Stocks/TCPC

TCPC

BlackRock TCP Capital Corp.
Financial Services·Asset Management
$3.85
$323M market cap
Claude Rating
3/10SELL
Revenue
$81.5M
Free Cash Flow
$119.9M
Rev Growth
-74.8%
FCF Margin
147.0%
P/FCF
2.7x
EV/FCF
9.6x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
17.7x
Fair Value
$3.80
Upside
-1.3%

BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. is a business development company specializing in direct equity and debt investments in middle-market, debt securities, senior secured loans, junior loans, originated loans, mezzanine, senior debt instruments, bonds, and secondary-market investments. It typically invests in communication services, public relations services, television, wireless telecommunication services, apparel, textile mills, restaurants, retailing, energy, oil and gas extraction, Patent owners and

2-Year Price History

$3.73-54.5%
$4.0$5.0$6.0$7.0$8.0volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q136.016.6--7.9--19.8-0.0294.8----------
Est2027-Q435.516.0--7.1--19.5-0.0275.0----------
Est2027-Q335.015.4--6.3--21.0-0.0255.4----------
Est2027-Q235.015.1--5.3--22.8-0.0234.4----------
Est2027-Q135.514.9--3.6--24.9-0.0211.7----------
Est2026-Q436.515.7--1.8--27.4-0.0186.8----------
Est2026-Q338.016.7---3.8--34.2-0.0159.5----------
Est2026-Q240.018.0---6.0--32.0-0.0125.3----------
Act2026-Q19.9-0.3-0.3-16.342.342.3-0.093.3925.884.3-0.1%-0.0x10.6x
Act2025-Q427.199.820.980.540.540.5-0.061.10.085.0--7.5x3.5x
Act2025-Q342.124.424.424.421.721.7-0.061.01,05285.08.2%1.4x--
Act2025-Q22.5-15.9-15.9-15.915.415.4-0.0107.31,17585.0-4.8%-0.9x--
Act2025-Q139.120.920.920.926.326.3-0.099.11,09985.16.5%1.4x--
Act2024-Q4-17.1-38.0-38.0-38.671.771.7-0.091.61,11885.3-11.6%-2.3x--
Act2024-Q346.021.621.621.6101.6101.6-0.0104.21,16085.66.0%1.0x--
Act2024-Q2-29.0-51.3-51.3-51.386.486.4-0.0194.71,32085.6-12.8%-2.6x--
Act2024-Q120.85.15.15.133.433.4-0.0120.61,30362.11.2%0.4x376.1x
Act2023-Q450.90.037.3-13.335.435.4-0.0112.2985.257.813.6%0.0x--
Act2023-Q354.20.040.512.846.646.6-0.091.7970.457.814.3%0.0x--
Act2023-Q254.00.039.916.346.046.0-0.0123.11,02157.813.3%0.0x--
Act2023-Q150.30.037.022.7-40.4-40.4-0.098.81,02357.812.3%0.0x--
Act2022-Q446.70.033.5-47.835.535.5-0.082.4944.057.811.9%0.0x--
Act2022-Q348.20.034.626.2132.2132.2-0.0105.8983.957.811.2%0.0x--
Act2022-Q244.00.030.6-0.128.128.1-0.049.41,04257.89.5%0.0x--
Act2022-Q142.20.029.112.526.726.7-0.043.71,02857.89.0%0.0x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
20227.800.0%06.7×n/m3.5×
20238.07+15.7%0.0%017.3×16.8×3.1×
20247.07-90.1%-301.5%-63n/m5.7×n/m31.3×
20255.21+433.5%116.6%1293.5×4.4×4.7×4.7×
TTM3.85+108.9%132.5%1080.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E3.85+72.9%0.4%10.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude3/10SELLFV: $3.80

TCPC is a deeply impaired BDC undergoing a painful multi-quarter workout of legacy credits that has destroyed 40% of NAV in two years. While management is taking the right steps—deleveraging, reducing concentration risk, pivoting to first-lien, leveraging the BlackRock platform—the damage is extensive and the turnaround timeline is uncertain. The Fitch downgrade to junk constrains future funding, new originations yield significantly less than exited assets (8.3% vs 11.2%), and the securities fraud class action adds tail risk. The 22.9% trailing dividend yield is a mirage built on a collapsing NAV base, and the recently cut dividend may need further reduction if NII continues to shrink. At a 46% discount to reported NAV, the stock reflects justified skepticism about the accuracy of Level 3 marks. Even if NAV stabilizes near $6.00-6.50, the discount is unlikely to narrow meaningfully until multiple quarters of clean results and realized gains demonstrate the portfolio is truly healed. This is a falling knife with asymmetric downside risk.

