M$16.95−$555K−$269K-0.2%$403.03B
LPL Financial LLC$2.6M$16.03+$975K+$1.1M-0.2%$372.65B
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$2.5M$17.81−$1.8M−$111K-0.2%$5.69T
Advisors Asset Management, Inc.$2.1M$13.27+$93K−$1.7M-0.4%$6.01B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-0.12%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.12%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.04%
41 buyers · $0.01B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.06%
40 sellers · $0.02B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-27.9%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-12.0%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-2.6%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+6.3%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+14.3%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-1.2%
Holder mid (any stock)
-1.1%
Holder rally (any stock)
-2.9%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

07.7M15.3M23.0M30.6M$11$13$15$17$192021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Kingstone Capital Partners Texas, LLC11KRAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC804KVAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP713KRAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATESMelia Wealth LLCInvesco Ltd.Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.TWO SIGMA ADVISERS, LPCetera Investment Advisers542KENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT INC545K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
6
6
Buy: 6Hold: 6Consensus: Buy
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2026 Q344M32M19M$0.51$0.50 – $0.524
2026 Q444M33M18M$0.49$0.48 – $0.502
2027 Q144M33M19M$0.50$0.49 – $0.512
2027 Q245M33M19M$0.49$0.48 – $0.501
2027 Q346M34M19M$0.50$0.49 – $0.511
2027 Q446M34M18M$0.48$0.47 – $0.492
2028 Q143M32M17M$0.46$0.45 – $0.473
2028 Q243M31M17M$0.45$0.44 – $0.462
2028 Q343M32M17M$0.45$0.44 – $0.462
2028 Q443M32M16M$0.43$0.42 – $0.443

Corporate

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

33.5%retail+2.9pp
12.8%dark+0.1pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%50%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Fidus Investment Corporation: Level 3 Valuation Dependency and Non-Cash Revenue Aggression

Overall Risk
6/10
Fraud
3/10
Dilution
4/10
Insolvency
5/10
Earnings Overstated
7/10
Hidden Liabilities
4/10
Legal
2/10
Audit Warnings
3/10
Hidden Upside
4/10
Contextually Acceptable
8/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

Fidus reported mixed Q1 2026 results where a significant 'beat' in Adjusted Net Investment Income ($0.62 vs $0.50 est) was heavily inflated by a one-time $6.97 million refinancing fee from American AllWaste. Concurrently, the company recorded $12.2 million in net realized losses for Q1 2026, primarily due to a $15.8 million loss on the exit of 'Pseudo Connector,' a non-accrual investment. Previously, Q4 2025 revenue of $32.73 million significantly missed analyst estimates of $39.46 million (MarketBeat, Seeking Alpha).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on the sustainability of earnings as 'one-time' fees mask underlying pressure. Analysts have highlighted that 32-37% of the portfolio is concentrated in SaaS and IT services, which are increasingly vulnerable to AI disruption and may lack traditional asset-heavy collateral. Furthermore, management characterized recent deal activity as 'relatively modest,' suggesting a slowdown in the M&A-driven origination pipeline essential for growth in the lower middle market (Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha).

🚩 Red Flags

A major technical red flag appeared in March 2026 when short interest surged by 36% in a single reporting period. Additionally, the company's significant exposure to 'ARR loans' (Annual Recurring Revenue) is a high-risk factor in a shifting tech landscape. A separate operational concern involves a public warning from Fidus regarding fraudulent 'imposter' websites and WhatsApp scams targeting potential investors, which could indicate brand-related regulatory or security vulnerabilities (MarketBeat, FDUS Investor Relations).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Fidus faces intense competition from larger, higher-liquidity BDCs like Ares Capital (ARCC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX). Analysts have explicitly downgraded FDUS to 'Hold' or 'Sell' status in early 2026, suggesting that peers like Capital Southwest (CSWC) offer similar exposure with lower risk profiles. The externally managed structure of FDUS remains a competitive disadvantage compared to internally managed peers like MAIN, which typically command higher premiums (Seeking Alpha, StockInvest.us).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Negative sentiment is reflected in the credit quality of the underlying portfolio companies. The realized loss from the exit of 'Pseudo Connector' demonstrates the struggle of distressed portfolio companies to navigate current market conditions. While non-accruals remain low (<1%), the $12.2 million in realized losses indicates that exits are currently occurring at a deficit, suggesting that the 'customers' (borrowers) may be under-capitalized relative to their debt loads (Motley Fool, Stock Titan).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-08

Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Fidus Investment Corporation First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jody Burfening. Please go ahead.
Jody Burfening: Thank you, Debbie, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for Fidus Investment Corporation's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. With me this morning are Edward H. Ross, Fidus Investment Corporation's chairman and chief executive officer, and Shelby Elizabeth Sherard, chief financial officer. Fidus Investment Corporation issued a press release yesterday afternoon with the company's quarterly financial results. A copy of the press release is available on the Investor Relations page of the company's website at fdus.com. I would also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosure regarding forward-looking information included on today's call. The conference call today will contain forward-looking statements including statements regarding the goals, strategies, beliefs, future potential, operating results, and cash flows of Fidus Investment Corporation. Although management believes these statements are reasonable based on estimates, assumptions, and projections as of today, 05/07/2026, these statements are not guarantees of future performance. Time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any telephonic or webcast replay. Actual results may differ materially as a result of risks, uncertainties, and other factors including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Fidus undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Edward H. Ross. Good morning, Ed.
Edward H. Ross: Good morning, Jody, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our first quarter 2026 earnings conference call. In today's call, I will start with a review of our first quarter performance and our portfolio at quarter end, and then share with you our outlook for 2026. Shelby will cover the first quarter financial results and our liquidity position. After we have completed our prepared remarks, we will be happy to take your questions. Fidus' first quarter results were extremely strong from an income statement perspective. With adjusted NII of 62¢ per share, our debt portfolio continued to over-earn our base dividend of $0.43 per share and to support a payout of excess earnings to shareholders. Adjusted NII grew 14.8% to $23.7 million, reflecting a 13.1% increase in interest income on higher average income-producing assets along with higher fee income than last year. We ended the quarter with estimated spillover income of $1[inaudible] per share. Deal activity was relatively modest during the quarter, including M&A transactions completed by our portfolio companies. Overall, our portfolio remains healthy, characterized by niche market leaders with traits that provide long-term barriers to entry that ensure their value proposition and competitive positioning. Through our strict underwriting process, we ensure that we are selecting companies with proven, resilient business models that generate recurring revenue and cash flow to service debt and to provide capital for growth. We remain focused on industries we know well in the lower middle market, leveraging our established relationships with deal sponsors. For the second quarter of 2026, the Board of Directors declared a total dividend of $0.62 per share, which consists of a base dividend of $0.43 per share and a supplemental dividend of 19¢ per share, equal to 100% of the surplus in adjusted NII over the base dividend from the prior quarter, which will be payable on 06/29/2026 to stockholders of record as of 06/16/2026. Net asset value held steady at $742 million at quarter end, or $19.55 per share. Originations in the first quarter amounted to $118.7 million, nearly all of which consisted of first lien debt investments in support of both M&A transactions and debt recapitalizations. We also invested $1.8 million in equity securities of two new portfolio companies, consistent with our investment strategy of maintaining a portfolio that is structured to produce both high levels of current and recurring income and the potential for capital gains from monetizing equity investments. Subsequent to quarter end, we invested an additional $21.5 million in one new portfolio company. Proceeds from repayments and realizations totaled $73.1 million for the first quarter, resulting from a mix of M&A and refinancing activity. We monetized equity investments in two portfolio companies, generating $3.9 million in realized gains. Offsetting these gains was a total of approximately $15 million in realized losses in connection with the conversion of Student Connector's debt into [inaudible]. Looking at net investment activity, which takes debt recapitalizations into account, our portfolio grew by $46 million in Q1. First lien investments comprised 87% of the debt portfolio, reflecting the ongoing migration towards first lien securities. Combined with our $149.6 million equity portfolio, we ended the quarter with a portfolio totaling $1.4 billion on a fair value basis, equal to 102.5% of cost. Overall, the portfolio remains healthy from a credit quality perspective, supported by very solid underlying portfolio company performance. We ended the quarter with only one portfolio company on non-accrual that accounted for less than 1% of the total portfolio on both a fair value and cost basis. Our portfolio remains well diversified by industry, consisting of a mix of manufacturing, distribution, and services companies. In addition, we have a well-diversified group of software and IT services names within our portfolio that are exposed to both opportunities and risks associated with AI. This group represents about 32% of our total portfolio on a fair value basis. We have not seen any negative impacts from AI on this portfolio. Importantly, nearly all of our debt investments in these companies are in highly structured first lien securities with at least two maintenance