Stocks/RES

RES

RPC, Inc.
Energy·Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
$6.62
$1.5B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$1.7B
Free Cash Flow
$44.4M
Rev Growth
+36.6%
FCF Margin
2.5%
P/FCF
33.0x
EV/FCF
30.2x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
6.1x
Fair Value
$5.25
Upside
-20.7%

RPC, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides a range of oilfield services and equipment for the oil and gas companies involved in the exploration, production, and development of oil and gas properties. The company operates through Technical Services and Support Services segments. The Technical Services segment offers pressure pumping, fracturing, acidizing, cementing, downhole tools, coiled tubing, snubbing, nitrogen, well control, wireline, pump down, and fishing services that are used in the

2-Year Price History

$7.06+15.2%
$5.0$6.0$7.0volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q1440.055.0--6.6--8.8-30.8318.9----------
Est2027-Q4430.051.6--6.5--23.7-30.1310.1----------
Est2027-Q3455.063.7--13.7--18.2-34.1286.5----------
Est2027-Q2450.060.8--11.3--15.8-33.8268.3----------
Est2027-Q1435.047.9--2.2--4.4-30.5252.5----------
Est2026-Q4440.050.6--2.2--22.0-33.0248.2----------
Est2026-Q3460.062.1--11.5--13.8-39.1226.2----------
Est2026-Q2465.060.5--9.3--11.6-37.2212.4----------
Act2026-Q1454.851.08.10.931.2-0.9-32.1200.774.7221.33.5%61.4x6.1x
Act2025-Q4425.842.28.1-3.161.931.2-30.6210.095.2212.33.3%44.8x4.2x
Act2025-Q3447.169.920.813.046.54.1-42.5163.581.0219.08.5%21.7x4.3x
Act2025-Q2420.862.215.510.253.110.0-43.1162.181.1218.26.3%61.8x5.5x
Act2025-Q1332.946.512.412.039.97.6-32.3326.730.9211.95.5%354.8x4.8x
Act2024-Q4335.443.910.512.894.253.7-40.5326.032.9215.06.2%337.4x5.0x
Act2024-Q3337.752.519.218.870.719.1-51.7276.934.3211.39.8%200.9x4.1x
Act2024-Q2364.264.535.532.4127.952.9-75.0261.528.3211.219.4%651.1x5.6x
Act2024-Q1377.861.132.427.556.63.8-52.8212.227.3211.716.9%261.3x4.5x
Act2023-Q4394.577.049.240.395.663.4-32.2223.327.2216.026.2%810.6x4.5x
Act2023-Q3330.449.322.718.3121.677.3-44.3171.927.9212.811.8%488.3x3.3x
Act2023-Q2415.9106.582.465.045.05.9-39.2100.528.8213.445.2%1458.5x3.5x
Act2023-Q1476.7129.290.771.5132.567.2-65.3177.930.2213.755.7%1794.7x3.7x
Act2022-Q4482.0135.3112.387.0160.4111.0-49.3126.430.3216.679.5%1904.9x4.2x
Act2022-Q3459.6111.692.269.3-1.9-41.6-39.735.923.1213.480.2%780.2x--
Act2022-Q2375.578.760.446.934.63.1-31.578.245.7213.461.6%354.6x--
Act2022-Q1284.639.623.015.18.3-10.8-19.173.247.9213.322.9%222.2x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
20228.1822.8%3654.2×24.5×7.4×1.0×
20236.84+1.0%22.4%3624.5×7.5×9.3×1.1×
20245.72-12.5%15.7%2225.0×8.5×15.3×1.0×
20255.40+14.9%13.6%2214.2×17.5×32.5×0.6×
TTM6.62+27.6%12.9%2250.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E6.62+1.2%0.1%20.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $5.25

