ZS

Zscaler, Inc.
Technology·Software - Infrastructure
$139.73
$22.6B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$3.0B
Free Cash Flow
$943.7M
Rev Growth
+25.9%
FCF Margin
31.4%
P/FCF
23.9x
EV/FCF
22.2x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
110.6x
Fair Value
$135.00
Upside
-3.4%

Zscaler, Inc. operates as a cloud security company worldwide. The company provides Zscaler Internet Access solution that provides users, servers, operational technology, Internet of Things device secure access to externally managed applications, including software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications and Internet destinations; and Zscaler Private Access solution, which is designed to provide access to managed applications hosted internally in data centers, and private or public clouds. It also offer

2-Year Price History

$182.37+7.3%
$150$200$250$300volMay 24Sep 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q21,08878.3---3.3--304.6-43.55,836----------
Est2028-Q11,05073.5---5.3--525.0-47.35,532----------
Est2027-Q41,01566.0---10.2--253.8-71.15,007----------
Est2027-Q3980.058.8---14.7--186.2-53.94,753----------
Est2027-Q2945.052.0---18.9--255.2-42.54,567----------
Est2027-Q1910.052.8---13.7--436.8-45.54,312----------
Est2026-Q4876.045.6---24.5--210.2-70.13,875----------
Est2026-Q3843.037.9---29.5--151.7-50.63,664----------
Act2026-Q2815.829.0-51.8-34.3204.1239.1-35.03,5131,864159.7-5.8%6.9x218.4x
Act2026-Q1788.135.0-36.4-11.6448.3413.3-35.03,3211,834158.6-4.4%16.5x374.8x
Act2025-Q4719.234.7-32.2-17.6250.6171.9-78.73,5721,797156.5-4.1%16.7x407.7x
Act2025-Q3678.039.0-22.4-4.1211.1119.5-91.63,0061,229154.9-3.5%19.8x291.5x
Act2025-Q2647.914.5-37.0-7.7179.4143.4-36.02,8801,238153.7-4.7%6.3x247.7x
Act2025-Q1628.024.3-31.9-12.1331.3291.9-39.52,7081,237152.6-5.7%8.1x257.1x
Act2024-Q4592.923.0-25.7-14.9203.6136.3-67.22,4101,238151.5-4.9%6.2x382.1x
Act2024-Q3553.244.3-4.419.1173.4123.1-50.32,2401,235154.1-0.9%18.6x495.7x
Act2024-Q2525.01.8-47.1-28.5142.1100.8-41.32,4601,234149.0-10.4%0.5x--
Act2024-Q1496.75.6-46.7-33.5260.8224.7-36.12,3241,216147.6-11.4%1.8x--
Act2023-Q4455.04.6-42.0-30.7135.9101.3-34.62,1001,211146.4-10.8%1.7x--
Act2023-Q3418.8-12.1-48.1-46.1108.573.9-34.61,9681,215145.4-13.3%-8.4x--
Act2023-Q2387.6-28.6-61.0-57.589.562.8-26.71,9051,216144.5-17.7%-21.5x--
Act2023-Q1355.6-40.6-64.4-68.2128.595.6-32.81,8251,219143.5-20.1%-30.5x--
Act2022-Q4318.1-41.0-82.5-97.7103.174.8-28.41,7311,046142.4-26.3%-2.8x--
Act2022-Q3286.8-50.7-86.6-101.477.243.7-33.51,6581,005141.4-29.4%-3.6x--
Act2022-Q2255.6-65.6-83.9-100.448.329.5-18.81,621989.6140.5-28.7%-4.7x--
Act2022-Q1230.5-57.2-74.4-90.893.383.4-9.91,585978.0139.3-25.9%-4.1x--

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $135.00

Zscaler is a legitimate category leader in cloud-delivered Zero Trust security with a $3.4B ARR base and strong FCF generation. However, the stock faces a perfect storm of headwinds: organic growth is decelerating (ex-acquisition net-new ARR growth at just 7%), competitive pricing pressure is intensifying from Netskope and Cloudflare (25-50% discounts), SBC at 25% of revenue masks true profitability and causes ~4% annual dilution, customer sentiment around product fragmentation and support quality is deteriorating, and the stock's 'perfection regime' has broken as secondary metrics like billings growth lag. At ~$118/share and ~20x TTM FCF (which itself is inflated by SBC add-backs), the valuation is more reasonable than its historical premium but still requires a return to growth acceleration that the competitive and macro environment may not support. Better opportunities exist elsewhere in security software at more compelling risk/reward.

Catalyst Potential positive catalysts include: (1) Agentic AI security becoming a meaningful revenue driver proving the TAM expansion thesis, (2) Z-Flex program driving meaningful upsell/cross-sell acceleration visible in net retention rates, (3) successful integration of Red Canary stabilizing churn and opening the managed SOC market. For the bear case: continued billings deceleration, further competitive losses, or another security incident.
Risk Competitive pricing pressure from Netskope (25-30% cheaper), Cloudflare (50% cheaper), and platformization by Palo Alto/Fortinet could structurally compress growth and margins, turning Zscaler's premium pricing into a liability as the Zero Trust market commoditizes faster than expected.
Trend
STABLE
Mgmt
6/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
-2.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Zscaler delivered a strong Q2 fiscal 2026, with revenue growing 26% to $816 million and ARR reaching $3.4 billion. The company raised its full-year guidance, reflecting confidence in its "Rule of 60" performance. A major highlight was the expansion of the "Zero Trust Everywhere" initiative, which now boasts over 550 enterprise customers, up from 130 last year. CEO Jay Chaudhry detailed the company’s vision for the "Agentic AI" era, where Zscaler’s Zero Trust Exchange secures billions of autonomous AI agents and machine-to-machine interactions. Financially, non-seat-based metered usage now represents 25% of new ACV, signaling a shift toward more diverse revenue streams. The "Z-Flex" licensing model continues to gain traction, contributing $290 million in Q2 TCV. While the company noted elevated churn in its recent Red Canary acquisition, it maintains that the technology is vital for its future "Agentic SOC" capabilities. Zscaler also acquired SquareX to bolster browser security. With record pipeline conversion and improving sales productivity, management remains focused on replacing legacy firewall and SD-WAN architectures with an integrated, AI-driven security platform, targeting a massive global market opportunity.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$139.73
Market Cap$22.6B
Enterprise Value$20.9B
P/S Ratio7.5x
P/FCF23.9x
EV/FCF22.2x
FCF Margin (TTM)31.4%
FCF Yield4.2%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution3.9%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$3.0B
Net Income$-67.6M
Free Cash Flow$943.7M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+25.9%
EBITDA Margin4.6%
Net Margin-2.3%
FCF Margin31.4%
CapEx % of Revenue8.0%
SBC % of Revenue24.6%
ROIC-4.5%
WC Change % Rev-1.1%
Interest Coverage13.3x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$177.59
+27.1% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$26.7B
− Net Debt$-1.6B
= Fair Equity$28.4B
Revenue Growth15.6% → 8.0%
FCF Margin31.4% → 22.0%
Discount Rate14.0%
Terminal EV/FCF20.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float9.8%
Short Shares10.2M
Days to Cover4.3
Change (vs Prior)-3.2%
Short % Float History
9.80%+2.30pp
5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%10.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)70%
Put IV (ATM)71%
ATM Spread0.44%
Call $OI (near money)$64.6M
Put $OI (near money)$29.0M
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$180.0
Major Expirations7
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$165.00$28.85/$30.4564$10.55/$12.1093
$170.00$25.85/$27.4099$12.70/$14.25370
$175.00$23.05/$24.65132$14.90/$16.6061
$180.00$21.20/$22.00346$17.40/$19.1078
$185.00$18.10/$19.7563$20.05/$21.9047
$190.00$15.95/$17.6034$22.95/$25.0026
$195.00$14.60/$15.70156$25.95/$28.358
$200.00$13.15/$14.00229$29.30/$31.4510
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+19.1%
Forward FCF Margin29.5%
Forward EBITDA Margin5.3%
Forward P/FCF21.4x
Forward EV/FCF19.9x
Forward Int. Coverage17.6x
Model Risk Score6/10
Bankruptcy Odds1%
Est. Borrow Rate5.5%
Terminal EV/FCF20.0x
LT Growth8.0%
LT FCF Margin22.0%