Catalyst Multiple consecutive quarters of stable/rising NAV, resolution of remaining nonaccruals at or above marked values, Fitch rating stabilization, and successful new originations at attractive yields could begin to narrow the NAV discount. Dismissal of the securities fraud lawsuit would also help.
Risk Further realized losses on remaining problem credits (software portfolio, Job & Talent) and continued NAV erosion could trigger covenant issues, further rating downgrades, and potentially force additional dividend cuts or dilutive equity raises at massive discounts to NAV.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
4/10
Quarter
4/10
Exp. Move
-5.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) announced Q1 2026 results centered on portfolio cleanup and deleveraging. Nonaccruals significantly improved to 2.8% at fair value following the restructuring of ALPINE 4840 and Suited Connector. Net leverage decreased to 1.29x, driven by over $135 million in exits and paydowns. However, NAV per share fell 4.9% to $6.72, primarily due to $35 million in markdowns. Significant contributors to these markdowns included Job and Talent and the broader software portfolio, which faced valuation multiple compression and AI-related disruption risks. Management noted that despite these markdowns, the software book maintains a healthy (though reduced) equity cushion from an initial 26% LTV. Adjusted NII was $0.21 per share, supported by a $0.17 dividend. The company successfully repaid its 2026 notes, leaving it with no near-term maturities and $358.6 million in liquidity. Share repurchases continued, with a new $50 million authorization in place. Management remains focused on repositioning the portfolio toward smaller, more granular first-lien positions, utilizing the BlackRock platform's scale to source resilient opportunities in a shifting credit landscape.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$3.85
Market Cap$323M
Enterprise Value$1.2B
P/S Ratio4.0x
P/FCF2.7x
EV/FCF9.6x
FCF Margin (TTM)147.0%
FCF Yield37.1%
Dividend Yield (TTM)22.9%
Annual Dilution-0.9%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$81.5M
Net Income$72.6M
Free Cash Flow$119.9M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-74.8%
EBITDA Margin132.5%
Net Margin89.1%
FCF Margin147.0%
CapEx % of Revenue0.0%
SBC % of Revenue0.0%
ROIC1.1%
WC Change % Rev-9.9%
Interest Coverage1.7x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$0.59
-84.6% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$500M
− Net Debt$833M
= Fair Equity$50M
Revenue Growth-5.7% → 1.0%
FCF Margin147.0% → 45.0%
Discount Rate16.0%
Terminal EV/FCF6.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float6.6%
Short Shares5.6M
Days to Cover8.8
Change (vs Prior)-5.1%
Short % Float History
6.60%+4.40pp
2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)72%
Put IV (ATM)--
ATM Spread41.6%
Call $OI (near money)$20K
Put $OI (near money)$151K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$2.5
Major Expirations2
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50$0.50/$2.052--/$0.601,400
$5.00--/$0.104$0.10/$2.150
$7.50--/$0.450$3.10/$4.700
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+84.0%
Forward FCF Margin78.9%
Forward EBITDA Margin43.5%
Forward P/FCF2.7x
Forward EV/FCF9.8x
Forward Int. Coverage1.1x
Model Risk Score8/10
Bankruptcy Odds12%
Est. Borrow Rate9.5%
Terminal EV/FCF6.0x
LT Growth1.0%
LT FCF Margin45.0%

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 4.7% of float, sold 2.2%. 1 filer moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+2.5% of float (net)
Bought 4.7% · Sold 2.2%
114 filers reported (last quarter: 130)

