QRHC
Quest Resource Holding CorporationQuest Resource Holding Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides solutions for the reuse, recycling, and disposal of various waste streams and recyclables in the United States. It offers disposal and recycling services for motor oil and automotive lubricants, oil filters, scrap tires, oily water, goods destruction, food waste, meat renderings, cooking oil and grease trap waste, plastics, cardboard, metal, glass, mixed paper, construction debris, as well as a large variety of regulate
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 63.5 | 1.6 | -- | -2.2 | -- | 0.0 | -0.1 | 11.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 62.0 | 1.7 | -- | -1.9 | -- | 0.9 | -0.1 | 11.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 65.5 | 2.8 | -- | -1.0 | -- | 2.6 | -0.1 | 10.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 64.0 | 2.4 | -- | -1.3 | -- | 2.2 | -0.1 | 8.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 62.5 | 1.3 | -- | -2.5 | -- | -0.6 | -0.1 | 5.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 61.0 | 1.5 | -- | -2.1 | -- | 0.6 | -0.1 | 6.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 64.5 | 2.6 | -- | -1.3 | -- | 2.9 | -0.1 | 5.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 63.0 | 2.2 | -- | -1.6 | -- | 1.9 | -0.1 | 3.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 61.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | -2.3 | 0.2 | -0.3 | -0.5 | 1.1 | 64.0 | 21.2 | 1.3% | 0.7x | 11.6x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 58.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | -1.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | -0.0 | 1.0 | 65.0 | 21.1 | 1.6% | 0.7x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 63.3 | 2.6 | 1.1 | -1.4 | 5.7 | 5.4 | -0.0 | 1.2 | 66.8 | 21.0 | 6.2% | 1.1x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 59.5 | 1.9 | 0.4 | -2.0 | 3.9 | 3.3 | -0.3 | 0.5 | 72.3 | 20.9 | 2.1% | 0.8x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 68.4 | -0.3 | -8.2 | -10.4 | -1.1 | -1.5 | -0.5 | 1.4 | 76.8 | 20.9 | -42.4% | -0.1x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 70.0 | 1.0 | -7.2 | -9.5 | -4.8 | -5.9 | -0.8 | 0.4 | 79.2 | 20.8 | -34.3% | 0.4x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 72.8 | 1.7 | -0.9 | -3.4 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 1.1 | 74.5 | 20.7 | -3.1% | 0.6x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 73.1 | 4.4 | 1.8 | -1.5 | 0.8 | -2.1 | -2.6 | 1.0 | 73.4 | 20.5 | 5.3% | 1.7x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 72.7 | 4.4 | 1.9 | -0.7 | -1.7 | -4.3 | -2.3 | 0.6 | 71.3 | 20.4 | 8.4% | 1.8x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 69.3 | 3.8 | -0.3 | -2.3 | -8.0 | -8.7 | -0.6 | 0.3 | 67.6 | 20.3 | -0.8% | 1.6x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 70.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | -2.1 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -0.4 | 0.9 | 59.8 | 20.1 | 1.9% | 1.2x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 74.5 | 4.4 | 1.8 | -0.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 | -0.1 | 3.0 | 62.0 | 20.0 | 8.2% | 1.7x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 74.1 | 3.3 | 0.8 | -2.0 | 3.0 | 2.7 | -0.0 | 9.8 | 71.6 | 19.9 | 2.3% | 1.4x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 62.3 | 1.8 | -1.4 | -3.3 | 2.0 | 1.3 | -0.4 | 9.6 | 74.0 | 19.5 | -5.9% | 0.8x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 73.4 | 3.3 | 0.4 | -1.7 | -0.5 | -0.8 | -0.2 | 7.1 | 73.7 | 19.4 | 1.0% | 1.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 76.9 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 1.2 | -3.4 | -4.1 | -0.4 | 4.2 | 68.5 | 21.4 | 11.8% | 3.9x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 71.5 | 2.0 | -0.5 | -2.2 | -0.4 | -0.7 | -0.3 | 7.9 | 69.1 | 19.2 | -2.0% | 1.3x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6.11 | — | 4.6% | 13 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 7.33 | +1.5% | 5.0% | 14 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6.50 | +0.1% | 4.0% | 11 | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1.86 | -13.3% | 2.3% | 6 | — | — | — | — |
