ALOT
AstroNova, Inc.AstroNova, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and distributes specialty printers, and data acquisition and analysis systems in the United States, Europe, Asia, Canada, Central and South America, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Product Identification (PI) and Test & Measurement (T&M). The PI segment offers tabletop and production-ready digital color label printers, and OEM printing systems under the QuickLabel brand; digital color label mini-presses and inline printi
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q4 | 41.0 | 3.5 | -- | 1.0 | -- | 2.9 | -0.3 | 21.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2028-Q3 | 42.0 | 3.8 | -- | 1.3 | -- | 3.2 | -0.3 | 19.1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2028-Q2 | 39.0 | 2.9 | -- | 0.6 | -- | 1.6 | -0.3 | 15.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 40.0 | 2.8 | -- | 0.4 | -- | 2.2 | -0.3 | 14.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 39.5 | 3.0 | -- | 0.6 | -- | 2.8 | -0.2 | 12.1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 40.5 | 3.2 | -- | 0.8 | -- | 2.6 | -0.2 | 9.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 37.5 | 1.9 | -- | -0.4 | -- | 0.8 | -0.2 | 6.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 38.5 | 2.1 | -- | -0.2 | -- | 1.9 | -0.2 | 6.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q4 | 37.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | -1.1 | 3.7 | 3.5 | -0.1 | 4.1 | 41.4 | 7.7 | 0.3% | 0.1x | 22.7x |
| Act | 2026-Q3 | 39.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 3.3 | -0.1 | 3.6 | 47.0 | 7.7 | 8.9% | 2.8x | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q2 | 36.1 | 0.5 | -0.7 | -1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 3.9 | 45.4 | 7.6 | -2.9% | 0.5x | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 37.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | -0.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | -0.1 | 5.4 | 48.8 | 7.6 | 3.0% | 2.1x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 37.4 | -11.1 | -12.3 | -15.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 | -0.1 | 5.1 | 48.5 | 7.5 | -74.3% | -13.2x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 40.4 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | -4.7 | -5.0 | -0.3 | 4.4 | 51.0 | 7.6 | 5.7% | 2.7x | 12.2x |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 40.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 | -0.3 | 0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 4.8 | 47.3 | 7.5 | 3.9% | 2.3x | 10.2x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 33.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 6.9 | 6.4 | -0.5 | 4.0 | 18.1 | 7.6 | 10.2% | 4.7x | 11.4x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 39.6 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 6.9 | -0.4 | 4.5 | 24.5 | 7.6 | 22.0% | 6.4x | 10.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 37.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | -0.8 | 4.8 | 28.1 | 7.5 | 24.6% | 8.9x | 8.8x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 35.5 | -0.2 | -1.2 | -1.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 | -0.5 | 4.5 | 30.6 | 7.4 | -5.4% | -0.4x | 13.8x |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 35.4 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | -0.1 | 5.4 | 30.3 | 7.5 | 8.4% | 4.4x | 10.7x |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 39.9 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | -0.0 | 4.0 | 30.9 | 7.4 | 3.8% | 8.5x | 10.9x |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 39.4 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.3 | -3.6 | -5.3 | -0.1 | 4.5 | 35.0 | 7.4 | 7.9% | 3.1x | 18.0x |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 32.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | -2.2 | -2.3 | -0.1 | 4.3 | 17.7 | 7.4 | 8.9% | 10.2x | 19.0x |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 31.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | -1.6 | -1.7 | -0.1 | 5.8 | 9.3 | 7.4 | 7.6% | 9.0x | 14.9x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 29.7 | 0.6 | -0.2 | -0.8 | -2.5 | -2.7 | -0.3 | 5.3 | 10.3 | 7.2 | -2.3% | 4.2x | 12.3x |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 28.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | -0.4 | -1.7 | -2.0 | -0.3 | 8.7 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 2.9% | 8.1x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 29.8 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | -0.6 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 7.3 | 26.2% | 25.1x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 29.1 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 3.4 | -0.5 | 11.4 | 15.5 | 7.3 | 7.3% | -- | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 12.82 | — | 7.0% | 8 | 11.2× | n/m | 13.4× | 0.7× |
| 2023 | 16.26 | +21.3% | 7.6% | 11 | 11.0× | n/m | 34.7× | 0.7× |
| 2024 | 12.01 | +3.9% | 8.8% | 13 | 9.1× | 10.3× | 21.0× | 0.7× |
| 2025 | 8.65 | +2.2% | -2.8% | -4 | n/m | 32.8× | n/m | 0.5× |
| 2026 | 14.23 | -0.5% | 3.1% | 5 | 31.1× | 12.8× | n/m | 0.7× |
| TTM | 15.62 | -0.5% | 3.1% | 5 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 15.62 | +3.6% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2028E | 15.62 | +3.9% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