RPC is a well-managed oilfield services company with a fortress balance sheet and zero debt, but the business is trapped in a cyclical margin trough with no clear catalyst for recovery. EBITDA margins have compressed from the high-20s% to low-teens%, and FCF generation has nearly evaporated despite revenue growth from the Pintail acquisition. At 78x trailing P/E and 31x EV/FCF, the stock is priced for a margin recovery that is unlikely to materialize in the near term given persistent overcapacity in pressure pumping, cautious operator spending, and potential oil price headwinds from geopolitical de-escalation. The 14.6% short interest reflects legitimate fundamental concerns. While the proprietary technology portfolio (Metal Max, A10 motor) and diversification strategy are sound long-term, they are insufficient to offset the structural headwinds in the core pressure pumping business at current pricing levels. The stock needs either significantly higher oil prices or meaningful industry consolidation to work.

Catalyst A sustained move in WTI above $75-80 would drive operator budget increases and pricing recovery in pressure pumping; alternatively, further industry consolidation reducing overcapacity could restore pricing power. Short squeeze potential exists given 14.6% short interest and 7 days to cover.
Risk Oil prices declining below $55/bbl would trigger further activity reductions and pricing pressure, potentially pushing RPC into quarterly losses and forcing dividend cuts, while the high short interest could accelerate any selloff.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
7/10
Quarter
4/10
Exp. Move
-4.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

RPC, Inc. delivered a solid first quarter in 2026, with revenues rising 7% sequentially to $455 million. The growth was led by Thru Tubing Solutions and pressure pumping, though the latter's gains were largely driven by job mix and pass-through costs. Technical Services continues to dominate the portfolio, contributing 95% of revenue. Despite the revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA margins decreased to 11.8% due to higher input costs and accounting transitions. Management maintains a fortress balance sheet with $201 million in cash and no revolver debt. Strategic highlights include the growing adoption of Metal Max downhole tools and the expansion into regulated gas storage maintenance via new snubbing units. RPC remains disciplined regarding fleet expansion; they will not reactivate stacked Tier 2 diesel fleets until pricing improves and provides clear visibility on long-term returns. While higher oil prices are viewed as incrementally positive, management noted that operator caution persists and broad-based pricing power has yet to materialize. The company raised the low end of its 2026 CapEx guidance to $160-$180 million. The outlook for the remainder of the year is cautiously optimistic, contingent on commodity price stability and industry discipline.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$6.62
Market Cap$1.5B
Enterprise Value$1.3B
P/S Ratio0.8x
P/FCF33.0x
EV/FCF30.2x
FCF Margin (TTM)2.5%
FCF Yield3.0%
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.4%
Annual Dilution4.4%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$1.7B
Net Income$20.9M
Free Cash Flow$44.4M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+36.6%
EBITDA Margin12.9%
Net Margin1.2%
FCF Margin2.5%
CapEx % of Revenue8.5%
SBC % of Revenue0.4%
ROIC5.4%
WC Change % Rev-3.5%
Interest Coverage37.5x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$2.64
-60.1% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$459M
− Net Debt$-126M
= Fair Equity$585M
Revenue Growth-1.4% → 2.0%
FCF Margin2.5% → 8.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float9.3%
Short Shares10.2M
Days to Cover3.9
Change (vs Prior)-28.4%
Short % Float History
9.30%-6.80pp
10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)44%
Put IV (ATM)49%
ATM Spread2.1%
Call $OI (near money)$35K
Put $OI (near money)$20K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$7.5
Major Expirations2
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50$4.00/$5.200--/$0.750
$5.00$1.80/$2.550--/$0.750
$7.50$0.25/$0.4031$0.70/$0.854
$10.00--/$0.750$2.30/$3.500
$12.50--/$0.750$4.80/$6.000
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+2.9%
Forward FCF Margin2.9%
Forward EBITDA Margin12.3%
Forward P/FCF28.3x
Forward EV/FCF25.9x
Forward Int. Coverage61.4x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds1%
Est. Borrow Rate5.5%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x
LT Growth2.0%
LT FCF Margin8.0%

Employees

Headcount2,597
Revenue / Employee$673,255
Gross Profit / Employee$76,945
2022: 2,732 → 2023: 2,691 → 2024: 2,597 → 2025: 2,893 (2% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 10.5% of float, sold 4.2%.