| TTM | 1.18 | -14.3% | 3.1% | 8 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 1.18 | +4.3% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
QRHC is a highly leveraged, declining-revenue asset-light waste brokerage business trading at optically cheap multiples that mask severe fundamental distress. Revenue has declined ~15% over two years while the broader waste management industry grew, indicating competitive share loss. The balance sheet is precarious: ~$78M in debt (7x net debt/EBITDA) with ~$1M cash, interest expense that exceeds operating income, and a toxic Monroe Capital term loan with an uncapped exit fee. Goodwill of $81M represents 55% of total assets and is likely impaired. The company is essentially a levered call option on industrial production recovery and successful deleveraging — but with interest rates consuming virtually all cash flow, the path to equity value creation is extremely narrow. Insider buying provides a modest positive signal, but the risk/reward is deeply unfavorable at current fundamentals. This is a capital structure problem masquerading as an operating business.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Quest Resource Corporation’s Q1 2026 earnings highlight a strategic shift toward non-industrial sectors to mitigate a soft manufacturing environment. Revenue reached $61.7 million, a 5% sequential increase, though it remained 10% lower year-over-year due to industrial headwinds and a prior divestiture. The company successfully secured a new seven-figure QSR franchisee contract and dozens of wallet-share expansions, bolstering its "land and expand" growth model. Operational highlights included a 26% reduction in SG&A through cost-containment and a successful refinancing of the ABL facility with Texas Capital Bank, which facilitated a $2 million early debt repayment. Management reported a positive operating cash flow of $200,000 and improved working capital efficiency, reducing working capital days by 11. Despite macro challenges such as high fuel costs and sluggish industrial production, Quest finished the quarter with strong momentum. The company expects sequential growth in gross profit as recent wins become full contributors and the new QSR client ramps up. Executives remain focused on leveraging their technology platform to drive internal efficiencies and high-service levels, positioning the firm for enhanced profitability when macroeconomic conditions stabilize.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | --/$0.75 | 0 | $1.05/$1.80 | 0 |
| $5.00 | --/$0.75 | 0 | $3.30/$4.50 | 0 |
| $7.50 | --/$0.75 | 0 | $5.70/$7.20 | 0 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 1.7% of float, sold 2.9%.
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WYNNEFIELD CAPITAL INC | $3.3M | $5.80 | +$0 | +$0 | -1.3% | $148M |
| Veradace Capital Management LLC | $1.5M | $1.86 | +$0 | +$1.5M | -8.9% | $112M |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $819K | $1.19 | +$819K | +$819K | — | $4.04T |
| LPL Financial LLC | $409K | $3.36 | +$37K | +$192K | -0.2% | $372.65B |
| KENNEDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $388K | $5.02 | +$8K | +$145K | -1.5% | $4.72B |
| Mink Brook Asset Management LLC | $352K | $1.86 | +$0 | +$352K | -0.1% | $179M |
| BB&T CORP | $329K | $5.98 | +$0 | +$35K | -0.2% | $73.72B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $233K | $7.54 | +$37K | −$203K | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| Skylands Capital, LLC | $197K | $5.88 | −$38K | −$50K | -0.6% | $763M |
| RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC | $153K | $7.40 | −$7K | −$63K | +1.2% | $63.91B |
| SEI INVESTMENTS CO | $146K | $1.52 | +$73K | +$146K | -0.4% | $108.06B |
| VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COPassive | $99K | $1.19 | +$99K | +$99K | — | $395.83B |
| MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | $90K | $3.71 | −$20K | +$90K | -0.5% | $127.40B |
| DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive | $85K | $6.50 | −$14K | −$256K | -0.4% | $480.92B |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $77K | $7.89 | +$4K | −$889K | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $62K | $8.57 | +$0 | −$155K | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| GSA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP | $44K | $3.85 | −$86K | −$32K | -5.9% | $1.61B |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $43K | $7.75 | +$0 | −$118K | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| PRESCOTT GROUP CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. | $41K | $7.74 | +$0 | −$39K | -0.2% | $993M |
| Greenhaven Road Investment Management, L.P. | $37K | $1.63 | +$0 | +$24K | -11.6% | $145M |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 74.1%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 60M | 3M | -0M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $0.01 | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 61M | 3M | 0M | $0.00 | $0.00 – $0.00 | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 62M | 3M | -1M | $-0.07 | $-0.07 – $-0.07 | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 64M | 3M | -1M | $-0.04 | $-0.04 – $-0.03 | 1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 67M | 3M | -0M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $0.00 | 1 |
| 2026 Q4 | 65M | 3M | -0M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 66M | 3M | -1M | $-0.04 | $-0.04 – $-0.04 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 68M | 3M | -0M | $-0.02 | $-0.02 – $-0.02 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 71M | 3M | -0M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 69M | 3M | -0M | $-0.01 | $-0.01 – $-0.01 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2022-2024)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | BUY | FRIEDBERG DANIEL M. | director, 10 percent owner: | 8,500 | $0.87 | $7K | $43K |
| 2026-03-18 | BUY | Lipstein Robert J | director | 11,000 | $0.90 | $10K | $43K |
| 2026-03-16 | BUY | Culpepper Glenn | director | 5,000 | $1.16 | $6K | $71K |
| 2025-12-23 | BUY | Culpepper Glenn | director | 5,000 | $1.96 | $10K | $111K |
| 2025-10-27 | BUY | KITT BARRY M | 10 percent owner | 62,867 | $1.36 | $86K | $3.66M |
| 2025-10-24 | BUY | KITT BARRY M | 10 percent owner | 33,480 | $1.33 | $44K | $3.49M |
| 2025-10-23 | BUY | KITT BARRY M | 10 percent owner | 103,412 | $1.26 | $131K | $3.28M |
| 2025-09-02 | BUY | Dunning Audrey | director | 4,000 | $1.82 | $7K | $96K |
| 2025-08-20 | BUY | FRIEDBERG DANIEL M. | director, 10 percent owner: | 17,232 | $1.60 | $28K | $4.54M |
| 2025-08-14 | BUY | Culpepper Glenn | director | 5,000 | $1.68 | $8K | $87K |
| 2025-08-14 | BUY | Lipstein Robert J | director | 15,000 | $1.70 | $25K | $64K |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Services | $58.5M | -10% |
| Product Sales And Other | $3.2M | -1% |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
Quest Resource Holding Corp: A Balance Sheet of Goodwill and Predatory Debt
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
QRHC recently reported a disastrous Q1 2026 (May 2026), missing earnings estimates by 200% with a loss of $0.09 per share compared to the -$0.03 expected. Revenue for Q4 2025 fell 15.8% year-over-year to $58.9 million, also missing targets. Zacks Investment Research downgraded the stock to a #5 (Strong Sell) in May 2026, noting that the company has failed to surpass consensus EPS estimates for four consecutive quarters (Zacks, May 2026; FinancialContent, March 2026).
The core bear case centers on 'revenue in reverse gear'—while the broader waste management industry is growing, QRHC’s revenue declined 13.3% for FY2025. Analysts at Simply Wall St and StockStory highlight a 'lack of competitiveness' as sales have declined at an average annual rate of 6.9% over two years. Furthermore, the company’s asset-light model is failing to protect margins during macro volatility, with free cash flow (FCF) margins dropping to -3.7% in the trailing 12 months (Simply Wall St, Dec 2025; StockStory, April 2025).