Ownership composition

Active
23.9%(-25.0% YoY)
112 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
0.5%(-0.5% YoY)
1 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(+0.0% YoY)
3 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
0.6%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
Next Capital Management LLC$11.0M$5.79+$1.3M+$10.8M+0.2%$330M
Invesco Ltd.$8.6M$6.13+$0+$3.0M-0.2%$652.04B
UBS Group AG$8.0M$5.97+$2.3M+$3.2M-0.3%$562.11B
TRANSCEND WEALTH COLLECTIVE, LLC$4.7M$6.93+$438K−$636K-0.1%$1.25B
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP$4.6M$7.45−$3.1M−$2.8M+0.8%$133.17B
North Ground Capital$3.1M$5.83+$224K+$1.8M-4.5%$83.0M
VICTORY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC$3.0M$3.61+$3.0M+$3.0M$156.12B
MORGAN STANLEY$2.7M$7.03−$90K−$620K-0.3%$1.65T
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$2.5M$6.64−$1.6M+$131K-0.9%$117.03B
Legal & General Group Plc$2.4M$6.60+$214K+$385K-0.1%$432.24B
BARINGS LLC$2.0M$5.57+$88K+$243K+0.7%$6.00B
ARES MANAGEMENT LLC$2.0M$6.27+$1.6M+$2.0M-10.5%$1.46B
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$1.6M$6.47−$550K+$210K-0.2%$5.69T
BI Asset Management Fondsmaeglerselskab A/S$1.6M$7.15+$0+$212K-0.4%$9.55B
LSV ASSET MANAGEMENT$1.5M$6.59+$0+$198K+0.0%$46.40B
Callodine Capital Management, LP$1.4M$3.61+$1.4M+$1.4M-0.3%$1.42B
FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC$1.3M$3.61+$1.3M+$1.3M-0.2%$403.03B
Muzinich & Co., Inc.$1.0M$7.22+$0+$56K-1.5%$286M
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc.$1.0M$7.30+$0+$67K+1.8%$154.47B
GatePass Capital, LLC$1.0M$3.61+$1.0M+$1.0M+1.7%$206M
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
-0.53%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.49%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-1.45%
23 buyers · $0.01B in
Sellers (this Q)
+0.07%
35 sellers · $0.02B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
+8.2%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-7.2%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-9.7%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+6.2%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+19.0%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-1.1%
Holder mid (any stock)
-1.1%
Holder rally (any stock)
-0.5%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

02.4M4.8M7.3M9.7M$3.61$4.72$5.84$6.96$8.072021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
BARINGS LLC565KVAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP1.3MSTATE TREASURER STATE OF MICHIGANCliffwater LLCNext Capital Management LLC3.0MInvesco Ltd.2.4MMILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLCMORGAN STANLEY760KMelia Wealth LLCTRANSCEND WEALTH COLLECTIVE, LLC1.3M

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
4
7
2
Buy: 4Hold: 7Sell: 2Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2026 Q338M-5M17M$0.20$0.19 – $0.213
2026 Q437M-5M17M$0.20$0.19 – $0.211
2027 Q135M-5M15M$0.17$0.17 – $0.181
2027 Q235M-5M15M$0.18$0.17 – $0.191
2027 Q335M-5M15M$0.18$0.17 – $0.191
2027 Q435M-5M15M$0.17$0.16 – $0.181
2028 Q131M-4M12M$0.14$0.14 – $0.151
2028 Q231M-4M12M$0.14$0.14 – $0.151
2028 Q331M-4M12M$0.14$0.14 – $0.151
2028 Q431M-4M12M$0.14$0.14 – $0.151

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$370K
5 txns · 4 insiders · 97,175 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-03-13BUYWolfe Patrickofficer: Chief Operating Officer8,925$3.65$33K$59K
2026-03-10BUYWorrell August Danielofficer: Co-Chief Investment Officer40,000$3.75$150K$426K
2026-03-06BUYCuellar Erik L.officer: CFO1,750$3.86$7K$8K
2026-03-06BUYMehring Jasonofficer: President6,500$3.86$25K$113K
2026-03-06BUYWorrell August Danielofficer: Co-Chief Investment Officer40,000$3.89$156K$286K

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

30.2%retail-2.7pp
22.7%dark+3.0pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

BLACKROCK TCP CAPITAL CORP.: Controlled Capital Destruction Masked by Subjective Valuations

Overall Risk
8/10
Fraud
3/10
Dilution
2/10
Insolvency
6/10
Earnings Overstated
5/10
Hidden Liabilities
4/10
Legal
3/10
Audit Warnings
7/10
Hidden Upside
4/10
Contextually Acceptable
3/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