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+6.3% of float (net)
Bought 10.5% · Sold 4.2%
135 filers reported (last quarter: 219)

Ownership composition

Active
22.6%(+6.3% YoY)
203 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
20.6%(+5.3% YoY)
13 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.0%(-0.3% YoY)
5 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
40.1%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$103M$6.06+$1.9M+$4.6M-0.2%$5.69T
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$88.8M$6.96+$6.3M+$4.1M-0.4%$480.92B
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$46.1M$7.08+$46.1M+$46.1M$1.91T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$30.1M$7.51+$1.4M+$582K-0.2%$2.89T
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$29.9M$7.08+$29.9M+$29.9M$4.04T
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$29.5M$6.26+$983K+$5.5M+0.7%$193.48B
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP$24.5M$7.16+$6.7M+$10.9M+0.8%$133.17B
GAMCO INVESTORS, INC. ET AL$20.5M$5.72−$355K−$1.3M-0.0%$10.15B
IES Holdings, Inc.$17.8M$5.40−$624K+$17.8M+27.2%$214M
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$17.7M$6.73+$12.1M+$14.2M-0.9%$117.03B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$15.6M$6.87+$534K+$1.5M+2.3%$1.61T
GABELLI FUNDS LLC$15.4M$7.87−$9K−$676K-0.2%$14.68B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$14.1M$6.71+$1.2M+$857K+0.7%$645.81B
MORGAN STANLEY$13.8M$6.24+$2.7M+$2.9M-0.3%$1.65T
BRIDGEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC$12.1M$7.21+$213K+$143K-2.3%$4.93B
SIR Capital Management, L.P.$11.3M$7.08+$9.5M+$11.3M$1.07B
Bank of New York Mellon Corp$11.3M$7.28+$71K−$548K-0.2%$543.21B
Invesco Ltd.$10.6M$7.18+$2.9M+$4.9M-0.2%$652.04B
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$10.6M$5.90−$2.1M+$3.5M-0.1%$1.36T
CONGRESS ASSET MANAGEMENT CO$10.3M$6.88+$1.3M+$10.3M-0.4%$13.95B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BULLISH
Holders
+1.37%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
+1.38%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.04%
103 buyers · $0.25B in
Sellers (this Q)
-15.19%
71 sellers · $0.01B out
alpha coverage: 88% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-9.7%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-16.6%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-5.8%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+3.8%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+14.6%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
+0.9%
Holder mid (any stock)
-1.0%
Holder rally (any stock)
-6.3%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

07.0M14.0M20.9M27.9M$4.62$5.91$7.20$8.48$9.772021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP3.5MPacer Advisors, Inc.MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC276KGAMCO INVESTORS, INC. ET AL2.9MAMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC4.2MGABELLI FUNDS LLC2.2MVICTORY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC51KIES Holdings, Inc.2.5MTWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP2.5MCITADEL ADVISORS LLC390K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (1 analysts)$7.501330.0%
Last Year (3 analysts)$6.17-680.0%
Current Price$6.62
Analyst Ratings
8
23
5
Buy: 8Hold: 23Sell: 5Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2025 Q3407M68M14M$0.07$0.06 – $0.072
2025 Q4425M71M14M$0.07$0.06 – $0.073
2026 Q1407M68M6M$0.03$0.03 – $0.033
2026 Q2454M76M9M$0.04$0.04 – $0.042
2026 Q3456M76M14M$0.06$0.06 – $0.072
2026 Q4441M74M12M$0.06$0.05 – $0.061
2027 Q1426M71M9M$0.04$0.04 – $0.041
2027 Q2469M78M14M$0.07$0.06 – $0.071
2027 Q3484M81M15M$0.07$0.07 – $0.071
2027 Q4455M76M12M$0.06$0.05 – $0.061