Employees

Headcount7,348
Revenue / Employee$408,427
Gross Profit / Employee$312,691
2022: 4,975 → 2023: 5,962 → 2024: 7,348 → 2025: 7,923 (17% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 10.9% of float, sold 7.1%. 1 filer moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+3.8% of float (net)
Bought 10.9% · Sold 7.1%
796 filers reported (last quarter: 963)

Ownership composition

Active
30.6%(-14.8% YoY)
716 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
7.2%(-8.4% YoY)
7 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.3%(+0.3% YoY)
6 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
0.9%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$1.20B$183.89+$103M+$241M-0.2%$5.69T
FIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP$494M$187.35+$131M+$134M-0.9%$139.72B
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$410M$180.52+$71.9M+$11.7M-0.2%$760.93B
STATE STREET CORPPassive$335M$209.74+$6.6M+$36.0M-0.2%$2.89T
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$335M$167.54−$2.4M−$77.6M+0.3%$193.48B
FMR LLC$307M$261.97−$328M+$46.0M+0.3%$1.89T
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$292M$208.20+$2.4M+$45.6M+2.3%$1.61T
UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS INC$276M$179.98+$41.5M−$163M-0.3%$480.58B
Pictet Asset Management Holding SA$269M$191.26+$92.8M+$29.6M-1.1%$94.52B
PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/$245M$214.82−$115M+$141M-0.2%$864.93B
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.$237M$198.42−$33.5M−$128M-1.3%$145.22B
TIGER GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LLC$222M$183.20+$0−$13.9M-1.2%$22.85B
VICTORY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC$218M$145.28+$199M+$202M-0.2%$156.12B
UBS Group AG$198M$201.40+$20.1M−$17.3M-0.3%$562.11B
MORGAN STANLEY$180M$204.32−$38.7M+$30.9M-0.3%$1.65T
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$165M$181.35+$137M+$132M-0.7%$117.03B
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$142M$228.10−$81.8M−$24.5M-0.2%$218.19B
Amundi$141M$184.68+$46.5M+$51.8M-0.2%$366.88B
Invesco Ltd.$131M$246.73−$75.4M+$27.3M-0.2%$652.04B
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP$125M$175.78+$107M−$49.0M+0.1%$533.98B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
-0.29%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.28%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.71%
161 buyers · $0.95B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.20%
281 sellers · $4.38B out
alpha coverage: 99% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-8.4%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-4.4%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-17.3%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+5.1%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+2.2%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-3.3%
Holder mid (any stock)
-2.8%
Holder rally (any stock)
-5.1%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

04.2M8.5M12.7M17.0M$112$162$213$263$3142021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
FMR LLC2.2MCapital Research Global InvestorsAMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC2.4MUBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS INC2.0MT. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.1.7MGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC2.9MFIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP3.5MAllianz Asset Management GmbH36KJPMORGAN CHASE & CO331KD. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.68K

Related Stocks

Investors who own this also own

Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.

TickerNameCo-holdersScore
NOWServiceNow, Inc.332.41×
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.32.65×
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.62.56×
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.42.02×

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (5 analysts)$216.805520.0%
Last Year (32 analysts)$288.4410640.0%
Current Price$139.73

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$438.5M
Incentive & Other$42.2M
Total Compensation$480.6M
% of Revenue6.6%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$58.97M
35 txns · 9 insiders · 214,285 sh
Major holders (≥10% beneficial owners)
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$32.35M
5 txns · 2 insiders · 109,254 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-03-18SELLBEER JAMES Adirector177$153.53$27K$673K
2026-03-18SELLGeller Adamofficer: Chief Product Officer2,094$153.53$321K$7.21M
2026-03-17SELLChaudhry Jagtar Singhdirector, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO & Chairman1,941$156.59$304K$54.17M
2026-03-17SELLGeller Adamofficer: Chief Product Officer1,485$156.59$233K$7.68M
2026-03-17SELLJudge Rajdirector, officer: EVP, Corp. Strategy & Ventures2,488$156.59$390K$10.63M
2026-03-17SELLRUBIN KEVINofficer: Chief Financial Officer1,682$156.59$263K$7.28M
2026-03-17SELLRich Michael J.officer: CRO and President of WW Sales3,147$156.59$493K$16.34M
2026-03-17SELLSchlossman Robertofficer: Chief Legal Officer2,263$156.59$354K$11.34M
2026-01-02SELLBEER JAMES Adirector653$226.72$148K$790K
2025-12-26SELLBrown Andrew William Fraserdirector5,000$0.00$0$0
2025-12-17SELLSchlossman Robertofficer: Chief Legal Officer2,349$232.79$547K$17.38M
2025-12-17SELLGeller Adamofficer: Chief Product Officer1,620$232.79$377K$11.76M
2025-12-16SELLChaudhry Jagtar Singhdirector, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO & Chairman2,843$230.82$656K$80.29M
2025-12-16SELLGeller Adamofficer: Chief Product Officer2,060$230.82$475K$12.04M
2025-12-16SELLJudge Rajdirector, officer: EVP, Corp. Strategy & Ventures3,438$230.82$794K$16.25M
2025-12-16SELLRUBIN KEVINofficer: Chief Financial Officer3,303$230.82$762K$11.12M
2025-12-16SELLRich Michael J.officer: CRO and President of WW Sales4,100$230.82$946K$24.81M
2025-12-16SELLSchlossman Robertofficer: Chief Legal Officer3,084$230.82$712K$17.77M
2025-10-24SELLSchlossman Robertofficer: Chief Legal Officer3,200$325.00$1.04M$26.03M
2025-10-02SELLSchlossman Robertofficer: Chief Legal Officer7,006$305.57$2.14M$23.26M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

