WTI
W&T Offshore, Inc.W&T Offshore, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas producer, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico. The company sells crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas. As of December 31, 2021, the company had working interests in 43 fields in federal and state waters; and under lease approximately 606,000 gross acres, including approximately 419,000 gross acres on the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, as well as approximately 187,
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 126.0 | 16.4 | -- | -18.9 | -- | 6.3 | -3.8 | 197.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 130.0 | 18.2 | -- | -18.2 | -- | 7.8 | -5.9 | 191.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 133.0 | 20.0 | -- | -16.0 | -- | 9.3 | -5.3 | 183.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 128.0 | 16.6 | -- | -19.2 | -- | 6.4 | -4.5 | 173.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 132.0 | 19.8 | -- | -17.2 | -- | 9.2 | -4.0 | 167.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 135.0 | 21.6 | -- | -13.5 | -- | 13.5 | -6.1 | 158.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 140.0 | 19.6 | -- | -16.8 | -- | 11.2 | -5.6 | 144.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 130.0 | 10.4 | -- | -23.4 | -- | 2.6 | -4.6 | 133.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 150.0 | 50.4 | 14.6 | -22.5 | 2.4 | -7.9 | -10.3 | 130.9 | 353.0 | 148.8 | 13.6% | 5.5x | 6.9x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 121.7 | 20.6 | -19.1 | -27.1 | 25.0 | 15.2 | -9.8 | 140.6 | 350.8 | 148.8 | -21.3% | 2.3x | 7.0x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 127.5 | 22.1 | -12.6 | -71.5 | 26.5 | 4.7 | -21.8 | 124.8 | 352.2 | 148.6 | -13.0% | 2.5x | 5.9x |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 122.4 | 12.2 | -12.9 | -20.9 | 28.0 | 35.1 | -7.2 | 120.7 | 351.8 | 147.9 | -9.1% | 1.4x | 7.2x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 129.9 | 15.6 | -8.2 | -30.6 | -3.2 | -10.4 | -7.2 | 105.9 | 351.7 | 147.6 | -4.5% | 1.6x | 6.0x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 120.3 | 31.4 | -17.0 | -23.4 | -4.3 | -18.5 | -14.1 | 109.0 | 394.8 | 147.4 | -10.9% | 3.1x | 5.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 121.4 | 2.7 | -19.0 | -36.9 | 14.8 | 5.1 | -9.7 | 126.5 | 394.1 | 147.2 | -9.9% | 0.3x | 4.5x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 142.8 | 35.2 | -6.2 | -15.4 | 37.5 | 30.7 | -6.8 | 123.4 | 393.4 | 146.9 | -2.6% | 3.5x | 3.6x |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 140.8 | 41.6 | 0.0 | -11.5 | 11.6 | -76.0 | -87.6 | 94.8 | 392.7 | 146.9 | 0.0% | 4.1x | 4.2x |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 132.3 | 52.3 | 1.8 | -0.4 | 43.0 | 24.9 | -18.2 | 173.3 | 402.9 | 146.6 | 0.7% | 5.4x | 3.8x |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 142.4 | 53.9 | 17.3 | 2.2 | 22.7 | -17.0 | -39.7 | 149.0 | 409.7 | 151.5 | 7.4% | 5.4x | 3.1x |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 126.2 | 37.1 | 0.1 | -12.1 | 26.2 | 10.5 | -15.7 | 171.6 | 416.3 | 146.5 | 0.0% | 3.6x | 2.7x |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 131.7 | 79.5 | 10.4 | 26.0 | 23.4 | 15.9 | -7.5 | 177.4 | 415.5 | 148.7 | 3.9% | 5.4x | 1.8x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 189.7 | 99.1 | 56.0 | 43.5 | 12.7 | 0.9 | -11.8 | 461.4 | 705.6 | 146.3 | 20.5% | 6.8x | 2.2x |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 266.5 | 172.2 | 138.1 | 66.7 | 89.1 | 80.8 | -8.3 | 447.1 | 713.9 | 145.9 | 53.7% | 10.2x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 273.8 | 207.1 | 162.3 | 123.4 | 210.2 | 184.7 | -25.5 | 377.7 | 721.6 | 144.5 | 62.0% | 11.4x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 191.0 | 48.9 | 97.6 | -2.5 | 27.5 | -20.1 | -47.6 | 215.5 | 732.7 | 142.9 | 53.3% | 2.5x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5.30 | — | 57.3% | 527 | 2.2× | 4.8× | 4.0× | 1.0× |
| 2023 | 3.10 | -42.2% | 41.8% | 223 | 3.8× | 24.6× | 39.2× | 1.1× |
| 2024 | 1.61 | -1.4% | 21.1% | 111 | 5.7× | n/m | n/m | 0.7× |
| 2025 | 1.62 | -4.5% | 14.1% | 70 | 7.0× | 10.9× | n/m | 0.6× |
| TTM | 3.68 | +1.4% | 20.2% | 105 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 3.68 | +0.3% | 0.1% | 1 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