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$23.0M
Incentive & Other$8.1M
Total Compensation$31.1M
% of Revenue0.7%

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

17.0%retail-0.4pp
25.0%dark+1.4pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%15%20%25%30%35%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Technical Services$434.3M+39%
Support Services$20.5M-3%
By Geography (2026-Q1)
UNITED STATES$448.0MNEW
Non-US$6.8MNEW

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

RPC, INC.: Registration Shell Offers Zero Forensic Visibility into Operational Health

Overall Risk
1/10
Fraud
1/10
Dilution
1/10
Insolvency
1/10
Earnings Overstated
1/10
Hidden Liabilities
1/10
Legal
1/10
Audit Warnings
1/10
Hidden Upside
1/10
Contextually Acceptable
10/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

On May 7, 2026, RPC's stock fell over 6% following Q1 2026 earnings. Despite beating revenue estimates ($454.8M vs. $406M), the market reacted negatively to contracting profitability. Adjusted EBITDA margins dropped to 11.8% (down 290 bps year-over-year), and the company reported negative free cash flow of $932,000, a stark reversal from the $7.6M positive FCF in the prior year (Source: TradingView, Investing.com).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on a valuation/execution gap. RES trades at a P/E ratio of approximately 78.6x—nearly triple the energy services industry average of 26.9x—despite trailing twelve-month profit margins slipping to a razor-thin 1.1%. Analysts argue that the bullish 'margin rebuild' narrative is overly optimistic, as it relies on equipment upgrades and technological adoption (like the A10 motor) that have yet to offset rising fuel and material costs (Source: Simply Wall St).

🚩 Red Flags

Significant financial and market red flags include a high short interest of 15.54% of the float as of mid-April 2026, suggesting professional skepticism. Furthermore, the company's $0.04 quarterly dividend is currently not well covered by earnings, and the 'Adjusted EPS' often strips out recurring 'one-off' costs like the $13.8M wireline cable adjustments and $7.3M in acquisition-related employment expenses (Source: MarketBeat, PR Newswire).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

RPC faces severe pricing pressure in its core pressure pumping and wireline segments. A specific technological threat is the shift toward 'simul-frac' work, which can reduce the required material per job, potentially cannibalizing revenue. Additionally, de-escalation of geopolitical tensions (e.g., reported peace talk proposals involving Iran in May 2026) has led to falling crude prices, directly threatening the demand for RPC's technical services (Source: Simply Wall St, TradingView).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Customer sentiment appears strained by macro uncertainties. Management reported 'customer budget exhaustion' and delays in projects, particularly within the pressure pumping segment. While demand for specialized downhole tools is growing, the broader customer base is remains sensitive to commodity price volatility, leading to regional weakness in segments like Cudd Pressure Control (Source: Stock Titan, Motley Fool).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-07

