REKR
Rekor Systems, Inc.Rekor Systems, Inc., through its subsidiaries, develops and implements transformative mission-critical intelligent infrastructure solutions and services for transportation management, public safety, and commercial markets in the United States, Canada, and internationally. It offers Rekor One Traffic Management solutions, including software modules for roadway monitoring and response, an incident detection and management solution; traffic and infrastructure analytics to capture data for roadway a
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 13.5 | -1.4 | -- | -4.1 | -- | -2.7 | -0.4 | -6.1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 16.5 | 0.5 | -- | -2.5 | -- | -0.8 | -0.5 | -3.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 16.0 | 0.0 | -- | -2.9 | -- | -1.3 | -0.5 | -2.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 14.0 | -1.1 | -- | -3.9 | -- | -2.1 | -0.4 | -1.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 12.0 | -2.4 | -- | -4.8 | -- | -3.6 | -0.4 | 0.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 15.0 | -0.8 | -- | -3.8 | -- | -1.5 | -0.5 | 4.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 14.5 | -2.2 | -- | -5.1 | -- | -2.9 | -0.4 | 6.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 12.5 | -4.4 | -- | -6.9 | -- | -3.8 | -0.4 | 8.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 10.3 | -7.4 | -8.8 | -9.4 | -3.8 | -4.1 | -0.4 | 12.6 | 29.4 | 136.7 | -116.4% | -12.5x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 12.7 | -5.6 | -3.3 | -7.8 | 0.2 | -0.3 | -0.5 | 16.6 | 29.7 | 119.7 | -33.6% | -12.6x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 14.2 | -2.0 | -4.0 | -4.2 | -4.9 | -6.3 | -1.4 | 3.2 | 29.9 | 125.6 | -48.1% | -3.4x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 12.4 | -6.5 | -7.7 | -8.7 | -7.7 | -8.0 | -0.3 | 4.8 | 29.9 | 117.4 | -96.8% | -11.7x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 9.2 | -8.8 | -10.1 | -10.9 | -8.1 | -8.4 | -0.4 | 3.9 | 30.6 | 106.8 | -132.8% | -14.3x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 13.3 | -17.5 | -18.5 | -20.4 | -4.9 | -5.7 | -0.8 | 5.0 | 32.4 | 91.8 | -226.8% | -29.1x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 10.6 | -9.8 | -12.9 | -12.7 | -9.6 | -10.0 | -0.4 | 10.6 | 32.3 | 89.3 | -132.9% | -19.7x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 12.4 | -6.9 | -10.1 | -9.8 | -10.0 | -10.4 | -0.4 | 3.1 | 33.1 | 84.9 | -88.4% | -12.7x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 9.8 | -15.2 | -12.9 | -18.6 | -7.9 | -8.1 | -0.2 | 12.3 | 32.8 | 79.6 | -95.0% | -14.4x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 11.1 | -10.3 | -9.4 | -11.3 | -5.5 | -6.0 | -0.4 | 15.7 | 42.3 | 69.2 | -88.3% | -10.1x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 9.1 | -7.7 | -9.8 | -10.6 | -7.5 | -7.9 | -0.5 | 7.0 | 27.3 | 66.7 | -135.3% | -8.5x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 8.6 | -8.3 | -10.3 | -11.1 | -10.3 | -10.1 | -0.2 | 2.4 | 27.6 | 61.8 | -149.2% | -9.1x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 6.2 | -10.0 | -12.7 | -12.7 | -9.4 | -10.1 | -0.7 | 12.1 | 25.2 | 54.7 | -182.5% | -13.1x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 6.5 | -9.4 | -10.1 | -7.2 | -9.5 | -10.1 | -0.6 | 1.9 | 20.8 | 54.4 | -193.1% | -360.5x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 6.8 | -11.0 | -47.7 | -48.0 | -7.3 | -8.2 | -0.9 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 53.5 | -981.7% | -523.6x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 3.7 | -14.3 | -15.7 | -15.3 | -10.7 | -11.4 | -0.8 | 14.0 | 19.7 | 47.2 | -112.9% | -842.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 3.0 | -11.4 | -12.7 | -12.6 | -12.2 | -13.9 | -1.8 | 14.6 | 16.7 | 44.1 | -107.8% | -1268.1x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1.20 | — | -231.4% | -46 | n/m | n/m | n/m | 2.9× |
| 2023 | 3.33 | +75.4% | -103.6% | -36 | n/m | n/m | n/m | 5.5× |
| 2024 | 1.56 | +31.8% | -107.3% | -49 | n/m | n/m | n/m | 2.1× |
| 2025 | 1.38 | +5.3% | -47.3% | -23 | n/m | n/m | n/m | 3.9× |
| TTM | 0.84 | +8.9% | -43.5% | -22 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 0.84 | +18.1% | -0.1% | -0 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
Rekor is a structurally impaired company facing an existential liquidity crisis. While the underlying technology has niche value in AI-powered roadway intelligence and government contracts provide some revenue visibility, the company has a going concern qualification, sub-$1 stock price triggering Nasdaq non-compliance, $15M in debt maturing in 2026, only $12.2M in cash with ~8 months of runway, an exhausted ATM facility, 28% annual dilution, and deeply negative margins across every metric. Even if management executes perfectly on cost cuts, the math doesn't work without significant external capital that will be severely dilutive at current prices. The 12.6% short interest reflects professional conviction in continued deterioration. The only bull case is an acquisition at a premium to current prices, but buyers would likely wait for further distress to negotiate better terms. Risk-reward is asymmetrically negative for equity holders.