PD

PagerDuty, Inc.
Technology·Software - Application
$9.93
$906M market cap
Claude Rating
6/10SLIGHT BUY
Revenue
$492.6M
Free Cash Flow
$110.7M
Rev Growth
+2.7%
FCF Margin
22.5%
P/FCF
8.2x
EV/FCF
7.7x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
23.4x
Fair Value
$7.50
Upside
-24.5%

PagerDuty, Inc. operates a digital operations management platform in the United States, Japan, and internationally. Its digital operations management platform collects data digital signals from virtually any software-enabled system or device, and leverage powerful machine learning to correlate, process, and predict opportunities and issues. It serves various industries, including software and technology, telecommunications, retail, travel and hospitality, media and entertainment, and financial s

2-Year Price History

$7.20-63.5%
$6.0$8.0$10$12$14$16$18$20$22volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q4131.012.5--6.6--24.9-0.9669.9----------
Est2028-Q3129.012.9--7.1--23.2-0.9645.0----------
Est2028-Q2127.010.8--6.4--30.5-0.9621.8----------
Est2028-Q1124.57.5--3.7--26.1-1.0591.3----------
Est2027-Q4125.010.0--5.0--22.5-0.9565.2----------
Est2027-Q3123.011.1--5.5--20.9-0.9542.7----------
Est2027-Q2121.59.1--4.3--28.0-0.9521.8----------
Est2027-Q1120.06.0--2.4--24.0-1.0493.8----------
Act2026-Q4124.87.64.511.025.424.5-0.9469.8413.389.63.3%3.6x23.4x
Act2026-Q3124.619.18.1159.624.824.1-0.7547.8408.594.25.3%9.1x45.3x
Act2026-Q2123.413.03.69.834.033.1-0.9567.9408.494.23.0%5.7x103.5x
Act2026-Q1119.8-0.2-10.3-6.530.729.0-1.7597.1463.691.4-8.3%-0.1x1801.8x
Act2025-Q4121.5-1.7-11.7-10.631.428.6-2.8570.8463.792.0-9.7%-0.7x--
Act2025-Q3119.01.4-10.3-5.922.519.9-2.6542.2459.792.5-9.0%0.6x--
Act2025-Q2115.91.4-16.0-10.935.432.9-2.5599.3460.693.3-13.9%0.6x--
Act2025-Q1111.2-9.7-21.5-24.128.727.1-1.6592.8460.192.9-18.5%-4.5x--
Act2024-Q4111.1-15.9-25.5-30.622.219.6-2.5571.2461.092.2-22.0%-6.9x--
Act2024-Q3108.7-7.2-20.8-12.816.915.2-1.7575.3461.993.1-18.0%-4.9x--
Act2024-Q2107.6-16.5-26.2-22.110.88.7-2.0504.5299.892.5-29.1%-11.8x--
Act2024-Q1103.3-5.7-15.8-12.822.220.8-1.3495.1300.591.5-18.1%-4.3x--
Act2023-Q4101.0-19.0-26.5-24.617.617.4-0.2477.0301.590.3-31.4%-13.9x--
Act2023-Q394.2-28.0-32.5-32.8-0.5-2.3-1.8459.4303.089.3-38.5%-20.6x--
Act2023-Q290.3-33.2-37.9-38.52.81.0-1.8470.8305.888.2-42.8%-23.9x--
Act2023-Q185.4-29.1-32.5-32.8-3.0-5.8-2.9467.5306.787.1-34.8%-22.0x--
Act2022-Q478.5-24.1-27.2-28.91.3-1.4-2.7543.4307.686.1-29.2%-17.8x--
Act2022-Q371.8-23.2-24.8-26.32.71.8-0.9545.3308.685.1-26.1%-17.2x--
Act2022-Q267.5-26.2-28.5-29.7-11.6-12.9-1.3546.8309.583.9-28.8%-19.0x--
Act2022-Q163.6-19.1-21.2-22.61.6-0.4-1.9557.0310.482.9-20.9%-14.5x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202226.56-32.9%-92n/mn/mn/m7.4×
202323.15+31.8%-29.5%-109n/m185.4×n/m5.7×
202418.26+16.2%-10.5%-45n/m23.7×n/m3.8×
202513.11+8.5%-1.8%-9n/m12.9×n/m3.2×
20267.20+5.4%8.0%3914.7×5.2×3.6×1.3×
TTM9.93+5.4%8.0%390.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E9.93-0.6%0.1%00.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2028E9.93+4.5%0.1%00.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude6/10SLIGHT BUYFV: $7.50