Financial instability is a major red flag: QRHC carries a dangerous net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 7x and has a 'short cash runway,' with only $396,000 in cash against over $78 million in debt as of early 2026, risking dilutive financing. Leadership turnover is also notable, including the recent resignation of the COO and the appointment of a new CEO (Perry Moss) to stabilize the ship. Northland recently slashed its price target from $5.50 to $2.25, a massive 59% cut (Intellectia.AI, May 2026; StockStory, April 2025).
QRHC is suffering from significant 'client attrition,' particularly among key industrial and manufacturing customers. Competitors like Waste Management (WM) and Casella (CWST) possess superior scale and assets. QRHC’s asset-light brokerage model appears increasingly vulnerable as customers consolidate spending or move to providers with more direct control over the waste stream (Perplexity/Market Insights, May 2026).
Sentiment among its client base appears weak, evidenced by management’s admission of 'persistent soft volumes' and a 'pronounced sequential decline' in volume from traditionally resilient sectors like retail and restaurants. While management claims no major industrial clients were lost, the 'lower volumes' across almost all end-markets suggest QRHC is no longer a preferred or essential growth partner for its customers (Seeking Alpha, March 2026).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-08
Operator: Good day, and welcome to Quest Resource's First Quarter of 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Also, please be aware that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Ryan Coleman with Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Ryan Coleman: Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining us for Quest Resource's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that this conference call may include predictions, estimates and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future performance of the company. Use of words like anticipate, project, estimate, expect, intend, believe and other similar expressions are intended to identify those forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the company's current expectations, estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions and involve significant risks and uncertainties. Actual events or the company's results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, which are discussed in greater detail in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements and to consult SEC filings for additional risks and uncertainties. The company's forward-looking statements are presented as of the date made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update such statements unless required to do so by law. In addition, this call may include industry and market data and other statistical information as well as the company's observations and views about industry conditions and developments. The data and information are based on the company's estimates, independent publications, government publications and reports by market research firms and other sources. Although Quest believes these sources are reliable and the data and other information are accurate, we caution that Quest does not independently verify the reliability of the sources or the accuracy of the information. Certain non-GAAP financial measures will also be disclosed during this call. These non-GAAP measures are used by management to make strategic decisions, forecast future results and evaluate the company's current performance. Management believes the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is useful to investors' understanding and assessment of the company's ongoing core operations and prospects for the future. Unless it is otherwise stated, it should be assumed that any financials discussed in this call will be on a non-GAAP basis. Full reconciliations of non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures are included in today's earnings release. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Perry Moss, Chief Executive Officer. Perry Moss: Thanks, Ryan, and thanks, everyone, for joining this afternoon. Our first quarter marked a steady monthly sequential improvement in the business from the fourth quarter, which was consistent with the seasonal trend we typically observe, though slightly better than the prior year. Revenue from our industrial customers increased primarily due to seasonality, though we did see some incremental revenue from certain customers above the usual seasonal acceleration. However, the industrial portfolio as a whole remains challenged as a result of the softer manufacturing environment. Meanwhile, nonindustrial parts of the business performed largely in line or better than anticipated as our focus to diversify the business into sectors like restaurants, hospitality and retail helped to partially offset the lower industrial volumes. Notably, our performance improved from month-to-month throughout the quarter, and we ended the quarter with an encouraging trend. While it is far too early to determine the durability of this trend, we are cautiously optimistic given the exit rate of the quarter. This is tempered in part by recent geopolitical events as well as the risk of extended period of elevated fuel prices. As we continue to communicate, we are acutely focused on what we can control. We continue to demonstrate a firm grasp on the operations of the company as our operational excellence initiatives