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Rekor Systems (REKR) is transitioning toward profitability following a comprehensive organizational restructuring. In Q1 2026, the company reduced its workforce by 16% and optimized its cost structure, aiming for EBITDA neutrality by Q2 or early Q3 and a positive EBITDA by year-end. Despite one-time restructuring costs, Rekor reported 12% year-over-year revenue growth and a gross margin improvement to 53%. Recurring revenue now represents 64% of the total mix. Key growth drivers include the Georgia DOT contract, which serves as a statewide purchasing vehicle, and the renewal of the Oklahoma UVED program. The company also announced Rekor Labs' upcoming GoSecure product, an anti-deepfake video authentication tool launching in Q3 2026, overseen by MIT's Professor Sanjay Sarma. Management emphasized that the 'heavy lifting' of right-sizing the company is complete, leaving a leaner organization focused on higher-margin software sales. While cash reserves decreased to $12.2 million due to seasonal factors and one-time severance payments, the company is pursuing refinancing of its revenue-sharing notes to reduce capital costs. The outlook remains focused on disciplined execution and leveraging its technological edge in public safety and commercial markets to achieve sustainable financial performance.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | --/$0.10 | 0 | $1.35/$2.10 | 0 |
| $5.00 | --/$0.10 | 0 | $3.70/$4.70 | 0 |
| $7.50 | --/$0.75 | 0 | $6.20/$7.20 | 0 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Cash Runway
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 3.3% of float, sold 7.7%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 3 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $4.5M | $0.82 | +$4.5M | +$4.5M | — | $4.04T |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $3.1M | $1.50 | +$16K | +$2.0M | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| UBS Group AG | $2.1M | $1.10 | +$874K | +$1.8M | -0.3% | $562.11B |
| PRESCOTT GROUP CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. | $2.1M | $1.31 | +$315K | +$1.9M | -0.2% | $993M |
| RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC | $1.9M | $1.28 | +$458K | +$1.9M | +1.2% | $63.91B |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $1.7M | $1.21 | +$35K | −$2.3M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| MERCER GLOBAL ADVISORS INC /ADV | $1.4M | $1.48 | −$1.4M | +$1.4M | -0.0% | $63.93B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $1.1M | $1.66 | −$186K | −$653K | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $999K | $1.96 | +$89K | +$999K | +0.3% | $70.36B |
| VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COPassive | $724K | $0.82 | +$724K | +$724K | — | $395.83B |
| SG Americas Securities, LLCMM | $558K | $1.61 | −$0 | −$20K | -0.1% | $90.20B |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $440K | $1.34 | −$2K | −$367K | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | $408K | $2.15 | −$1.2M | −$2.9M | -0.2% | $760.93B |
| OMERS ADMINISTRATION Corp | $215K | $1.34 | +$85K | +$215K | -0.2% | $15.55B |
| SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLPMM | $212K | $1.89 | −$610K | −$10K | -0.6% | $77.14B |
| Curated Wealth Partners LLC | $164K | $1.78 | +$0 | +$0 | +0.8% | $794M |
| Private Advisor Group, LLC | $145K | $1.88 | −$25K | +$53K | -0.1% | $21.04B |
| Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC | $116K | $1.42 | +$66K | +$116K | +1.3% | $12.20B |
| BARCLAYS PLC | $100K | $1.93 | −$129K | +$31K | -0.1% | $279.69B |
| STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP | $98K | $1.59 | +$0 | −$11K | -0.3% | $108.17B |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 58.4%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 11M | -10M | -6M | $-0.04 | $-0.04 – $-0.04 | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 15M | -13M | -4M | $-0.03 | $-0.03 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12M | -11M | -5M | $-0.04 | $-0.05 – $-0.03 | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 13M | -12M | -4M | $-0.03 | $-0.03 – $-0.03 | 1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 15M | -13M | -3M | $-0.02 | $-0.02 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2026 Q4 | 16M | -14M | -1M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 14M | -13M | -1M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 17M | -15M | -1M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 17M | -15M | -1M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 17M | -15M | -1M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Recurring Revenue | $6.6M | +29% |
| Product and Service, Other | $3.7M | -10% |
| Public Safety | $3.5M | +9% |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
Rekor Systems: A Debt-Saturated SaaS Play Running on Fumes and Excessive Share Issuance
