Stocks/RMR

RMR

The RMR Group Inc.
Real Estate·Real Estate - Services
$19.95
$636M market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$640.2M
Free Cash Flow
$92.0M
Rev Growth
-12.6%
FCF Margin
14.4%
P/FCF
6.9x
EV/FCF
7.8x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
16.7x
Fair Value
$22.00
Upside
+10.3%

The RMR Group Inc., through its subsidiary, The RMR Group LLC, provides business and property management services in the United States. The company provides management services to its four publicly traded real estate investment trusts and three real estate operating companies. It also provides investment advisory services. The company was formerly known as REIT Management & Research Inc. and changed its name to The RMR Group Inc. in September 2015. The RMR Group Inc. was founded in 1986 and is h

2-Year Price History

$20.21+4.5%
$14$16$18$20volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q2140.07.0--2.8--11.2-2.1189.1----------
Est2028-Q1155.015.5--6.2--14.0-1.2177.9----------
Est2027-Q4145.08.0--2.9--10.2-1.5163.9----------
Est2027-Q3148.07.4--3.7--14.8-1.8153.8----------
Est2027-Q2142.06.4--2.8--12.8-2.1139.0----------
Est2027-Q1160.019.2--8.0--16.0-1.3126.2----------
Est2026-Q4148.08.9--3.7--11.8-1.8110.2----------
Est2026-Q3152.08.4--4.6--18.2-2.398.3----------
Act2026-Q2145.69.78.61.048.846.1-2.780.1157.716.813.8%3.7x4.3x
Act2026-Q1180.438.832.112.210.79.7-1.149.3158.216.746.2%--4.6x
Act2025-Q4159.414.210.93.415.614.6-1.162.3204.016.712.6%--6.9x
Act2025-Q3154.715.110.04.222.121.7-0.4121.3116.316.716.7%14.2x4.0x
Act2025-Q2166.712.47.63.613.012.3-0.7137.2112.116.612.6%14.2x4.5x
Act2025-Q1219.519.613.46.425.023.6-1.5147.6112.316.621.8%28.1x5.2x
Act2024-Q4212.720.310.25.3-5.7-6.9-1.2141.6114.316.514.2%25.9x4.8x
Act2024-Q3205.717.412.34.932.131.3-0.8208.033.916.527.0%--3.0x
Act2024-Q2218.016.112.15.95.14.3-0.8192.135.131.530.3%--2.7x
Act2024-Q1261.718.610.67.029.928.8-1.1202.436.231.523.8%--1.9x
Act2023-Q445.820.414.87.7-4.5-5.2-0.8268.030.131.536.0%--1.2x
Act2023-Q3280.263.460.924.671.670.2-1.4295.430.531.5159.9%--1.2x
Act2023-Q2208.418.617.818.514.013.1-1.0198.031.631.441.0%--3.1x
Act2023-Q149.623.320.36.328.127.2-0.9201.031.631.470.4%--2.3x
Act2022-Q451.724.821.312.011.411.2-0.2189.130.331.465.7%--3.2x
Act2022-Q353.028.425.47.639.539.2-0.3195.931.131.493.4%----
Act2022-Q249.324.421.56.415.414.9-0.5181.732.431.378.8%----
Act2022-Q1181.620.320.18.035.034.8-0.2181.933.331.369.9%----
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202221.4929.2%982.4×2.4×11.7×1.2×
202322.88+74.1%21.5%1261.3×1.5×6.9×0.7×
202417.97+53.7%8.1%725.4×6.8×18.1×0.5×
202514.48-22.0%8.8%616.5×5.6×14.8×0.4×
TTM19.95-20.4%12.2%780.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E19.95-7.1%0.1%00.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $22.00

RMR is a deeply conflicted, externally-managed REIT platform whose revenue is shrinking as its captive client base deleverages through asset sales and one major client (OPI) has gone bankrupt. The governance structure—with Adam Portnoy controlling both the manager and the managed entities—creates severe agency conflicts evidenced by the benchmark-switching to trigger $23.6M in incentive fees and the $50M SVC backstop that uses RMR shareholder capital to prop up a struggling client. While the 11.6% dividend yield looks attractive, the 130%+ payout ratio signals unsustainability. The private capital pivot is nascent and unproven against well-capitalized competitors. At ~5x EBITDA ex-cash, the stock appears cheap, but this discount is warranted given governance risk, declining AUM, and concentration in distressed commercial real estate. The stock is a value trap until private capital fundraising proves scalable or managed REIT fundamentals materially improve.