are delivering improved performance across the business from exception management, wallet share expansions, billing and collections and overall productivity and cost containment efforts. We're controlling costs very well and taking proactive measures to give ourselves incremental financial flexibility as macroeconomic conditions improve. We're very encouraged by our progress on each front and expect these initiatives to drive additional efficiencies going forward. These efforts also began to deliver important sales momentum during the second half of 2025, which included the launch of a significant expansion of an existing retail customer, the onboarding of a new full-service restaurant customer and expanded share of wallet wins with two major customers. While each of these wins were delivering incremental revenue since shortly after their announcement, the one-time costs associated with onboarding these clients had been masking their profitability contributions. I am pleased to report that each of these recent wins finished the first quarter as full contributors to our financial results as we have completed the onboarding period of one-time cost to execute the service change-outs to serve these new or expanded programs. Our new sales pipeline remains active, and we continue to engage with several exciting opportunities to add large national companies to our portfolio. While the overall macroeconomic environment continues to slow the overall decision-making process for many of these prospective customers, we are encouraged by the discussions we are having as the Quest value proposition continues to resonate with key prospective customers. We ended 2025 with better momentum, though saw opportunities get pushed into 2026. We remain very engaged with these prospects and believe that we will be able to successfully win and onboard our share of these potential customers as the macro backdrop improves and confidence returns. Just recently, we won a new contract with one of the largest franchisees in the quick service restaurant industry. This customer is a large national operator that carries plenty of white space for wallet share expansion as we execute effectively. It also marks another important win to diversify the business and will help to offset the seasonal fluctuations of our larger industrial customers. We onboarded this new customer on May 1 with minimal service change-outs. We also remain encouraged by the number and size of share of wallet opportunities with existing customers, which remains a central focus of ours. Last year, we heightened our focus on this sales channel and structured a more robust internal systems and processes to track, evaluate and pursue these opportunities. We are very happy with the early successes we've had, and we have broadened the number of waste streams that we're handling for some clients, adding new value-added services or have captured larger share of customer locations. Our growing pipeline of opportunities across both new sales and wallet share expansions leaves us confident that these initiatives will contribute to greater levels of organic growth for us going forward and be strong contributors to gross profit dollar growth as we continue to execute our land and expand strategy, and optimize service levels. We also continue to diversify the portfolio as we grow in nonindustrial end markets like retail, hospitality, grocery stores and expand into new markets like health care and more. Our technology and capabilities continue to be key differentiators for us and are driving improved customer service levels and vendor management practices. Our technology platform's ability to identify exceptions in vendor invoices is central to our value proposition of cost avoidance, cost reduction and improved service levels. The platform's ability to identify these exceptions continues to improve. And importantly, we have invested in automated no-touch capabilities to enable our team to effectively rectify these exceptions. Customer and vendor-facing advancements like these create real value and make it easier to do business with Quest, but also help to optimize our internal processes and overall profitability. Overall, macroeconomic conditions and a softer industrial environment continue to flow through to reduced volumes from our large industrial customers. However, we continue to make very encouraging progress streamlining our overall operations and growing in nonindustrial end markets. We remain as confident as ever that we are on very solid footing for when conditions improve and as our softer year-over-year revenue is a function of volume and not one of customer attrition. The operational improvements we've implemented over the past year will drive higher leverage when conditions normalize, and we are encouraged by the trend we finished the first quarter on and cautiously optimistic as we look out to Q2 and the rest of 2026. Looking ahead, our key priorities remain unchanged in 2026. We remain focused on growing the business with new and existing customers, driving margin improvements as we execute our operational excellence initiatives, continuing the development of our operating platform, improving cash generation and reducing our debt balance. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Brett to review our first quarter financial results in greater detail. Brett? Brett Johnston: Thanks, Perry, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue for the first quarter was $61.7 million, a 10% decrease from 1 year ago, but a sequential increase of 5% compared to the fourth quarter. The year-over-year decline was primarily driven by ongoing headwinds from certain clients in the industrial end market, which reduced revenue by approximately $4 million compared to the prior year. These headwinds are mostly confined to a few clients and are primarily related to lower waste volumes and services, which are directly tied to the client's lower production volumes. Notably, the year-ago period also included $3 million of revenue from our mall-related business, which was divested in the first quarter of 2025. Excluding these specific headwinds, the business continued to grow by approximately $2 million, mostly related to new clients and the expansion of client business or wallet share during the fourth quarter of 2025. This growth in business was partially offset by client attrition of $1.7 million, primarily related to a single client loss in the first quarter of 2025. While this growth was modest, it speaks to the efforts of the entire team to offset the impact of the industrial headwinds. It also speaks to what should be less noisy comparables year-over-year as we have now sunsetted the higher-than-normal attrition experienced in Q4 of 2024 and Q1 of 2025. As a reminder, this attrition was isolated and mostly related to customers that were acquired and absorbed into the incumbent waste solution. Since then, we have returned to normalized customer retention rates, which have been very sticky historically. On a sequential basis, the improvement was driven by higher seasonal volumes from our industrial customers and continued growth across much of our nonindustrial portfolio, with performance strengthening across the quarter. Moving on to gross profit. In the first quarter, gross profit dollars totaled $9.7 million, a decline of almost 12% compared to the prior year, but a sequential increase of 6%. This resulted in a gross margin of 15.7%. The declines in both gross profit and gross margin compared to the prior year were primarily isolated to the headwinds from the select industrial clients, which contributed to lower volumes as well as isolated margin pressure. These declines were slightly offset by both improved gross profit and gross margins across the remainder of the business as operating initiatives, maturing margins from new clients and wallet share expansions continue to take hold. The sequential improvement was in line with our expectations provided last quarter and representative of the seasonal improvement from industrial customers as well as the contribution of recently onboarded customer wins and share of wallet expansions as we have cleared the one-time costs associated with those launches. As we look ahead to Q2, we expect sequential growth in gross profit dollars as recent new business wins and wallet share expansions finished Q1 as full contributors to our financial results. Additionally, the new quick-service restaurant customer will launch in Q2 and is expected to begin ramping fairly quickly as it requires fewer associated service provider change-outs, which means minimal start-up costs and thus should contribute gross profit dollars more quickly than a typical new client win. While we expect to continue to experience some margin pressure in 2026, both in a challenged industrial volume environment as well as from the mix impact of our land and expand strategy we anticipate we will be able to help offset these pressures through optimizing service levels, growing our share of wallet with existing clients, optimizing the client wins from the previous years and continuing to drive operational improvements across the business. Moving on to SG&A, which was $8.4 million and better than our estimate for the quarter that we provided on the last call. Sequentially, SG&A grew 9%, driven mainly by the resumption of our bonus expense. Our operational excellence initiatives continue to deliver strong productivity and cost containment results, and we remain focused on maintaining this discipline going forward. To that, compared to the prior year, SG&A has decreased by $3 million, a 26% reduction year-over-year. Moving on to a review of the cash flows and balance sheet. We ended the quarter with $1.1 million in cash and approximately $63.4 million in net notes payable. As a reminder, in March, we refinanced our ABL with Texas Capital Bank to replace the prior ABL with PNC. Concurrently, we negotiated with Monroe Capital, who holds our term debt to provide both fixed charge and leverage covenant easements across 2026 and into 2027. Those combined efforts will provide ample cushion to operate in this challenging operating environment while we continue to focus on the execution and completion of our initiatives to drive additional efficiencies and operating leverage across the business, while also investing in driving growth through new clients and wallet share. Additionally, the new arrangement with Texas Capital Bank gives us more flexibility to use the excess availability on our ABL to make voluntary early payments on our high-interest term debt, which is currently about a 500 basis point spread between the two credit facilities. Accordingly, during the first quarter, we made a $2 million early payment on the Monroe term debt, which will reduce interest expense and should free up additional cash to allocate toward debt paydown. We anticipate executing similar early payments as appropriate throughout the year as we work to reduce our overall cost of debt and strengthen our balance sheet. Our operating cash flow