TEAM
Atlassian CorporationAtlassian Corporation, through its subsidiaries, designs, develops, licenses, and maintains various software products worldwide. Its product portfolio includes Jira Software and Jira Work Management, a project management system that connects technical and business teams so they can better plan, organize, track and manage their work and projects; Confluence, a connected workspace that organizes knowledge across all teams to move work forward; and Trello, a collaboration and organization product t
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q3 | 2,180 | 109.0 | -- | 10.9 | -- | 697.6 | -8.7 | 4,330 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2028-Q2 | 2,000 | 70.0 | -- | -20.0 | -- | 320.0 | -10.0 | 3,632 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 1,850 | 37.0 | -- | -46.3 | -- | 222.0 | -9.3 | 3,312 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 1,880 | 56.4 | -- | -28.2 | -- | 507.6 | -9.4 | 3,090 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 1,920 | 48.0 | -- | -38.4 | -- | 576.0 | -7.7 | 2,583 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 1,750 | 17.5 | -- | -52.5 | -- | 245.0 | -8.8 | 2,007 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 1,620 | -8.1 | -- | -72.9 | -- | 162.0 | -8.1 | 1,762 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 1,655 | 8.3 | -- | -66.2 | -- | 463.4 | -6.6 | 1,600 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q3 | 1,787 | -15.0 | -56.3 | -98.4 | 567.5 | 561.3 | -6.2 | 1,136 | 1,243 | 261.0 | -11.6% | -1.1x | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q2 | 1,586 | -6.0 | -48.8 | -42.7 | 177.8 | 168.5 | -9.3 | 1,566 | 1,391 | 263.4 | -5.1% | -0.5x | 3422.6x |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 1,433 | -23.4 | -96.3 | -51.9 | 128.7 | 114.6 | -14.1 | 2,778 | 1,226 | 263.0 | -15.0% | -2.7x | 76442.4x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 1,384 | 17.2 | -28.5 | -23.9 | 375.3 | 360.3 | -15.0 | 2,937 | 1,239 | 262.9 | -4.6% | 2.1x | 2296.8x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 1,357 | 23.6 | -12.5 | -70.8 | 638.6 | 624.6 | -14.0 | 2,974 | 1,231 | 262.7 | -2.0% | 3.0x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 1,286 | -16.7 | -57.5 | -38.2 | 351.9 | 342.6 | -9.3 | 2,469 | 1,245 | 261.2 | -8.2% | -2.3x | 3517.5x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 1,188 | -0.0 | -32.0 | -123.8 | 80.5 | 74.3 | -6.2 | 2,217 | 1,245 | 260.5 | -5.8% | 0.0x | 3182.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 1,132 | -23.3 | -67.0 | -196.9 | 426.2 | 412.6 | -13.6 | 2,339 | 1,249 | 260.3 | -12.1% | -3.0x | 1796.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 1,189 | 51.7 | 17.8 | 12.8 | 565.4 | 554.9 | -10.5 | 2,112 | 1,246 | 261.8 | 2.0% | 6.1x | 1993.3x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 1,060 | -14.1 | -49.1 | -84.5 | 289.6 | 284.3 | -5.3 | 1,611 | 1,271 | 258.6 | -9.2% | -1.6x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 977.8 | 13.1 | -18.9 | -31.9 | 167.0 | 163.3 | -3.7 | 2,238 | 1,274 | 257.9 | -3.7% | 1.5x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 939.1 | -21.6 | -50.4 | -59.0 | 272.8 | 270.2 | -2.6 | 2,113 | 1,282 | 257.4 | -10.5% | -2.5x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 915.5 | -131.9 | -161.6 | -209.0 | 352.4 | 349.7 | -2.7 | 1,982 | 1,290 | 256.8 | -34.5% | -16.5x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 872.7 | -81.6 | -99.2 | -205.0 | 150.5 | 146.5 | -4.0 | 1,673 | 1,304 | 255.9 | -21.0% | -10.9x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 807.4 | 15.0 | -34.0 | -13.7 | 92.4 | 76.0 | -16.5 | 1,523 | 1,312 | 255.2 | -7.5% | 2.5x | 3826.7x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 759.8 | -37.6 | -63.3 | -105.5 | 230.4 | 205.8 | -24.7 | 1,459 | 1,314 | 254.5 | -15.2% | -5.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 740.5 | 22.7 | 32.9 | 4.7 | 334.7 | 304.2 | -30.5 | 1,281 | 1,315 | 255.7 | 7.6% | 5.5x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 688.5 | 13.1 | 23.0 | -22.3 | 203.5 | 191.1 | -12.4 | 986.0 | 1,326 | 253.0 | 5.7% | 0.6x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 614.0 | -385.8 | 56.5 | -411.2 | 65.0 | 58.1 | -6.9 | 1,602 | 1,255 | 252.1 | 17.8% | -33.5x | -- |
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