15.4%retail+0.8pp
28.8%dark+0.6pp
week of 2026-04-27
10%15%20%25%30%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q2)
Reportable Segment$815.8MNEW
By Geography (2020-Q1)
UNITED STATES$45.9M+54%
EMEA$38.3M+40%
Asia Pacific$7.8M+63%
Other$1.5M+18%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

ZSCALER, INC.: The SBC Mirage Masking a Billion-Dollar Liquidity Event

Overall Risk
6/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
8/10
Insolvency
4/10
Earnings Overstated
7/10
Hidden Liabilities
3/10
Legal
2/10
Audit Warnings
1/10
Hidden Upside
4/10
Contextually Acceptable
7/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In April 2026, Zscaler (ZS) hit a 52-week low following a high-profile downgrade by BTIG from 'Buy' to 'Neutral,' citing a deteriorating outlook for the next 6–12 months. This followed a volatile period where shares plummeted nearly 40% YTD. Additionally, Zscaler confirmed a supply chain data breach in late 2025 (disclosed August 31) where a compromise of a third-party Salesforce integration (Salesloft Drift) exposed customer contact metadata, licensing details, and support case content for a 'large number' of clients (Investing.com, Cyber Press).

🐻 Bear Case

The core bear case centers on a structural deceleration of growth. While headline ARR growth reached 25% in early 2026, organic growth (excluding the Red Canary acquisition) was notably lower at 21%, with net-new ARR growth excluding acquisitions dropping to just 7%. Analysts warn that Zscaler is entering a 'Mid-Life Crisis' where its core Zero Trust market is maturing, potentially resetting long-term growth to the mid-teens. Despite a high valuation multiple of ~12x Sales, the company continues to report negative GAAP EBIT margins and relies on high sales and marketing spend to defend its position (BTIG, Forbes, Quiver Quantitative).

🚩 Red Flags

A major red flag is the retirement of long-time CFO Remo Canessa, which triggered market anxiety regarding future financial transparency and growth stability. Stock-based compensation (SBC) remains extremely high, consuming 25.6% of revenue in FY25 and causing 3-4% annual shareholder dilution. Furthermore, recent 'beat and raise' quarters have seen the stock drop, a classic sign that the 'perfection regime' is ending—where any miss in secondary metrics like calculated billings (which grew only 13% vs. 26% revenue) is severely punished (Seeking Alpha, Forbes).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Zscaler faces a 'meaningful increase' in pricing pressure from more agile rivals. Netskope is reportedly pricing its comparable SSE offerings 25–30% below Zscaler, while Cloudflare (NET) is winning large enterprise deals at roughly 50% of Zscaler's price point. Legacy giants like Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet are also aggressively 'platformizing' their install bases with free incentives to displace Zscaler's standalone cloud security edge (BTIG, Seeking Alpha).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment among IT administrators has soured due to perceived product fragmentation; users on platforms like Reddit describe the management experience as 'hot garbage,' complaining that different modules (ZIA/ZPA) feel like separate portals with little cohesion. Customers also report 'insane' price increases and a significant decline in the quality of Tier 1 support, which frequently forces clients to pay for expensive TAM (Technical Account Manager) upgrades to get basic issues resolved (Reddit r/networking, r/sysadmin).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q2 • 2026-02-27