in the quarter was slightly positive, roughly $200,000. This was a sharp improvement compared to the prior year despite lower revenue and gross profit dollars and was driven by the ongoing optimization of our billing and collections processes and our improved vendor payment processes, which both continue to drive improvements in our cash cycle. This progress was partially offset by some of the moving pieces of the ABL refinancing, which used a modest amount of cash at the time of the transaction. Our DSOs finished the quarter in the mid-70s, which was largely unchanged from the fourth quarter. Accounts receivable was up $3 million and in line with the sequential increase in revenues, but the overall trend in DSOs remains downward, falling from the 80s one year ago, and we continue to implement measures to improve our cash cycle. We remain committed to reducing DSOs going forward and believe we have incremental initiatives in our control to drive improvement. During the first quarter, we also reduced the number of working capital days to 11.5, roughly an 11-day improvement from a year ago. Our financial strategy remains focused on managing our cost structure, leveraging our operational excellence initiatives to drive cash flow and paying down debt. We also continue to seek ways to elevate our billing and collection practices and further optimize working capital. We expect these measures, along with our focus on continuous improvement to improve our cash cycle, strengthen our balance sheet and provide incremental financial flexibility as the operating landscape improves. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Perry for some closing comments before we open it up for Q&A. Perry? Perry Moss: Great. Thank you, Brett. Our first quarter saw improved performance from the fourth quarter with results getting better throughout the quarter. Some of this was the typical seasonal acceleration, but it was modestly better than the prior year. It is also clear that the business is benefiting from the team's strong execution, and it is evident in the numbers driven by the now fully onboarded recent new wins and wallet share expansions. It remains a difficult operating environment, but we are confident that we are better positioned to drive improved financial performance. We believe that with continued execution, we will be well on our way to delivering improved shareholder returns and achieving a valuation that is more reflective of inherent value of the business. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to our operator to move us to Q&A. Operator? Operator: [Operator Instructions] And our first question here will come from Aaron Spychalla with Craig-Hallum. Aaron Spychalla: First for us, on the new win in the QSR, congrats on that. Could you -- any details you can give on size, number of locations? You talked a little bit about white space for land and expand. So just curious on how many waste streams. And then it sounded like minimal service provider changes. So it sounds like that can ramp pretty quickly as well. Perry Moss: Yes, that's right, Aaron. So we -- as you know, we don't give specific details about these clients, but this is consistent with all of our new growth targets being 7 to 8 figure. So this is a 7-figure account. We landed a little over 50% of the portfolio. So there's plenty of room for continued expansion. This came from another asset-light provider. So they saw value in the Quest program over the program they were currently on. And early reports, the other award winner was also an asset-light company and some early indications are that our launch process and transition is much smoother than our competitor. So that leaves me optimistic that there's some growth potential there. And the material streams here are typical municipal solid waste and recyclables. Aaron Spychalla: And then on the share of wallet initiatives, is there a way to think about just potential growth you see there, whether it's penetration rates or average number of waste streams? It just -- it seems like you saw good success kind of coming out of the last year and are optimistic moving forward? Perry Moss: Yes. So as you know, we put some additional focus and discipline around our share of wallet beginning last year. And we don't really talk about all of the share of wallet wins that we've had. We've had several dozen of those wins, but some of them are not material enough to really mention. So the share of wallet that we typically talk about, again, fall into that same category as new business. So these are large opportunities to expand. We have, I would say, 5 or 6 opportunities with some of our largest customers to bring on a whole another segment of their business. And we're in very opportunistic discussions, I would say, with them. So we've got rolled out plans on how to implement this new business. So look, the business hasn't been sold yet, but the conversations are very positive, and I expect to see a lot more growth in the share of wallet sector. If you'll recall, because of the uncertainty in the general economy, we decided that instead of only focusing on new business, which we're still doing, we would put added emphasis on share of wallet because these are existing relationships. These are customers that already trust us. They already know that we execute. So it's an easier yes than with a new prospect. But I would tell you that we don't give the value of our pipelines. The new business pipeline is very robust. The share of wallet pipeline is about 50% of the size