MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. operates as the bank holding company for Metropolitan Commercial Bank that provides a range of business, commercial, and retail banking products and services to small businesses, middle-market enterprises, public entities, and individuals in the New York metropolitan area. The company offers checking, savings, term deposit, and money market accounts, as well as certificates of deposit. It also provides lending products, including commercial real estate, constructi
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 168.0 | 50.4 | -- | 35.3 | -- | 23.5 | -2.2 | 233.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 172.0 | 57.6 | -- | 42.1 | -- | 36.1 | -1.9 | 210.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 167.0 | 55.1 | -- | 40.1 | -- | 30.1 | -2.0 | 174.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 162.0 | 52.7 | -- | 37.3 | -- | 30.8 | -2.1 | 144.1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 155.0 | 43.4 | -- | 30.2 | -- | 18.6 | -2.3 | 113.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 158.0 | 50.6 | -- | 36.3 | -- | 31.6 | -1.9 | 94.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 153.0 | 48.2 | -- | 34.4 | -- | 24.5 | -2.0 | 63.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 148.0 | 44.4 | -- | 31.8 | -- | 26.6 | -2.2 | 38.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 137.5 | 44.4 | 44.4 | 31.4 | 55.0 | 52.4 | -2.7 | 12.0 | 36.6 | 10.8 | 23.1% | 0.9x | 7.5x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 140.6 | 41.2 | 41.2 | 28.9 | 30.7 | 27.9 | -2.9 | 591.0 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 37.6% | 0.8x | 2.0x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 134.5 | 4.8 | 10.2 | 7.1 | 31.8 | 31.5 | -0.3 | 920.7 | 292.4 | 10.6 | 4.8% | 0.1x | 1.6x |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 129.7 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 18.8 | 18.4 | 17.5 | -0.9 | 686.3 | 217.4 | 10.7 | 14.6% | 0.5x | 1.2x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 122.4 | 21.9 | 23.4 | 16.4 | 7.8 | 5.6 | -2.2 | 253.4 | 302.4 | 11.3 | 10.6% | 0.4x | 7.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 124.2 | 31.3 | 31.3 | 21.4 | 83.4 | 82.3 | -1.1 | 267.2 | 457.4 | 11.4 | 11.1% | 0.6x | 8.5x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 126.7 | 14.3 | 17.6 | 12.3 | 4.8 | 4.2 | -0.6 | 829.4 | 257.5 | 11.3 | 8.8% | 0.3x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 121.9 | 21.3 | 23.9 | 16.8 | 35.3 | 34.5 | -0.8 | 749.4 | 257.5 | 11.2 | 12.4% | 0.4x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 119.3 | 21.1 | 24.3 | 16.2 | 25.0 | 24.9 | -0.1 | 1,032 | 407.6 | 11.1 | 9.6% | 0.4x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 111.8 | 20.7 | 19.9 | 14.6 | -30.8 | -31.6 | -0.8 | 269.5 | 546.6 | 11.4 | 7.2% | 0.4x | 5.9x |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 104.4 | 29.2 | 28.4 | 22.1 | 27.5 | 24.5 | -3.0 | 607.2 | 362.6 | 11.1 | 14.7% | 0.7x | 1.6x |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 96.8 | 27.6 | 24.9 | 15.6 | 6.7 | 5.8 | -0.9 | 627.8 | 450.7 | 11.3 | 9.5% | 0.8x | 1.6x |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 90.2 | 35.1 | 33.8 | 25.1 | 39.0 | 38.1 | -1.0 | 743.7 | 402.7 | 11.1 | 16.2% | 1.4x | 2.8x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 86.9 | 0.7 | 1.3 | -7.7 | 11.5 | 12.0 | -0.5 | 257.4 | 257.7 | 11.2 | 0.8% | 0.0x | 7.2x |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 75.9 | 38.5 | 36.0 | 24.9 | 53.4 | 37.7 | -15.8 | 1,132 | 26.9 | 11.2 | 44.3% | 5.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 66.2 | 34.8 | 33.6 | 23.1 | -9.9 | -12.0 | -2.1 | 1,808 | 32.0 | 11.2 | 41.1% | 9.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 58.4 | 27.2 | 26.0 | 19.0 | 30.9 | 29.0 | -1.9 | 1,920 | 32.3 | 11.2 | 35.5% | 6.3x | -- |
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