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Zscaler Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Kim Watkins, SVP of Investor Relations and Strategic Finance. Please go ahead.
Kim Watkins: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. Welcome to Zscaler's Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today are Jay Chaudhry, Chairman and CEO; and Kevin Rubin, CFO. Please note that we posted our earnings release, shareholder letter and a supplemental financial schedule to our Investor Relations website. Unless otherwise noted, all numbers we talk about today will be on an adjusted non-GAAP basis. You will find a reconciliation of GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measures in our earnings release. Before we get started, I'd like to remind you that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the company's anticipated future revenue, annual recurring revenue, net new annual recurring revenue, gross margin, operating profit, net other income, earnings per share and free cash flow margin, our customer response to our products, our expectations regarding AI and its impact on our business and customers, and our market share and market opportunity and our objectives and outlook. These statements and other comments are not guarantees of future performance, but rather are subject to risks and uncertainty, some of which are beyond our control. These forward-looking statements apply as of today, and you should not rely on them as representing our views in the future. We undertake no obligation to update these statements after this call. For a more complete discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please see our filings with the SEC as well as in today's earnings release. I also want to inform you that we'll be attending the following conferences: Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference on March 2; Loop Capital Markets Investor Conference on March 10; Stifel Technology Conference on March 10; Cantor Global Technology and Industrial Growth Conference on March 11; and Wells Fargo Software Symposium on April 8. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Jay.
Jagtar Chaudhry: Thanks, Kim, and thanks to everyone for joining us today. We delivered strong Q2 results, and I couldn't be more proud of the team's execution. ARR grew 25%, reflecting continued strong demand for our platform. We are confident in our outlook for the second half of fiscal 2026. And as a result, we are increasing our guidance across the board. I'd like to zoom out for a moment and talk about what's on everyone's mind, AI. AI is the single most transformative technology of our time, and its mass adoption is only just beginning. We believe Zscaler is the security platform for the AI era, because we already protect users, data and applications across clouds and the Internet at scale. Just as we enable customers to securely accelerate digital transformation and cloud adoption, we believe we are uniquely positioned to secure the AI transformation, driving continued demand for our platform. Organizations are rapidly adopting AI to drive productivity and innovation, but doing so is creating new vulnerabilities, significantly expanding the attack surface and increasing cyber threats in scale, sophistication and speed, recasting AI from a productivity engine into a dangerous security threat. During my conversations with more than 100 CEOs and CIOs, including many at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month, the urgency of securing AI is one of the top concerns on their minds. This is the opportunity for Zscaler's industry-leading Zero Trust Exchange, which enables our customers to securely scale AI for the agentic era and beyond. Zscaler minimizes the attack surface and limits lateral movement with our unique Zero Trust architecture that enables direct one-to-one communication among users, applications and AI agents. I started Zscaler with an initial focus on securing users with Zero Trust. Then we extended our platform to deliver Zero Trust for workloads, branches and devices, which has increased our TAM significantly and extended our technology lead from other vendors who are still trying to build a SASE solution for user security. Now we are extending our global Zero Trust Exchange platform to secure AI applications, AI agent communication and agentic workflow at scale. As AI agents are unleashed within the enterprise, it won't be long before billions of AI agents interacting with each other will have access to mission-critical applications and sensitive data. Just like users and organizations, AI agents are also becoming the weakest link in cybersecurity. Imagine a threat actor hijacking even one of an organization's AI agents resulting in a serious breach. AI agents shift the threat landscape and operate autonomously at speeds far exceeding humans, exponentially increasing agentic traffic while compressing the time to prevent, detect and respond to threats. This is becoming even more acute as AI agents or apps exposed to the Internet can be scanned and targeted in seconds. Securing this new reality requires in-line policy enforcement at massive scale. This is what Zscaler is built to deliver. Zscaler stands for the Zenith of scalability. Effective AI security requires a proven global Zero Trust Exchange infrastructure, and we believe Zscaler is the only cybersecurity platform for the AI age that's able to secure at this unprecedented speed and scale, creating a durable advantage. We have 15-plus years of experience operating our own cloud across 160-plus data centers worldwide, offering real-time security services with 99.999% reliability. This global infrastructure is critical to secure AI agent communication. Our software is present on millions of end-user devices, servers as well as in the cloud and branch offices, and it enables us to get agentic traffic to our Zero Trust Exchange, giving us a unique advantage. With our AI platform capabilities, we processed nearly 1 trillion AI transactions in calendar 2025. We are also processing millions of MCP requests through our exchange on a monthly basis, up from literally nothing a couple of quarters ago. As an example, a large Fortune 100 financial services customer is using our Zero Trust Exchange to enforce policy for the software development agents. In another example, a CISO of a Fortune 500 entertainment company, a Zscaler customer, shared with me that with little deployment effort, he was able to turn on Zscaler Exchange to enforce policy for AI traffic and is securing over 4 million prompts per week. Our Zero Trust Exchange is fundamentally different from competitive firewall-based security architecture that connects users or AI agents to a network and then allows them to roam free, dramatically increasing the risk of cyber breaches. We expect these advantages, including significant architectural differentiation and our large customer base to drive short-term and long-term demand for our platform. Turning back to the quarter. Our results reflect robust demand across all 3 of our growth pillars. AI Security, Zero Trust Everywhere, and Data Security Everywhere. I will start with AI Security, which includes 2 product areas: AI Protect, our recently introduced solution to secure the use of AI and agentic operations. I will begin with AI Protect, which secures the full spectrum of enterprise AI adoption and solves a range of cyber and data loss challenges. Zscaler ThreatLabz Research found that in calendar 2025, AI application use within our customer base expanded to over 3,400, a quadrupling in the last 12 months alone, with data transfers to AI apps exceeding 18,000 terabytes. Many of these apps have serious vulnerabilities. Zscaler AI Protect gives customers a single integrated way to secure AI at scale by discovering and managing all AI assets, including shadow AI uses, enforcing safe access to approved apps and inspecting every prompt and response in real time to stop data leaks and attacks like prompt injection. For customers building their AI models and applications, our AI Red Teaming solution performs continuous security assessment. This quarter, we integrated our AI Red Teaming and our Guardrail products to provide true closed-loop security. While our Zscaler AI Protect solution is new, we see demand rapidly accelerating, including landing new logos, representing a massive future growth opportunity. This quarter, several large enterprises adopted our solution. In an 8-figure new logo win, we landed a Fortune 500 semiconductor manufacturer. This customer expanded its use of our platform to include AI Protect and Data Security solutions to block access to unsanctioned applications, prevent public LLM data leakage and provide visibility into prompts. Zscaler's integrated AI Protect solution spanning the entire AI life cycle was a key differentiator for this new logo win. In another example, in a 7-figure upsell deal, a Global 2000 construction company, which is securing users with Zscaler, added our AI Protect solution to prevent data leakage and enforce acceptable use controls for access to GenAI applications. The second product area of our AI security is Agentic Operations, which includes our Agentic SecOps and Agentic IT Ops solutions. we are significantly advancing our Agentic SecOps capabilities by integrating Red Canary's agent framework with the deep security insights we generate from the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, which processes more than 500 billion transactions every