W&T Offshore is a deeply distressed Gulf of Mexico E&P in harvest mode, generating modest free cash flow from legacy assets but carrying an unsustainable liability structure. The $566M in ARO, $351M in debt, negative $222M equity, and active surety litigation creating binary liquidity risk make this a poor risk/reward proposition. The business requires constant workover spending to arrest production declines, and management's strategy of paying dividends while technically insolvent raises governance concerns. While the stock trades at a seemingly cheap 7.4x EV/FCF, this is a classic value trap — the true enterprise value must include the massive ARO overhang that is not captured in standard EV calculations. Adding the $400M+ ARO to enterprise value makes the stock far more expensive on a fully-loaded basis. The 24.5% short interest reflects the market's awareness of these structural problems. Any sustained oil price weakness below $65/bbl would render the business non-viable.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
W&T Offshore (WTI) reported a strong first quarter for 2026, achieving 36,200 boe/d in production and its highest adjusted EBITDA since 2023 at $55 million. The company benefited from higher realized oil prices and an 11% reduction in lease operating expenses. W&T’s strategy continues to prioritize high-return workovers over intensive drilling, resulting in a low annual CapEx guidance of $20–$25 million. This approach, combined with $175 million in liquidity, positions the firm for potential accretive acquisitions. Operationally, management maintained full-year guidance despite a planned Q2 turnaround at Mobile Bay, which will temporarily lower production and increase costs. Regulatory tailwinds were also highlighted, specifically proposed Department of Interior rule changes that could significantly lower bonding requirements for offshore operators. Furthermore, W&T reported legal progress in a dispute with sureties, successfully resisting demands for immediate collateral and filing for damages. During the analyst Q&A, CEO Tracy Krohn emphasized the company's ability to convert 2P reserves into cash flow with minimal investment. Overall, the company presents a stable, cash-flow-focused outlook with a strong emphasis on operational efficiency and strategic growth in the Gulf of Mexico.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | $1.55/$2.25 | 701 | --/$0.15 | 390 |
| $3.00 | $1.45/$1.60 | 3,713 | $0.05/$0.15 | 658 |
| $3.50 | $0.90/$1.30 | 621 | $0.15/$0.25 | 183 |
| $4.00 | $0.65/$1.00 | 4,216 | $0.35/$0.45 | 313 |
| $4.50 | $0.55/$0.70 | 708 | $0.60/$0.75 | 117 |
| $5.00 | $0.40/$0.50 | 2,097 | $0.90/$1.05 | 37 |
| $5.50 | $0.20/$0.40 | 125 | $1.15/$1.65 | 0 |
| $6.00 | $0.15/$0.25 | 880 | $1.55/$2.10 | 1 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 24.4% of float, sold 8.7%. 8 filers moved >1% of shares (5 buying, 3 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $26.1M | $2.07 | −$291K | −$81K | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $17.5M | $3.43 | +$12.7M | +$11.0M | -0.9% | $117.03B |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | $16.6M | $3.17 | +$10.9M | +$14.3M | -0.2% | $760.93B |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $14.2M | $3.41 | +$14.2M | +$14.2M | — | $4.04T |
| MARSHALL WACE, LLP | $10.9M | $3.25 | +$10.2M | +$10.9M | +0.6% | $92.71B |
| AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC | $10.7M | $2.11 | +$140K | −$2.9M | -0.1% | $430.96B |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | $10.0M | $3.60 | +$9.9M | +$9.9M | -0.3% | $118.02B |
| VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $9.5M | $3.41 | +$9.5M | +$9.5M | — | $1.91T |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $9.1M | $3.88 | −$32K | +$2K | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $8.3M | $3.09 | +$340K | +$529K | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC | $8.1M | $1.90 | −$522K | +$5.3M | +0.7% | $645.81B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $6.5M | $2.65 | +$120K | +$4.4M | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| Huber Capital Management LLC | $5.9M | $2.84 | −$6.9M | −$17.5M | -0.2% | $647M |
| CastleKnight Management LP | $5.2M | $3.56 | +$4.9M | +$5.2M | +1.2% | $2.13B |