PagerDuty is deeply cheap on trailing FCF metrics (4.2x EV/FCF) but facing a perfect storm of structural headwinds: seat-based compression driving DBNR below 100%, a risky pricing model transition, $402.5M in convertible debt maturing in 2028 that will likely need cash repayment given the depressed stock price, and increasing competitive encroachment from hyperscalers bundling incident management. The company generates real free cash flow (~$110M TTM) and has a mission-critical product for its core enterprise customers, but is burning through its cash cushion via buybacks ($135M in FY26) while facing a debt wall. The stock is statistically cheap but the growth trajectory is broken, and the 2028 debt maturity creates a hard catalyst that could either force a dilutive refinancing or drain the balance sheet. This is a classic 'cheap for a reason' situation where the value is real but the path to unlocking it is uncertain. Moderate conviction that shares are modestly undervalued at current levels if the company can stabilize ARR and successfully navigate the debt maturity.

Catalyst Successful transition to consumption-based pricing leading to DBNR recovery above 100%, or a strategic acquisition by a larger platform player seeking PagerDuty's proprietary incident data and enterprise customer base at a premium to current depressed levels.
Risk The $402.5M convertible debt maturing in 2028 may require cash repayment or dilutive refinancing at unfavorable terms, especially if revenue continues to stagnate and the stock remains depressed, potentially creating a liquidity squeeze given aggressive buyback spending.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
6/10
Quarter
4/10
Exp. Move
-8.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

PagerDuty reported Q4 revenue of $125 million, up 3% year-over-year, and achieved its first full year of GAAP profitability with a 24% non-GAAP operating margin. While the company saw 10% growth in $1 million-plus ARR customers and a 14% increase in total platform users, it faced significant headwinds from seat-based compression, leading to a 98% dollar-based net retention rate. To mitigate this, PagerDuty is transitioning to a flexible consumption-based pricing model, decoupling revenue from headcount to focus on platform value and AI-driven automation. Positioned as the "control plane for AI operations," the company is leveraging its proprietary incident data moat and new "Agentic" SRE products to serve AI natives and large enterprises. Strategic partnerships with Anthropic and Snowflake bolster its AI ecosystem. However, management issued a cautious FY27 revenue guide of $488.5 million to $496.5 million, reflecting flat growth during this business model transition. CFO Howard Wilson will retire in Q2, leaving a strong cash position of $470 million. The company remains focused on operational efficiency and reaccelerating growth through its new GTM leadership and platform innovation.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$9.93
Market Cap$906M
Enterprise Value$849M
P/S Ratio1.8x
P/FCF8.2x
EV/FCF7.7x
FCF Margin (TTM)22.5%
FCF Yield12.2%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution-2.7%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$492.6M
Net Income$173.8M
Free Cash Flow$110.7M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+2.7%
EBITDA Margin8.0%
Net Margin35.3%
FCF Margin22.5%
CapEx % of Revenue0.8%
SBC % of Revenue14.6%
ROIC0.8%
WC Change % Rev-0.3%
Interest Coverage4.5x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$10.74
+8.2% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$905M
− Net Debt$-57M
= Fair Equity$962M
Revenue Growth4.5% → 2.0%
FCF Margin22.5% → 18.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float10.7%
Short Shares8.4M
Days to Cover3.8
Change (vs Prior)-14.4%
Short % Float History
10.70%-0.80pp
8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)76%
Put IV (ATM)76%
ATM Spread1.4%
Call $OI (near money)$91K
Put $OI (near money)$129K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$7.5
Major Expirations2
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50$4.10/$5.300--/$0.750
$5.00$1.95/$2.700$0.10/$0.250
$7.50$0.70/$0.8036$0.95/$1.051
$10.00$0.20/$0.255$2.50/$3.7027
$12.50$0.05/$0.750$4.80/$6.0012
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-0.6%
Forward FCF Margin19.5%
Forward EBITDA Margin7.4%
Forward P/FCF9.5x
Forward EV/FCF8.9x
Forward Int. Coverage4.2x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds8%
Est. Borrow Rate9.5%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth2.0%
LT FCF Margin18.0%