MCB is a well-run community bank trading at a significant discount to intrinsic value (P/FCF ~10.8x, EV/FCF ~3.6x) with improving NIM trajectory and strong deposit franchise in specialty verticals. The business is transitioning away from BaaS/fintech toward traditional CRE and C&I lending, which creates near-term earnings headwinds but positions the bank for more sustainable, higher-quality earnings. The recent equity raise was dilutive but strategically sound, providing capital to support $1B+ annual loan growth. Key concern is CRE concentration (~300% of RBC) in a potentially softening NYC market, and the NPL ratio doubling to 1.01%. However, management has been transparent about credit issues, reserves appear adequate, and the mid-teens ROTCE target is achievable. At ~1.2x tangible book value with a clear path to 16%+ ROTCE, this is a reasonably attractive risk/reward for patient investors willing to look past near-term noise.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Metropolitan Commercial Bank (MCB) delivered a solid Q1 2026 performance, highlighted by a 15.6% ROATCE and the successful completion of an equity offering. The bank is executing on its $1 billion annual loan growth target, supported by a $1.2 billion pipeline and $700 million in signed term sheets. Deposit growth remains a key strength, increasing by 5% in the quarter through specialty verticals such as HOAs, EB-5, and municipal programs. Net Interest Margin (NIM) is projected to reach 4.15%-4.20% by year-end, driven by loan repricing and the deployment of excess cash from the capital raise. Management addressed credit quality by identifying $12.3 million in charge-offs but anticipates significant recoveries ($7-8 million) and emphasized that legacy non-performing loans are adequately reserved. Strategic initiatives, specifically iGaming payments and HUD lending, are entering the integration phase, with live operations expected in late 2026. These platforms are poised to enhance fee income and lower funding costs. Despite a slight delay in its digital transformation project, MCB remains committed to its financial guidance, leveraging its unique business model to drive superior growth relative to peers.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $75.00 | $16.10/$19.30 | 0 | $0.05/$2.40 | 0 |
| $80.00 | $11.50/$15.00 | 0 | $0.25/$2.35 | 1 |
| $85.00 | $7.40/$10.60 | 0 | $1.10/$3.50 | 0 |
| $90.00 | $4.20/$7.00 | 0 | $2.55/$5.00 | 0 |
| $95.00 | $1.50/$4.30 | 0 | $5.00/$7.40 | 0 |
| $100.00 | $0.55/$3.60 | 0 | $8.30/$11.50 | 0 |
| $105.00 | $0.05/$2.15 | 0 | $12.70/$15.60 | 0 |
| $110.00 | --/$1.50 | 0 | $17.20/$20.40 | 0 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 29.5% of float, sold 5.1%. 9 filers moved >1% of shares (8 buying, 1 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | $100M | $75.36 | +$50.8M | +$80.7M | +0.1% | $533.98B |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $85.0M | $54.04 | +$3.8M | −$7.7M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| Patriot Financial Partners GP II, L.P. | $63.7M | $74.48 | +$0 | +$63.7M | +6.0% | $388M |
| ADAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS GP, L.L.C. | $48.7M | $51.91 | +$2.1M | +$21.3M | -0.1% | $64.61B |
| DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive | $38.3M | $63.47 | +$2.7M | +$10.1M | -0.4% | $480.92B |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $31.9M | $49.21 | +$3.1M | +$4.2M | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| CITADEL ADVISORS LLC | $31.4M | $75.07 | +$24.6M | +$27.6M | -0.4% | $138.22B |
| UBS Group AG | $28.2M | $79.27 | +$22.8M | +$26.4M | -0.3% | $562.11B |
| AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC | $27.6M | $55.27 | +$368K | +$4.9M | +0.3% | $193.48B |
| MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | $27.0M | $62.79 | +$22.0M | +$27.0M | -0.5% | $127.40B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $21.9M | $58.75 | +$1.7M | +$493K | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| KENNEDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $18.1M | $83.29 | +$14.4M | +$18.1M | -1.5% | $4.72B |
| BASSWOOD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. | $17.5M | $46.99 | −$924K | −$924K | -0.1% | $1.96B |
| Bank of New York Mellon Corp | $16.1M | $66.36 | −$710K | +$10.2M | +0.5% | $543.21B |
| ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P. | $13.5M | $68.12 | +$13.8M | +$9.4M | -0.3% | $307.70B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $12.5M | $53.32 | +$1.5M | +$1.7M | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| Nuveen, LLC | $12.5M | $58.76 | +$1.9M | −$2.7M | +0.0% | $368.63B |
| BANC FUNDS CO LLC | $11.8M | $52.44 | +$1.1M | −$7.5M | -1.3% | $537M |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | $11.8M | $74.40 | +$10.1M | +$10.2M | -0.1% | $1.36T |
| Pacific Ridge Capital Partners, LLC | $11.4M | $39.89 | +$447K | −$3.2M | -0.8% | $462M |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
Top-5 holders · 38.0%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Related Stocks
Investors who own this also own
Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.