Atlassian is a high-quality franchise with strong network effects in developer/enterprise workflow tooling, but the stock faces a difficult setup. The massive SBC burden (~25% of revenue) means shareholders bear enormous dilution that makes GAAP profitability elusive even at scale. While FCF margins look healthy at ~20%, adjusting for SBC the true economic profit is minimal. Revenue growth is decelerating as the DC pull-forward fades and cloud migration matures. The AI narrative cuts both ways: Rovo adoption is encouraging, but the existential risk of seat compression from AI coding tools is real and unresolved. At ~20x EV/FCF on a TTM basis, the stock is not expensive for a high-growth SaaS name, but the quality of earnings is lower than peers due to SBC and the ongoing platform transition creates meaningful execution risk. Net insider selling is heavy and concerning. This is a hold/slight avoid — the business quality is good but the risk/reward at current levels doesn't compensate adequately for the structural uncertainties.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Atlassian reported a strong Q3 FY2026, with total revenue rising 32% to $1.8 billion and cloud revenue growing 29% to $1.1 billion. A major highlight was the Service Management business reaching a $1 billion ARR milestone, driven by a record number of competitive displacements from legacy providers. AI adoption is accelerating via the Rovo platform, which saw 20% monthly usage growth; notably, Rovo users are expanding their ARR at twice the rate of non-users. While the Data Center segment saw a $50 million revenue beat due to deal pull-forward and pricing changes, management remains focused on transitioning large enterprises to the cloud. Addressing industry-wide fears of seat compression, CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes stated that Atlassian is seeing the opposite: strong seat expansion and cross-selling into non-technical teams. CFO James Chuong highlighted a new focus on "durable, profitable growth," supported by internal AI efficiencies and improved engineering scale. Management plans to offer greater transparency into historical ARR metrics at next week's Team '26 conference to help investors better understand the core business momentum amidst accounting-related revenue volatility.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $70.00 | $17.10/$19.60 | 340 | $2.60/$2.90 | 363 |
| $75.00 | $14.90/$15.80 | 396 | $4.00/$4.40 | 743 |
| $80.00 | $11.90/$12.80 | 129 | $5.90/$6.40 | 128 |
| $85.00 | $9.30/$9.70 | 279 | $8.30/$8.80 | 171 |
| $90.00 | $7.20/$7.70 | 312 | $11.10/$11.70 | 382 |
| $95.00 | $5.60/$5.90 | 674 | $14.30/$15.00 | 331 |
| $100.00 | $4.20/$4.60 | 752 | $18.10/$19.20 | 20 |
| $105.00 | $3.00/$3.50 | 174 | $22.00/$23.10 | 6 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 11.9% of float, sold 5.0%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (2 buying, 1 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $788M | $165.11 | +$23.4M | +$28.3M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| BAILLIE GIFFORD & CO | $680M | $178.37 | +$105M | +$86.6M | -1.9% | $97.89B |
| DnB Asset Management AS | $551M | $117.85 | +$279M | +$549M | +0.4% | $28.04B |
| Pictet Asset Management Holding SA | $343M | $145.62 | +$73.7M | +$329M | -1.1% | $94.52B |
| TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $317M | $114.65 | +$255M | +$274M | -0.7% | $117.03B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $289M | $181.51 | −$40.2M | +$156M | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $283M | $169.72 | −$246M | +$166M | -0.1% | $218.19B |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $278M | $155.85 | +$5.5M | +$19.0M | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| Voyager Global Management LP | $263M | $110.14 | +$171M | +$263M | +1.6% | $2.94B |
| UBS Group AG | $194M | $124.17 | +$138M | +$132M | -0.3% | $562.11B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $174M | $149.15 | +$6.6M | +$17.0M | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS | $172M | $173.96 | +$60.2M | +$85.7M | -0.2% | $149.31B |
| UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS INC | $162M | $193.03 | −$23.4M | +$30.7M | -0.3% | $480.58B |
| FMR LLC | $161M | $156.17 | +$28.5M | +$69.6M | +0.3% | $1.89T |
| FIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP | $160M | $137.52 | +$52.3M | +$69.7M | -0.9% | $139.72B |
| T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. | $160M | $187.58 | +$29.2M | +$25.7M | -1.3% | $145.22B |
| Amundi | $146M | $193.05 | −$952K | +$60.8M | -0.2% | $366.88B |
| KBC Group NV | $98.3M | $110.54 | +$92.8M | +$69.5M | +0.5% | $39.86B |
| ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $91.7M | $156.12 | +$30.1M | +$26.8M | -0.4% | $70.48B |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | $86.9M | $190.64 | +$827K | +$50.8M | +0.1% | $118.02B |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
Top-5 holders · 30.3%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Related Stocks
Investors who own this also own
Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.