Employees

Headcount1,242
Revenue / Employee$396,575
Gross Profit / Employee$336,879
2023: 1,166 → 2024: 1,182 → 2025: 1,242 → 2026: 1,155 (-0% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 29.2% of float, sold 3.7%. 6 filers moved >1% of shares (6 buying, 0 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+25.5% of float (net)
Bought 29.2% · Sold 3.7%
255 filers reported (last quarter: 250)

Ownership composition

Active
43.0%(-147.5% YoY)
225 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
30.1%(-44.2% YoY)
12 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
1.5%(+0.1% YoY)
9 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
6.4%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$63.6M$16.98+$5.6M+$9.6M-0.2%$5.69T
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$45.2M$6.21+$45.2M+$45.2M$1.91T
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.$24.7M$8.07+$21.8M+$23.8M-0.3%$118.02B
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$24.0M$6.21+$24.0M+$24.0M$4.04T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$15.3M$20.57+$1.3M+$1.3M-0.2%$2.89T
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$14.5M$9.98+$12.4M+$13.6M-0.2%$218.19B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$14.2M$21.26+$1.0M+$1.2M+2.3%$1.61T
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$13.1M$23.37+$874K−$736K-0.2%$760.93B
Qube Research & Technologies Ltd$12.7M$12.63+$6.5M+$9.1M+0.3%$70.36B
MORGAN STANLEY$11.7M$21.43+$1.4M+$2.4M-0.3%$1.65T
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$8.6M$15.93+$4.7M+$6.0M-0.9%$117.03B
Lynrock Lake LP$8.5M$8.16+$6.1M+$8.5M-6.5%$585M
JACOBS LEVY EQUITY MANAGEMENT, INC$8.3M$10.08+$3.6M+$8.3M+0.4%$23.79B
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC$7.5M$15.78+$1.6M+$7.4M-0.1%$430.96B
FMR LLC$6.3M$16.72+$1.3M+$2.6M-0.0%$1.89T
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$6.1M$6.21+$5.9M+$6.1M-0.4%$480.92B
GLENMEDE TRUST CO NA$5.8M$18.39+$1.5M+$1.5M+0.3%$20.36B
Bank of New York Mellon Corp$5.1M$15.51+$1.6M−$1.2M-0.2%$543.21B
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$5.0M$22.32+$50K−$304K-0.2%$755.34B
HRT FINANCIAL LP$4.9M$8.01+$4.6M+$4.6M-0.6%$39.46B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
-0.46%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.45%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.66%
99 buyers · $0.15B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.13%
53 sellers · $0.11B out
alpha coverage: 83% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-4.0%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
+5.4%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-2.1%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+5.2%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+4.2%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-4.6%
Holder mid (any stock)
-4.4%
Holder rally (any stock)
-8.5%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

010.6M21.2M31.7M42.3M$6.21$13$21$28$352021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
ARK Investment Management LLCSumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc.Nikko Asset Management Americas, Inc.PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/104KWILLIAM BLAIR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLCClearbridge Investments, LLCJANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC38KRGM Capital, LLCFIL LtdAMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC35K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Year (7 analysts)$15.295400.0%
Current Price$9.93
Analyst Ratings
7
14
2
Buy: 7Hold: 14Sell: 2Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2025 Q4125M48M22M$0.25$0.25 – $0.266
2026 Q1123M47M22M$0.24$0.24 – $0.256
2026 Q2120M46M22M$0.25$0.24 – $0.256
2026 Q3123M47M29M$0.32$0.31 – $0.335
2026 Q4124M47M31M$0.35$0.35 – $0.351
2027 Q1127M48M31M$0.35$0.34 – $0.351
2027 Q2124M47M28M$0.32$0.31 – $0.321
2027 Q3127M48M32M$0.35$0.35 – $0.361
2027 Q4130M49M33M$0.37$0.37 – $0.381
2028 Q1132M50M34M$0.38$0.37 – $0.382