AstroNova is a deeply discounted small-cap specialty printer company trading at ~9.4x TTM FCF and 0.72x sales, with a potential strategic alternatives catalyst that could unlock value. The turnaround story has some merit — debt reduction of $9.1M in FY2026, royalty expiration adding $2M to gross profit, and improving aerospace mix — but execution risk is high given chronic underperformance, activist criticism, customer attrition in PI, and a fragile balance sheet with 3.5x leverage. The strategic review process adds optionality but also uncertainty. At current valuation, the stock appears roughly fair if the turnaround progresses on track, with upside skewed toward a potential takeout. However, without a sale, the standalone business faces a long road to adequate returns given sub-scale positioning in competitive markets.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
AstroNova reported its fourth-quarter and fiscal year 2026 results, framing the year as a "reset" period that saw significant operational improvements in the second half. For the full year, revenue reached $150.5 million, with a notable recovery in operating profit and adjusted EBITDA during the final six months. The Product Identification segment gained momentum through a new go-to-market strategy focused on regulated verticals like life sciences, while the Aerospace segment thrived on strong demand for ToughWriter printers as OEM build rates improved. A key financial highlight was the reduction of debt by $9.1 million over the fiscal year, bringing the total down to $37.6 million. Management also highlighted a $2 million annualized gross profit benefit expected starting in late fiscal 2027 following the expiration of a royalty obligation. Additionally, the Board has initiated a review of strategic alternatives, including a potential sale or merger. For fiscal 2027, the company forecasts mid-single-digit revenue growth and margin expansion. Despite the positive operational trajectory, the quarter lacked analyst participation during the Q&A session, leaving the focus entirely on management's prepared remarks regarding their disciplined turnaround strategy and the ongoing search for value-enhancing strategic options.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 1.4% of float, sold 4.3%. 1 filer moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 1 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juniper Investment Company, LLC | $4.9M | $14.11 | +$0 | +$0 | +1.4% | $313M |
| DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive | $4.0M | $12.47 | −$269K | −$632K | -0.4% | $480.92B |
| Mink Brook Asset Management LLC | $3.5M | $12.00 | +$0 | +$51K | +0.1% | $179M |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $3.0M | $9.19 | +$3.0M | +$3.0M | — | $4.04T |
| ROYCE & ASSOCIATES LP | $1.3M | $12.82 | −$1.4M | −$1.8M | -0.9% | $10.09B |
| GRACE & WHITE INC /NY | $1.3M | $11.83 | +$0 | −$6K | -1.1% | $566M |
| Peapod Lane Capital LLC | $1.2M | $11.72 | +$88K | +$24K | -0.8% | $122M |
| DIAMOND HILL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC | $1.1M | $12.18 | −$135K | +$217K | -1.4% | $15.99B |
| RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC | $1.0M | $12.74 | +$94K | +$118K | +1.2% | $63.91B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $759K | $12.38 | +$17K | +$87K | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $699K | $13.29 | +$13K | +$23K | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $527K | $13.49 | −$21K | −$61K | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COPassive | $434K | $9.19 | +$434K | +$434K | — | $395.83B |
| MML INVESTORS SERVICES, LLC | $360K | $15.17 | +$0 | −$37K | -0.1% | $35.81B |
| BRIDGEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | $325K | $12.01 | +$0 | −$4K | -2.3% | $4.93B |
| Neuberger Berman Group LLC | $304K | $15.08 | +$0 | +$0 | -0.3% | $131.37B |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $190K | $13.19 | +$0 | +$0 | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| Vanguard Global Advisers, LLCPassive | $19K | $9.19 | +$19K | +$19K | — | $186.48B |
| Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC)MM | $14K | $11.35 | +$10K | +$7K | -0.6% | $3.84B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $12K | $12.12 | +$0 | −$5K | -0.3% | $1.65T |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 66.8%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q4 | 30M | 2M | 0M | $0.06 | $0.06 – $0.06 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 31M | 2M | 0M | $0.06 | $0.06 – $0.06 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 30M | 1M | 0M | $0.01 | $0.01 – $0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 30M | 1M | 0M | $0.06 | $0.06 – $0.06 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 31M | 2M | 0M | $0.05 | $0.05 – $0.05 | 1 |
| 2028 Q1 | 32M | 2M | 1M | $0.12 | $0.12 – $0.12 | 1 |
| 2028 Q2 | 33M | 2M | 1M | $0.12 | $0.12 – $0.12 | 1 |
| 2028 Q3 | 31M | 2M | 0M | $0.05 | $0.05 – $0.05 | 1 |
| 2028 Q4 | 32M | 2M | 1M | $0.12 | $0.12 – $0.12 | 1 |
| 2029 Q1 | 33M | 2M | 1M | $0.12 | $0.12 – $0.12 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-17 | BUY | QUAIN MITCHELL I | director | 10,000 | $9.05 | $91K | $884K |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Supplies | $19.7M | +1% |
| Hardware Products | $11.7M | -1% |
| Service And Other | $6.1M | +1% |
| UNITED STATES | $22.1M | -9% |