day, more than 20x the number of daily Google searches. This fusion of capabilities simplifies customer operations, automates threat hunting, and provides more accurate, actionable threat prioritization. Some of our wins for our Agentic SecOps solutions this quarter include a leading AI software and research organization, a Global 2000 utilities energy company, and a Global 2000 oil and gas company. In Agentic IT operations, our innovations include Zscaler Digital Experience or ZDX CoPilot, which combines Agentic technology with a conversational interface to troubleshoot and resolve performance issues of applications and network and endpoint devices. Booking for ZDX Advanced Plus, which includes our ZDX CoPilot product, crossed $100 million over the last 12 months, growing more than 80% year-over-year. We are soon launching an AI agent for ZDX that will automate multiple troubleshooting tasks, resulting in faster diagnosis and resolution of performance issues. Overall, I'm very pleased to see growing demand and continued momentum for our AI Security solutions. Our next growth pillar is Zero Trust Everywhere, which includes revenue from customers who are more broadly adopting our Zero Trust architecture by purchasing all of the following: Zero Trust Users, Zero Trust Branch, and Zero Trust Cloud. We pioneered the Zero Trust Users market by disrupting the traditional proxy and VPN markets, and we are a clear market leader. With our Zero Trust Branch, we are disrupting branch firewalls, software-defined networks or SD-WAN and MPLS networks. With Zero Trust Cloud, we are disrupting virtual firewalls in the cloud. We are seeing ARR from Zero Trust Branch and Zero Trust Cloud growing significantly as we dramatically reduce cost and complexity. The number of Zero Trust Everywhere enterprises has grown at a rapid pace and now sits at over 550, up from over 130 a year ago. The pricing of Zero Trust Branch and Zero Trust Cloud are based upon the number of devices, the number of workloads and the amount of traffic, which keeps growing. This expansion also creates a flywheel effect, generating follow-on demand for our Data Security and AI Security offerings. Let me give an example of a Zero Trust Branch win at a subsidiary of a Fortune 500 retailer, who significantly expanded its deployment of Zero Trust Branch to over 1,000 sites in a 7-figure upsell, making it one of our largest ever Zero Trust Branch deals. The use cases for this customer were frictionless M&A integration and rapidly bringing both newly acquired and greenfield sites online. This order also included our AI Protect solution to secure sensitive data from GenAI apps. In Q2, 45% of the total customers who bought our Zero Trust Branch solution were new logos, demonstrating that Zero Trust Branch is helping us grow our new logos. This is also a clear proof that for better cyber protection, customers want each branch to become like an Internet cafe and replace SD-WAN, which is often sold by SASE vendors. Another important part of our Zero Trust Everywhere solution is Zero Trust Cloud, which reduces cost and operational complexity by eliminating virtual firewalls in data center and cloud environments and can be deployed in 10 minutes. We're seeing tremendous momentum for Zero Trust Cloud. To share a customer example, in one of our largest ever Zero Trust Cloud wins, a Global 2000 financial services customer signed a 7-figure deal, increasing their ARR to more than $5 million, up over 40%. Zero Trust Cloud is priced based on traffic, creating a natural path for ARR to grow as customer traffic grows. This deployment will eliminate a large number of virtual firewalls in their multiple cloud environments, which significantly reduces the operational burden of managing firewalls in multiple clouds and improves cyber posture by preventing lateral threat movement. With significant wins, we are proving that for better cyber protection, customers want each cloud workload to become like an island and communicate only through our Zero Trust Exchange and displace virtual firewalls. Our opportunity is to secure millions of workloads. Our third growth pillar is Data Security Everywhere, which is 8 modules, including Data Discovery, Data Classification, Posture Management, and Data Loss Prevention. We are seeing significant traction driven by enterprises consolidating the data security point products onto our integrated platform and simplifying deployments. The growing use of AI apps is making data protection essential, generating strong demand for our solution. Let me share an example. In an 8-figure upsell win, a Global 2000 financial services customer expanded its adoption of our platform by purchasing additional data security modules, strengthening protection for sensitive data across its organization. This customer selected us over well-known competitors to replace multiple legacy point products due to our unified policy for various data sources and channels. With this purchase, the ARR for this customer increased nearly 5x. We believe Zscaler is incredibly well positioned to secure the AI era. As the number of agents expands, the unique Zero Trust architecture becomes even more crucial, minimizing attack surfaces and limiting lateral movement by enabling direct one-to-one communication. In summary, our growth opportunity is straightforward. Traffic flowing through our Zero Trust Exchange for secure communication expands our revenue opportunity. In the agentic era, the traffic from Zscaler's more than 50 million users, servers, cloud workloads, branch locations and AI agents will grow exponentially, driven by billions of autonomous agents. We believe that Zero Trust communication will be the only way to provide the real-time protection customers need to adopt AI safely and securely. We run the largest in-line globally distributed security cloud platform in the world, processing more than 500 billion transactions every day, more than 20x the number of daily Google searches. This proprietary anonymized data is used to train our AI engine, a powerful differentiator to stop ever-changing threats at speed and scale. We provide the global infrastructure, which enables our customers to secure communication and apply policies in real time at wire speed. Today, we are trusted by more than 45% of Fortune 500 companies, and we expect to continue expanding our partnership over time. In addition, with just 4,400 of more than 20,000 largest enterprises in the world as Zscaler customers today, we have a significant opportunity ahead. This gives us a durable runway for long-term growth from both upsell and new logo opportunities. Protecting AI is not just a job or task for Zscaler, it is our mission. We believe Zscaler is the cybersecurity platform for the AI age. Now I will hand it over to Kevin to walk through the financials.
Kevin Rubin: Thanks, Jay. We delivered strong Q2 '26 results, exceeding our targets while investing with discipline. With 26% revenue growth and a 36% free cash flow margin, we achieved Rule of 62 performance in the first half of the year, placing us among the elite companies that consistently outperform the Rule of 40. Our Q2 '26 net new ARR was $156 million, up 19%, bringing total ARR to $3.4 billion, up 25% year-over-year. Net new ARR benefited from strength in large deals and volume of deals. In particular, the Americas closed twice the number of $1 million-plus deals this year as compared to last year. Excluding the contribution from our acquisition of Red Canary, net new ARR was $139 million, up 7% year-over-year and total ARR up 21%. These results compared to an exceptionally strong 24% net new ARR growth last year. Red Canary exited Q2 with $114 million of ARR. For the first half of the year, net new ARR, excluding Red Canary, grew 10% year-over-year, accelerating from 1% last year. This quarter, our Zero Trust Internet Access, or ZIA, and Zero Trust Private Access, or ZPA, ARR remained healthy and grew in the mid-teens. We have steadily expanded our Zero Trust platform beyond users to protect branches, workloads, AI applications and now AI agents. We believe AI agents will drive a meaningful increase in machine-to-machine and agent-to-agent interactions over time. In Q2, our non-seat-based metered usage solutions delivered just over 1/4 of new ACV and the ARR tied to those offerings grew more than 100% year-over-year. Revenue of $816 million grew 26% year-over-year and 4% sequentially, exceeding the high end of our guidance. We closed Q2 with 728 customers generating over $1 million of ARR and 3,886 customers exceeding $100,000 in ARR, both growing 18% year-over-year. We also set a record $1 million-plus new ACV deals for a Q2. On a geographic basis, we saw strong growth from the Americas, which accounted for 57% of revenue, up approximately 31% year-over-year. EMEA accounted for 28% of revenue, up approximately 18%, and APJ for 15%, up approximately 23%. Remaining performance obligation, or RPO, of $6.1 billion grew approximately 31%, including approximately 47% classified as current RPO. We are pleased with the strong execution in our account-centric sales motion, which is strengthening our position as a long-term strategic partner and driving deeper customer adoption over time. In Q2, we again delivered double-digit sales productivity growth, reflecting continued improvement in our go-to-market execution with meaningful headroom ahead. We also achieved record pipeline conversion for Q2, signaling stronger pipeline quality and improved visibility. We continued to build strong momentum this quarter with our recently launched Z-Flex program. Z-Flex gives customers with multiyear commitments, the flexibility to activate or swap modules without starting a new procurement cycle, along with premium deployment assistance and support. This program is driving meaningful upsell, shorter sales cycles and greater forward visibility. In Q2, Z-Flex generated more than $290 million in TCV, up over 65% quarter-over-quarter. Since launching a year ago, we have delivered approximately $650 million in TCV at an average 4-year term, underscoring customers' long-term commitment to Zscaler. To share a couple of customer examples, in a 5-year 8-figure Z-Flex deal, a large U.S.