| Ticker | Name | Co-holders | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVBH | Avidbank Holdings, Inc. | 3 | 635.20× |
Analyst Coverage
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | BUY | Dougherty Daniel F | officer: EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 1,000 | $79.95 | $80K | $2.57M |
| 2026-01-23 | SELL | PATENT ROBERT C | director | 4,445 | $92.28 | $410K | $7.77M |
| 2026-01-22 | SELL | PATENT ROBERT C | director | 10,000 | $94.99 | $950K | $8.42M |
| 2026-01-21 | SELL | Rosenberg Nick | officer: Executive Vice President | 1,250 | $90.21 | $113K | $2.33M |
| 2025-12-10 | SELL | Rosenberg Nick | officer: Executive Vice President | 625 | $80.41 | $50K | $2.18M |
| 2025-10-30 | BUY | FABIANO ANTHONY J | director | 147 | $67.87 | $10K | $861K |
| 2025-10-27 | BUY | Dougherty Daniel F | officer: EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 1,000 | $71.66 | $72K | $1.96M |
| 2025-10-27 | BUY | Erikson Frederik F | officer: EVP & General Counsel | 20 | $68.65 | $1K | $546K |
| 2025-10-20 | SELL | Lublin Scott | officer: EVP and Chief Lending Officer | 5,000 | $74.36 | $372K | $3.06M |
| 2025-10-17 | SELL | Rosenberg Nick | officer: Executive Vice President | 625 | $72.47 | $45K | $2.01M |
| 2025-09-17 | SELL | Rosenberg Nick | officer: Executive Vice President | 1,250 | $79.47 | $99K | $2.25M |
| 2025-09-03 | SELL | Fredston Dale C | director | 3,000 | $78.65 | $236K | $1.11M |
| 2025-08-27 | SELL | PATENT ROBERT C | director | 5,000 | $79.02 | $395K | $7.80M |
| 2025-08-19 | SELL | MITCHELL TERENCE J | director | 4,796 | $72.44 | $347K | $958K |
| 2025-08-19 | SELL | PATENT ROBERT C | director | 5,000 | $72.75 | $364K | $7.54M |
| 2025-07-22 | SELL | GUTMAN HARVEY | director | 1,400 | $78.41 | $110K | $1.47M |
| 2025-07-21 | SELL | Lublin Scott | officer: EVP and Chief Lending Officer | 5,000 | $78.64 | $393K | $3.63M |
| 2025-07-21 | SELL | PATENT ROBERT C | director | 10,000 | $78.52 | $785K | $2.58M |
| 2025-07-03 | SELL | Rosenberg Nick | officer: Executive Vice President | 1,250 | $75.05 | $94K | $2.22M |
| 2025-06-20 | SELL | Lublin Scott | officer: EVP and Chief Lending Officer | 5,000 | $65.03 | $325K | $3.33M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Deposit Account | $2.3M | NEW |
| Financial Service, Other | $0.3M | NEW |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
METROPOLITAN BANK HOLDING CORP.: Administrative Shell Lacks Substantive Disclosures
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
In April 2026, MCB completed a dilutive follow-on equity offering of 2.3 million shares at $85.00, which, while strengthening capital ratios, signaled a significant need for a liquidity buffer and immediate balance sheet fortification. This move was followed by a reset in market expectations and a reported analyst downgrade as the bank's non-performing loan (NPL) ratio surged to 1.01% in Q1 2026, up from 0.54% a year prior. Furthermore, the bank recorded $12.5 million in charge-offs during the first quarter, largely tied to an ongoing 'idiosyncratic' multifamily CRE loan issue (GuruFocus, Simply Wall St).