| Europe | $10.7M | +32% |
| Asia | $1.7M | -20% |
| CANADA | $1.6M | +2% |
| Central And South America | $1.1M | +13% |
| Others Countries | $0.3M | -29% |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
ASTRONOVA, INC.: Administrative Header Only No Forensic Risk Identified
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
In April 2026, AstroNova reported a disappointing fiscal Q4 loss of $1.1 million ($0.15 per share), despite a 35% run-up in stock price earlier in the year. While revenue hit $37.5 million, the company has officially initiated a 'review of strategic alternatives,' signaling that management may be seeking a sale or merger due to an inability to drive standalone value. Additionally, the company previously lowered its full-year 2026 sales guidance in September 2025, suggesting persistent top-line struggles (Source: AP/Chron, Benzinga).
The bear case centers on chronic underperformance and the failure of the MTEX acquisition to deliver expected synergies. Activist investor Samir Patel (Askeladden Capital) has publicly critiqued the company's 'niche-oriented strategy' in the Product Identification segment, arguing it lacks the scale to be successful. Bears point to the necessity of restructuring actions and a waiver/amendment of its credit agreement in March 2025 as evidence of a fragile balance sheet and poor operational execution (Source: StockTitan, Benzinga).
A major red flag is the company's recent 'strategic alternatives' announcement, which often precedes a 'fire sale' or reflects a lack of confidence in the current business plan. Further concerns include a history of net losses ($2.4 million for fiscal 2026) and a contentious proxy battle with shareholders who allege a 'breach of trust' and poor corporate governance regarding confidential settlement discussions (Source: Investing.com, StockTitan).
AstroNova is struggling in the 'direct-to-package' and 'direct-to-media' digital printing sectors. Activists suggest that competitors are more effectively exploiting these high-value markets while AstroNova remains stuck in a low-growth niche strategy. The Aerospace segment, while stable, faces cyclical risks and high R&D requirements to compete with larger avionics suppliers (Source: StockTitan).
While management claims 'improving traction' in the Product ID segment, shareholder activists suggest that the MTEX acquisition has faced significant challenges that may have alienated some customer bases or delayed product deliveries. Official customer satisfaction metrics are sparse, but the company's need to restructure suggests a mismatch between its product offerings and current market demand (Source: StockInvest.us, StockTitan).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q4 • 2026-04-14
Operator: Greetings. Welcome to AstroNova Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Financial Results Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Deborah Pawlowski, Investor Relations for AstroNova. Thank you. You may begin. Deborah Pawlowski: Thank you, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest in AstroNova, and thank you for taking the time to join us today. With me on the call are Jorik Ittmann, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Tom DeByle, our Chief Financial Officer. You should have a copy of the earnings release that crossed the wires after market closed yesterday as well as the slide deck that will accompany our conversation today. If you do not, you can find both documents on the Investor Relations section of our website at astronovainc.com. Please turn to Slide 2 for our cautionary statements. As a reminder, during this call, we may make some forward-looking statements about our current plans, beliefs and expectations. These statements relate to future events and results and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied today. These risks and uncertainties are described in today's earnings release and in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available on our website and at sec.gov. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements. We also will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these measures provide investors with additional insight into our core operating performance. However, they should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP results. Reconciliations of non-GAAP to GAAP measures are included in the tables that accompany both today's release and the slide presentation. With that, please turn to Slide 3, and I'll hand the call over to Jorik to discuss the quarter and our progress. Jorik? Jorik Ittmann: Thank you, Debbie, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today. As we said on my first conference call reporting the second quarter of fiscal 2026, we expected the second half to perform better than the first half of the year. The second half of fiscal 2026 was a reset period for AstroNova, and our results reflect the early benefits of the changes we have made across the business. We entered the year with a focus on stabilizing the company, improving cash generation, reducing debt and raising accountability across both segments, and we delivered against those priorities. Operationally, the Product Identification turnaround is gaining momentum. In the Product ID, we're executing against a clear go-to-market and operational strategy. By applying more robust analytics to understand