-based finance and insurance customer nearly tripled its annual spend by expanding its module adoption across 11 existing modules and adopting 5 new modules, including our AI Security solution. In a new logo Z-Flex win, a Fortune 500 retail customer purchased 11 modules in a 5-year 8-figure deal. This customer adopted all of our Zero Trust solutions, including Zero Trust Users, Cloud and Branch, landing as a Zero Trust Everywhere customer. Turning to M&A. I'd like to start with some color on our recent acquisitions. On February 5, we closed the acquisition of SquareX, which extends Zero Trust capabilities into any browser, enabling organizations to leverage standard browsers like Chrome and Edge to secure access on unmanaged devices without requiring a separate third-party enterprise browser or using outdated and costly virtual desktop infrastructure. Next, Red Canary. On February 1, we executed the next phase of integrating the Red Canary teams with the respective Zscaler teams. Red Canary was primarily a technology and talent acquisition. As we shared when we closed this acquisition, churn for MDR businesses is higher than we experienced in our Zscaler business. Post acquisition, Red Canary's churn has been elevated. We'll be providing Red Canary ARR in Q3 and Q4. Turning to operating performance. Non-GAAP gross margin was 80.2% compared to 80.4% a year ago. Non-GAAP operating income of $181 million grew $41 million or 29% as compared to $140 million last year. Non-GAAP operating margin of 22.2% increased 50 basis points year-over-year, reflecting the sales productivity improvements I mentioned earlier, demonstrating leverage on sales and marketing. Turning to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with $3.5 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and $1.7 billion of debt. In Q2, we generated $204 million in operating cash flow, up 14% year-over-year, and CapEx was $18 million or 2% of revenue. Finally, free cash flow margin was 20.7% this quarter, down from 22.1% last year, driven by the timing of cash collections. Looking ahead, I'd like to spend a minute addressing the recent increases in memory, storage and processor prices and availability. So far, we haven't seen a meaningful impact to our operations. However, it could become a factor in the future as we purchase equipment for our data centers and Zero Trust Branch appliances. We'll continue to monitor our costs and adjust customer pricing if needed. Turning to guidance. Let me provide our outlook for Q3 and full year fiscal '26. As a reminder, these numbers are all on a non-GAAP basis. For the third quarter, we expect revenue of $834 million to $836 million, reflecting approximately 23% year-over-year growth; gross margin of approximately 80%; operating profit of $187 million to $189 million, equating to an operating margin of 22.4% to 22.6%; net other income of approximately $25 million; and earnings per share of $1 to $1.01, assuming a 21% tax rate and 167 million fully diluted shares. For the full year fiscal 2026, ARR of $3.730 billion to $3.745 billion or year-over-year growth of approximately 24%. This guidance implies net new ARR growth, excluding Red Canary, of approximately 9.5%. For Red Canary, we expect ARR of approximately $130 million in fiscal '26, up from our prior guidance of $95 million, with net new ARR of approximately $6 million in Q3 and $10 million in Q4. This includes all the business expected in each period, including fiscal '26 renewals, upsells and new logos. For the second half of fiscal '26, we expect approximately 40% of total net new ARR to be recognized in Q3. Revenue of $3.309 billion to $3.322 billion, reflecting year-over-year growth of 23.8% to 24.3%. We expect Red Canary revenue of approximately $125 million in fiscal '26, up from our prior guidance of $90 million. Operating profit of $742 million to $748 million, up approximately 28% to 29% year-over-year, up from our prior guidance of $732 million to $740 million. Earnings per share of $3.99 to $4.02, assuming a 21% tax rate and approximately 169 million fully diluted shares. And free cash flow margin of approximately 26.5% to 27%, reflecting CapEx in the mid-single digits as a percentage of revenue. We are very pleased with the results we delivered in the first half of fiscal '26. We achieved 25% year-over-year ARR growth and record operating income. Excluding Red Canary, our net new ARR growth accelerated to 10% in the first half of the year, up from 1% in the same period last year. We also saw continued momentum with Z-Flex and closed a record number of $1 million-plus ARR deals for Q2. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, we believe we are well positioned to build on this momentum. We will do this by scaling our rapidly expanding AI Security portfolio, expanding Zero Trust Everywhere adoption, and growing our Data Security Everywhere revenue. Ultimately, we remain focused on driving durable, profitable growth with strong cash generation. I want to thank our employees, customers and partners for their continued support. With that, operator, you may now open the call for questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Saket Kalia of Barclays.
Saket Kalia: Thank you, team, for the increased disclosure on Red Canary. Very helpful. Jay, maybe for you. I'd love if you could talk about just the competitive backdrop a little bit and anything you can touch on in terms of competitive win rates and what you saw this quarter. I mean, clearly, this is a rising tide market, but there are other players as well. Maybe the question is, where are you winning? And what impact, if any, are they having?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Thank you, Saket. We haven't seen much change in the competitive dynamics over the past few quarters. What we saw was a record pipeline conversion for Q2, which is wonderful. And we also had a record Q2 in terms of large deal wins in Q2, and by large deal wins, I mean, over $1 million. I mean, there's a fair amount of noise the market creates out there, SASE this, SASE that. SASE is a collection of all kinds of products. In many of these SASE numbers, legacy firewalls, VPNs get thrown out. But what we are seeing in the market is our customers care about Zero Trust. And as we engage and explain Zero Trust, we almost always win. And by the way, SASE is not equal to Zero Trust, and Zero Trust is what eliminates lateral movement. So very pleased with the performance. Our brand has grown. Most of the large enterprises like us, they know us. And I think the future is great for us.
Operator: Our next question will be coming from the line of Brad Zelnick of Deutsche Bank.
Brad Zelnick: Congrats again on another great quarter, guys, and also appreciate the additional disclosure. Kevin, it seems you're raising your full year ARR expectation by more than your overachievement in Q2. How much might be from newer acquisitions? And are there any seasonal anomalies we should consider, perhaps slipped deals out of Q2 or anything like that?
Kevin Rubin: Thanks, Brad. I appreciate the comments and the question. First of all, just remember, our business seasonality tends to favor H2. So we are going into the second half of the year feeling confident. We do see a strong pipeline of deals going into the back half, which does give us confidence in the raise, excluding Red Canary. So I would point to strength in the overall business as well as just general seasonality that we see in the back half of the year.
Operator: Our next question will be coming from the line of Gregg Moskowitz of Mizuho.
Gregg Moskowitz: Also welcome the additional disclosure. So thank you for that. Very interesting that your non-seat-based meter usage solutions are now over 25% of new ACV. That's higher than a lot of people had thought. And with the related ARR more than doubling year-over-year, this has the potential to put some upward pressure on the growth algorithm for Zscaler in the future. But Jay, when you kind of look deeper at these non-seat-based solutions, you gave some good color in your prepared remarks, but can you help us better understand what's really most resonating with customers today as well as what you're most excited about going forward?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Of course. Yes, we started early on with Zscaler for users for Zero Trust that is largely seat-based. But now we have Zero Trust for workloads, branches, devices, and now we are extending it to AI agents as well. Now even for users, we did have a number of use cases that are non-seat based. This is ZIA, ZPA, where we were doing third-party contractors, guest Wi-Fi or B2B data exchange with suppliers and customers. And yet our growth on Zero Trust Branch and Cloud has been very strong, and that's all non-user or meter pricing. Our AI Security solutions, which are starting small but growing pretty rapidly, are all non-user-based, rather they are token-based. And yes, we are pleased to say that 1/4 of our new business came from metered usage, and we expect it to grow over time, especially with AI agents, because we believe that there will be billions of AI agents. The only way to secure communication of AI agents is to go through Zero Trust Exchange that scales, that's highly reliable and globally distributed, and that's what we have.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Brian Essex of JPMorgan.