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
On May 11, 2026, Rekor reported a Q1 2026 net loss of $9.4 million and confirmed a workforce reduction of approximately 16% (45 positions) to stem losses (GuruFocus). Simultaneously, management issued a 'going concern' warning, stating existing cash is insufficient to fund operations for the next 12 months (Stock Titan). This follows a late April 2026 notice from Nasdaq regarding non-compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement (Simply Wall St).
The bear case centers on a critical liquidity crunch; as of March 31, 2026, the company held only $12.6 million in cash against a working capital deficit of $3.7 million and $15 million in debt maturing in late 2026 (Stock Titan). Short sellers point to the 'low quality' of recent revenue growth, which has been driven by non-recurring perpetual license sales rather than sustainable SaaS subscriptions, raising doubts about long-term scalability (Seeking Alpha).
The most significant red flag is the formal 'substantial doubt' regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern (Stock Titan). Additionally, the company has exhausted its At-The-Market (ATM) equity offering, leaving few remaining avenues for non-dilutive financing (Seeking Alpha). Short interest remains exceptionally high at over 20% of the float, indicating heavy professional conviction in further price declines (YouTube/Stock Analytics).
Rekor faces intense pressure in the AI-driven roadway intelligence market, where 'ongoing uncertainty within the government sector' has slowed project activity (Rekor AI). Skeptics argue that Rekor's shift to a software-centric model is a late-stage pivot to compete with more established, better-capitalized players in the smart-city and public safety infrastructure space, particularly as government budgets tighten (Simply Wall St).
Sentiment appears strained by external delays; the company cited 'adverse weather conditions' and a 'slowdown in project activity' for recent revenue hurdles (Rekor AI). While some new contracts were signed (e.g., Oklahoma District Attorneys Council), analysts note that their immediate financial impact is limited and adoption timelines remain cautious, suggesting a disconnect between contract wins and actual cash flow (Seeking Alpha).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-11
Operator: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to today's Rekor Systems, Inc. Conference Call. My name is Joe, and I will be your coordinator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. Before we start, I must remind you that statements made in this conference call concerning future revenues, results of operations, financial position, markets, economic conditions, products and product releases, partnerships and any other statements that may be construed as a prediction of future performance or events are forward-looking statements. Such statements can involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. We ask that you refer to the full disclaimers in our earnings release. You should also review a description of the risk factors contained in our annual and quarterly filings with the SEC. Non-GAAP results will also be discussed on the call today. The company believes the presentation of non-GAAP information provides useful supplementary data concerning the company's ongoing operations and is provided for informational purposes only. I would now like to turn the presentation over to Rekor's CEO, Mr. Robert Berman. Robert Berman: Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I want to be direct about where we are and where we are headed because I think the story is clearer now than it has been in some time. Toward the end of 2025 and into Q1 2026, we decided to take a hard look at every part of this organization, every headcount, every contract, every expense. Nothing was exempt from that review. The question we asked was simply, does this make the company better? If the answer was no or even maybe, we adjusted to improve our core business. That process produced real structural change. We reduced headcount by approximately 45 positions, roughly 16% of our workforce between year-end 2025 and the end of Q1 2026. We found efficiencies and optimized engineering activities that were core to our path forward. We rightsized the cost and organizational structure to match where the business actually is today. The financial impact of those decisions were not fully visible in Q1. Some of those actions were taken mid-quarter. Some carried onetime costs that hit Q1, but will not repeat. And Joe will walk you through all of that in detail. What I want the investors to understand is that this work is done. The organization we are running today is leaner, faster and more focused than the one we had a year ago, and Q2 will be where you start to see what that means in the numbers. Our target is to reach EBITDA positive by the end of the year, and we expect to be very close to EBITDA neutral by the end of Q2 or