The bear case rests on a 'triple threat' of dilutive capital raises, high Commercial Real Estate (CRE) concentration, and shrinking revenue streams. Despite recent efforts to reduce the ratio, non-owner-occupied CRE loans remain elevated at approximately 299.5% of total risk-based capital, leaving the bank highly exposed to a downturn in the New York property market. The exit from the B2C portion of its Global Payments Group (GPG) and its BaaS business—previously a high-growth engine—is expected to create a structural earnings gap and higher near-term volatility as the bank pivots its business model (Public.com, Seeking Alpha).
Non-performing assets have increased from historically low levels, driven by a single large multi-family relationship that appears to be souring. Operating expenses are also under pressure from a $9.5 million systems upgrade and a $12.5 million quarterly charge-off. Additionally, technical indicators like the SMA_20 falling below the SMA_60 signal a strong bearish trend in the mid-term, suggesting that the recent price momentum is exhausted (Intellectia AI, KBRA).
MCB is increasingly marginalized by larger commercial banks with significantly higher lending limits and superior technology budgets. As MCB completes its expensive tech overhaul, more agile fintech-focused competitors and larger regional peers have already optimized their digital offerings. The bank's niche focus on 'New York real estate entrepreneurs' is a double-edged sword; as regional liquidity tightens, MCB faces intense competition from larger institutions for high-quality, lower-risk commercial and industrial (C&I) clients (SEC.gov, Ticker Nerd).
Sentiment among former fintech partners and B2C customers is strained following MCB's aggressive exit from the BaaS and prepaid debit sectors. This transition has led to a perception of the bank as less 'innovative' compared to its 2023 status as a crypto/fintech leader. Retail sentiment is further dampened by the bank's shift away from consumer-facing verticals to focus almost exclusively on high-net-worth real estate entrepreneurs, potentially alienating a broader depositor base (Seeking Alpha, Public.com).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-04-22
Operator: Welcome to the Metropolitan Commercial Bank First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Hosting the call today from Metropolitan Commercial Bank are Mark DeFazio, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Daniel Dougherty, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is being recorded. During today's presentation, reference will be made to the company's earnings release and investor presentation, copies of which are available at mcbankny.com. Today's presentation may include forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Please refer to the company's notices regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures that appear in the earnings release and investor presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Mark DeFazio, President and Chief Executive Officer. You may begin. Mark DeFazio: Thank you, Angela. Good morning, and thank you all for joining our call. We ended the year with momentum, meaningful visibility into our growth outlook. A substantial portion of our expected loan and deposit growth is already in the pipeline and expected to be realized in the first half of the year, with the balance building steadily into the back half. The visibility reflects signed client commitments, active onboarding activity and long-standing relationships rather than speculative assumptions. Our iGaming payments and HUD [Audio Gap] platforms are no longer conceptual. They are in integration stage. We have a line of sight into implementation time lines and client onboarding activity, which will allow us to provide increasingly specific guidance around when these initiatives will translate into meaningful balance sheet growth, fee income and a broader client engagement. With new investors joining us following the successful capital raise, this is an important moment to restate what defines the MCB business model. This is not a new strategy or a pivot. This is a continuation and acceleration of a long-standing plan that has been executed consistently over many years. MCB is led by an experienced management team with a demonstrated track record of delivering on growth initiatives. Our performance reflects disciplined execution, not opportunistic expansion, and our results speak to the depth and experience across the organization. Our growth profile is unmatched among peers, both within the New York City market and nationally. This outperformance is not limited to a single cycle or initiative. It is evident across multiple years of economic environments, underscoring the durability of our model. The initiatives driving our growth today were developed over many years and required extensive upfront investments, particularly in technology, infrastructure and risk management. Those investments are now largely complete. As a result, today's growth reflects execution on a well-planned strategy, not aggressive stretch targets or growth for the sake of growth. The magnitude of our growth opportunity is a direct result of the investment we've made in technology and talent, which are now fully embedded in the organization. MCB is positioned to comfortably support a substantially larger balance sheet while continuing to meet the evolving needs of a sophisticated commercial client. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to our employees, directors and clients for their continued dedication and contributions. Their commitment to excellence has been instrumental to MCB's sustained performance and will remain a key driver of our success in the years ahead. I will now turn our call over to our CFO, Daniel Dougherty. Daniel Dougherty: Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining the call. The press release does a good job summarizing the highlights of the quarter, but I would like to take a moment to emphasize the impressive ROATCE print of 15.6% and the successful follow-on equity raise, which was executed in March under challenging market conditions, thanks to everyone that participated. With that said, let's begin with a few comments on the evolution of the balance sheet during the first quarter. The loan book increased by about $235 million. The pace of loan growth is in line with our guidance of $1 billion in net growth for 2026. First quarter total originations and draws of approximately $524 million were printed at a weighted average coupon net of fees of about 7.24%. Payoffs and paydowns totaled approximately $287 million at a WAC of 7.37%. Our current loan spread guidance continues to drive new volume coupons well above 7%. Looking forward, our current loan pipelines remain very strong, with loan opportunities at various stages of underwriting totaling more than $1.2 billion. To add some additional context, the portion of the current pipeline represented by signed term sheets totals to more than $700 million. On the deposit side, our deposit growth continues to outpace our loan growth. In the first quarter, we grew deposits by about $363 million or approximately 5%. Over the course of the first quarter, our cost of deposits dropped by 15 basis points. The decline was primarily driven by the 2 late 2025 rate cuts made by the FOMC. The deposit verticals driving the bulk of the increase in deposits in the quarter were municipals, EB-5 and HOAs. The outlook for continued deposit growth in our existing verticals remain strong and our intent to continue funding all 2026 loan growth with deposits remains unchanged. As a normal course of business, we continuously seek new deposit opportunities. We currently have a couple of programs, namely our payments and HUD initiatives that are currently in the execution phase. Both of these initiatives are expected to become meaningful contributors to our deposit funding platform soon. Our net interest margin was 4.08% in the first quarter, down 2 basis points from the prior quarter. However, on a normalized basis, quarter-over-quarter, the NIM increased by about 10 basis points, a performance very much aligned with our recent guidance that each 25 basis point reduction in the Fed funds target rate should drive about 5 basis points of NIM expansion. Specifically, as discussed on the fourth quarter earnings call, the fourth quarter NIM of 4.10% was influenced higher by late year loan prepayments that drove above normal prepayment penalty and deferred fee income, resulting in a normalized NIM of about 4.02%. Looking at this quarter, we carried a cash balance well above normal. This was a result of deposit growth in excess of loan growth, the previously mentioned year-end 2025 loan prepayments and the capital raise. After conservatively adjusting for the outsized cash position, the first quarter normalized NIM print was about 4.12%. Now let's move on to some high-level comments on our income statement. Our first quarter interest income was down by about $2.5 million compared to the prior quarter. There were 3 primary drivers of this result. The first being the day count decline quarter-over-quarter, the elevated December loan payoffs, as previously mentioned, and to a lesser extent, the impact of rate resets that occurred late in the fourth quarter on floating rate loans. Importantly, on the other side of the ledger, interest expense was down by about $3 million, resulting in a flattish top line performance overall. Going forward, it is our expectation that top line growth will resume according to plan with at least 20% net interest income growth for the full year. We expect that the NIM will press higher over the course of the year toward 4.15% to 4.20% as the year progresses. Importantly, our expanding NIM forecast is not reliant on rate cuts. In fact, we have removed all rate cut assumptions from our current 2026 forecast model. On the allowance for credit losses, a confluence of events drove the reduction in the allowance in Q1. The primary drivers of the change were the charge-off of 3 loans totaling $12.3 million, a provision release of $2.6 million as we made enhancements to our ACL framework and improvements in the forecast for certain underlying macroeconomic variables. The 3 loans charged off this quarter included 2 unsecured personal lines and 1 out-of-market CRE loan. Using all channels available to us, we are actively seeking recoveries on each of these loans. We continue to work diligently toward the resolution of the credits that make up our NPL portfolio. Our core noninterest income continues to be relatively flat. However, we remain optimistic that our new initiatives related to payments and HUD activity will drive a meaningful uplift in fee income beginning in the back half of this year. Noninterest expense was $46.4 million, up $2 million versus the prior quarter. The major movements in operating expenses quarter-over-quarter were an increase of $3.8 million in comp and benefits, primarily related to an increase in the bonus accrual and restricted stock expense of about $3 million and seasonal increases in FICA and other payroll-related expenses of about $1.1 million. As well, we saw a $1.8 million decrease in technology costs. The primary driver of this decrease was related to a delay in the completion of the digital transformation project. In total, for the first quarter, digital project costs were about $1 