| Bank of New York Mellon Corp | $3.9M | $3.14 | +$364K | −$115K | -0.2% | $543.21B |
| TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $3.8M | $3.69 | +$3.1M | +$3.8M | -0.3% | $17.85B |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | $3.3M | $2.76 | +$800K | +$3.1M | -0.2% | $1.47T |
| MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | $3.2M | $2.56 | −$6.4M | −$7.3M | -0.5% | $127.40B |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $2.9M | $3.48 | +$220K | −$280K | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $2.5M | $3.09 | +$810K | +$2.1M | -0.2% | $218.19B |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 36.7%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3 | 146M | 46M | -2M | $-0.02 | $-0.02 – $-0.01 | 2 |
| 2026 Q4 | 141M | 45M | -3M | $-0.02 | $-0.02 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 143M | 45M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 130M | 41M | -4M | $-0.03 | $-0.03 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 130M | 41M | -3M | $-0.02 | $-0.02 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 138M | 44M | -0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2028 Q1 | 142M | 45M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2028 Q2 | 129M | 41M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2028 Q3 | 136M | 43M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2028 Q4 | 143M | 45M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-02 | BUY | KROHN TRACY W | director, 10 percent owner, officer: Chairman, CEO & President | 250,000 | $1.84 | $459K | $1.95M |
| 2025-10-01 | BUY | KROHN TRACY W | director, 10 percent owner, officer: Chairman, CEO & President | 36,842 | $1.84 | $68K | $1.49M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Oil and Condensate | $90.1M | +3% |
| Natural Gas, Production | $49.9M | +42% |
| Product and Service, Other | $3.1M | +37% |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
W&T Offshore: A Zombie Balance Sheet Drowning in Decommissioning Costs
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
In May 2026, W&T Offshore reported a Q1 net loss of $22.5 million ($0.15 per share), largely driven by a $24.5 million derivative loss on commodity contracts. Despite a slight revenue beat at $150 million, the stock dropped nearly 7% following the announcement due to a disappointing Q2 production outlook. Management guided for a sequential production decline in Q2 2026 (midpoint 34,300 boe/d) caused by a planned maintenance turnaround at the third-party Mobile Bay natural gas facility (Seeking Alpha, MarketBeat).
The bear case centers on persistent unprofitability and hedging drags that neutralize gains from higher oil prices. Analysts project a full-year 2026 loss of $0.22 per share. Additionally, the company faces a 'double whammy' in Q2 2026: lower production volumes and higher Lease Operating Expenses (LOE) estimated at $71–$79 million due to the Mobile Bay facility turnaround. This temporary shutdown pressures short-term cash flow and highlights the company's vulnerability to third-party infrastructure (MarketBeat, Investing.com).
Significant Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) exceed $400 million, requiring substantial annual cash outlays ($34–$42.4 million budgeted for 2026). WTI remains embroiled in escalating litigation with surety providers over demands for immediate collateral; while the District Court recently rejected the sureties' demands, the ruling is being appealed, leaving a multi-million dollar liquidity risk hanging over the balance sheet. High net debt of $220 million relative to a fluctuating EBITDA further constrains financial flexibility (Matrix BCG, Stock Titan).
As a pure-play Gulf of Mexico operator, WTI faces intense geographic concentration and regulatory pressure from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). Proposed updates to financial assurance rules could force WTI to post significant additional collateral or bonding for its offshore assets. Competitively, WTI’s strategy of acquiring aging, high-decline assets requires constant workover and recompletion spending, which may become uneconomical if service costs rise or oil prices dip below $70/bbl (Matrix BCG, Seeking Alpha).