BlackRock TCP Capital (TCPC) has faced a series of financial setbacks in the first half of 2026. On May 7, 2026, the company reported a Q1 loss and a further 4.9% decline in Net Asset Value (NAV) to $6.72 per share, driven by $35 million in net portfolio markdowns. This follows a catastrophic 19% quarter-over-quarter NAV drop disclosed in January 2026 ($8.71 to $7.07). Consequently, the board slashed the quarterly dividend by 32% to $0.17 per share (May 2026) to align with diminished earnings capacity and realized losses of $32.7 million from restructurings like Fishbowl and Alpine 4840 (Fitch, TipRanks, Motley Fool).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on a permanent 'impairment spiral.' While management claims credit quality is 'improving' because non-accruals fell to 2.8% of fair value in Q1 2026, this decline was achieved through loss realization and restructurings rather than borrower recovery. Realized losses are ballooning—$118.3 million in Q4 2025 alone. Furthermore, yield compression is intensifying; new investments yielded only 8.3% compared to 11.2% for exited assets, suggesting the company is forced to accept lower-quality spreads to maintain volume while its own borrowing costs remain elevated (Fitch, Motley Fool).

🚩 Red Flags

Multiple credit agencies have collapsed their ratings for TCPC. In late January 2026, Fitch downgraded TCPC to 'BB' (junk status) and placed it on 'Rating Watch Negative,' citing elevated leverage (1.74x debt-to-equity) and a vanishing asset coverage cushion. KBRA also downgraded the firm to 'BB+' with a Negative Outlook. Additionally, the $325 million senior unsecured notes maturing in February 2026 forced the firm to use its revolving credit facilities, significantly weakening its liquidity position and limiting its ability to fund new, higher-yielding opportunities (Fitch, KBRA).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

TCPC is struggling against a 'deteriorating' sector outlook for Business Development Companies (BDCs) in 2026. High interest rates are finally breaking mid-market borrowers, leading to the 289% surge in non-accruals (at cost) seen over the past year. Competitive pressure is also coming from within; as a discounted valuation (trading well below NAV) impedes its ability to raise new equity capital, TCPC is losing market share to better-capitalized peers who can underwrite new deals while TCPC is stuck in a defensive 'restructuring' mode (Fitch, Trefis).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Investor sentiment is overwhelmingly bearish, characterized by a 'flight to the exits.' Following the January 2026 disclosures, the stock plummeted nearly 13% in a single day on heavy volume. The filing of the 'Burnell v. BlackRock TCP Capital Corp.' securities fraud class action in February 2026, alleging that executives misled the market about the true health of the portfolio and overstated the NAV, has further eroded shareholder trust. Analyst sentiment is equally poor, with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods (KBW) and Wells Fargo downgrading the stock to 'Underperform' and 'Underweight' respectively, with price targets slashed as low as $3.50 (InvestmentNews, GuruFocus).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-07