Operator: Good morning, and thank you for joining us for the RPC, Inc. First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call will be hosted by Ben Palmer, President and CEO; and Mike Schmit, Chief Financial Officer. [Operator Instructions] I would like to advise everyone that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Schmit.
Michael Schmit: Thank you, and good morning. Before we begin, I want to remind you that some of the statements that will be made on this call could be forward-looking in nature and reflect a number of known and unknown risks. Please refer to our press release issued today, along with our 10-K and other public filings that outline those risks, all of which can be found on RPC's website at www.rpc.net. In today's earnings release and conference call, we'll be referring to several non-GAAP measures of operating performance and liquidity. We believe these non-GAAP measures allow us to compare performance consistently over various periods. Our press release and our website contain reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. I'll now turn the call over to our President and CEO, Ben Palmer.
Ben Palmer: Thank you, Mike, and thank you for joining our call this morning. Today, we'll talk about our first quarter results and provide you with a few operational highlights. First quarter results reflect a sequential revenue increase across the majority of our service lines despite the winter storms early in the quarter. Demand strengthened as the quarter progressed.  Within Technical Services, Thru Tubing Solutions' downhole tools revenues increased 11% sequentially. We saw broad-based strength with most geographic regions growing double digits. Thru Tubing Solutions is a market leader in downhole completion tools with a portfolio of products supported by proprietary technologies. We have introduced a number of new products in recent years that have helped expand our market leadership position. Thru Tubing Solutions continues the rollout of its new metal-on-metal power section, Metal Max. Adoption is accelerating with growth across both geographic markets and motor size offerings as inventory availability expands. Metal Max's performance and design characteristics are enabling entry into new markets and applications previously served by traditional power section components. Over the past 6 months, Metal Max has strategically displaced conventional power sections, but still only represents 15% of our power section utilization. We continue to see meaningful opportunities for further displacement as customers increasingly recognize the product's performance and value. Thru Tubing Solutions' on-plug technology, which replaces traditional bridge plugs is picking up momentum with several operators opting to utilize the technology as their primary stage isolation method. We are also seeing success with our new surface vibratory technology, particularly in longer laterals. Overall, our downhole tools business is benefiting from longer laterals and the need for technologies to deal with the related completion challenges. Also within Technical Services, Cudd Pressure Control's revenues were down 7% sequentially, led by weakness in the Rockies region and tough comparables in well control as the fourth quarter had multiple large well control events. This was partially offset by nitrogen, which was up 13% and snubbing, which was up 8% as equipment was well utilized during the quarter. Cudd Pressure Control's snubbing business is expected to receive and begin testing the big bore snubbing unit later this month. This unit was specifically designed for cavern gas storage work and was built to support a long-term customer with its storage well maintenance schedule. This work is regulatory driven and is part of our effort to continue diversifying into other markets. Coiled tubing our largest service line within Cudd Pressure Control was down 7% sequentially. Coiled tubing faced tough comparables in the Rockies and Northeast regions. Our new 2 7/8-inch unit continues to be well utilized. And we are upgrading an existing unit to handle the larger 2 7/8-inch tubing. Pintail Completions, the largest wireline provider in the Permian Basin generated revenues that were relatively flat sequentially. Given our leading market position, we expect Pintail's business to trend closely with large Permian operator activity. Cudd Energy Services' pressure pumping business saw a 20% sequential revenue increase due to job mix, primarily from operators, and we provided materials and supplies, along with fuel during the quarter. We have no plans to reactivate fleets at current pricing levels, but we are cautiously optimistic based on higher oil prices and less calendar white space. However, natural gas takeaway capacity, particularly in the New Mexico, could limit improvement in customer activity. Overall, we see recent geopolitical developments as incrementally positive as pricing pressures appear to be subsiding and current activity is being supported by higher commodity prices. However, we believe operators are cautious and concerned about the duration of higher crude prices and the perception of capital budget increases in the equity market. As such, we have only seen modest responses by customers since the Middle East events began. Our focus remains on full cycle returns, but our balance sheet affords us the optionality of leaning into certain markets where we see additional upside. We will continue to evaluate these opportunities with our focus being on cash flow generation and maximizing value over the long term. And with that, Mike will now discuss the quarter's financial results.