covenants, and all portfolio companies except for one are backed by high-quality sponsors with proven track records in the space. The weighted average loan-to-value for this portfolio was 42% this quarter, below our total portfolio weighted average loan-to-value of approximately 45% on a cost basis. In addition, the current contractual duration of our debt investments in this category is 2.2 years, enhancing our ability to manage any tougher situations we might encounter down the road. Equity investments in software and IT services companies totaled $16.1 million, or approximately 11% of our total equity portfolio on a fair value basis. In closing, our portfolio remains well positioned to continue to generate adjusted NII in excess of our base dividend and to realize gains from monetizing equity investments. Although M&A activity is currently lackluster in light of the geopolitical and associated market volatility, our pipeline of investment opportunities is decent, and our long-standing relationships with deal sponsors and lower middle market expertise position us to identify high-quality companies that meet our rigorous underwriting standards for investment. We will, as always, manage the business for the long term, staying focused on our goals of preserving capital and generating attractive risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders. I will now turn the call over to Shelby to provide details on our financial and operating results. Shelby?
Shelby Elizabeth Sherard: Thank you, Ed, and good morning, everyone. I will review our first quarter results in more detail and close with comments on our liquidity position. Please note, I will be providing comparative commentary versus the prior quarter, Q4 2025. Total investment income was $47.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, a $5.4 million increase from Q4, primarily driven by a $1.4 million increase in interest income due to increased average debt investments outstanding and a $4.1 million increase in fee income due to a $6.9 million fee related to the refinancing of our debt investments in American Always, partially offset by lower origination and prepayment fees from investment activity. Total expenses, including tax provision, were $22.9 million for the first quarter, a $0.4 million increase versus Q4, primarily driven by a $0.4 million increase in interest expense related primarily to higher average debt balances outstanding, a $1.4 million increase in base management and income incentive fees given the increase in assets under management and higher fee income in Q1, and a $0.9 million increase in G&A expenses. G&A expenses were higher due to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and incremental legal expenses related to our new registration statement, and the timing of annual audit and tax compliance expenses incurred in Q1. These were offset by a $0.7 million decrease in the capital gains fee and a $1.8 million decrease in income tax provision related to the annual excise tax accrual in Q4. Net investment income, or NII, for the three months ended March 31 was $0.65 per share versus $0.53 per share in Q4. Adjusted NII, which excludes any capital gains incentive fee accruals or reversals attributable to realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, was 62¢ per share in Q1 versus 52¢ in Q4. For the three months ended March 31, we recognized approximately $12.2 million of net realized losses related to a $15.8 million realized loss on the exit of our debt investments in Pseudo Connector, taking this non-accrual off our books, which was partially offset by $3.9 million in realized gains on our equity investments in CIH Intermediate and Zocd. We ended the quarter with $682.2 million of debt outstanding, comprised of $260.5 million of SBA debentures, $325 million of unsecured notes, $85.2 million outstanding on the line of credit, and $11.6 million of secured borrowings. Our net debt-to-equity ratio as of March 31 was 0.9x. Our statutory leverage, excluding exempt SBA debentures, was 0.6x. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was 5.2% as of quarter end. Turning now to portfolio statistics, as of March 31 our total investment portfolio had a fair value of $1.4 billion. Our average portfolio company investment on a cost basis was $13.8 million, which excludes investments in seven portfolio companies that sold their operations or are in the process of winding down. We have equity investments in approximately 85.6% of our portfolio companies, with an average fully diluted equity ownership of 2%. Weighted average effective yield on debt investments was 12.5% as of March 31, a slight decrease versus 12.6% at the end of Q4. The weighted average yield is computed using effective interest rates for debt investments at cost, including the accretion of original issue discount and loan origination fees, but excluding investments on non-accrual, if any. Now I would like to discuss our available liquidity. As of March 31, our liquidity and capital resources included cash of $50.4 million, $1.399 billion of availability on our line of credit, and $54.0 million of available SBA debentures, resulting in total liquidity of approximately $244.2 million. I will now turn the call back to Ed for concluding comments.
Edward H. Ross: Thanks, Shelby. As always, I would like to thank our team and the Board of Directors at Fidus Investment Corporation for their dedication and hard work, and our shareholders for their continued support. I will now turn the call over to Debbie for Q&A. Debbie?
Operator: We will now open the call for questions. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question is from Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Operator: Excuse me. I just put Christopher Nolan on the podium. My apologies. Robert will be next. Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann, please go ahead.