Analyst Coverage
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-19 | SELL | CHUONG JAMES | officer: Chief Financial Officer | 8,838 | $87.75 | $776K | $25.30M |
| 2026-05-19 | SELL | LIU GENE | officer: Chief Accounting Officer | 67 | $87.71 | $6K | $5.22M |
| 2026-05-19 | SELL | DUFFY BRIAN | officer: Chief Revenue Officer | 1,986 | $87.75 | $174K | $20.78M |
| 2026-05-14 | SELL | DUFFY BRIAN | officer: Chief Revenue Officer | 7,017 | $80.82 | $567K | $19.30M |
| 2026-05-14 | SELL | LIU GENE | officer: Chief Accounting Officer | 803 | $80.82 | $65K | $4.81M |
| 2026-02-19 | SELL | BINZ JOSEPH LEO | officer: Chief Financial Officer | 1,653 | $81.35 | $134K | $16.97M |
| 2026-02-19 | SELL | DUFFY BRIAN | officer: Chief Revenue Officer | 1,222 | $81.35 | $99K | $10.11M |
| 2026-02-19 | SELL | LIU GENE | officer: Chief Accounting Officer | 66 | $81.36 | $5K | $4.91M |
| 2026-02-19 | SELL | RAJAN RAJEEV BASHYAM | officer: Chief Technology Officer | 3,072 | $81.35 | $250K | $17.32M |
| 2026-02-17 | SELL | BINZ JOSEPH LEO | officer: Chief Financial Officer | 2,949 | $81.80 | $241K | $17.20M |
| 2026-02-17 | SELL | DUFFY BRIAN | officer: Chief Revenue Officer | 982 | $81.80 | $80K | $10.27M |
| 2026-02-17 | SELL | LIU GENE | officer: Chief Accounting Officer | 908 | $81.80 | $74K | $4.94M |
| 2026-02-17 | SELL | RAJAN RAJEEV BASHYAM | officer: Chief Technology Officer | 4,009 | $81.80 | $328K | $17.67M |
| 2026-02-06 | SELL | Farquhar Scott | director, 10 percent owner: | 7,665 | $94.81 | $727K | $26.16M |
| 2026-02-06 | SELL | Cannon-Brookes Michael | director, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO, Co-Founder | 7,665 | $94.81 | $727K | $26.16M |
| 2026-02-05 | SELL | Cannon-Brookes Michael | director, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO, Co-Founder | 7,665 | $102.28 | $784K | $29.01M |
| 2026-02-05 | SELL | Farquhar Scott | director, 10 percent owner: | 7,665 | $102.28 | $784K | $29.01M |
| 2026-02-04 | SELL | Cannon-Brookes Michael | director, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO, Co-Founder | 7,665 | $105.14 | $806K | $30.62M |
| 2026-02-04 | SELL | Farquhar Scott | director, 10 percent owner: | 7,665 | $105.14 | $806K | $30.62M |
| 2026-02-03 | SELL | Cannon-Brookes Michael | director, 10 percent owner, officer: CEO, Co-Founder | 7,665 | $104.04 | $797K | $31.10M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| License and Service | $1.7B | +34% |
| Product and Service, Other | $88.1M | +5% |
| Americas | $838.7M | +32% |
| EMEA | $763.4M | +34% |
| UNITED STATES | $731.4M | NEW |
| Other EMEA | $550.8M | NEW |
| GERMANY | $212.7M | NEW |
| Asia Pacific | $184.9M | +25% |
| Other Americas | $107.3M | NEW |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
ATLASSIAN CORPORATION: Standard administrative 8-K metadata reveals high compliance maturity but lacks substantive forensic detail.
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
In May 2026, Atlassian issued weak Q4 revenue guidance of $1.65B–$1.66B, falling short of analyst expectations and overshadowing a Q3 revenue beat. While Q3 2026 revenue grew to $1.79B, the company's GAAP operating loss widened to $98.4 million, signaling that the scale of growth is not yet translating into sustainable GAAP profitability (Simply Wall St, May 2026). Additionally, the stock suffered a sharp selloff in early 2026 following a Citi research note that slashed price targets due to 'pessimism on the quality of topline growth' and 'existential' AI threats (HCAMag, April 2026).
The core bear case centers on the 'AI Fear Trade': as AI-driven coding assistants (like GitHub Copilot) increase developer productivity, the total number of 'seats' required by enterprise customers could shrink, directly attacking Atlassian’s seat-based pricing model. Skeptics argue that Atlassian's terminal value is at risk if Jira and Confluence become obsolete or face heavy pricing pressure from AI tools that can replicate project tracking for less (Seeking Alpha, April 2026). Furthermore, the company’s net cash position has dwindled to roughly $0.5B following aggressive M&A, limiting its ability to support the stock through buybacks (Seeking Alpha, April 2026).
Insiders, including co-founders Scott Farquhar and Mike Cannon-Brookes, have been relentless sellers, executing over 800 sell trades in the last 6 months with zero open-market purchases, which shorts view as a lack of confidence in the current valuation (Quiver Quantitative, May 2026). Moreover, law firms like Portnoy Law and Pomerantz LLP have launched fresh investigations into potential securities fraud, alleging the company failed to disclose how emerging AI technologies were a 'direct threat' to its core offerings (HCAMag, April 2026).
Atlassian faces intensifying competition from 'all-in-one' platforms and specialized AI tools. Key threats include Microsoft (which benefits from deep GitHub/Azure integration), GitLab, and newer agile competitors like Linear and Monday.com. The most significant structural threat is the 'perceived disruption by code assistant platforms' which could bypass the need for traditional project management tools by automating the documentation and tracking of development workflows directly in the IDE (Citi via HCAMag, April 2026).