Market sentiment is increasingly skeptical; the stock has a consensus 'Hold' rating, with Weiss Ratings issuing a 'Sell' (D-) as of April 2026. Institutional confidence appears shaken by the Q1 earnings miss on EPS, with technical indicators flashing 'Sell' signals. Investors are particularly concerned about 'hedging drag,' where derivative losses are cannibalizing the benefits of the recent rally in realized oil prices (MarketBeat, TipRanks).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-08
Operator: Sounds like the music for the Titanic. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the W&T Offshore, Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. During today's call, all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the company's prepared comments, during the question and answer session, we ask that you limit yourselves to one. This conference is being recorded and a replay will be made available on the company's website following the call. Over to Tracy W. Krohn, our Chairman and CEO. Tracy W. Krohn: Thank you, Al. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our first quarter conference call for 2026. With me today are William J. Williford, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Sameer Parasnis, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Trey Hartman, our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. They are all available to answer questions later during the call. We started 2026 on a positive note with strong operational and financial results that either met or exceeded our guidance across multiple metrics. Our production was 36 thousand 200 barrels oil equivalent per day, toward the higher end of guidance and flat with 2025 despite some adverse weather impacts in early 2026. The solid quarterly results start with our ability to maintain strong production, and we were aided by our realized prices of $45.08 per barrel oil equivalent, an increase of 26% from the fourth quarter. In March, our realized oil price was $88.61 per barrel. Additionally, our lease operating expense, LOE, was down 11% to $66 million, below the midpoint of guidance. Reductions in our LOE costs were mainly driven by lower base LOE spend, reflecting fourth quarter 2025 cost-saving initiatives that began to materialize in 2026. All these positives helped us generate $55 million in adjusted EBITDA, our highest quarterly number since 2023. We are also very pleased to have generated $21 million in free cash flow, a significant improvement from the fourth quarter of last year. Our ability to execute our strategy has delivered very strong results to start off 2026, including a healthy balance sheet and enhanced liquidity. At the end of 2026, our total debt and net debt were $351 million and $220 million, respectively. Our liquidity was $175 million. We built W&T Offshore, Inc. using a proven and successful strategy that is committed to profitability, operational execution, returning value to our stakeholders, and ensuring the safety of our employees and contractors. We have consistently delivered operationally and financially with low-decline production, meaningful EBITDA, and seamlessly integrating accretive producing property acquisitions during our nearly 45-year history. Capital expenditures in 2026 were $7 million and asset retirement settlement costs totaled $17 million. We continue to expect our full-year capital expenditures to be between $20 million and $25 million, which excludes potential acquisition opportunities. Our budget for ARO remains the same at $34 million to $42 million. Yesterday, we provided our detailed guidance for second quarter 2026 and reiterated our unchanged full-year production and cost guidance. In 2026, we have a planned third-party Mobile Bay natural gas processing facility turnaround that will impact our NGL volumes and temporarily increase our LOE. However, our full-year LOE guidance has not changed. We are forecasting the midpoint of Q2 2026 production to be around 34 thousand 300 barrels oil equivalent per day. This is a decrease of 5% compared to 2026, driven primarily by the turnaround, but the key is that we have not changed full-year guidance. Second quarter LOE is expected to be $71 million to $79 million, up from first quarter actual of $66 million, and this is due to the planned Mobile Bay turnaround as well as higher planned workover and facility maintenance work that is expected to benefit production in 2026. It is important to note that LOE expenses tend to increase and decrease seasonally, with much of the work being accomplished during warmer weather months that also produce less wind. Second quarter transportation and production taxes are expected to be between $7 million and $8 million compared with $9 million in the first quarter, which reflects some of the benefit of the new pipeline we installed for the West Delta 73 field. Second quarter cash G&A costs are expected to remain comparable to our Q1 results. I want to point out that we tend to spend significantly less than our peers in capital expenditures and choose to instead spend more dollars on low-risk, high-rate-of-return workovers and facility optimization. We believe this is a more economic way to invest our operational cash flow back into our business and it is a lower-risk option. We can then build cash flow to help us make accretive acquisitions of producing properties. Over the years, we have consistently created significant value by methodically integrating producing property acquisitions. We look for strong producing assets with meaningful reserves at an affordable price that we can integrate into our vast infrastructure. We primarily spend LOE dollars to work over, recomplete, and upgrade these assets. As a result, we often see additional production uplift from these acquisitions above the rates they were producing when purchased. This strategy makes W&T Offshore, Inc. unique, but it is our ability to execute over and over throughout the years that allows us to add value. With our low-decline production, increasing realized pricing, and