Michael Schmit: Thanks, Ben. Our first quarter financial results, with sequential comparisons to the fourth quarter of 2025 are as follows:  Revenues increased 7% to $455 million compared to Q4 '25. Breaking down our operating segments, Technical Services, which represented 95% of our first quarter revenues was up 7%. Support Services, which represented 5% of revenues was flat. The following is a breakdown of our first quarter revenues for our largest service lines. Pressure pumping was 31%, downhole tools was 23.3%, wireline 22.7%; coiled tubing 8.5%, cementing 5.8% and rental tools 3%. Together, these service lines accounted for 94% of our total revenues. Cost of revenues, excluding depreciation and amortization was $356 million compared to $330 million in the previous quarter. This increase was primarily related to job mix as we provided higher levels of materials and supplies and fuel for customers during the quarter. In addition, the prior period also reflected the impact of transitioning wireline cables accounting to expensing. SG&A expenses were $48 million, up slightly from the prior quarter. As a percent of revenues, SG&A decreased 60 basis points to 10.6%, primarily due to only a modest increase in SG&A with the increase in revenues. Depreciation and amortization was $43 million, up from $39 million in the prior quarter. Fourth quarter D&A reflected a $3 million reduction related to the change in wireline cable accounting. The effective tax rate was unusually high during the quarter due to the disproportionate impact of permanent nondeductible items, mainly acquisition-related employment costs on a relatively low pretax income. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.03 in the first quarter. Adjustments totaled $0.03 per share and related to acquisition-related employment costs. Adjusted EBITDA was $53.5 million down from $55.1 million. Adjusted EBITDA margin decreased 110 basis points sequentially to 11.8%.  The decrease was due to several factors, including higher materials and supplies, higher fuel costs and lower other income. Operating cash flow year-to-date was $31 million and CapEx of $32 million. Free cash flow was negative $1 million. Operating cash flow was negatively impacted by increased revenues that resulted in higher working capital, specifically higher accounts receivable being a meaningful use of cash along with unearned revenue that we benefited from in the fourth quarter, partially offset by higher accounts payable. At quarter end, we had approximately $201 million in cash, a $50 million seller financed note payable and no borrowing on a $100 million revolving credit facility. Our regular cash dividend remains unchanged at $0.04 per share. Dividend payments totaled $8.9 million. We expect 2026 capital expenditures in the range of $160 million to $180 million. We raised the low end of the range versus the prior quarter due to opportunistic asset purchases that we were able to deploy. Recall our 2026 range includes approximately $15 million delayed from late 2025. We will adjust our spend based on project returns and opportunity. I'll now turn it back over to Ben for some closing remarks.
Ben Palmer: Thank you, Mike. We are cautiously optimistic about the rest of the year as commodity prices are more supportive of activity than they were entering 2026. Much will depend on operators' ability to hedge at higher prices, the duration of higher commodity prices and service companies discipline in a more supportive market. I want to thank all of our employees who have put in tremendous work to provide high levels of service and value to our customers. Thanks for joining us this morning. And at this time, we're happy to address any questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Don Crist with Johnson Rice.
Donald Crist: Obviously, things are moving pretty quick with the conflict overseas and oil pricing where it is today. Just your thoughts around the spot market here and pricing in the spot market. Obviously, compared to your competitors, you have more spot market exposure, generally speaking. Just curious as to what you're seeing and hearing from your customers out there.
Ben Palmer: Thanks for the question, Don. We -- as part of what we tried to relay in our comments there is, certainly, this environment with the prices is supportive. I'll say that we have seen some firming. We have seen instances of some firming. I wouldn't say it is not broad-based yet at this point. So I would say it's incrementally positive, but like I said, it's not really broad based yet at this point.
Michael Schmit: And Don, just -- sorry, just to point out too, spot really impacts -- you're referring to pressure pumping, and that's really only 31% of our overall revenue.
Donald Crist: Is that across all kind of product lines, right? Because I would assume that Thru Tubing and coil, which is the fastest kind of return dollars from an operator's perspective would see some firming as well.
Michael Schmit: Some, but they have a lot of larger customers. So really, I mean, the spot is not a big part of their business as it is for pumping.
Donald Crist: Okay. And then obviously, you stacked a few fleets over the past couple of quarters, and I don't know what state those fleets are in, but I would assume that they could be brought back fairly quickly if that call arises. Just any thoughts around the yards to bring back equipment or upgrade equipment here and the potential cost to bring back a fleet, I would assume that it's $3 million just for fluid ends and stuff like that, but any thoughts around the reactivation cost for a fleet?