million. With the Modern Banking in Motion conversion now expected to take place in May, we have penciled in about $2 million of related expenses to be recognized in the second quarter. I will now turn the call back to our operator for Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Timur Braziler with UBS. Timur Braziler: Looking at the deposit growth, pretty impressive this quarter. Maybe just give us a little bit more color to the drivers there and the accelerating growth rates more recently. Is this the deposit engine kind of catching up to some of the lending activities? Is this something else? And just maybe give us a little bit of color on what's been driving that growth? And as you look through the rest of the year, kind of the projection on the deposit side? Mark DeFazio: Yes. So when you look at -- Timur, this is Mark DeFazio. When you look at the slide in our investor deck showing you all the different deposit verticals, we differentiate the deposits that are coming in from commercial clients or our retail platform versus specialty deposits. So this year, as Dan mentioned, HOAs, EB-5 and munis sit in our specialty deposit opportunities. So they're not driven by loan or commercial activity. They're driven by a very focused team of SMEs who are very experienced in these markets, and they continue to drive opportunity for the bank. And we continue to expand into different geographies, allowing us to better serve HOAs and municipalities as well. Timur Braziler: Great. And then maybe looking at the payment side, I know you had said that those are no longer conceptual lifts. Can you just maybe provide us an update on how some of those initial use cases are playing out? And then just remind us again of the type of cadence that we should expect from the increase in payment-related revenues as you go through this year and maybe next? Mark DeFazio: Yes. So this is Mark again. I'll work backwards on that. I'll be in a better position to give you some good financial guidance perhaps in the next quarter. But we are in integration, which means that our technology is being developed and being integrated into the bank's platform in order to service iGaming clients. So we expect to be in testing. We will be inviting 3 operators. We haven't decided what operators we're going to approach yet. Hopefully, in June through September time frame to come in and do testing, perform testing on transactions. We hope to be live in the end of the third, fourth quarter. But I'll be able to give you better guidance on its contribution toward the second half of the year. We believe it to be meaningful. The HUD, we have our HUD underwriter on staff. We are actively meeting with all of our nursing home operators. We expect to start to report this quarter the pipeline of HUD-related applications, and then we'll be able to give you some guidance on the fee income and the deposit opportunities that come along with that as well. Timur Braziler: Great. And then just last for me. The quarterly charge-offs, were those all driven by the loans identified last year? And maybe a similar line of questioning, just the linked quarter decline in the reserve, the specific reserves that were tied to the loans charged off? Mark DeFazio: Yes and no. There was a total of 3 loans. We have discussed 1 particular loan, which was roughly $4.5 million in the past. Well, actually 2 out of the 3 loans we talked about in the past. One, the out-of-state commercial real estate loan we have not talked about in the past. Out of the $12 million, I'm fairly confident that we'll recover $7 million to $8 million in this year. We are actively discussing a resolution with all 3 of these and I expect a good outcome, and I consider a $7 million to $8 million recovery a good outcome on these unsecured facilities. Operator: And our next question comes from Feddie Strickland with Hovde. Feddie Strickland: Just sticking with credit to start off here. Just to clarify, that loan from the third quarter of '25, you're still working through that one, right? These are separate loans from that particular relationship, correct? Mark DeFazio: That's correct. And we expect that relationship to get resolved as well very soon. We're getting through a legal proceeding in Mission, Kansas. We're highly engaged with a buyer for the property and the sponsor. We expect to have a full recovery not only with principal, but interest at the regular rate and all legal fees there. So we're optimistic there. We'll get that resolved hopefully in the third quarter -- second to third quarter. Feddie Strickland: Okay. Great. And just bigger picture then, I mean, it seems like you're on track for a pretty significant improvement in credit this year. Is there anything else on the horizon that's may be coming up for resolution that could push NPA to assets even lower? Mark DeFazio: No, no, no. We are going to go back to our normal trends of criticized and classified loans, which historically over 27 years have been extremely low. We had a little bit of a speed bump with, I would say, on the inside of 5 credits that we've been talking about for the last 1.5 years. The system workouts are inefficient, costly and timely, but I'm a patient person. I'm not looking and rushing to have an unsuccessful settlement. So they do linger a bit. But no, these are the same 5 credits that we've been working on, and we will get to the final resolution of them this year for sure. And Feddie, I just want to make another point, which I'm sure you know about. We feel that we are adequately reserved for those loans at this time as well. So going forward with the resolution, we'll either resolve these loans and get paid off or have a recovery. But we do not expect any further