continued cost control, we believe that we are well positioned operationally and financially to deliver robust results in 2026 while we examine accretive acquisition opportunities. Before closing, I would like to discuss some regulatory updates in more detail. As we mentioned in yesterday's earnings release, the Department of Interior has proposed some positive regulatory changes that would roll back obligations from a 2024 rule that would require companies to set aside about $6.9 billion in supplemental financial assurance. About $6 billion would have applied to small businesses that make up most of the operators in the Gulf. The proposed changes will better align financial assurance requirements with actual decommissioning risk and reduce industry-wide bonding costs by at least $500 million annually. These proposed revisions have been published in the Federal Register with a 60-day public comment period, which is expected to end May 15. We welcome these changes proposed by the Trump [inaudible] that can further encourage U.S. offshore production growth and increase America's energy independence. Regarding the surety litigation, I am able to report that the district court has rejected the surety's attempt to require W&T Offshore, Inc. to immediately pay their demands—I would call them ridiculous demands—for collateral. The sureties are appealing that ruling and W&T Offshore, Inc. will continue to vigorously defend our position that the surety's demands for collateral were neither appropriate nor lawful. Moreover, W&T Offshore, Inc. prevailed in virtually every respect as it relates to the surety's attempt to dismiss the claims W&T Offshore, Inc. has asserted in the lawsuit. Yesterday, the court granted W&T Offshore, Inc.'s request to file an amended lawsuit, which sets forth broader and other claims against the sureties. This case will go on. As can be reviewed in our court filings, the sureties' conduct caused W&T Offshore, Inc. to incur substantial damages and we intend to seek to remedy the conduct and obtain damages to the fullest extent of the law. In closing, I would like to thank our team at W&T Offshore, Inc. for all their efforts. We are ready and able to add significant value in 2026. W&T Offshore, Inc. has been an active, responsible, and profitable operator in the Gulf of America for over 40 years. We have a long track record of successfully integrating assets into our portfolio and we know that the Gulf of America is a world-class basin, being the second largest basin by production and the largest basin in the USA by area. We have a solid cash position and strong liquidity that enables us to continue to evaluate growth opportunities while continuing to generate strong operational cash flow and adjusted EBITDA. We will maintain our focus on operational excellence and maximizing the cash flow potential of our asset base in 2026 and beyond. Operator, we can now open the lines for questions. Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. Your first question today comes from Derrick Whitfield with Texas Capital. Please go ahead. Derrick Whitfield: Good morning, Tracy and team, and thanks for your time. Tracy W. Krohn: Good morning, Derrick. Derrick Whitfield: Starting with your guidance, while I understand you are reiterating production guidance for the full year, how would you characterize your desire to further lean into workovers in the favorable environment? Tracy W. Krohn: Yes. Well, that is always a key factor for us. We have always got a good inventory of things to do. As we have acquired assets over the years, we take the time to study them and restudy them, and that allows us to continue doing these workovers. Do expect to see some more of that. We will ramp up a little bit during the summer because the weather is better—late spring and summer, which is about now. In fact, we are moving some things around in the Gulf now to begin that process. Workovers have always been a key strong point for us, along with not only workovers but recompletions. Analyst: Great, Tracy. And then maybe shifting over to the M&A environment, I wanted to get your thoughts on the competitive landscape at present. Is it safe to assume we are in a pencils-down environment for larger packages, or are you seeing reasonable action in the market at present? Tracy W. Krohn: The company has got a very strong liquidity position right now. There has been a dearth of significant transactions for the last several years in the Gulf. We feel pretty good about where we are. We are in different data rooms almost continuously over the years. I think that there is a real good possibility that things are going to start moving around. We certainly have aspirations in that direction and intend to continue to pursue things that will fit our normal financial criteria. That criteria usually starts with cash flow, and then also what is the reserve base. What are the things that we can do to increase cash flow near term, such as workovers and recompletions and facilities upgrades, that will generate those numbers near term. Analyst: Great update. Thanks for your time. Tracy W. Krohn: Thank you, sir. Operator: And your next question comes from William Blair. Please go ahead. Analyst: Hey Tracy, this is actually Neil. Just had two quick ones for you. How are you doing? And nice to be back on the call. Tracy W. Krohn: Good, Neil. Analyst: My first question, Tracy, I know part of the upside for you all is converting a lot of the 2P to primary reserves. It seems like with the plan you have laid out, there is still a lot of that going on. Could you tell us what you think the timing of that would be? Tracy W. Krohn: The really cool part about our 2P reserves is that a lot of those reserves come to us in the form of cash and then later on booked reserves. As time moves forward, we see that first as cash flow. That is cash flow and reserves that we do not have to spend any CapEx on, and that has been a real focal point of the company over many years. It is why we have traditionally very low decline rates, and that shows up