Operator: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Q1 2026 Earnings Call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 again. I will now hand the conference over to Alex Doll, Executive Director. Alex, please go ahead.
Alex Doll: Thank you, operator. Before we begin, I will note that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements based on management's estimates and assumptions at the time such statements are made, which are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those projected. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in our most recently filed report on Form 10-Q and the Form 8-K filed with the SEC today, along with the associated press release. Any forward-looking statements made on this call are as of today and are subject to change without notice. Additionally, certain information discussed and presented may have been derived from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. Accordingly, we make no representation or warranty with respect to such information. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the first quarter ended 03/31/2026 and posted a supplemental earnings presentation on our website at tcpcapital.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC earlier today. Now I will turn the call over to our Chairman, CEO, and Co-CIO, Philip Tseng.
Philip Tseng: Thank you, Alex. Thank you to our investors and analysts for joining us today. I will start with an overview of our first-quarter 2026 performance. Then Jason Mehring, our President, will cover portfolio and investment activity, and Erik Cuellar, our CFO, will walk through our financial results. I will come back with closing remarks before we open the call for questions. We are also joined today by Dan Worrell, our Co-CIO, who will be available to answer questions. In the first quarter, we executed against our strategic priorities, which are improving credit quality, further repositioning our investment portfolio, and strengthening our balance sheet. We are deploying capital selectively into high-quality opportunities, leveraging the origination power of the PFS platform, while reducing average position sizes, increasing the portion of the portfolio in first-lien loans, and reducing leverage. While there is work to do, we are taking steps to drive value for our shareholders. One of the most important metrics for us is nonaccruals, and during this quarter, these declined to 2.8% of the portfolio at fair value and 7.6% at cost, down from 4% and 9.7%, respectively, last quarter. This improvement reflects the completion of the restructurings of ALPINE 4840 and Suited Connector, and the sale of Fishbowl. Importantly, net leverage declined to 1.29x at quarter end, down from 1.41x last quarter, bringing it closer to our target range of 0.9x to 1.2x. The reduction in leverage was driven primarily by exits, partial paydowns, and proactive balance sheet management. Full exits and partial paydowns during the quarter totaled $135.3 million and included sizable payoffs of our investments in Team Services, James Purse, kart.com, and Eddie Bauer, with average position size of more than $28 million. Further, Team Services, our largest repayment during the period, was a second-lien position. In addition to generating attractive returns, these repayments helped to reduce leverage, enhance diversification by lowering portfolio concentration, and supported our continued focus on increasing the percentage of the portfolio allocated to senior positions in the capital structure. Since quarter end, we received more than $50 million of additional paydowns, including approximately $13 million from AutoAlert, which was previously restructured and recently sold to a strategic buyer. While we still have equity in the combined company, we view this repayment as a positive outcome that meaningfully reduces our exposure while preserving potential upside. At the end of the quarter, our portfolio had a fair market value of $1.4 billion invested across 139 companies in more than 20 industry sectors, with an average position size of $10 million. 91.8% of the portfolio was invested in senior secured loans, and 8.2% was in equity investments, and 94.4% of our debt investments were floating rate. Adjusted net investment income for the quarter was $0.21 per share, compared to $0.25 last quarter, primarily reflecting a smaller portfolio as paydowns outpaced investments, lower investment income, and higher expenses. Annualized net investment income ROE was 11.8%. PIK interest income for the quarter was 8.5% of total investment income, down from 10.9% last quarter, and nearly 80% of PIK was from positions that contemplated PIK when the loans were underwritten. NAV declined 4.9% to $6.72 per share at quarter end, from $7.[inaudible] last quarter, reflecting $35 million of net portfolio markdowns during the quarter. Job and Talent, a staffing company, was the largest contributor to the markdowns at approximately $11 million, or 32% of the total markdowns during the quarter. Weaker operating performance during the quarter combined with lower industry-wide valuation multiples put pressure on the company's enterprise value. Our current exposure includes both a first-lien term loan and preferred equity. The preferred equity drove a meaningful portion of this quarter's mark-to-market movement, given its greater sensitivity to changes in enterprise value. Separately, software-related investments also accounted for approximately $11 million, or 32% of total markdowns in the period. These reductions were driven primarily by valuation multiple compression, revised growth expectations, and AI-related disruption risk in certain subsectors. The balance of the NAV decline was attributable to unrealized loss across the portfolio related to wider market spreads and lower market multiples, in addition to borrower-specific factors. These markdowns were more spread out and hence limited in size per borrower, the largest of which was $2.8 million. Now I want to provide some perspective on our software portfolio. As we mentioned on our last call, we do not view