of the new business pipeline. So it's significant. Aaron Spychalla: And then just maybe one last one, how is -- what are you seeing on inflation across the commodity space on the business? Any impact to your customer decisions or your vendor network, just how you're managing that and thinking about that moving forward? Perry Moss: Yes. That's a really good question. Certainly, with the current fuel situation. We've got -- we kind of got out in front of this and started working with our vendors and our customers before this really fast ramp-up in fuel. We've got good protection in our contracts, where uncontrollable costs can be passed through. But one of the value propositions that we deliver to our customers is we always fight on their behalf. So instead of simply just taking on cost increases and passing them through, we do everything within our capabilities to push those off or to minimize them. But I would say that we haven't seen anything significant to affect the business so far. But we've been proactively working on plans should significant cost increases come through. But so far, so good. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from Gerry Sweeney with ROTH Capital. Gerard Sweeney: Do you ever disclose or even directionally how big the industrial business is for you guys in terms of revenue? Brett Johnston: No, Gerry, not directly. We've tried to do a good job over the last, I don't know, a year or so plus to call out the variance that's taking place with those select customers within the industrial group. As a reminder, the industrial group is larger than some of the variants than the clients that are driving the variances. We're only speaking to the select couple of clients that sit in an isolated industry market as the variance, but we haven't called that out largely. Gerard Sweeney: The reason I ask is, I mean, we're starting to see some data from like ISM that's turning positive for the first time in years. I think there's some freight data that's showing maybe some price increases indicating the real goods economy is there I'd say starting to expand a little bit. So these are maybe forward-looking indicators. So I'm just curious if you have any thoughts on that? Or are these -- some of these industrial clients, sort of, in their own little select world that may not be benefiting from what I'm talking about. Perry Moss: Yes. Gerry, I think the -- these few customers that Brett referenced, they're in a specific category of the industrial manufacturing sector that has really been pretty soft. I think we've said they operate in the bag sector. If we look at sequential volume increases from Q4, they were largely what we would expect. But if you compare the increase to last year, the increases that we realized in Q4 and this year were slightly better. So we are not predicting any significant increase in volume yet. We're cautiously optimistic. We did see some good trends, but we don't control the production. So volumes, if they continue to perform like they did, particularly in March, I think we'll see some nice trending. We've built this business over the last year to take every advantage of any tailwind that we can get. We just haven't had any. March, we may have had a little breeze, and I think we took advantage of it. So if those early indicators flow through to these specific customers in the bag sector, I think we'll benefit from that. Gerard Sweeney: Sure. I'm sure there's a lot more operating leverage there once some of the... Perry Moss: And, Gerry... Brett Johnston: I'd also remind you as well, one of the positives for us is from a year-over-year perspective, if you look back at when we started really talking about those struggles on the industrial side, it was in Q1 of last year. So from a year-over-year comparison, we're kind of sunsetting some of those challenges. We did see some additional reductions across last year, but the bulk of the decline in those clients came largely in Q4 of 2024 and even Q1 of 2025. So despite some continued pressure there, maybe we don't get back to the same volumes we had 1.5 years ago. But from a year-over-year comparison, it's not going to hold us back from showing growth. Gerard Sweeney: Switching gears, that QSR win, I think you talked a little bit about it, but I don't know if I caught all of it, but you said I think you had 50% of the portfolio. And it sounded like another asset-light company got the other 50% of the portfolio. I'm just wondering if that's sort of stores, locations or was it sort of service lines? And... Perry Moss: Yes, Gerry, that's a good question. Those represent locations. So, yes, I don't have that based on service lines. I would expect that it would probably be linear that we got a little over half the locations as well as a little over half of the service lines. Gerard Sweeney: Is that QSR in meat, fish or chicken? Perry Moss: The answer is yes. These are major brands that are very recognizable. And in fact, our in came from a referral from one of our corporate customers, who operate some of those brands and made the recommendation that this franchisee should look at our model, yes. Operator: And this concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Perry Moss for any closing remarks. Perry Moss: Great. Thank you, operator. And thanks to all of you for joining this afternoon. We always appreciate your support, and continued support and interest in Quest, and we look forward to updating you all in the next quarter. Thank you. Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.