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$6.79M
4 txns · 2 insiders · 730,216 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-05-19SELLTejada Jenniferdirector, officer: Executive Chair105,101$6.92$727K$12.11M
2026-05-18SELLTejada Jenniferdirector, officer: Executive Chair358,400$6.98$2.50M$12.94M
2025-12-30SELLSolomon Dan Alexandrudirector266,667$13.35$3.56M$31.90M
2025-07-25SELLSolomon Dan Alexandrudirector48$18.00$864$47.83M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

27.7%retail+2.3pp
25.5%dark+1.0pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Geography (2026-Q4)
UNITED STATES$176.9M+104%
Non-US$72.4M+110%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

PagerDuty, Inc.: Tax-Asset Accounting Magic Masks Marginal Operating Profitability

Overall Risk
5/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
6/10
Insolvency
3/10
Earnings Overstated
8/10
Hidden Liabilities
3/10
Legal
2/10
Audit Warnings
3/10
Hidden Upside
4/10
Contextually Acceptable
7/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

PagerDuty's stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.89 in April 2026 following a series of disappointing financial updates. In March 2026, the company reported Q4 FY2026 results that, despite a profit beat, revealed anemic revenue growth of just 2.7% YoY and a sequential ARR increase of only $2 million. Most critically, management issued FY2027 revenue guidance of $488.5M–$496.5M, which was significantly below the analyst consensus of $524.6M, implying potentially flat or contracting revenue for the coming year (ChartMill, MarketBeat, Seeking Alpha).

🐻 Bear Case

The core bear case centers on a structural growth slowdown as the company's net dollar retention (NDR) fell to 98% in Q4 2026, down from 107% a year prior. Skeptics argue PD is becoming a 'value trap' as it struggles with a transition from seat-based pricing to a consumption-based model amidst high churn in middle-market accounts. Furthermore, despite achieving GAAP profitability, high stock-based compensation (SBC)—totaling nearly $98M over the last four quarters—has heavily diluted real free cash flow, leaving net FCF at only $14.2M (Seeking Alpha, Investing.com).

🚩 Red Flags

A major red flag is the flurry of securities fraud investigations and class-action lawsuits initiated by firms such as Holzer & Holzer, Glancy Prongay & Murray, and Portnoy Law Firm following a 23% single-day stock crash in late November 2025. These actions allege that PagerDuty potentially violated federal securities laws by misleading investors regarding the severity of customer budget caution and seat-based contractions (GlobeNewswire, Business Wire). Additionally, sequential ARR growth has effectively stalled, rising by only 1% YoY in the most recent quarter (Investing.com).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Analysts from William Blair and Morgan Stanley highlight increasing pressure from larger software platforms and hyperscalers who are bundling incident management into broader AI and observability suites. Customers are reportedly defecting to lower-cost vendors or simpler automated solutions to avoid PD's premium pricing. The company's move into 'AI-native' and enterprise accounts is facing longer sales cycles, making it difficult to offset the rapid churn in its historical mid-market base (Seeking Alpha, GuruFocus).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Negative sentiment is evident in the 'seat compression' trend, where existing IT departments are actively reducing user licenses to cut costs. The drop in retention below 100% (98% in March 2026) serves as a definitive signal that customers are either downgrading their tiers or exiting the platform entirely. Market analysts note that middle-market clients, in particular, no longer view the platform as a 'must-have' at its current price point in a high-interest-rate environment (Simply Wall St, Intellectia.ai).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q4 • 2026-03-12