software as monolithic because some segments are fundamentally more resilient than others. We have considered the potential for AI disruption in our underwriting of potential software investments for some time now, and as a result, we have pursued businesses where we believe AI is more likely to enhance a company's offering rather than displace it. As of March 31, software represented 30.5% of the portfolio at fair value and was spread across 47 companies, with 95% in debt positions and the remaining 5% in equity. These companies had an LTV of approximately 26% at origination, providing a considerable equity cushion. While public software companies have seen valuation reprice, we have not seen a corresponding decline in the operating performance of our private portfolio companies. That said, we will continue to closely monitor our software investments. Now I will turn the call over to Jason to discuss our portfolio, as well as our recent investment activity.
Jason A. Mehring: Thanks, Phil, and welcome, everyone. I will begin with some additional details on our portfolio composition. As Phil mentioned, we made continued progress in diversifying our portfolio and reducing the average position size of our investments. At the end of the first quarter, our five largest investments accounted for 24.9% of our portfolio. Investment income was broadly distributed, with more than 70% of our portfolio companies each contributing less than 1% of the total. New investments this quarter had an effective yield of approximately 8.3% versus 11.2% on those we exited, reflecting lower base rates and the impact of spread compression relative to when the repaid deals were booked. As a result, our average portfolio yield declined from 11.1% last quarter to 10.9% at March 31. During the first quarter, we invested approximately $22.5 million across six new and two existing portfolio companies. Each of the new investments leveraged sourcing and underwriting capabilities across the broader BlackRock PFS platform. Originations were intentionally modest this quarter, as we prioritized paydowns and exits to strengthen our balance sheet and reduce leverage while being highly selective on new commitments. All new investments were in senior secured loans and reflect our continued focus on building a diverse portfolio that mitigates industry and individual concentration risk, while also being mindful of our goal to reduce leverage. Turning to capital allocation, on 05/07/2026, our Board of Directors declared a second-quarter dividend of $0.17 per share, payable on June 30 to stockholders of record on June 16. We repurchased 0.505 million shares of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. stock during the quarter at a weighted average share price of $4.51 and an additional 0.156 million shares subsequent to quarter end at a weighted average share price of $3.78. On 04/29/2026, our Board of Directors reapproved our stock repurchase plan to acquire up to $50 million in the aggregate of our common stock. Now I will turn the call over to Erik to discuss our financial results and capital and liquidity positioning.
Erik L. Cuellar: Thank you, Jason. I will begin with a review of our financial results for 2026. As detailed in our earnings press release, adjusted net investment income excludes the amortization of the accounting discount resulting from our merger with BCIC and is calculated in accordance with GAAP. A full reconciliation of adjusted net investment income to GAAP net investment income, as well as other non-GAAP financial metrics, is included in our earnings press release and 10-Q. Total investment income for the first quarter was $42.6 million, or $0.51 per share. This included recurring cash interest of $0.39, nonrecurring income of $0.03, recurring discount and fee amortization of $0.03, PIK income of $0.04, and dividend income of $0.02 per share. Operating expenses for the first quarter were $0.29 per share, including $0.19 per share of interest and other debt expenses. Net investment income was $0.22 per share, and adjusted net investment income was $0.21 per share. As of 03/31/2026, our cumulative total return did not exceed the total return hurdle, and therefore, no incentive compensation was accrued for the first quarter. Net realized losses for the quarter were $32.7 million, or $0.39 per share, driven primarily by our sale of Fishbowl and restructuring of ALPINE 4840, which together accounted for approximately $30 million. Net unrealized losses were $2 million, or $0.02 per share. This included $30.1 million in reversals of previously unrealized losses on Fishbowl and ALPINE 4840, which moved from unrealized to realized losses, as well as $32.1 million in net unrealized losses during the quarter, primarily due to the markdown on Job and Talent, along with smaller markdowns on positions in other legacy investments. The net decrease in net assets for the quarter was $16.3 million, or $0.19 per share. Now I will discuss our balance sheet and liquidity, which remains solid, reflecting our progress in reducing leverage during the quarter. During the first quarter, we repaid all $325 million of our 2026 notes. As a result, we have no material debt maturities due in the near term. Total liquidity at the end of the first quarter was $358.6 million, including $164.1 million in available borrowings under our revolvers and $93.3 million in cash. The combined weighted average interest rate on debt outstanding was 5.77% as of 03/31/2026. Unfunded loan commitments represented 8.7% of our $1.4 billion investment portfolio, or $121 million, including $53.3 million in revolver commitments. Net regulatory leverage was 1.29x at quarter end, down from 1.41x in 2025, resulting in a total debt-to-equity leverage ratio of 1.65x. Subsequent to quarter end, our net regulatory leverage ratio improved to 1.23x as a result of paydowns. We expect to reduce leverage further over time as we exit additional investments as part of our portfolio repositioning. We are well positioned to fund new investments with a diverse leverage program, which includes three low-cost credit facilities, an unsecured note issuance, and an SBA program. Now I will turn the call back to Phil for his closing remarks.