as massive amounts of cash and reserves over time. It has always seemed to have been that way for the company since we started, and I try to reiterate that to investors in just about every presentation that we do. There are additional reserves that are probables that we do have to spend some CapEx on. We look forward to doing that in the near future. We have not been doing a lot of drilling lately because we have not needed to. One of the hallmarks of the company is making sure that we try to continue the cash flow stream. If any time I can acquire reserves as opposed to drilling for them at approximately the same price, then that is what we are going to do. We are going to take the risk out of it and do that, and that is one of the reasons why we are still here after 40-something years. That is a great question, Neil. I appreciate it. Analyst: I love that upside. Secondly, as you said, not that you are going to have to go drill much, but you have a very low CapEx guide. Does that factor in the workovers that Derrick talked about? Are service costs holding in right now, or what are you seeing for service? Tracy W. Krohn: Part of that is exactly what you suggested—holding on and making judicious decisions about workovers and recompletions. Part of it is to make sure that we maintain really good liquidity. I think there will be opportunities going forward in the market for us to make additional acquisitions. Again, it is not that we do not have wells to drill. We do. We have a pretty good inventory of exploration opportunities and, in fact, even proven reserve opportunities that are substantial. It is not because we do not have inventory; it is because management, including myself, believes that opportunities to do additional acquisitions are good, and we like the way that we are positioned in this market and we have good liquidity. Analyst: Perfect. Thank you much, sir. Operator: Your next question comes from Jeff Robertson with Water Tower Research. Please go ahead. Analyst: Thank you. Tracy, just to follow up on your previous comments. W&T Offshore, Inc. has a pretty low reinvestment rate when you think about cash flow from operations in 2026, and yet production is expected to stay relatively flat for the year from where you were in the first quarter based on your midpoint guidance. To your point about the capital-light business model, is a lot of that production performance just related to, as Neil talked about, moving 2P reserves into PDP without any capital? And is that something that goes on for 2026, 2027, and beyond just based on your reserve profile and performance of your assets? Tracy W. Krohn: The short answer to that is yes. Again, with probable reserves, because of the quirks around the booking of those via the SEC, we have to wait a while before we can put them back in as proved reserves, and often those are just additions to proved producing. We get a dual effect of not only increasing the reserves, but also increasing our borrowing capacity as well. That is a double plus for us. This is normal. These are the actions of the corporation. I have done this illustration in just about every investor meeting we have ever had. I have an illustration in the deck that shows you the effects of the probable reserves and how they get to be producing reserves over time. We generally book them again as cash flow and reserves over time. It is not that we do not have inventory to drill—we do—but it is nice to have that additional bit of reserves. In Europe, they look at this as companies are valued more on the 2P basis than they are just 1P, and our regulators have been a little bit slow to do that. That has always been a complaint and I do not understand the rationale behind it. It seems ridiculous to me because we have proven it over and over again that we definitely increase reserves and cash flow over time without additional CapEx. Analyst: When you think about acquisitions, two-part question. One, are you able to buy on a 1P basis? And then secondly, you spoke about the regulatory environment and some of the things that are coming down the road. Will that have an impact on M&A activity in the Gulf of Mexico, do you think? Tracy W. Krohn: That is a pretty good two-part question, Jeff. To answer your question on 1P, it is really a bunch of different factors. It is not just necessarily 1P. We do look at the entire reserve stack, and again, we like to see acquisitions that have cash flow and a reserve base that we can forecast, but also we like to see some upside too, where we can do some work or drill some wells, that sort of thing. They are all a little bit different. In the Gulf, you have to take into consideration what are the retirement obligations. That is a very important part of what we do. We manage that very well. The company has done more plug and abandonment decommissioning on those AROs than anyone. We have spent over a billion dollars doing that decommissioning work over the years. We think that we are the expert in that market. We understand it very, very well, and that is one of the things that we always look at closely in determining value. As far as the other things that we are looking for, yes, we are in a mode where we are looking around for things that are going to fit our financial criteria, and we have been in data rooms for quite a while. Analyst: Thank you. Tracy W. Krohn: Thank you, sir. Operator: Seeing no further questions, this concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tracy W. Krohn, Chairman and CEO, for any closing remarks. Tracy W. Krohn: Thank you, operator. We appreciate everybody listening, and I look forward to every day. I never know what is going to happen with regards to the markets, and it seems that with the war in Iran, it has been a little bit more difficult to think about it in terms of going forward. On the other hand, we are very pleased that the company is doing well and positioned to do even better. Thank you for listening, and we look forward to talking to you again soon. Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.