Sentiment among enterprise customers is shifting toward cautious consolidation. There are growing concerns regarding 'seat elasticity'; customers are beginning to question the necessity of high-cost, per-seat licensing in an era where AI-driven automation reduces the headcount required for manual tracking and documentation tasks (Seeking Alpha, March 2026). Analysts have noted a 'slightly lighter' cloud beat in recent quarters, suggesting that the massive migration from on-prem to cloud is maturing and organic expansion is becoming harder to come by (Piper Sandler via Investing.com, February 2026).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q3 • 2026-04-30
Operator: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Atlassian's earnings conference call for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026. This conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay on the Investor Relations section of the Atlassian website following this call. I will now hand the call over to Martin Lam, Atlassian's Head of Investor Relations. Martin Lam: Welcome to Atlassian's Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Call. Thank you for joining us today. On the call with me today, we have Atlassian's CEO and Co-Founder, Mike Cannon-Brookes; and Chief Financial Officer, James Chuong. Earlier today, we published a shareholder letter and press release with our financial results and commentary for our third quarter of fiscal year 2026. The shareholder letter is available on the Investor Relations section of our website where you will also find our other earnings-related materials, including the earnings press release and supplemental investor data sheet. As always, our shareholder letter contains management's insight and commentary for the quarter. So during the call today, we'll have brief opening remarks and then focus our time on Q&A. This call will include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If any such risks or uncertainties materialize or if any of the assumptions prove incorrect, our results could differ materially from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements we make. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements represent our management's beliefs and assumptions only as of the date such statements are made. And we undertake no obligation to update or revise such statements should they change or seek to be current. Further information on these and other factors that could affect our business performance and financial results is included in filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including the section titled Risk Factors and our most recently filed annual and quarterly reports. During today's call, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are in addition to and are not a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is available in our shareholder letter, earnings release and investor data sheet on the Investor Relations section of our website. We'd like to allow as many of you to participate in Q&A as possible. So out of respect for others on the call, we'll take one question at a time. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mike for opening remarks. Michael Cannon-Brookes: Thank you all for joining us today. As you've already read in our shareholder letter, we delivered some incredible Q3 results. Total revenue grew 32% year-over-year to $1.8 billion. Cloud revenue surpassed $1.1 billion and accelerated to 29% growth year-over-year, and RPO grew again 37% year-over-year to $4 billion. These are likely thanks to our team's excellent execution and clear momentum across our key strategic priorities: enterprise, AI and the system of work. This quarter, some of the world's largest enterprises, including Siemens Energy, Rheinmetall and Wayfair deepened and broadened their commitments to Atlassian. In AI, we continue to add millions of monthly active users to Rovo and our AI Rovo credit usage is growing more than 20% month-over-month. Customers using Rovo are also growing their ARR at roughly 2x the rate of customers who are not using Rovo, contributing to our strong cloud outperformance and expansion in the quarter. And more and more enterprises are embracing our platform-wide vision using Atlassian system of work to see the full picture of their organization. This is because the Teamwork Graph connects knowledge, work, people and code, giving our customers one of the richest enterprise context graphs in the world. Context is a clear differentiator for us. And we're saying this is our competitive momentum built. This is our largest ever quarter for competitive displacements from a major ITSM provider. We're taking it from rivals as customers move away from legacy systems and choose Atlassian for a more modern AI native and much better value service platform. As I've said before, I believe AI is one of the best things that has ever happened to Atlassian. In a world where human will run teams of agents, context is the only anchor to avoid chaos. And we believe the companies that prioritizes context will come truly AI native. With Atlassian, our customers aren't just choosing software that choosing the kind of company that they want to become. This is a time of significant change in our industry, and we're moving forward with strong conviction and discipline. We're focused on executing, delivering customer value and driving, durable profitable growth. With that, I'll pass the call to the operator for Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Arjun Bhatia from William Blair. Your first question comes from Keith Weiss from Morgan Stanley. Keith Weiss: And congratulations on a really solid Q3 print. It's great to see all these investments in all innovation really starting to come to fruition within the numbers. As it is important in getting investors more confident in the stock, I think another sort of important part of it, and I think Mike, you do a good job of this, is helping people better understand how the existing software that Atlassian brings to the equation plus AI brings a better result. And then there's one line in the shareholder letter that I thought was really interesting. When you're talking about the Teamwork Graph and how it makes the AI investments not just smarter, I mean, we've been talking a lot about context and how it makes the AI better, but you're also talking about cheaper and more valuable. So one, I was hoping you could dig into that and how the Teamwork Graph and the broader system lowers the cost of these AI investments, particularly as we're hearing more and more pushback on these credit costs were really starting to rise and the token costs starting to get really big? And then maybe a follow-up for James. Again, in the shareholder letter, you mentioned data center outperformance driven by some pull forward of some of the -- some deals from future quarters. Any kind of view you can give us into what that means for FY '27 and what we should be expecting from data center in the year ahead? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Keith, sure. Thanks for the question. Not what I expect from the start, but a great question, very, very savvy as I would expect from you. Look, the Teamwork Graph and the Atlassian platform is certainly delivering amazing results to customers. You can see that, that customers using Rovo are growing their ARR at twice the rate of non-Rovo customers. Their credit usage continues to grow strongly, with strong results of over 20% month-on-month. And they're upgrading the Teamwork Collection to get more of those credits included in the base offering, but also using many more agents, right?. And that agent usage is, I think, what you're referring to, whether that agent usage are Rovo agents or whether they're other platforms' agents that are accessing Atlassian's context with Teamwork Graph, that usage is increasing markedly. And that's the compounding effect of intelligence for customers as models continue to get better. But to really accelerate a business, the intelligence compounding is only one aspect. What you also need is the context. That is your knowledge, your work and projects and goals, understanding of your people, so your org chart, their skills and everything else, as well as knowledge of the code. We have a lot of huge announcements coming up next week at Team '26 around this area, but what you're seeing in the Teamwork Graph is the world's best context graph across all aspects of the business. So whether that's a service team, a marketing team, a technology team or a business team, bringing that context to bear in all of those AI surfaces is what's the most important. Now when we say it makes better, faster and cheaper. Why is that? Well, we have a lot of statistics and proof points that not only do you get higher quality AI answers because of our search, the Teamwork Graph, everything put together in the knowledge that we have about your business, but you also get cheaper answers. Those are cheaper answers because you use far less tokens to get to an answer in the same amount of time and fundamentally using less tokens and reduces your cost of AI or allows you to do far more AI investment, whichever way you look at it. So customers are seeing that. You're seeing that in the usage and then showing up in and financial results. James, do you want to follow on with the second half? James Chuong: Yes, Keith, thanks for the question. So on the data center side, the Q3 revenue beat, as we mentioned, was primarily driven by recognizing greater-than-expected upfront term license revenue within that quarter. Since our announcement of the data center end of life back in September, we've had a couple of quarters now to really better understand some of the signals that we're seeing from our customers in terms of their buying behaviors, especially Q3 being the largest expiry base for us. So let me unpack that a little bit more for us here. So first, I would say that the migration to the cloud is on track and continues as expected. We're pleased with what we're seeing there. We still expect that to contribute mid- to high single digits on cloud growth. And second is that the retention rates on our data center business remain incredibly robust, in fact, actually outperformed expectations in the quarter. And third, for some of our largest customers with more complex migration, they remain committed to transitioning to the cloud. But it's going to be a multiyear journey for them, right? They've got a lot of deep customizations, change management. It's going to take these customers time, right? Often many of these have tens of thousands of users, some with over 100,000 users. So this category of customers, we saw a pull forward of purchasing and expansion activity into Q3 from future periods. And we also had a pricing change in March. That further catalyzed this dynamic. So as a result, that drove greater-than-expected upfront term license revenue recognized in the quarter. In fact, relative to our expectations for Q3, we recognized approximately $50 million more in upfront term license revenue. And that's some of the trends that we've been seeing since our announcement of end of life back in September, but more pronounced in Q3 given the size of the expiry base and the pricing catalysts that I mentioned. And maybe lastly, the cohort of DC customers that are actively planning and transitioning to the cloud, we're seeing these customers moderate their seat expansion. versus historical trends we've seen. Again, I'll mention that retention rate remains incredibly high, but now expecting a more muted level of data center expansion from these customers going forward as they try to move to the cloud. We're still seeing really nice uplift when customers move from DC to cloud. So net-net, what we're seeing is that our largest strategic customers continue to deepen their commitment at lasting, whether that's on DC or cloud, and we're working hard to meet them where they are and help them accelerate that transition so they can unlock all the AI and agent capabilities in the cloud. So hopefully that gives you a little bit of color there, Keith. And maybe I'll just share that with these dynamics sort of playing out across the year on data center, with Q4 yet to play out where revenue rec is being pulled into FY '26 from FY '27, we recognize that there's lumpiness in that pull-forward effect in data center and having the timing of -- and that does impact the timing of reported revenue RPO and CRPO. So internally, of course, we look at a variety of metrics to performance manage our business, including a really healthy ARR. So next week, we're going to be holding that investor forum at our Team '26 Conference and to help guide investors through the revenue recognition timing dynamics on the data center side. We'll look to enhance our disclosures and share historical subscription ARR, which will help normalize some of those timing effects and help everyone better understand the underlying strength of the overall business. So all up, we feel really good about our execution, the runway that we still have ahead of us. So more to share next week at the TEAM event and the investor forum. Operator: Your next question comes from Arjun Bhatia from William Blair. Arjun Bhatia: Sorry about that. But congrats on the strong quarter here. I was curious on just Rovo, how you're thinking about positioning that against some of the third-party agents. It seems like you're having a lot of success in your existing customer base I'm curious, are customers evaluating other agents against Rovo? Or is this sort of an easy add-on given how integrated it is into the rest of the platform with Jira and Confluence and JSM and the rest of the suite? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Thanks, Arjun. I can take that one. Look, there are a lot of places that customers can access Rovo is maybe the simplest way to phrase it. Think of Rovo as the AI part of the Atlassian platform that shows up in all of our surfaces, whether those surfaces are on the Atlassian platform inside of Jira or Confluence, in our chat app from the mobile and the desktop or whether those surfaces are in other agent platforms, right, be that from Google, Salesforce or any of the foundation model vendors. Like we want to make sure that Atlassian's workflows, processes, the Teamwork Graph show up wherever is most relevant for the customer. Now that has required us for a number of years to push past through a huge amount of R&D work, really hard R&D work to make sure that our context graph in the Teamwork Graph is the best out there. It has the most amount of context about the organization. It's the most deeply connected. We do the inference upfront to make sure that you get those better, cheaper and faster results that we talked about, better quality answers at lower cost with that run your agents faster is an amazing offering to customers, and they're realizing that. Whether or not that happens on the Atlassian platform or off the Atlassian platform, what we want to make sure is that the customers see value in the platform overall. There is no doubt that agents existing in native context in our automation framework. If you have a huge amount of business processes running through Jira or the Service Collection, the agents that are natively integrated have the largest access to that platform and they're right in the sidebar. They appear in the