reserves associated with those legacy loans. I just thought that was important to mention. Feddie Strickland: Appreciate that, Mark. And just switching gears to the margin, it sounds like you guys still expect a pretty good lift in the margin this year even without rate cuts. Could you talk a little bit about the dynamics between maybe how much loan yields versus deposit costs are playing into that? It sounds like on the yield side, you got a little bit of a lift from cash going into loans. But I guess more specifically, what is the ability to lower deposit costs just as this mix shift over the course of the year? Daniel Dougherty: Feddie, this is Dan. The primary driver of the margin expansion is going to be repricing of the back book. This quarter, the maturing loan -- the paid-off loans had a pretty high coupon. We've got just a couple of tranches over the course of the next couple of quarters that are lower coupon paper. So as we replace that or renew that, we'll price it at higher coupons. Our ability to continue to reprice on the deposit side is going to be dependent on mix. So to the extent EB-5 continues its momentum, that will help drive down the cost of deposits. Of late, most of the -- 2 of the big contributors have been HOAs and governmental munis. Those tend to be at the higher end of the coupon stack, if you will. But again, if the mix kind of persists with EB-5 generating a noticeable contribution, that could help to drive down the cost of deposits as well. Mark DeFazio: And Feddie, I'd add as well, looking into '27, I think the deposits that we expect coming from HUD and iGaming will definitely bring down our cost of funds immediately. Daniel Dougherty: That's a significant opportunity. Feddie Strickland: Understood. That's helpful. And just one last one for me, just on expenses. It sounds like it's fair to assume the expense growth quarter-over-quarter probably slows here a bit just given your opening comments, Dan, and the $189 million and $191 million guide. Daniel Dougherty: Yes, we can stick to that guidance, Feddie. Operator: Our final question comes from David Konrad with KBW. David Konrad: A couple of quick questions, just to follow on from everyone else. On the funding side, as we move through and you've got the $1 billion loan growth guide, how should we think about the cash on the balance sheet largely from the capital raise working down throughout the year? So like how much of the $1 billion might be funded by the cash? Or is that kind of a 2-year outlook? But how should we work down the cash? Daniel Dougherty: We should see the cash working down in parallel with loan growth. So if you look at the average balance sheet, I think my average -- I carried about on average about $600 million of cash. It is my goal and my expectation that we'll work that down through loan growth towards a normal cash position, which is closer to $200 million for this bank. And when I made the NIM adjustment, I was really conservative. I only adjusted for $100 million. I'm well north of that in excess cash right now. So again, as loan growth continues, we'll work down that cash balance. As we sit here today, I've got second quarter growth fully funded with cash for sure. And I've got a good start on quarters 3 and 4 as well. David Konrad: And I guess, qualitatively, with that cash, your unique deposit channels, that should keep pressure off of other segments of deposits given that you have all this cash to fund loan growth? Daniel Dougherty: Well, we're not sitting on our laurels. We -- I am happy to carry an excess -- large cash position, and I've got no problem with that. So far this quarter, the trend continues. Deposits are coming in faster than loan growth. I expect that to normalize a little this quarter because my pipeline on the loan side is significant, signed term sheets totaling more than $700 million right now. So the pull-through on that is TBD, obviously, but again, the deposit growth continues a pace at a pace in excess of the loan growth. And I have no intention of slowing that down. I think the teams are -- intent to get out there and drive business. David Konrad: And then the last one for me might be a little bit trickier in a way. But in the Investor Day, we talked about maybe a target of 115 loan-to-reserve ratio. I think you're at 116 now, but you also made some methodology changes and economic changes. So maybe refresh the update of where we think, all else equal, obviously, credit quality could change, but all else, what you're thinking about a target reserve ratio? Daniel Dougherty: I think in the long run, the 115 is okay. It's going to take us a while to -- once we work our way through all the remaining NPLs are out there with reserves, that could come down a little bit. But through time, management's view on the reserve is that 100 to 115 basis points kind of makes sense for a commercial banking franchise such as ours that's growing at the pace we're growing. Operator: This concludes the allotted time for questions. I would now like to turn the call over to Mark DeFazio for any additional or closing remarks. Mark DeFazio: Thank you. I'd just like to say, once again, thank you to all of the investors that came in and invested in the more recent capital raise. And also, again, as I said many times, we don't take that commitment on your part lightly, and I'd like to thank all of our existing investors for their continued support, and look forward to meeting all of the investors as the years go on at different road shows. Thank you very much. Operator: This does conclude today's conference call and webcast. A webcast archive of this call can be found at www.mcbankny.com. Please disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day.