in early Q3. That is not a wish. It is where the math takes us when you run the full impact of the cost reductions we've already executed against our current revenue trajectory. Now let me turn to the revenue side because the business itself is performing well. Revenue grew 12% year-over-year and every product line, Scout, Discover and Command grew. Gross margins reached 53%, up from 48% a year ago. These are not small moves. They reflect the business that is executing. Finally, we previously announced the creation of Rekor Labs. And before I close, I want to spend a moment on Rekor Labs because I think it deserves attention. Rekor Labs was established to develop technology that extends into public safety and the commercial markets. Its first product, GoSecure, is on track for commercial release in Q3 2026. GoSecure answers a question a law enforcement customer put us way back in 2024. That question was, can video evidence captured by your platform be faked. Prosecutors and defense attorneys were using that footage in court, and they needed a definitive answer. We built one. GoSecure certifies with mathematical certainty whether video or photo content has been altered down to a single frame. It verifies the camera of origin, the time stamp, the GPS location and the integrity of the file from the moment of capture in a world where deep fake technology is becoming widely accessible. The credibility of surveillance video is increasingly under threat. The ability to authenticate video evidence is therefore becoming essential for law enforcement insurers and the courts. Rekor Labs is chaired by Professor Sanjay Sarma, MIT Professor of Mechanical Engineering and former Vice President for Open Learning at MIT. Professor Sarma also previously served as a Director of Rekor Systems. His involvement underscores both the technical rigor behind the platform and the seriousness with which we are bringing this technology to market. We look forward to sharing more about GoSecure as we move towards its planned Q3 launch. I'll now turn the call over to Joe Nalepa to review the Q1 financial results. Joe? Joseph Nalepa: Thank you, Robert. Q1 came in largely as we planned. We expected the quarter to include normal seasonality as well as certain onetime charges tied to the cost reduction actions we executed during the period. We also expected that the full benefit of those actions would not be meaningfully reflected until Q2. What is important to highlight is that when comparing Q1 2026 to Q1 2025, the underlying trajectory of the business is positive. Revenue increased, adjusted gross margin improved, and we continue to identify and execute on meaningful cost efficiencies, the majority of which are expected to show in Q2 2026. Revenue increased 12% year-over-year, approximately $1.1 million in growth realized across each of our product lines. Scout contributed $281,000 to that increase, while Discover contributed $682,000 and Command contributed approximately $102,000. Adjusted gross margins rose to 53% in Q1 2026 compared to 48% in Q1 2025. This 5 percentage point improvement reflects revenue growth, which allows us to be more efficient when we operate deployments, a favorable product mix with higher-margin software sales and recurring revenue representing a larger portion of our total revenue. EBITDA loss came in at approximately $6.5 million, an improvement from $7.4 million loss in Q1 2025. Importantly, the Q1 2026 results do not fully reflect the benefit of the cost optimization measures implemented during the quarter and also include certain onetime costs related to those actions. Despite those items, we still delivered year-over-year improvement, and we believe that improvement will continue through 2026. The improvement in EBITDA was driven by revenue growth and a disciplined focus on cost containment. Payroll and payroll-related costs declined as a result of the headcount reductions Robert referenced, a significant portion of which were implemented during Q1 and will begin to have their full impact in Q2. Q1 also reflected normal seasonality, which typically results in lower activity relative to later quarters. Beyond those specific actions, we have evaluated every line item and policy across our cost structure. Where spending was not critical, it was eliminated and where spending was deemed necessary, we evaluated how to improve efficiency, optimize processes and reduce costs. This detailed review of our current operating model has already produced meaningful improvements, and we expect it to help lower overall operating costs going forward. We ended Q1 2026 with $12.2 million in cash compared to $16.6 million at the end of 2025. The sequential decline was expected and reflects the seasonal Q1 pattern as well as the onetime restructuring costs. On a year-over-year basis, our operating cash consumption improved, which reinforces our view that the underlying business is moving in the right direction. We are actively evaluating options to refinance our existing prime revenue