Catalyst Successful syndication of the $250M Enhanced Growth Venture or material private capital fundraising milestones would validate the strategic pivot and re-rate the stock. Alternatively, a dividend cut could paradoxically be a catalyst if it preserves capital for growth investments.
Risk The circular, related-party ecosystem means that distress at any major managed REIT (particularly SVC or DHC) could cascade into fee losses, forced capital injections, and balance sheet impairment simultaneously—a reflexive doom loop where the manager's health depends on entities it must subsidize.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
4/10
Quarter
4/10
Exp. Move
-6.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

The RMR Group Inc. reported fiscal Q2 2026 distributable earnings of $0.44 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $18.5 million, meeting the high end of its expectations. The company continues to benefit from its managed REITs, with DHC and ILPT both accruing incentive fees for 2026 following strong total shareholder returns and operational improvements. Notable milestones included anchoring SVC’s $575 million equity offering with a $50 million investment and facilitating a $1.6 billion refinancing for ILPT. RMR also expanded its private capital footprint through a $350 million multifamily acquisition in Greenwich, CT, bringing private AUM to nearly $12 billion. While private AUM growth remains a priority, management noted that global fundraising has decelerated due to geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, slowing the timeline for its $250 million Enhanced Growth Venture. Despite these headwinds, RMR maintains strong liquidity of $133 million and projected Q3 distributable earnings between $0.48 and $0.50 per share. Management emphasized the stock's attractive valuation, noting it trades at five times EBITDA when excluding cash. The company remains focused on leveraging its 20-year evergreen contracts and pursuing value-add strategies in North American residential and retail real estate.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$19.95
Market Cap$636M
Enterprise Value$713M
P/S Ratio1.0x
P/FCF6.9x
EV/FCF7.8x
FCF Margin (TTM)14.4%
FCF Yield14.5%
Dividend Yield (TTM)11.3%
Annual Dilution0.8%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$640.2M
Net Income$20.8M
Free Cash Flow$92.0M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-12.6%
EBITDA Margin12.2%
Net Margin3.2%
FCF Margin14.4%
CapEx % of Revenue0.8%
SBC % of Revenue0.0%
ROIC22.4%
WC Change % Rev2.2%
Interest Coverage21.2x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$16.42
-17.7% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$353M
− Net Debt$78M
= Fair Equity$275M
Revenue Growth-2.3% → 1.5%
FCF Margin14.4% → 10.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float3.6%
Short Shares1.0M
Days to Cover5.5
Change (vs Prior)-8.0%
Short % Float History
3.60%+2.40pp
1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)28%
Put IV (ATM)28%
ATM Spread4.5%
Call $OI (near money)$51K
Put $OI (near money)$16K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$20.0
Major Expirations1
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$10.00$9.50/$11.100--/$0.301
$12.50$7.00/$8.600--/$0.3511
$15.00$5.00/$5.6076--/$0.351
$17.50$2.35/$3.6068$0.05/$0.3580
$20.00$0.60/$1.5046$0.30/$1.1010
$22.50$0.05/$0.505$1.80/$2.950
$25.00--/$0.251$4.00/$5.600
$30.00--/$0.350$8.90/$10.600
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-6.0%
Forward FCF Margin9.8%
Forward EBITDA Margin7.1%
Forward P/FCF10.8x
Forward EV/FCF12.1x
Forward Int. Coverage3.8x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds8%
Est. Borrow Rate8.5%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x
LT Growth1.5%
LT FCF Margin10.0%

Employees

Headcount1,000
Revenue / Employee$640,193
Gross Profit / Employee$552,570
2022: 600 → 2023: 600 → 2024: 500 → 2025: 0

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 4.7% of float, sold 2.8%. 2 filers moved >1% of shares (1 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+1.9% of float (net)
Bought 4.7% · Sold 2.8%
119 filers reported (last quarter: 168)