Brian Essex: Another set of kudos to Kevin for the organic versus inorganic disclosure. Maybe a question for you, Jay, and we saw this quite a lot during -- like a decade ago when digital transformation was the buzzword and a lot of different IT projects were classified as digital transformation products. Similarly, we're starting to hear of a lot of projects where executives are throwing AI on top of their projects to get more budget. And from that perspective, are you beginning to see any attach to budgets outside of security? How are CIOs thinking about funding some of these projects? And is Zscaler a beneficiary of that?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Yes. So we are seeing CIOs trying to really move as fast as they can to implement AI security projects. The kind of feeling is, if I'm not doing something, I'll be left behind. That's a clear thing I see as I talk to lots and lots of them. But they do all worry about cybersecurity, especially when you see all these agents showing up every other week. I mean, last night was Perplexity Computer and Claude before that and all these guys keeps on coming. They are definitely creating security issues. So our customers are asking us, what can you provide me for visibility into AI assets and risk associated with that. And then start moving around. How do we control agents? How do we have a policy that can say certain agents can access certain applications. Agents are somewhat like you. They're just more dangerous, and they're growing at a rapid pace. So there is a high degree of interest in proper security, especially Zero Trust or agents that we provide. The budget opens up. The budget either comes from the security side of it or the CIOs are allocating some number of budget out of the AI project. If you're spending $100 on an AI project, you spend $4, $5, $6 on security is viewed as very nominal thing. So we're not seeing budgets as an issue to do AI security projects. It does require that you need to engage at the C level, and we have very good C-level relationships. And we have pretty good brand and credibility with Fortune 500 companies.
Operator: Our next question will be coming from the line of Meta Marshall of Morgan Stanley.
Meta Marshall: Maybe a question for me, kind of following up on Brian's question of just what you're seeing in terms of sales cycles once kind of a deal is encompassing more AI. I guess just how does it change the dynamic of either kind of needing to take a more holistic view or needing to include more modules? Just what are you seeing there?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Thank you. So sales cycle depends on the scope of the project. The first thing our customers are trying to do is put their hands around what do they have in AI environment, what public AI application is being used and what private AIs are being used. So for that, we offer AI asset management. Then they want to do vulnerability assessment, teaming kind of stuff. As they roll out the project, guardrails become important. Last month, we launched a very integrated AI security portfolio. The sales cycle based on what modules they're doing is generally faster, because they are not really trying to go after everything, they want to start somewhere, but they want an integrated solution. And a number of customers have told me, hey, we bought this solution from a start-up, but for 1 year, until I figure out what integrated solution can I get from a trusted vendor like Zscaler, who will be around for the long term. So these sales cycles are faster. They are smaller deals to start with, and I think they'll grow over time, especially most of those deals are based on consumption or tokens. And as usage grows, users or tokens will grow.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from Fatima Boolani of Citi.
Fatima Boolani: Kevin, this one is for you. I was hoping to take a step back to have you reconcile the comments around Red Canary seeing elevated churn, but also the close to 30% revision on your financial contribution expectation from Red Canary, both to ARR and top line on revenue. So just wanted to kind of better understand. I know you sort of flagged that the Red Canary business generally had much higher levels of churn relative to Zscaler proper. So I just kind of wanted to better understand the dichotomy between those statements and if you can opine on that.
Kevin Rubin: Yes, I appreciate the question. So look, I mean, there is an element here that, as we talked about when we did the acquisition, as we do secure the renewals, there is a positive impact to ARR. And so you are seeing some of that come in. My commentary just around the elevated levels of renewals is just to give color around what we are seeing. As a reminder, Red Canary was a technology and talent acquisition, and it is a core feature of the Agentic SOC that we are putting together and combining. And I mentioned that we moved into the next phase of our integration earlier this month and now consolidating those teams, which we're really excited about. So I mean, the reconciliation is really just to give you guys a sense for what we're seeing in the business and how you should think about the second half of the year.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Roger Boyd of UBS.
Roger Boyd: Jay, I want to touch on sales productivity. You've made a number of changes to the go-to-market strategy over the past year in order to really help guide customers towards more transformational projects. And I know you mentioned another improvement this quarter, but can you talk about kind of the future ramp you're expecting in terms of sales force productivity? Do you see further room to upside given the push towards more of these transformational deals that are bigger, but maybe more complex?
Jagtar Chaudhry: I'll give you a broader view, and Kevin can get into more specific stuff. With the changes we have gone through, we are driving more transformational deals, better engaging with our customers. With that, you're seeing bigger deals, Z-Flex type of deals that are happening and that's leading to improved productivity. In fact, rather, we had a double-digit sales productivity growth. Very pleased with the way sales transformation has happened. As we said last quarter, the transformation is done. Now we keep on executing further. Kevin?
Kevin Rubin: Yes. Thanks, Jay. So I want to just kind of double-click on that last point, right? So as we engage with our customers, the account-centric model is a much different level of engagement. We're seeing a lot of interest in Z-Flex and what that looks like from a strategic point of view. And so the nature of the conversations, the way in which we're engaging, the larger deals that we're seeing all will lend itself to continued productivity opportunity going ahead. So as I look forward, I would expect that we will continue to see improvement in productivity as a result. So we are seeing the benefits, and I expect that we'll continue to see an improvement over time.
Jagtar Chaudhry: And if I may add, the record pipeline conversion in Q2, as a good indication of that what we want to do is working. Record $1 million dollar deals in Q2, another indication of the results we're getting.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from Ittai Kidron of Oppenheimer & Company.
Ittai Kidron: Kevin, I wanted to dig in into your comment on the core ZIA, ZPA growth. I think you mentioned mid-teens in ARR. Can you give us a little bit more color what was that growth rate over the last 2, 3 quarters perhaps? And how do we think about expectations for your core ZIA, ZPA business for the next 2, 3 quarters?
Kevin Rubin: Yes. Thanks, Ittai. I appreciate the question. We have seen a pretty consistent performance in ZIA, ZPA. We did get some feedback that it would be helpful for you guys to get a little bit more color in that regard, which is why I added that into the script. Keep in mind that ZIA, ZPA as it relates to Zero Trust Everywhere is the foundation and, to a large degree, the base and the opportunity. If you look at the number of customers that we have today, roughly 4,400 out of more than 20,000 potential companies that we think can be customers, you look at it in terms of the Fortune 500, where we still have over half of those to prospect against, there is a massive opportunity left with ZIA, ZPA as we think about it. And even within the companies that we do have on ZIA, ZPA, we have an opportunity to upsell those to Zero Trust Everywhere and then adjacently through the other pillars, Data Security and AI. So from our point of view, it just reiterates the stability in the underlying business and really gives a sense for what's driving kind of the core of the business. But again, we've got these other 3 growth pillars that have been doing exceptionally well. And hopefully, that additional color is helpful for you.