Jira UI, that's a huge advantage. At the same time, we've shipped a whole series of features that allow third-party agents from Gamma and Canva to Cursor and Claude Pro in each of our different types of teams. We want to make sure that third-party agents also surface in Atlassian's context, whether that's on a Confluence whiteboard, whether that's on a Jira work item, but they all use the Teamwork Graph at the core. So customers are really seeing that. We certainly get evaluated against other platforms. I'll tell you that customer reaction is amazing. We've done a phenomenal amount of R&D to give you great quality answers. We see that in the increasing usage of our Rovo platform on and off Atlassian, both of which benefit us. And then you can see that in the customer is increasing their they see an expansion rates as well as using our AI technology. So all AI is not built equal. We build fantastic AI, and we get it into the customers' hands. That's what's most important. Operator: Your next question comes from Gregg Moskowitz from Mizuho. Gregg Moskowitz: James, welcome to Atlassian. Mike, you may recall my high level of frustration one quarter ago when after I thought it was a pretty good quarter of acceleration, your shares perceived to go materially lower -- continue to be materially lower. And I don't want to minimize that there's a lot more work to be done. But clearly, this is an impressive result. My question relates to a comment in the shareholder letter that strong seat expansion in Jira was a key driver of the cloud revenue acceleration this quarter. And given that there is so much fear about meaningful seat compression at Atlassian being on the horizon, can you unpack the drivers of the seat growth for us? And secondly, is this a dynamic that you think can be durable? James Chuong: Gregg, thanks for the question on that. Yes, on the cloud side, again, we saw strong performance reaccelerating to 29% year-on-year there. And maybe I'll start with the fact that DC migrations again to the cloud were in line with our expectations and not the realistic contributor to that $50 million beat on the print. It's progressing well, and we still expect that to contribute that mid- to single high-digit growth to cloud, like we mentioned. So the real 2 primary drivers that we talked about on the outperformance is really that cross-sell and seat expansion. . So on the cross-sell side, we saw outperformance in our collections business across Service Collection and in particular, Teamwork Collection. We have got Jira and Confluence, Loom and Rovo. And just keep in mind that right now, Teamwork Collection is really the best vehicle for our customers to buy and unlock AI and all the agent capabilities across the Atlassian platform, right? Customers are upgrading to TWC because of the increased AI credits. We're giving 10x more credits on Rovo versus the stand-alone subscription. And I'm sure Mike can touch a little bit more on some of the progress that we're seeing there. But importantly, we're also -- the other driver here is that we're seeing that growth in TWC while also seeing continued seat expansion in our core Jira stand-alone offering, right? And I think that really speaks to how an AI-driven agentic world, Jira and the Atlassian platform really remain core to enabling customers to manage their workflows and collaboration to fully unlock that value of AI. So whether it's TWC or standalone Jira offerings, we're launching a ton of new value that's really enabling our customers to deploy agents to do the work, to capture that agent activity alongside work history, full permissions and audit trails and admin governance. So a lot of great traction here, as you can see in our Q3 print. Michael Cannon-Brookes: Yes, Gregg, thanks for that and for calling it out. I hope we've been very consistent on our views in that world. We are not seeing any signal of seat compression from customers. If anything, we are seeing the opposite. We are seeing strong expansion numbers, strong cross-sell numbers between collections, strong usage of AI and strong commitment to the Atlassian platform. Many, many competitive wins, a huge amount of consolidation happening into the Teamwork Collection. So we have a lot of green lights in a lot of different places. Similarly, you can see that NRR maintained north of 120% and even ticked up again for, I think, the third or fourth quarter in a row. We have a lot of reasons why that is. Firstly, I would go to high R&D investment in just great quality software, right? That does matter. It always gets ignored in a lot of context, wrong choice of words, in a lot of quarters. But we build amazing applications that deliver great value for our customers. Secondly, the context we have in the Teamwork Graph and the critical business processes continue with AI to blur the boundaries between teams and between roles. That means our platform and our offering between service teams on one side that connect to finance and HR, marketing and in through ops teams to technology teams with business teams and leadership teams. The same context across all of those teams allows us to expand into those nontechnical roles at an increasing rate, right, which shows why we are getting that seat expansion in different collections, in different areas and just the continues in our business. Fundamentally, customers are opting for more and more workflows on the Atlassian platform. Operator: Your next question comes from Brent Thill from Jefferies. Brent Thill: Mike, you called out the largest competitive replacements. I think I don't know if you've seen or just you were mentioning that. What are you seeing? What's driving this now where you're seeing that increasing rate? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Thanks, Brent. Yes, we had a great quarter for competitive displacements, especially in the Service Collection, especially -- look, we continue to be incredibly strong in the mid-market area. As you can see from many years of investment in the enterprise pillars of our business, we are starting to go really, really strongly in the enterprise and strategic segments across service management in particular. That's not just in ITSM, although in ITSM, we are growing really strongly, it is in broader employee service management. We're seeing that -- we get the statistic of the 75% of the Fortune 500 uses Service Collection. 60% of Service Collection customers use us outside of IT on HR and marketing in other areas. This is just a fantastic example and why we're getting those competitive displacements. It was our largest quarter ever for those. And it's because, again, I would go to the quality of the software, the state with which you can get up and running on the Service Collection continues to be a strength. The high level of user experience quality continues to be a strength. The comprehensiveness of our data and the Teamwork Graph and bringing that to their Service Collection fundamentally allows you to operate those services cheaper, quicker, better answers because we have access to a better knowledge graph across your organization. And AI continues to win every which way. We're incredibly AI forward. It's one of the largest areas of usage of agents in automation and automated workflows because it allows the service teams to run more quickly. And we're only just getting started in customer service and had a great quarter in that area as well. And our asset management platform, again, assets moving into the platform as a whole, part of that overall Teamwork Graph. It's just an incredibly strong customer story. And so we're really excited about how we keep taking share in that space. And $1 billion of ARR is a great milestone. We thought it was worth celebrating. That's just a fantastic milestone for that business while continuing to grow incredibly fast. Operator: Your next question comes from Allan Verkhovski from BTIG. Allan M. Verkhovski: Mike, it's great to see the AI momentum here. I'd be curious if you could share what drove the decision to announce the data collection changes you're making? And what are you looking forward to from a product capability perspective on the other side of it? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Yes. Thanks, Allan. Look, Atlassian continues to be incredibly driven by its values and its long-term philosophy. I say that because our data collection, the largest part of that is clarifying exactly how it is that we use customer data what the data is in the different segments, I think we have an absolutely world-class policy there. We are as clear as any vendor out there about what the different categories of data are, where they are used, what the benefit is to the customer for that, and what the customers' option sets and other things are. So think of it as broadly a large clarification of what it is that happens at different points and the value that's delivered to the customer from those. The increasing usage of AI allows us to build ever more powerful features. We are seeing a lot of customers. If you look at the DX business, for example, one of the greatest advantages is being able to see how my engineering organization compares to others in my industry, compares to others of my size, et cetera, and this requires a lot of those changes. Similarly, the usage of different types of SaaS tools is how we build the Teamwork Graph. So it's all about that open company, being very clear with customers what it is, what the advantage is and trades are. And we've had, I would say, a really positive customer relationship, customer response because we put trust and openness at the core of that relationship and explaining to them what they get from that. And those usage patterns of customers are incredibly important to building fantastic software, which is our highest overall. Operator: Your next question comes from Raimo Lenschow from Barclays. Raimo Lenschow: Perfect. In your letter, you talked a lot about momentum in ITSM. Can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing there? What's driving it? And how skilled customers like how meaningful this is for you? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Sure, Raimo. Yes, we are seeing great momentum in the Service Collection, again, as I mentioned earlier, celebrating the milestone of passing $1 billion in ARR. We try in the shareholder letter to put a different focus each quarter. So last quarter, you saw us talking about the Teamwork Collection. When we passed 1 million seats and 1,000 customers, less than 6 months into that offering, so showing some momentum in that area, that continues. This quarter, we've chosen to focus on the Service Collection because of the milestone that it passed, which is a great milestone. The strength we're seeing is across the regions. So we had a great quarter in EMEA, the business, but also in the Service Collection a lot of large wins in Europe, Middle East and Asia region of increasing strategic customers and enterprise-level customers. We are seeing a big strength as we mentioned in non-IT use cases as well in the Service Collection. So that blurring of roles is really, really important to understand in the Atlassian platform and importance to business as having less -- one tool for the IT team, one tool for the employees, one tool for the HR team, our ability to connect the teams in an organization is really powerful as your organization becomes increasingly service driven. And lastly, as I mentioned, we have a huge amount of AI features that are delivering real value from AI ops in the IT area to be able to diagnose and fix problems more quickly, all the way through to how you can use Rovo as a broad platform and our increasing adoption by customers of our MCP servers and our CLR Command Line Interfaces. We'll talk a lot more about this next week, but especially in the Service Collection, you're seeing that enabling customers to get access to the contact craft it's built in their service offerings, which lets them just get, again, a fantastic results, a better value proposition for the customer and the service part of the business execute more quickly and at a lower cost. Operator: Your next question comes from Alex Zukin from Wolfe Research. Arsenije Matovic: This is Arsenije on for Alex. So Mike, what is working best with customers when adopting service and Teamwork Collections that's kind of driving that stronger cross-sell growth contribution in cloud? And then a brief follow-up, James. I think you mentioned it earlier, but when we're thinking about next year and the DC revenue growth decel comment, do you think we could get more color on how DC ARR is trending? Or clarify whether we'll get any DC ARR figure exiting the year to better understand for growth when we kind of lap some of these tougher comparison periods next year? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Thanks, Arsenije. What is working best? Good question. It's all working really well. Look, I think I've covered the Teamwork Graph as a whole and the data we have. The speed of adoption and user experience, again, we have customers that have 500-plus different service desks from a new organization, for example. The ability to get new service desks up and running with all of the data from your organization to create incredibly efficient offerings for your finance team, for your operations and workplace teams, for your HR teams, that is going really, really well. It's because of our investment in user experience overall. We continue to do really strongly in the HRSM space. So in service management around HR and other business functions that continues to be a source of strength for the service question. And our traditional connectivity between the dev team and the IT team between your technology teams and your business teams has always been a source of strength for historically for Jira Service Management, we've seen that continue to deepen and improve with the Service Collection because both of those 2 teams are getting more and more AI driven. And that AI-driven nature of things and our ability to connect different teams across the organization with a single context graph with a single AI offering and take that offering out to all of the other products that a customer uses makes all of those service-driven parts of their business just quicker to operate and faster to run. So I would say we're seeing strength across the board. And lastly, our newest addition to the service suction in customer service management, internally, we're having huge success there, right? Again, we got a statistic that more than 70% AI resolution rates are being hit internally across hundreds of thousands of conversations in our internal adoption of customer service management. So it lets us run our business more efficiently and customers are seeing that, too, as the customer service offering continues to roll out with fantastic set of features. James Chuong: Arsenije, thanks for the question. As it relates to FY '27, right now, it's too early to discuss any guide at this point, we'll, of course, provide that guidance out in August, our Q4 earnings. But as it relates to ARR, as I mentioned a little bit earlier, right, we're seeing that lumpiness in the revenue recognition in the year on the data center side. And next week, we're going to be able to share some of the historical subscription ARR across the overall business to help really smooth out those timing