our value proposition and where we have the best opportunity to win, we have a clearer view of where we are the stickiest with our customers. Our products and full-service capability are appreciated in these applications. We have focused our sales resources to better address these markets, which has entailed changes in talent and structure. Operationally, we are addressing productivity and efficiencies to strengthen our competitive position while also to support a stronger margin profile. Our Aerospace business continues to perform well. We are benefiting from a favorable product mix and a strong demand for our ToughWriter solutions. We had a very strong order quarter and have several tailwinds that should continue to benefit the business. Importantly, we exited the year with a solid backlog in both segments, providing a good visibility heading into fiscal 2027. As you know, we announced that the Board is evaluating a range of potential strategic alternatives, which may include, among other things, a sale of all or part of the company, a strategic investment, a merger or other business combination, other strategic or financial options or continuing to execute on our organic strategic plan. We are early in the process, and as you would expect, we cannot speculate on the outcome. If you turn to Slide 4, I will walk you through our sales results. As shown on the slide, our performance picked up in the second half of the year, and we believe that momentum is carrying into the fiscal 2027. Product ID second half sales were up 4.2% over the first half of the year as our customer-centric sales approach gained traction. Notably, Product ID orders were $27.5 million, up $2.9 million year-over-year, resulting in a book-to-bill ratio of 104% and backlog increased by $1.1 million sequentially as our new go-to-market strategy continued to gain traction. Our new sales and marketing strategy is focused on applications where we tend to win and where customer relationships are the stickiest. This is often where our print solutions are part of a customer product in a highly regulated markets. Over the past several quarters, we have sharpened our focus on 3 key verticals of life science, industrial, chemical markets. In these verticals, our label and packaging solutions are directly embedded in customer products and workflows, making reliability, durability and regulatory compliance critical for our customer outcomes. In these applications, labels can change frequently to address regulatory updates must be durable to withstand heavy handling in harsh environments and both the label and the ink must meet regulatory standards. Turning to Aerospace. Second half sales also improved over the first half. Orders in Aerospace were $13.6 million, resulting in a book-to-bill ratio of 122% and year-end backlog was $12 million, reflecting sustained demand from OEMs as aircraft build rates continue to recover. A key driver in Aerospace is the ongoing transition to our ToughWriter product family. ToughWriter now represents more than 80% of total flight deck printers shipments, positioning us well as aircraft utilization and build rates increase. Looking ahead, a major royalty obligation will expire in the third quarter of fiscal 2027, representing approximately a $2 million annualized benefit to gross profit that will be fully realized beginning in the fourth quarter. We're also making operational improvements in the business, driving greater efficiency and productivity in our service and repair operation. With that, I will turn it over to Tom to walk us through the financial details. Tom? Thomas DeByle: Thank you, Jorik, and good morning, everyone. Fourth quarter revenue was $37.5 million, up $0.2 million compared with the prior year period as growth in our Product ID slightly more than offset our lower Aerospace revenue. Tariff mitigation actions contributed approximately $0.6 million to revenue in the quarter, and the foreign currency translation provided a $0.8 million benefit. For the full year, revenue was $150.5 million compared with $151.3 million last year. As Jorik noted, second half revenue grew nearly 4% over the first half, and the demand we are building from our sales efforts supports our expectation for mid-single-digit growth in our fiscal 2027. Please turn to Slide 5. Gross profit for the fourth quarter was $11.3 million and gross margin was 30.2%, reflecting a contraction of 250 to 260 basis points year-over-year, primarily to lower volume and mix. On a non-GAAP basis, gross profit was $11.9 million and non-GAAP gross margin was 31.7%. It is also worth noting that the second half gross profit increased 8% and margin expanded 130 basis points. Given our size, quarter-to-quarter comparisons can sometimes mask the changes occurring in the business, and we believe the trailing periods since our second half reset provide a better view of the progress we are making with our strategy. Turning to Slide 6. Last year's fourth quarter was impacted by a $13.4 million goodwill impairment charge, which makes the year-over-year comparison less meaningful. Here, too, the first half and second half comparison is more realistic. Under new leadership, we had $1.3 million in operating profit in the second half of fiscal '26 compared with the loss in the first half. On a non-GAAP basis, operating profit grew by more than 90% and operating margin expanded 220 basis points. Turning to Slide 7. You can see our adjusted EBITDA performance. Starting with GAAP results. Net loss for the quarter was $1.1 million or $0.15 per diluted share versus a net loss of $15.6 million or $2.07 per share in the prior year quarter, which again included the goodwill impairment charge. Non-GAAP net loss was $0.3 million or $0.04 per share. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter grew 18% to $3.3 million, while adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 130 basis points to 8.8%. For the full fiscal year 2026, adjusted EBITDA was $12.7 million, up $0.4 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin improved 20 basis points to 8.4%. Comparing the second half with the first half, adjusted EBITDA grew 44% and margin expanded 270 basis points, again, demonstrating the progress resulting from the actions we have taken across the organization. If you turn to Slide 8, I'll review our improved cash generation, debt reduction and liquidity. Cash provided by operating activities in the fourth quarter was $3.7 million compared with $2.5 million in the prior year period, reflecting stronger cash earnings and lower working capital needs, particularly inventory. For the full year, cash from operations was $11.7 million, a meaningful improvement over fiscal 2025. Capital expenditures were tightly controlled at $0.3 million for the year compared with $1.2 million in the prior year. This also highlights capital-light nature of our business. We use the stronger cash generation to further deleverage the balance sheet. During the fourth quarter, we reduced debt by $2.7 million, bringing total debt to $37.6 million as of January 31, 2026, down from the $46.7 million at the end of fiscal 2025. We ended the year with $4.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and total liquidity of $15.9 million, including $11.8 million of borrowing capacity on our revolver. Our net debt leverage ratio was 2.97 at year-end, well inside our 4.5 covenant, and our fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.43 versus the 1.05 requirement. Overall, we are pleased with the progress we have made in strengthening the balance sheet and enhancing our financial flexibility. Turning to Slide 9. I'll briefly review orders and backlog. As most of you know, our orders can vary from period to period, especially in Aerospace because of the size and timing of customer projects. So quarter-to-quarter order patterns do not necessarily reflect underlying demand. Total orders in the quarter of $41.1 million were up 6.5% over the prior year period, driven by over 12% growth in the Product ID orders. Demand for our label printing products has improved with renewed energy and focus of our sales and marketing organization. Aerospace demand, which is subject to customer project timing reflects improved aircraft build by the major OEMs. At year-end, backlog of $25.5 million was down from $28.3 million in the prior year. During the second half, we reduced our backlog in our Mail & Sheet/Flatpack Printers that was long past overdue by improving productivity in the operation. As Jorik mentioned, we have added leadership talent in both the segment for both operations and sales that we expect to help further drive demand and production output while streamlining costs. Aerospace backlog was up 17.6%, driven by increasing demand from our OEMs and the timing of deliveries. With that, please turn to Slide 10, and I'll hand the call back to Jorik to discuss our outlook. Jorik Ittmann: Thanks, Tom. Let me reiterate that fiscal 2026 was a foundational reset year for AstroNova, particularly in the second half of the year. Across the organization, we have been driving culture change around customer centricity and transparency, disciplined, data-driven decision-making at the time we are simplifying operation, containing costs and refining our organizational structure to support continued improvement in execution. We have spent the last 6 months positioning AstroNova for improved and more sustainable performance. Looking ahead, for fiscal 2027, we expect mid-single-digit revenue growth and expansion in adjusted EBITDA margin. In Aerospace, we anticipated measured top line growth supported by rising aircraft utilization and favorable shift in product mix and the expiration of a major royalty obligation in the third quarter of fiscal 2027, which will provide an approximate $2 million annualized contribution to gross profit beginning in the fourth quarter. In Product ID, our focus is on converting our growing commercial pipeline into consistent revenue growth while continuing to improve operational performance and profitability. As we navigate this next phase, we remain committed to create value for our shareholders. This includes evaluating all strategic alternatives that can enhance that value, as I discussed earlier. With a more disciplined operating model, a stronger balance sheet and attractive opportunities across both segments, we believe AstroNova is on a path to deliver stronger and more resilient performance over time. With that, operator, we're ready to open the line for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] There are no questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks. Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect at this time, and thank you for your participation.