Ownership composition

Active
20.0%(+2.8% YoY)
152 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
10.5%(-2.3% YoY)
9 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(-0.1% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
1.1%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$20.9M$21.69−$1.1M−$4.1M-0.2%$5.69T
Nantahala Capital Management, LLC$17.8M$15.71+$0+$6.4M-2.4%$1.60B
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$14.6M$15.18+$6.3M+$14.3M-0.1%$1.36T
MORGAN STANLEY$14.5M$15.33+$312K+$11.8M-0.3%$1.65T
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$13.3M$15.47+$13.3M+$13.3M$1.91T
Flat Footed LLC$12.4M$15.24+$290K+$11.6M+1.4%$300M
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$10.4M$15.47+$10.4M+$10.4M$4.04T
FEDERATED HERMES, INC.$8.2M$17.76−$763K−$182K-1.1%$61.33B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$7.2M$18.97+$154K+$370K+2.3%$1.61T
RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$6.8M$16.81−$166K−$2.7M+1.2%$63.91B
STATE STREET CORPPassive$6.2M$18.24+$154K+$463K-0.2%$2.89T
Garner Asset Management Corp$5.5M$18.40+$557K−$933K-0.2%$255M
HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$5.2M$19.90−$6.3M−$5.2M-0.1%$31.89B
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$4.7M$19.58−$156K−$1.3M-0.4%$480.92B
LINCLUDEN MANAGEMENT LTD$4.5M$22.65+$0+$0-0.7%$939M
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$2.8M$16.87+$96K+$80K-0.2%$755.34B
O'SHAUGHNESSY ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC$2.7M$16.87−$176K+$980K+0.1%$19.92B
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$2.3M$19.61+$321K−$170K-0.2%$760.93B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$2.1M$19.56−$53K+$239K+0.7%$645.81B
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.$1.7M$15.07+$1.0M+$1.7M-1.6%$7.90B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-0.34%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.34%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.13%
65 buyers · $0.04B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.18%
43 sellers · $0.01B out
alpha coverage: 87% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-18.2%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
+3.3%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
+2.9%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
-2.8%
outflows — trims may be forced
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+0.3%
Sellers' overall flow ~ flat.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-2.3%
Holder mid (any stock)
-2.5%
Holder rally (any stock)
-6.2%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

01.1M2.2M3.4M4.5M$14$17$19$21$232021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC338KNantahala Capital Management, LLC1.1MRussell Investments Group, Ltd.49KRENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC440KFEDERATED HERMES, INC.527KBANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/941KMORGAN STANLEY937KInvesco Ltd.32KROYCE & ASSOCIATES LPCITADEL ADVISORS LLC50K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
5
7
2
Buy: 5Hold: 7Sell: 2Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2025 Q2202M23M5M$0.28$0.24 – $0.321
2025 Q3214M24M4M$0.22$0.22 – $0.221
2025 Q4191M21M3M$0.18$0.18 – $0.191
2026 Q1171M19M2M$0.14$0.14 – $0.141
2026 Q2155M17M3M$0.18$0.17 – $0.181
2026 Q3158M18M3M$0.18$0.15 – $0.201
2026 Q4167M19M3M$0.20$0.19 – $0.201
2027 Q1158M18M3M$0.18$0.18 – $0.181
2027 Q2159M18M3M$0.20$0.20 – $0.211
2027 Q3161M18M3M$0.20$0.19 – $0.201

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$107.8M
Incentive & Other$2.6M
Total Compensation$110.5M
% of Revenue4.9%

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

33.5%retail+2.1pp
15.8%dark-3.3pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q2)
Reimbursements, Other$79.3M-19%
Management Service$40.7M-8%
Reimbursement, Payroll Related And Other Costs$16.8M-18%
Reimbursement, Client Company Equity Based Conpensation$2.4M+112%
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service$1.4M+22%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

RMR Group Inc.: A Captive Ecosystem Sustained by Related-Party Fees and Benchmark Manipulation

Overall Risk
7/10
Fraud
4/10
Dilution
5/10
Insolvency
3/10
Earnings Overstated
6/10
Hidden Liabilities
4/10
Legal
6/10
Audit Warnings
2/10
Hidden Upside
3/10
Contextually Acceptable
3/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

On May 6, 2026, RMR reported a significant Q2 2026 earnings miss, with an EPS of $0.05 vs. the $0.14 expected and revenue of $145.6M vs. the $182M consensus. Quarterly revenues fell 12.6% year-over-year, and net income attributable to RMR dropped to $1.0M from $3.6M the prior year. This follows a massive 46% EPS miss in Q4 2025. Additionally, the bankruptcy of one of its largest managed clients, Office Properties Income Trust (OPI), in October 2025 has forced a fee restructuring that replaces variable fees with a fixed $14M annual fee, significantly altering RMR's revenue model for that entity (Sources: MarketBeat, Investing.com, Stock Titan).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on RMR’s heavy concentration in the struggling commercial office sector and its reliance on a 'closely linked ecosystem' of managed REITs that are facing solvency and refinancing risks. AUM has declined from $40.9B to $37.1B year-over-year as managed REITs sell assets to shore up balance sheets, directly reducing RMR's base management fees. Furthermore, the company’s pivot to private capital fundraising is unproven and faces stiff competition from mega-cap asset managers during a period of rising interest expenses, which tripled to $5.3M in the latest half-year report (Sources: Seeking Alpha, Stock row, Stock Titan).