effects that we talked about. And I think that will give folks a better understanding of the underlying strength in the business. But maybe just as a reminder, too, for the data center end of life announcement, right, we began to recognize great upfront term license revenue and that results in greater upfront revenue recognition in the period, but there's a corresponding drawdown in RPO and in particular, CRPO as well. So it's worth sharing then that when you normalize for the impact of ASC 606 here, our RPO would have been north of 40% in the quarter, in Q3. And our CRPO would have been north of 30% year-over-year in Q3, much more in line with some of the recent trends that we're seeing, and again, underscores the strength in the backlog that we're continuing to build. Operator: Your next question comes from Fatima Boolani from Citi. Fatima Boolani: I wanted to ask you about diversifying some of your pricing strategy, collections has been a huge step in the direction of consolidating adjacent capabilities into more intuitive selling motion. But a lot of your peers in other enterprise software complex are sort of investigating or testing the path of usage-based pricing. So I'm curious what you think about that approach and particularly how pertinent it could be for the service collection, for instance, and to the extent you're A/B testing any of this with certain products, I'd love the perspective. And then a quick one for James. There has been a tremendous amount of focus on driving efficiencies in the business and is leveraging AI to help Atlassian become even more efficient. So I was curious about what type of qualitative learnings and quantifiable yields you're seeing as you more sort of move down the path of deploying AI internally? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Fatima, look, I'll take the first one on pricing and James can talk about efficiencies next so the efficiency is an incredibly important part. What does sound pricing broadly look? Our philosophy has always been to meet customers where they're at. Let me start there. Customers, in general, like the way we price our offerings and we wish to continue to be customer-led and meeting them where they are. The largest amount of value delivered today is through the seat-based pricing model. The collections have been a major transformation in how we do that, for sure. And in that, you are getting a broader amount of value that you can see there.. So we talk about that when people move to the Teamwork Collection, which we're seeing great momentum in. We talked about the cross-sell and the expansion earlier. The Teamwork collection gives you an amazing amount of software value across Jira, Confluence and Loom and all of the platform assets, goals and projects, et cetera, gives you access to Rovo, but it gives you an increased Rovo credit allowance. And we see that in the Teamwork Collection customers using more than twice as many Rovo credits per user, right? We want to make sure that we're building amazing features that use those Rovo credits, that the customers see value in using those credits. They also have more than twice as many active agents. So the Teamwork Collection comes with a larger pool credits, which customers are then using increasingly. And that's leading Rovo driving customers to have twice the ARR growth rate of non-Rovo customers, which is all a good set of long-term clients' direction and areas for us. We have a series of consumption or usage-based pricing meters now. I think we're over 10 or 12 meters from assets to customer service, index subjects, extra Rovo credits. Forge has a series of different offerings for extensibility, Bitbucket Pipelines. So I would say that we continue to be customer-led in how we deal with that pricing as long as customers continue to consume our AI offerings and continue to grow, which I believe they will. We have a great track record of doing that, growing that token usage of 20% month-on-month. is an incredible achievement by our team, and it shows value of the offerings that we are delivering. And fundamentally, it's about selling the outcome to the customer, then understanding the value that they're getting from our software. You've seen that in them broadly increasing the length of their commitment to the Atlassian platform and increasing their overall dollar-based commitment. You can see that in our strong RPO growth, as James pointed out, normalizing for the Ascend revenue recognition north of 40%, that is customers voting for the long term for the Atlassian platform with our pricing models continue to adapt to their needs underneath that. So I feel we're really strongly placed for that. James, I'll leave it to you to talk about the second half of the question. James Chuong: Yes, Fatima, as it relates to margin expansion, I think we're just in this unique opportunity right now where we're seeing a lot of demand signals, and we're going to continue to reinvest I think on the AI side, on the enterprise sales side where we see a lot of opportunity. But at the same time, we're going to do that while balancing a very disciplined fiscal approach. You saw that in the shareholder letter where we elevated driving durable, profitable growth as a strategic priority for the company, alongside AI, enterprise and system of work. So again, that margin expansion is going to come twofold through those types of efficiencies as well as continue to drive value for our customers on that top line. Michael Cannon-Brookes: Fatima, if I might just add on that. Look, we're seeing an amazing result of investments in the business, right? James talked about durable profitable growth. That's been a long-term Atlassian aim. We've run an incredibly capital-efficient business for our entire history. And I appreciate you calling out we've had some great quarters about as we look to continue the durable, profitable growth story as one of our strategic priorities. At the same time, we've had a number of wins across the R&D investments that we've had in terms of the engineering at scale. You can see that in our continued strength in our COGS numbers, in the cost of operating our platform which is an incredible achievement because that platform is operating with the larger customers that are also expanding at larger and larger scale than ever before, and we are running the platform at a cheaper and cheaper rate without any reliability hiccups. So that's a huge credit to our engineering team and the work that we've done across every level of the stack to continue to build that durable profitable business, every reason that we should do that in the future.and we're seeing that in the fantastic results that we have. So I just wanted to add on, there's an R&D story, there's a finance story, and we're feel really strong about that in terms of durable profitable future. Operator: Thank you. That's all the questions we have time for today. I will now turn the call over to Mike for some closing remarks. Mike? Michael Cannon-Brookes: Thank you all, everyone, for joining us on the call today. Thanks to the Atlassian team for a fantastic quarter. As always, to all of you, we appreciate the thoughtful questions. I believe one of our long-time friends, Keith Weiss, is retiring after this call. So Keith, thank you very much for all the questions over time in person and virtually. We appreciate your thoughtful questions, especially today. And to everyone else, hopefully, Keith, hopefully you will join us next week in Anaheim for Team '26. We have a series of incredibly exciting announcements as well as an investor forum. So whether we see you online or in-person in Anaheim, we'll see you next week. And otherwise, hope you have a kickass weekend.