Christine Cloonan: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us to discuss PagerDuty's Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 results. With me on today's call are Jennifer Tejada, PagerDuty's Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer; and Howard Wilson, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that statements made on this call include forward-looking statements based on the environment as we currently see it, which involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include our growth prospects, future revenue, operating margins, net income, cash balance and total addressable market, among others, and represent our management's beliefs and assumptions only as of the date such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update these. During today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are in addition to and not a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is available in our earnings release, which can be found on our Investor Relations website. Further information on these and other factors that could cause the company's financial results to differ materially are included in filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recently filed Form 10-K as well as our subsequent filings made with the SEC. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jennifer.
Jennifer Tejada: Thank you, Christine. Good afternoon, and thanks for joining us today. Fiscal 2026 was a transformational year for PagerDuty. We stabilized ARR in Q4 and accelerated new and expansion business, ending the year with solid fourth quarter results. In our first GAAP profitable year, we continued to increase operating margin through disciplined execution, while advancing our AI-first operations for mission-critical work. In Q4, we delivered $125 million in revenue, up 3% year-over-year and 24% non-GAAP operating margin, both above our guidance ranges. Total annual recurring revenue ended the year at $499 million, with an increasing contribution from enterprise customers. Throughout the year, we expanded non-GAAP operating margin by nearly 700 basis points through consistent discipline, structural efficiency initiatives and AI adoption. We see a clear path to our long-term target of 30% non-GAAP operating margin, as we increase our own operational AI leverage and drive our customers' consumption of our AI platform. Leading growth indicators in the quarter were increasingly encouraging. Total platform customers grew significantly to over 35,000 total paid and free customers, up 14% year-over-year. Improved conversion from both free to paid and total top of funnel led to over 600 new customers, including AI natives and enterprises, accelerating 17% year-over-year. These segments combined are high value and high propensity to grow. We expanded with AI natives and AI-first companies like Anduril, CoreWeave, Snowflake and Scale AI. Companies across the globe demonstrated deep trust in PagerDuty. In EMEA, Banco Santander, Bupa and Vodafone are just a few that expanded. Likewise, our Asia Pac and Japan teams experienced success through strategic deals, including an expansion with JR East Railway Information Systems and one of Australia's largest banks. New and expansion performance in the quarter was our strongest for the fiscal year, up 6% from the previous year and sequentially up 37%. Underpinning our Q4 new and expansion bookings momentum were large 6- and 7-figure opportunities. We signed over 40 deals worth $100,000 or more in the quarter, almost twice the average of prior quarters in the year, showing progress towards reaccelerating growth. By year's end, the cohort of customers spending $1 million or more in ARR has increased up -- has increased to 79, up 10% year-over-year, while 861 customers now spend over $100,000 annually, an increase of 1% year-over-year. This segmentation is important. The modest growth in the $100,000 customers reflects churn in the midsized spend range, but double-digit growth at the $1 million range shows we're making real progress with our highest value enterprise customers, exactly where we're focused for growth. While seat-based compression continued to impact some of our installed base, we're attracting customers with higher propensity to grow -- that are higher propensity to grow on the platform with flexible consumption-led pricing. Our new pricing model makes it more compelling for customers to land new business and expand existing accounts on the platform. As a result, in Q4, we secured several large multiyear agreements with new pricing. Our flex pricing enables frictionless scaling between human responders, agents and automated solutions, as well as access to new products, better aligning value to business outcomes. One of the world's largest toy makers was seeking resilience at scale after a $10 million loss in both revenue and costs caused a manufacturing outage -- caused by a manufacturing outage. In Q4, they signed a $4.5 million TCV multiyear renewal with PagerDuty, leveraging our Flex pricing. In North America, we signed a $2.7 million multiyear expansion with one of the world's leading telecommunications providers, more than doubling their ARR with PagerDuty. By aligning the platform with the customers' highest priority challenges, driving cost efficiency across networks and capitalizing on AI goals, PagerDuty is now their AI operations platform, addressing both enterprise efficiency and AI risks. PagerDuty was built for a world, where every business is digital and every digital business at scale needs to anticipate and respond to urgent critical operational challenges immediately, intelligently and automatically. That need is not going away. What is changing is that AI is the new operational risk layer for business, where resilience and automation are paramount. Customers must improve their