🚩 Red Flags

The most prominent red flag is the dividend payout ratio, which reached an alarming 130.43% following the latest earnings miss, raising serious questions about the sustainability of its 9.2% yield. Insider sentiment is also 'strongly negative' with zero insider buys over the last year and persistent sales from key executives. Additionally, the company’s free cash flow per share turned negative (-$0.79) in late 2025/early 2026 due to ballooning capital expenditures and working capital swings (Sources: MarketBeat, StockInvest.us, Stockrow).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

RMR faces 'internalization' risk, where managed REITs (like Diversified Healthcare Trust) bring property management in-house to save costs, which historically led RMR to slash its own headcount by 98% in a single year to maintain margins. It also faces fee compression as the broader asset management industry sees a 10-15% decline in benchmark fees, and its private credit arm (SEVN) is being squeezed by a 20% surge in originations from larger, better-capitalized private credit competitors (Sources: Stockrow, Porter’s Five Forces Analysis).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment among the 'customers' (the managed REITs and their shareholders) is poor, highlighted by the Chapter 11 filing of OPI. While DHC and ILPT have shown some recent price recovery, the historical performance of RMR-managed entities has often lagged benchmarks, leading to market skepticism regarding the alignment of interest between the manager and the managed REITs. Analysts have noted that RMR is currently 'valued like a distressed landlord' rather than an asset-light manager due to these fractured relationships (Sources: Seeking Alpha, Investing.com).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q2 • 2026-05-07

Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to The RMR Group Inc. Fiscal Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Bryan Maher, Senior Vice President. Please go ahead.
Bryan Maher: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining The RMR Group Inc.’s fiscal second quarter 2026 conference call. With me on today's call are President and CEO, Adam Portnoy; Chief Operating Officer, Matthew Paul Jordan; and Chief Financial Officer, Matthew Brown. In just a moment, we will provide details about our business and quarterly results, followed by a question-and-answer session. I would also like to note that the recording and retransmission of today's conference call is prohibited without the prior written consent of the company. Today's conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based on The RMR Group Inc.’s beliefs and expectations as of today, 05/07/2026, and actual results may differ materially from those that we project. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to forward-looking statements made in today's conference call. Additional information concerning factors that could cause differences is contained in our filings with the SEC, which can be found on our website at rmrgroup.com. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements. In addition, we may discuss non-GAAP numbers during this call including adjusted net income per share, distributable earnings, and adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation of net income determined in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to these non-GAAP figures can be found in our financial results. I will now turn the call over to Adam.
Adam Portnoy: Thanks, Bryan, and thank you all for joining us this afternoon. Yesterday, we reported second quarter results reflecting distributable earnings and adjusted EBITDA at the high end of our expectations, despite operating in what remains an unsettled economic environment. Our second quarter results were highlighted by distributable earnings of $0.44 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $18.5 million. Although we continue to navigate market volatility and geopolitical uncertainty, The RMR Group Inc. has been very active this year executing on our clients’ strategic initiatives. The markets continue to recognize our efforts as both DHC and ILPT remain among the best performing REITs in 2026 from a total shareholder return standpoint, extending the significant outperformance they each achieved in 2025. As a result, The RMR Group Inc. earned incentive fees for 2025 of $23.6 million, and we are on track to earn incentive fees again this year, as both DHC and ILPT accrued incentive fees this quarter. I would now like to go over some recent highlights at our managed REITs. Before turning the call over to Matthew Paul Jordan to provide an update on our private capital initiatives, at DHC, following the successful transition of 116 senior living communities to new operators in 2025, it has continued to focus on improving SHOP operating performance while also strengthening its balance sheet. In the first quarter, DHC generated normalized FFO of $33 million, or $0.14 per share, and adjusted EBITDA of $74 million, both exceeding analyst consensus estimates. SHOP performance showed positive momentum with year-over-year same-property NOI growth of 13.5% and occupancy increasing by 110 basis points. In March, DHC completed the sale of 13 unencumbered non-core communities for gross proceeds of approximately $23 million. Following an active 2025 in which DHC completed approximately $605 million of asset sales, we expect asset sales to decelerate in 2026 with management focused on improving NOI across the retained portfolio. Lastly, in April, Moody's upgraded DHC's debt ratings and revised its outlook to positive from stable, underscoring the company's improving operating performance and balance sheet. At SVC, we recently made significant progress improving its balance sheet and covenant ratios. The RMR Group Inc. was instrumental in helping SVC complete a $575 million equity offering, which accelerated its deleveraging strategy, eliminated near-term refinancing risk, and provided SVC additional flexibility to optimize its hotel performance and execute further asset sales. With the net proceeds, SVC eliminated all of its unsecured debt maturities until 2028. As it relates to SVC's equity offering, I would highlight that The RMR Group Inc. participated with a $50 million anchor investment, further aligning our interests with shareholders and demonstrating our confidence in SVC's business plan. Following several years of strategic capital investments to reposition the retained hotel portfolio, SVC is now transitioning toward an earnings recovery phase supported by new hotel leadership at Sonesta that is focused on improving operating performance. ILPT continues to deliver strong results with first quarter normalized FFO of $0.33 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $87 million, both exceeding the high end of management's guidance. ILPT also executed approximately 862 thousand square feet of leasing during the quarter at rental rates 26% higher than prior rents. Additionally, The RMR Group Inc. recently assisted ILPT with the refinancing of $1.6 billion of new debt for its consolidated Mountain joint venture, which replaces floating-rate and amortizing debt with interest-only fixed-rate debt at an attractive 5.7% interest rate while also extending ILPT's debt maturity profile. Seven Hills, our mortgage REIT, has been actively deploying capital from its December rights offering. During the quarter, Seven Hills originated three loans totaling $67.5 million and generated distributable earnings of $0.24 per share. Total loan commitments increased to approximately $776 million in the first quarter, achieving a record high for the portfolio. Originations thus far in 2026 are at the highest net interest margins achieved over the past four years, which reflects the benefits of our focus on middle market lending where there tends to be less competition for high-quality loans. Lastly, OPI recently received court approval for its plan of reorganization, and we expect it to emerge from bankruptcy by the end of the second quarter and for its shares to be publicly traded. We also expect The RMR Group Inc.’s contract with OPI to be consistent with our previously disclosed terms. More specifically, The RMR Group Inc. will continue managing OPI for a five-year term, with The RMR Group Inc. receiving a flat business management fee during the first two years of $14 million per year, and our property management agreement economics will remain unchanged. To conclude, we are pleased with the progress The RMR Group Inc. has made assisting our clients with their financial and strategic objectives. While there remains more work to do, we are encouraged that the markets recognize the significant improvements at both DHC and ILPT. It is important to remember that our publicly traded perpetual capital clients provide The RMR Group Inc. with stable cash flows, which we are using to pursue new growth initiatives in the private capital space. The private capital segment of our business has grown from essentially zero AUM in 2020 to nearly $12 billion today, and we anticipate this segment will be a key driver of our future revenue and earnings growth. With that, I will now turn the call over to Matthew Paul Jordan to provide added insights on our platform and private capital growth initiatives.