Philip Tseng: Thanks, Erik. Over the past year, and again in the first quarter, we continued to reposition our portfolio by reducing nonaccruals and deploying capital into new investments that align with our investment strategy. This repositioning is driving greater diversification, with an emphasis on senior secured first-lien loans with more granular position sizes and reduced concentration across individual credits and sectors. We have also strengthened our balance sheet and reduced leverage, which improves our flexibility as we look ahead. While we have made meaningful progress, we recognize there is more work to do, and we remain focused on disciplined execution. As part of BlackRock's PFS platform, BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. benefits from expanded sourcing and origination, broader investment expertise and resources, and the ability to participate in larger transactions that many others do not see or do not have the capabilities to pursue. We believe this positions BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. for long-term success as the credit market continues to evolve. We appreciate your continued support. We will now open the call for questions. I will turn the call back to the operator.
Operator: Thank you. We will now open the call for questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, please press 1 again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Robert James Dodd from Raymond James. Your line is now open.
Robert James Dodd: Without going through line by line of various portfolio items, I just want to ask you a more general, conceptual question on one of my questions. The pace at which restructuring is occurring, you know, the work going on dealing with troubled assets, etc. Obviously, you are doing it as fast as you can, but how would you rank that in terms of how quick or hard or easy you thought it was going to be, say, six months ago, in terms of dealing with these assets?
Philip Tseng: Hey, Robert. Thank you for the question. I would say that we always expect restructuring and workouts to not take a linear pattern. As you know, each deal has its own idiosyncratic issues, whether that is company, product, competitive landscape, liquidity management, and so on. Sometimes they are great businesses with weaker balance sheets; their restructurings really benefit the company. So I would say that we did not really go in with any specific expectation. However, we are doing everything we can to actively manage through these restructurings, monetizations, and paydowns. As you saw in the results, we have made meaningful progress in the quarter, having exited ALPINE 4840 and Suited Connector with respect to restructuring processes, and then also exiting Fishbowl and AutoAlert in terms of sales of those assets—not exiting the entire position because we did roll some of the equity—but we are doing what we can in terms of managing those processes.
Robert James Dodd: Fair enough. Appreciate that. Another one—this is a question about a specific position. Job and Talent was marked down this quarter; you said the round numbers are a third of the total markdowns. That is not actually my question. That business is positioned as an AI-enabled job and talent search business, so maybe AI enabling is not the fix-all in one context. On the other hand, what were the drivers, if you can give any information? You said there was some softness in the business and obviously pressure on enterprise values. It is an AI-enabled business, so any context you can give us on the interaction between how that business is valued while being AI-enabled versus how AI is or is not helping or impacting that business? I am just trying to get a feel, because you do have a lot of other software businesses where the fear is AI, but then you have a business that is AI and it did not seem to help.
Jason A. Mehring: Hey, Robert. It is Jason. What I would say is, first and foremost, Job and Talent is a staffing and recruitment business. Those businesses typically have a tech-enabled element to them and have an ability to leverage AI and other emerging technologies and approaches to benefit their business. In this quarter, the cause of the drop in enterprise value is really more due to market valuation multiples, as opposed to something tied specifically to the business being challenged because of AI or otherwise. I would say the relative performance of the business was more of a modest contributor, as opposed to broader tech multiples.
Robert James Dodd: Got it. Thank you. And then on software, you said you had a 26% LTV at origination in your software book. Maybe you do not want to put an exact number on it, but I presume that 26 has moved fairly significantly if we put in valuations today. Can you use any relative scale? Has that 26 doubled, or—just kind of ballpark—how much have values moved on the assets that you have in the book?
Philip Tseng: The purpose of including that metric was to indicate how much cushion we underwrote to in those deals, being cognizant of software and AI as a risk. You are right, the market multiples have come down meaningfully, and so the cushion has come down as well. We do not have a number to disclose in terms of exactly how much, and it depends on the credit itself and what end market and what software functionality they are offering. I would say that the cushion certainly has decreased, but we feel like at 26% LTV, we are still in reasonably good shape.
Operator: Thank you for your questions. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Philip Tseng, Chairman, CEO, and Co-CIO, for closing remarks.
Philip Tseng: Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining our call today. I would also like to thank our team for their continued hard work and dedication to BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. As always, please reach out with any questions.
Erik L. Cuellar: Thank you all.
Operator: This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.