Ben Palmer: There hasn't been a lot of discussion about that because like I said, they really haven't been broad-based opportunities to really look at that seriously. I mean, at the current pricing levels, no, we would not reactivate a fleet. There are some discussions going on that could result in us perhaps looking at that, but we would need some visibility into, obviously, the pricing and the duration of the work and the volume of the work that was going to occur. In terms of time, the fleets that you referred to that we have stacked, those are no longer staffed. So it would take some time and some planning to be able to restaff those. And you're right, the pumps that we were to reactivate, they would be not necessarily all of them would need to have fluid ends replaced. So the cost really depends. But historically, you're right. If you needed to replace a full fleet worth of fluid ends that's probably a reasonable estimate. But I think it's still at this moment, it's still a little bit early. It's a good question, a reasonable question, but it's a little bit early. We're really not talking about leaning into reactivating fleets. I think the first thing we would try to do is take advantage of higher prices with the fleets that we already have deployed.
Michael Schmit: And Don, just point out, those fleets are both our Tier 2 diesel fleets, which aren't as customers are more focused on, obviously, dual fuel and lower cost. Diesel is pretty expensive right now. So that's the other factor there.
Donald Crist: I appreciate the color. If I could sneak in one more on the labor side. Are you able to get people today if you tried? Or do you think that, that would be more difficult given the current environment and people leaving to go to Amazon or other places?
Ben Palmer: Well, we haven't been hiring a tremendous amount and not trying to increase the staffing. So we don't know for sure. But that could present a challenge, yes. Again, that hopefully would play into the ability to firm up pricing as well, right?
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of John Daniel with Daniel Energy Partners.
John Daniel: So Mike, I mean, when you listen to a lot of the E&P calls and read the press releases, it's essentially flattish with a couple of one-offs, I think Don alluded to in terms of incremental rigs. But you listen to the land drillers, they're all kind of calling for higher activity in Q2 and with prospects for more work going on in the back half. I'm just curious, what do you think the disconnect is? And for some of your product lines that might be tied more to the drilling side, are they seeing a similar rise of activities, maybe what the land drillers are [indiscernible]. Just any color on there?
Michael Schmit: I mean I think that there's hope that, obviously, as drilling improves, then that will improve some of our business as you alluded to. And the pricing still hasn't caught up. I mean there is -- there has been upward momentum, but I think the disconnect is we haven't -- and I think OFS companies haven't really seen the increase in pricing yet to really push us to start moving. So we still have kind of the supply/demand. And so until it actually starts and we start getting a fair price, making it worthwhile, you'll probably see more activity. I think it's just -- hopefully, we read your note this week. Hopefully, that's accurate, and we see 50 new rigs come on that will help drive price and activity.
Ben Palmer: John, our business, our rental tools business is a relatively small percentage of our total revenue, and it's a nice business, it has good margins, [ low ] OpEx costs, therefore, increased revenue can really drop to the bottom line. So it has been a little bit -- had a little bit of a challenge in the last couple of quarters, but they're seeing some improvement. I don't know that because it's small and has particular regions where they are particularly active. They're seeing a little bit of improvement, but again, I wouldn't say that we're seeing anything that's broad-based yet.
John Daniel: Fair enough. I hope the forecast is right. I hate looking too stupid.
Michael Schmit: We hope it's true.
John Daniel: Yes. The next question I've got is just -- and I don't know if this might be too granular and you might not even have the data in front of you, but I'm curious as your guys, the businesses talk about quoting activity, if you had to hazard a guess, the inquiries that are coming in, what proportion of them would you characterize as being from the public operators versus privates. Again, you might not have that handy, but if you do, it would be interesting to hear.
Ben Palmer: The inquiries and questions.
John Daniel: People reaching out asking about availability, equipment, et cetera.
Ben Palmer: Yes, more are the privates, I would say.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] With no further questions in queue, I will now hand the call back over to Mr. Ben Palmer for closing remarks.
Ben Palmer: Well, thank you for joining this morning. We appreciate it. Appreciate your interest, and hope you have a great rest of the day. Take care.
Operator: And once again, I would like to remind everyone that the replay on today's call will be available at www.rpc.net within 2 hours following today's completion of the call. This does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.