Matthew Paul Jordan: Thanks, Adam. As it relates to our private capital initiatives, with a global in-house sales team firmly in place, we are spending the necessary time building The RMR Group Inc. brand awareness. As an example, I recently had the privilege of joining Peter Welch, who leads our international fundraising efforts in Southeast Asia, meeting with potential partners and participating in events where The RMR Group Inc. stood side by side with larger, more well-established international brands. In aggregate, our international outreach has resulted in our leaders meeting with almost 100 global investors representing almost $7 trillion in AUM. With that said, the ongoing conflict in the Middle East has disrupted fundraising. This disruption has played out in the global fundraising data, as fundraising in 2026 dropped 50% from the same time last year. The positive news for The RMR Group Inc. is that North American real estate still garnered 65% of all dollars raised and value-add strategies represented 56% of all fundraising. Within our residential business, which today represents over $4.7 billion in value-add residential real estate across 18.5 thousand owned and managed units, in April we closed on the acquisition of a multifamily portfolio in Greenwich, Connecticut for almost $350 million. The transaction was sourced off market and marks our entry into one of the most supply constrained and affluent housing markets in the country. The RMR Group Inc. Residential will assume property management and will execute a multiyear strategy focused on modernizing the communities, enhancing the resident experience, and unlocking embedded efficiencies. The acquisition is part of a joint venture where The RMR Group Inc. is a co-general partner and, in that capacity, made a $6 million investment for a 5% ownership interest. The remaining equity of approximately $120 million was raised from two institutional partners. The RMR Group Inc. will recognize revenues from this transaction of $600 thousand in our third fiscal quarter and, as general partner, we will earn ongoing operating fees of approximately $750 thousand annually. Longer term, the venture is expected to generate annual cash-on-cash returns of approximately 7.5%, and we expect to receive carried interest from the venture as certain investment hurdles are met. Finally, the venture will not be consolidated given our ownership is limited to 5%, and a portion of our GP interest may become part of The RMR Group Inc. Enhanced Growth Venture. As it relates to the Enhanced Growth Venture, which was launched last fall with the goal of raising approximately $250 million of third-party equity, there remains significant interest in both U.S. value-add multifamily real estate and our seeded portfolio of assets. This interest has resulted in ongoing diligence with a number of potential investors, with the hope that we can provide a more meaningful update on our next earnings call. As it relates to the operating performance within our residential business, we, along with our joint venture partners, remain pleased as occupancy approaches 94%, with resident retention currently over 70% and retained residents absorbing rental rate increases of over 3%. Operating performance at these levels will continue to help with the fundraising in the highly competitive residential space. I would like to also highlight a new disclosure we have made in our investor presentation that emphasizes the discount our shares trade at when looking at our business from a sum-of-the-parts perspective. As we illustrate, if one were to back out the cash and investments held by The RMR Group Inc., our shares are currently trading at only five times the EBITDA generated from the durable cash flows associated with our 20-year evergreen management contracts from our perpetual capital vehicles. This is materially below EBITDA multiples at which our peers trade. We are hopeful this new slide illustrates the significant upside embedded in our shares. In closing, it remains an active time for our organization as we continue to invest in our people, technology, and brand awareness. We are leveraging these investments to reinvent our operating structure, materially increase productivity, and ultimately drive down operating costs to deliver meaningful EBITDA growth. With that, I will now turn the call over to Matthew Brown.
Matthew Brown: Thanks, Matt, and good afternoon, everyone. For our fiscal second quarter, we reported adjusted EBITDA of $18.5 million and distributable earnings of $0.44 per share, which exceeded or were at the high end of our guidance. I would also like to note that we reported adjusted net income of $0.11 per share, which fell $0.01 short of our guidance. Going forward, we will no longer provide guidance on adjusted net income, as our investments in leveraged real estate have significantly reduced the usefulness of this metric as we incur depreciation and interest expense on these investments. Recurring service revenues were $42 million, a sequential quarter decrease of approximately $1 million driven primarily by hotel sales, a decrease in the enterprise value of SVC and DHC as they strategically paid off debt, and the wind-down of Alaris Life's business. Next quarter, we expect recurring service revenues to increase to approximately $44 million, driven by approximately $100 thousand of revenue from the multifamily portfolio acquisition in Greenwich, Connecticut that Matt discussed, increased construction management fees, and enterprise value improvements at certain of our managed REITs. Turning to expenses, recurring cash compensation was $37.7 million, a modest sequential quarter increase driven by calendar 2026 payroll tax and benefit resets. Looking ahead to next quarter, we expect recurring cash compensation to remain consistent with the second quarter. Recurring G&A this quarter was $10.1 million after excluding $600 thousand in annual director share grants, which is a slight sequential quarter decrease driven by a reduction in normal course legal and professional fees. We expect recurring G&A to remain at these levels for the remainder of the fiscal year. It is also worth noting that this quarter's income tax rate was