sharing notes with a goal of reducing our cost of capital. Our growing contract portfolio supports the refinancing, and we expect to have more to report on this as we get further into 2026. Looking ahead, the cost reductions executed during Q1 were not fully reflected in our quarter end results because many were implemented mid-quarter. In Q2 and the remainder of the year, those savings are expected to be reflected and combined with our revenue growth trajectory, we believe the business is positioned for continued EBITDA improvement as we move through 2026. We remain focused on disciplined execution, cost efficiency and driving sustainable growth across the business. Thank you again for your time and continued support. And with that, I'll turn it back to our operator for Q&A. Operator: And the first question comes from the line of Alex Latimore with Northland Capital Markets. Alexander Latimore: My first question, I was just wondering about the status of the Georgia DOT deployment? And then how should we think about that building throughout the year? Robert Berman: Mike, it's Robert. Thanks for asking. So Georgia took a little longer to finalize, but we got it done last fall. And we're seeing substantial growth already because it's a contract vehicle, meaning that it's not just with the central office of GDOT, but it gives the ability to all other entities in the state of Georgia to buy through that contract vehicle. So without getting into specific details, which I can't, we're already working with several other counties, a couple of large cities and so forth. So as I think we said when we announced the contract, we think the value will be substantially higher than the base value, which was roughly $60 million. And I think we're doing well with it. Plus we got a price bump on stuff we already have, which is equipment that's in the ground. So that means higher margins. So overall, headed in the right direction Alexander Latimore: Great. Good to hear. And then thinking about expenses throughout the year, do you expect the 1Q expense level to be about right for the rest of the year? Or do you expect to change? Robert Berman: I think that's a question for Joe. Joe? Joseph Nalepa: Yes. So we -- thank you for the question. We expect Q1 to be on the higher end of expenses. A lot of the cost-cutting measures that we ended up taking in Q1 didn't get their full impact as they were made towards the end of the quarter, and they bore some onetime costs with them. I think as we get into Q2, you'll see a stark drop in expenses, especially within our operating expenses that will continue throughout the rest of the year. Robert Berman: Yes. [ Mike ], just to add to what Joe said. But as you said, the severance related to all those employees, office shutdowns, which required negotiating out of leases and so forth, really all took place. By the time it was finalized, it was towards the end of Q1. So I think -- Joe, correct me, but I think we're going to see all of that in Q2, right? So it's behind us as of Q1. Maybe a few days that we pick up, but it's mostly Q2 that you'll see the results of that. Alexander Latimore: Cool. Great. And then around the Oklahoma UVED program here, I was wondering if there's any additional prospects that might enter into an uninsured vehicle program that you expect to get approved this year or are maybe sitting in the pipeline currently? Robert Berman: We are talking to several other states. I scratch my head thinking given the benefits that the states get from this type of program and the insurance industry, the natural question is, why the hell aren't all the states doing this, right? But government takes time. But I think we're proud of the fact that they renewed for quite a long period with us. And hopefully, we'll see others realizing we need to be doing this. It's just -- there's no reason not to, right? So it's a good thing, right? Things just take time. Alexander Latimore: And then just one quick final one. What percent of revenue was recurring in the quarter? Joseph Nalepa: This quarter, we had -- sorry. This quarter, we had about 64% of our revenue was recurring. Operator: There are no further questions at this time. And I would like to turn the call back to Robert Berman for closing remarks. Robert Berman: Yes. Operator, I just want to make sure that there's nobody in the queue and there are no further questions. Just please double check. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Robert Berman: Operator, are you seeing anything or... Operator: No, there seems to be no further questions. Robert Berman: Okay. So look, just in closing, again, thank everybody for joining the call, your attendance, your patience. What we did in late Q4 '25 and all through Q1 '26 was long overdue, and we needed to do it, and we focused on it, and we got it done. And I think we'll see the results of that now going into Q2 and beyond. And we just, again, thank everyone for their support and patience. Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.