resilience posture in a more volatile operating environment. PagerDuty meets the rising standards for platform resilience that large enterprise and AI leaders expect. They trust PagerDuty because we provide the platform to solve these problems. Incident response, while powerful, is no longer sufficient. Customers need an enterprise-grade platform that automatically and accurately detects and diagnoses issues. Large enterprises and high-growth AI natives require resilience at scale to engender both customer trust and revenue continuity. PagerDuty provides an autonomous cloud-native engine for mission-critical operations. By unifying incident, event and service management, PagerDuty drives efficiency in high-stakes enterprise environments. PagerDuty's customers are consolidating their AIOps, alerting, automation investments into the Operations Cloud, reducing their need for high-cost service desks, people leading operations centers and multiple observability vendors. Our AI value proposition resonates and customers are doubling down. What differentiates PagerDuty as a platform for action is how we integrate agents, data, governance, teams and workflows in real-time autonomous operations. PagerDuty does the work for customers, dramatically reducing observability costs by eliminating noisy duplicative alert. Our platform acts immediately on the high-fidelity signals that matter automatically and responsibly. AI hyperscalers, including a large cloud and edge computing platform, a frontier large language model provider and the leading unified data and AI platform provider didn't just choose us. They expanded multiple times throughout the year. Likewise, AI start-ups like Decagon, Etched and Rogo continue to scale on PagerDuty. This repeat expansion is a compelling leading indicator that AI is a net tailwind as to how ops cloud and expansion consumption-based pricing drives growth. During the year, we expanded our relationship with a long-time customer, the world's largest digital infrastructure company. They signed another 7-figure multiyear expansion, deploying PagerDuty's process automation as the central orchestration platform for their new global automation architecture. We won the business because the platform demonstrated both technical security and also met their stringent security and compliance requirements. Our past innovation led to category creation and leadership in DevOps and digital apps. We're executing on a similar long game opportunity, pioneering the AIOps ops category for enterprise. Once again, we have a deep moat context. Competitors can imitate features or build limited agents on public LLMs. But without PagerDuty's decade-plus advantage of data, incident and service context, they cannot reliably deliver accurate, high fidelity and resilient outcomes. Our combination of historical incident data and AI agent context gives our customers the benefit of deep operational history and shared agent-to-agent memory in every response. Last year alone, our platform processed billions of events, nearly 1 billion incidents and millions of incident workflows. This proprietary context advantage, combined with our growing AI ecosystem positions PagerDuty uniquely, especially in the large enterprise segment. Case in point, a global semiconductor supplier that is pioneering Agentic automation, selected PagerDuty in a landmark $1 million AI-driven expansion on a multimillion dollar base. More than half of the investment is attributed to our Agentic capabilities as the customer transforms incident management to an AI orchestrated workflow and also uses PagerDuty to streamline supply and GPU utilization. This deal demonstrates the dual AI opportunity we're capturing. Our agents automate incident management, while PagerDuty serves as the control claim for AI operations more broadly. Two different use cases, both mission-critical, both expanding. AI is the new risk layer for enterprise. It's more complex and it feels differently than traditional software. And our platform is designed for the unique scale and materiality of AI operations. It automatically surfaces the relevant data and context to prevent failures before a human can even engage. We were first to market over 6 months ago with the capability of our model context protocol server and agent-to-agent functionality, advancing AI orchestrations to correlate events and drive automated actions. Early adopters from complex enterprises like NVIDIA are using PagerDuty Advance to speed resolution. IDC's recent report on AI agents in IT service management names PagerDuty and confirms what we're hearing from customers. organizations prioritize AI agents that can reason, plan and take action reliably, exactly what our 4 agents deliver. By enabling customers to operate their critical AI investments, including models, infra environments and agents resiliently and confidently, our agents take enterprises to the next frontier of AI operations. Our SRE agent now acts as a virtual responder for hundreds of clients. It resolves incidents autonomously. It learns from past incidents, it predicts failures and it progressively automates work. As these customers burn down their initial credits, ongoing consumption becomes a growth engine. Today, we announced the expansion of our AI ecosystem. Our platform agents now seamlessly engage with leading AI data platforms and enterprise applications, including over 30 new AI partners. Three marquee partnerships demonstrate the power of the ecosystem in action, Anthropic, Claude, Cursor and LangChain. Through these partnerships, PagerDuty handles increasingly complexity -- increasing complexity in customer environments, solves problems faster and delivers a complete platform based on a level of intelligence no other competitor can match. AI is transforming digital operations to proactive operations. Issues need to