elevated at 22% driven by the impact of certain fair value adjustments that we recognized during the quarter, mainly our investment in Seven Hills, that are subject to different statutory rates than our income. For modeling purposes, we may continue to see fluctuations in our income tax rate each quarter as these adjustments impact the timing of tax expense recognition. However, these fluctuations are not expected to materially impact our full-year estimated tax rate of 17% to 18%. Aggregating the collective assumptions I have outlined, next quarter we expect adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $19 million to $21 million and distributable earnings to be between $0.48 and $0.50 per share. As Adam and Matt highlighted earlier, subsequent to quarter end we participated in SVC's equity offering by acquiring nearly 42 million shares for $50 million and acquired a $6 million co-GP equity interest in the Greenwich, Connecticut multifamily joint venture. Our investment in SVC will result in approximately $420 thousand incremental quarterly dividends. Accounting for these transactions, our current liquidity is approximately $133 million, including $75 million of capacity on our revolving credit facility. We continue to be well capitalized with a strong dividend and look forward to executing on our strategic objectives and taking advantage of opportunistic investments as they arise. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the line for questions.
Operator: Thank you. We will now open the call for questions. We will begin the question-and-answer session. Today's first question comes from Mitchell Bradley Germain at Citizens Bank. Please go ahead.
Mitchell Bradley Germain: Thank you for taking my question. Adam, there is a whole bunch of multifamily assets that are owned in different syndications. I am curious, is the expectation of one transaction if you can lock in a larger fund? Is the expectation that this all kind of cleans up with that, or is there the potential for some of these to just continue to remain as one-off investments?
Adam Portnoy: Hi, Mitch. Thank you for that question. It is a good question. I think you have to keep in mind part of the way you answer that question is how we put together the portfolio that is our multifamily portfolio. It is the only asset class that we manage that is 100% private. We do not have a public vehicle around multifamily. That portfolio was originally, well, mostly constructed as part of the acquisition of our residential platform about a little over two years ago. Most of those investments are in joint ventures, one-off joint ventures per investment. A few of them are small portfolios. That is how that whole business has been structured, similar to the way we bought it. I expect that we will continue to have many of those joint ventures be the form of the investments we make, especially over the short term. But I think what you are seeing in terms of the Enhanced Growth fund that Matthew Paul Jordan talked about and we have talked about on many calls is we are starting to try to put together a portfolio among the approximately $4.7 billion, which is mostly joint ventures, into, let us say, a fund that we can raise money around. So we are trying to do both. I do not think you will see a transaction that will suddenly, let us say, roll up all $4.7 billion into a new public vehicle— I am not sure if that was your question, but that is not where we are going with that. It is likely to all stay private, likely to continue to be joint ventures, one-offs, small portfolio joint ventures, and our hope is that we can start to build a more dedicated fund around that strategy as well.
Mitchell Bradley Germain: Taking that a little bit further, I think the last couple of quarters you seemed a little bit more positive on a potential venture in, I guess we will call it commercial mortgage, as well as, I think, you have mentioned development. Are those two products just a little bit behind multifamily right now with regards to your priorities?
Adam Portnoy: They are all top priorities. I will tell you, we are continuing to talk to investors and partners about development projects. I think in the current market environment, the returns required for development projects are pretty high. Development is always difficult when you have a lot of uncertainty, and it is hard to predict the next quarter, let alone 18 months from now, which is typically what you have to sign off on for development projects. So we are continuing to work on those. I expect we will, in the course of the year or so, have some joint venture development projects underway. It is just that today, in the multifamily space, with the portfolio that we have assembled, we are generating the highest amount of interest around that. One comment on the credit that you mentioned, Mitch. We are also very active in talking to investors around credit as well. I would not say it is less of a priority, but we have a lot of money to put out in our Seven Hills mortgage REIT right now, and I think the number is close to $500 million of capacity over the next year of new investments that we are going to be able to make between new money coming into that vehicle and expected loan payoffs. So we have a pretty good pipeline and capacity with our existing vehicles there. We are still talking to investors around credit. There has been a general pullback around credit, given what is going on in the marketplace around some other funds that are in the credit space, especially retail-oriented funds, and so there has been some hesitancy among investors to take those conversations further at the moment. But that is okay from our perspective because we can do a lot of work there anyway. We can put a lot of AUM to work otherwise.
Mitchell Bradley Germain: Gotcha. Last one for me. I think at one point you might have had close to $300 million of cash on hand. I think that, obviously, that balance has come down a bit as you are buying some of these assets and warehousing them on balance sheet in anticipation of some of your fundraising. Where are you with regards to how much cash you want to keep on hand for some sort of rainy day? Are we getting close to an amount where you are starting to become a little bit more conservative with allocating capital, or are you still all systems go if the right opportunities are presented?
Adam Portnoy: More the “all systems go” if the right opportunities present themselves. We have over $100 million of liquidity between cash on hand and undrawn capacity on our revolver. We are also fairly optimistic that we will be getting some cash back, especially as we are hopefully successful in syndicating the Enhanced Growth value-add fund that we have built up around the multifamily strategy. We have just under $100 million of capital committed to that venture, and if we are successful in syndicating that and getting that fund launched— and we are optimistic that we will get it done— a lot of cash will also be coming back to us, we think. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from Christopher Nolan at Ladenburg Thalmann. Please go ahead.