Christopher Nolan: Obviously, they are preferring the person with the better look over Robert, so I am honored. Well done there. No offense, Robert. Shelby, were there any nonrecurring items in the quarter? Am I missing your comments?
Shelby Elizabeth Sherard: No. We did incur a rather large fee that I would characterize as more of a one-time fee. It was about $6.97 million related to the American Always debt refinancing. So that drove the fee income in Q1 and the beat versus consensus.
Christopher Nolan: Okay. That is really it for me. Thank you very much.
Operator: Thank you, Chris. The next question is from Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Robert Dodd: Good morning, and thank you, Chris, for letting me go second. I appreciate it. And congrats, Shelby and team, for a really good quarter. A question about that American Always fee. If I look, the position size is about $50 million now, and obviously it was smaller than that before. A $6.9 million fee on a refinancing of a position that size seems pretty high. Now, obviously, the first three last quarter was marked well above cost, so there were some odd differences in how the prior thing was structured. Is it a normal asset that just happened to repay and generate a really good fee, or was there something unusual about the structure of that asset? I am trying to get a feel—obviously it is probably not going to happen every quarter—but can this kind of outsized refinancing fee happen again in different assets?
Edward H. Ross: Sure. It is a great question, Robert. Could it happen again to this magnitude? Anything is possible, but it is a pretty healthy fee, as you highlighted, and it is not the norm for every credit by any stretch of the imagination. We have a few other investments where we have fees that can be earned on the back end. In this case, American Always has been in our portfolio for a while. There was a point in time where there was a need for capital on a relatively quick basis, and we ended up being the source of that capital. We priced that capital in accordance with what we thought the numbers should be. This is not our business going forward or anything like that. We are a solution provider, we provided a solution that was needed, and we were paid accordingly for that solution. That is the way I would think about it.
Robert Dodd: Got it. Thank you. I wonder if that was COVID-timing related because, obviously, it was before then. I appreciate that. And then more generally, you characterized the pipeline as decent, but the market is kind of lackluster, which is a theme across the space, not surprisingly with the number of macro uncertainties. Would you characterize that lackluster market as driven by these uncertainties—oil, macro, et cetera? And do you think the market needs more certainty for the PE market in your segment to show a little bit more life?
Edward H. Ross: Great question. Let me give you a little color on what we experienced in Q1. As most people in this space felt, deal flow was more modest in nature, largely due to seasonal patterns in Q1. That was prior to the geopolitical conflict in the Middle East. At that time, general expectations were for an increase in both deal flow and investment activity throughout the year. As we sit here today, we still have confidence in a pickup in activity, but the pace will be somewhat dependent upon a reduction in the current level of uncertainty in the world today. There is quite a bit of pent-up demand in M&A—nothing new there. The good news from our perspective is the fragmented nature of the lower middle market and its large overall size. That should continue to provide ample investment opportunities for us to pursue, whether M&A picks up or not. We like that aspect of the lower middle market. There is still activity going on today, but it is not close to robust levels. We have investment opportunities with both existing portfolio companies and new opportunities. At the end of the day, we expect an okay to decent originations quarter. We expect repayments to be on the lighter side. A lot of things can change; deals that we expect to close may not close. But that would be our expectation today—some decent growth this quarter in the portfolio, but lighter on the repayment side overall.
Robert Dodd: Okay. That is helpful. Thank you. And then following on, spreads—your portfolio yield ticked down a tiny bit versus Q4. Looking forward, there has been talk in the marketplace, certainly with larger buyers, about spread expansion, maybe impacted by flows in the private perpetual vehicles. What are your thoughts on spreads in your end of the market? Do you think stability is more likely, or is there a prospect for expansion in the smaller end of the market? And I would differentiate between the overall market and what you are seeing on the software side.
Edward H. Ross: Great question. We are seeing wider spreads, but for truly great assets—great operating companies—there continues to be a high level of competition, albeit slightly better pricing relative to prior to the conflict. There is ample capital out there, so there is competition, but for the right assets we still think spreads are extremely attractive and the terms remain very strong in the lower middle market in terms of covenants, security, and so on. There are opportunities to increase spreads, but for great assets competition is still meaningful.
Robert Dodd: Got it. I appreciate it. Thank you, and again, congratulations on the quarter.
Edward H. Ross: Thanks, Robert. Good talking to you.
Operator: Please press star then 1 if you would like to ask a question. At this time, we have no further questions in the queue.
Operator: Thank you. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Edward H. Ross for closing remarks.
Edward H. Ross: Thank you, Debbie, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning. We look forward to speaking with you on our second quarter call in early August. Have a great day and a great weekend.
Operator: This conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.