Jagtar Chaudhry: One interesting stat on ZIA is that customers on average are tripling their initial purchase in 4 years. That's pretty remarkable.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from Gray Powell of BTIG.
Gray Powell: Okay. So I want to follow up on some of the earlier questions, and I think you've hit on this somewhat. So you are seeing a lot of momentum in Z-Flex deals. If I'm doing the math correctly, I'm calculating that Z-Flex was over 30% of RPO bookings. I'm not sure if that's how you look at it. But I guess the question is, how does the ARR ramp on a Z-Flex deal compare to customers under historical contracts? And then just any directional commentary you can give on how big a typical Z-Flex customer is at maturity versus traditional or like what they spend? And what's sort of like giving you the most upside from a product perspective?
Kevin Rubin: Yes. Thanks for the question. Let me maybe just orientate -- I mean, the way that we look at Z-Flex is it is another opportunity for us to offer a package to a customer that we think is mutually compelling. It gives them flexibility, so they have less concern about being locked into a particular product or product decision in the future. It gives them an opportunity to focus more on long-term partnership versus more transactional selling in nature. And then it does give an opportunity for them to try, in a much easier, less friction way, new modules and expand into those modules. So from a from an offering perspective, it is a much better and more strategic way to engage. We do think over time that more and more of our customers will adopt Z-Flex. It is not something that we mandate or push, but where we feel that it really is well positioned, the field is enabled to be able to offer Z-Flex going forward. Your question around differences in ramps, et cetera. Fundamentally, 2 deals, if it's a Z-Flex or if it's a non-Z-Flex, so long as they're similar structure, there's no difference in how that shows up in ARR. Z-Flex is by their nature, because they're longer term, they've got more products, they may have a ramp that is built in, so that the customer can deploy along their deployment plan, which could take anywhere from 6 months to a year. But I wouldn't think about Z-Flex is creating a different dynamic with respect to ARR other than it's just another level of indication that we are very strategic in that environment. The average Z-Flex deal is typically an 8-figure TCV commitment. And for those deals that we've done thus far, it's been about a 4-year period. As we've talked about, they tend to be 3- to 5-year deals. And right now, the average is about 4. So hopefully, that's helpful color.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Jonathan Ruykhaver of Cantor Fitzgerald.
Jonathan Ruykhaver: So I think, Jay, this is for you. Just curious, when you look at SquareX, from my understanding, you're embedding browser security via an extension rather than having a dedicated secure browser. Can you just talk about that? It seems like the flexibility could be a plus, but is there any trade-off between control and functionality between extension and full browser? And then just curious also on your view of how critical is the browser layer to winning broader Zero Trust deals over the next couple of years?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Thank you. Very good question. So we have been offering Zero Trust Isolation solution using any standard browser for managed and unmanaged devices. Managed, no problem. Unmanaged devices means they were using their standard browser. Some customers wanted something like a device posture check on an unmanaged device. And for that, one option was you buy a full-blown enterprise browser from a third party. We looked at some of those acquisitions a couple of years ago. We did not like it. Full-blown browser with its own vulnerabilities and customers don't like one more agent, or in this case, this is one more mega agent on their endpoint. So what we found was with SquareX acquisition, we could add the security functionality such as device posture check using browser extensions on unmanaged device. It's a wonderful use case, but generally for third-party type of stuff for us. So it's a clean, better solution rather than trying to have full-blown third-party browser. And it really takes care of the gap that we have in this environment. So we think it expands our TAM. We have lots of customers who are using browser isolation. This actually will help us expand it to handle some of the third parties who will come from unmanaged devices. So very pleased with the acquisition and the fit and the early market reaction to it.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Eric Heath of KeyBanc.
Eric Heath: Maybe I wanted to come back as an extension to Gregg's earlier question thinking about AI agents. So AI agents will drive a lot of network traffic. So Jay, Kevin, just how should we think about how you can monetize that increased traffic? And Kevin, how we should think about it impacting the model over a longer time period?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Yes. Thank you. We think these agents that are growing at a pretty rapid pace will generate a fair amount of traffic. The traffic means they're going to access application A or B, or one agent is going to talk to a second agent. In order to do that, we believe the best security is that they should be going through a zero trust exchange, so that a given agent can only talk to a given agent or applications. Otherwise, imagine one infected or hijacked agent will infect the whole enterprise. That's the biggest value we bring to the table. The more agents, the more agentic traffic, the more value we deliver, and the better revenue opportunity for us. So we look at it as probably the biggest upside for growth of Zscaler business.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Matt Hedberg of RBC.
Matthew Hedberg: Strong results you're raising, Kevin, you said by more than the beat. But I just had a clarification on ARR. I just want to make sure that I'm not missing anything. It looks like you raised the ARR midpoint by $30 million. But it looks like in the disclosure, and maybe this is where I'm mistaken, but it looks like you took your Red Canary expectations up from $95 million to $135 million. So to me, that looks like a $35 million raise. So am I interpreting that right? Because I'm just not totally certain about what kind of the organic raise here is for the year.
Kevin Rubin: Yes. No, I appreciate the clarification. If you look at this on an organic basis, we are raising the organic net new from 6.7% as our initial raise in the beginning of the year to 9.5% growth for '26. So yes, there is some element of Red Canary that is mechanically inherent in the raise. But the underlying growth and strength in the organic business, giving us confidence to raise to 9.5% net new growth this year is what you're seeing fundamentally in the raised guidance. And keep in mind, just in the first half of this year, net new without Red Canary grew 10% against the backdrop of last year, where it grew 1%. So we are seeing very healthy acceleration in net new ARR growth, both first half and signaling for the back half.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Keith Bachman of BMO.
Keith Bachman: Okay. I broke up a little bit there, but I want to go ahead and ask a question about Zero Trust Everywhere. And Jay, the question for you is how significant could this be? You're at 550 customers now, you were at 130 a year ago. Two dimensions of the question are, a, what's the average ARR uplift that you experience when a customer goes to Zero Trust Everywhere? Is there some kind of lift that you could help guide us on? And then how deep do you think this could get with your installed base? What's the potential reach here?
Jagtar Chaudhry: Yes. So first of all, we are very pleased with the number of customers becoming Zero Trust Everywhere customers, the number 550 is very good, and these are enterprise customers. They are large customers out there. In terms of lift on ARR, I think we even shared last quarter that we are seeing 2x to 3x essentially move in the ARR when customers are moving to Zero Trust Everywhere, which is very good. In terms of potential out there, I can tell you, a year ago, when I was talking to customers about Zero Trust launch, which essentially replaces MPLS or SD-WAN, I was wondering how many customers will be saying, I love my SD-WAN, okay? I can tell you, I don't find any Zscaler customer. Now these are our customers. They all want to replace SD-WAN for cost reasons and for security reasons. Remember, SD-WAN enables lateral threat movement. So interest is very high in the Branch. On the Cloud side of it, too, it's a fascinating new disruptive play. We have literally no real competition other than old school firewalls and trying to do firewalls in the cloud with IP address and ACL is a nightmare. So we're seeing that traction going. So very bullish on both Zero Trust Branch and Zero Trust Cloud. So I would love to see that every Zscaler customer in a matter of time will be a Zero Trust Everywhere customer.
Operator: And that concludes our Q&A session. I would now like to turn the conference back to Jay Chaudhry, CEO, Chairman and Founder, for closing remarks.
Jagtar Chaudhry: Thank you for joining us. We look forward to seeing you at one of the investor conferences we'll be attending. Thanks again.
Operator: And this concludes today's program. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.