Christopher Nolan: Hi, guys. Adam, is Seven Hills participating in the Greenwich project, providing debt financing?
Adam Portnoy: Hi, Chris. No. Seven Hills is not providing any sort of financing with the multifamily acquisition in Greenwich. No.
Christopher Nolan: And then, I guess, Matthew Brown, did you say adjusted EBITDA in the next quarter will be $19 million to $21 million, or did I mishear you?
Matthew Brown: Adjusted EBITDA in the fiscal third quarter is expected to be $19 million to $21 million.
Christopher Nolan: Great. I guess as a follow-up in general, Adam, how would you characterize the market for raising equity for commercial real estate as opposed to raising debt for commercial real estate?
Adam Portnoy: It is a great question. First, I am going to let Matthew Paul Jordan answer that question. Go ahead, Matt.
Matthew Paul Jordan: Well, in terms of the debt, there is a lot of debt available to lend against real estate. We have no lack of interest— just having done this on the Greenwich asset. Adam touched on fundraising around credit, which is very challenging right now for a number of reasons, including a lot of supply in the market in terms of organizations like ours going out with credit vehicles. Fundraising for equity is a very challenging effort right now. The volatility in the Middle East has taken a large number of folks that were putting a lot of money out and put them on the sidelines. Volatility is not a good thing for those that are fiduciaries of deploying capital. The money and the allocations to real estate will be there in the long term, but right now a lot of the conversations we have had are continuing but have slowed significantly. And to Adam's point on the Enhanced Growth venture, I just think it is elongating the fundraising cycle for what we are doing. But there continue to be significant allocations— as we highlighted, we have met with a significant number of global LPs. The RMR Group Inc. itself is still a new brand, so we are spending a lot of time getting our name out there. People are amazed at the capabilities we bring and the breadth of our organization. But things are just going to take longer until the Middle East settles down.
Christopher Nolan: Okay. And then I guess as a final question, you are seeing with some private equity shops that they are setting up distressed commercial real estate funds. Is that a potential strategy that you would consider? In my view, that tends to be preparing for some sort of, you know, down cycle.
Adam Portnoy: Chris, it is not something we are actively pursuing at the moment in terms of setting up a distressed real estate fund. We have limited pockets within The RMR Group Inc., in the different funds that we manage and groups, that if a really attractive distressed opportunity presented itself to us, we could seriously consider executing on it. But we are not building out a strategy around that today.
Christopher Nolan: Okay. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. And our next question today comes from John James Massocca at B. Riley. Please go ahead.
John James Massocca: Maybe sticking with the big-picture fundraising theme, you have seen some pullback in some other types of credit funds, private lending being the most notable. Are you seeing any indications of that capital potentially being reallocated to things that are a little more tangible like real estate, or is that just an unrelated phenomenon in your mind?
Matthew Paul Jordan: Yeah. I do not think they are related. It is interesting— when you meet with LPs, lending may not even sit in the real estate bucket. It may be in fixed income and other pockets within these large organizations. So we have not yet experienced where credit allocations have been redeployed in a way that has benefited us on the equity side.
John James Massocca: Okay. And maybe switching gears a little bit, going back to a little bit of Mitch's last question, what is the appetite today for more wholly owned assets, or at least consolidated assets on balance sheet, to help create the base for funding either the multifamily-focused fund or even maybe a retail fund going forward? Just kind of curious if you think you are at a good point in terms of the wholly owned assets you have today, or if there is more capacity to continue to add to that?
Adam Portnoy: Yeah. I think there is a little more capacity to add to it. I do not think we will be adding— until we are successful syndicating the Enhanced Growth venture— wholly owned multifamily assets on the balance sheet. But you mentioned retail. Retail is an area that we could maybe add a couple more assets to the balance sheet if it was the right type of asset. So that is an area that you could see us do some more asset-level acquisitions on The RMR Group Inc. balance sheet to help get that retail strategy further along.
John James Massocca: Okay. And then thinking about the quarterly financials, you predicted a little bit— construction supervision revenues were down pretty big, certainly quarter over quarter, but even year over year. How much of that is just the new normal, how much is maybe one-off, and how much is seasonality? Any color on how you would expect that to trend over the remainder of the year?
Matthew Brown: Yes. When you look at our construction management fee revenue sequentially, it is really just driven by the start of the year generally being a little bit slower for us as budgets are reset. As we look year over year, at some of our managed public vehicles we had some pretty extensive capital improvement projects going on— mainly within DHC and SVC— that have largely wound down. Those REITs are now forecasting less capital spend in 2026 than they were. We do expect a little bit of a ramp next quarter as we progress throughout the year.
John James Massocca: But maybe the year-over-year decline as you think about comparing it to the comparable quarter in 2025 is kind of a good way to think about it going forward?
Matthew Brown: Yeah, I think that is a good run rate.
Operator: Thank you. And that does conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to President and CEO, Adam Portnoy, for any closing remarks.
Adam Portnoy: Thank you all for joining our call today. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming industry conferences, including NAREIT in June, and we encourage institutional investors to contact The RMR Group Inc. Investor Relations if you would like to schedule a meeting with management. Operator, that concludes our call.
Operator: Yes, sir. Thank you very much, and we thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.