be caught earlier and resolved faster because the complexity, cost and blast radius of AI failure is higher. AI workloads provide challenges only solvable by a platform offering real-time orchestration and operational maturity. In fiscal year 2026, the diversity of wins across the AI ecosystem, infrastructure leaders, emerging start-ups and AI-enabled enterprises demonstrate PagerDuty is the operations platform for choice for AI natives to ensure their products scale reliably and responsibly. PagerDuty is the new control plane for AI operations in the enterprise. In Q4, we strengthened our leadership with the appointment of Scott Aronson to our Board and Chris Ferro, as our Chief Legal Officer to our executive team. Both bring functional and business expertise essential to our operational performance. Our search for a new Financial Officer is progressing well with several accomplished financial leaders in advanced stages of consideration. We expect to appoint a candidate in Q2. In the meantime, Howard remains steadfast in his commitment as CFO and to support a smooth succession during the year. Our innovation and culture earned significant industry recognition again. PagerDuty ranks #1 in Built In's Best Places to Work list. Gartner named PagerDuty as a representative vendor in two recent research reports focused on AI agents for site reliability engineering. This recognition reflects our position, as a credible enterprise-ready platform as AI SREs approach mainstream adoption. PagerDuty now serves more than 650 nonprofit organizations worldwide. SIRUM, the largest redistributor of surplus medicine, uses our Operations Cloud to avail over $300 million in medicine to more than 500,000 patients across the country. Other leading nonprofits across critical sectors, including emergency response, health care and education are leveraging our AI platform to schedule and strengthen their impact. Throughout the year, we continued to invest in product priorities that drive long-term customer value. First, deepening our AI capabilities and integrating them seamlessly into the platform; second, expanding automation; and third, broadening the ways customers can use PagerDuty across their organizations. We see meaningful opportunities to extend our platform beyond its perception, as an incident response solution into an AI operations platform for broader operational workflows. like manufacturing throughput, network reliability, AI infrastructure utilization and FinOps to name a few, where urgency, intelligent orchestration and accountability are critical. So as we look to FY '27, our business priorities are clear. First, we continue to strengthen our core franchise, digital operations management, where our brand, scale and enterprise trust remain significant advantages. Second, we continue embedding AI and automation into the platform to drive better customer outcomes and increasing differentiation. Third, we are expanding the role that PagerDuty plays across enterprise by addressing a broader set of urgent high-value operational use cases, including AI operations. And finally, we do all of this with continued discipline, leveraging AI ourselves in our own operations to expand capacity and efficiency. PagerDuty drives enterprise resilience with a compounding advantage, where contacts drives better automation, agents take smarter action and customers move closer to autonomous operations. We made significant advancements in our platform and are optimistic that our reinvigorated go-to-market team continues to build momentum in new and expansion business, while also improving gross retention. The long-term opportunity in front of us is compelling. Modern organizations depend on resilient digital and AI operations, and that challenge is only growing for our customers. PagerDuty is positioned to successfully support customers and their leadership teams in navigating AI complexity, mitigating risk and capitalizing on transformational growth. As we enter FY '27, I'm confident in our people, our strategy, our execution and our position in the market. We have a category-leading platform, a proprietary data advantage, accelerated product innovation and a go-to-market transformation that is bearing fruit. FY '27 is about scaling what's working and capturing that opportunity ahead. And with that, I'll turn it over to Howard.
Howard Wilson: Thank you, Jen, and good day to everyone joining us on this afternoon's call. Unless otherwise stated, all references to our expenses and operating results on this call are on a non-GAAP basis and are reconciled to our GAAP results in the earnings release that was posted on our Investor Relations website. Before reviewing our fourth quarter and full year financial results, I want to highlight the durability of our business model. We achieved our first full year of GAAP profitability, a testament to our operational discipline. We expect to maintain full year GAAP profitability in FY '27. This financial strength allows us to return capital to shareholders, while simultaneously funding our transformation. In FY '26, we repurchased approximately 10 million shares under our $200 million repurchase plan, leaving roughly $63 million of the authorized amount available at quarter end. Our consistent cash generation and a strong cash position allow us to advance our enterprise transformation and invest in AI regardless of the macro environment, while returning capital to shareholders. Moving to results for the quarter, we delivered revenue of $125 million, up 3% year-over-year, with international revenue increasing 6% year-over-year, contributing 29% of total revenue. Annual recurring revenue exiting Q4 grew 1% year-over-year to approximately $499 million. Despite the macro headwind of seat compression in some of our customers, our enterprise strategy is working. Customers spending over $100,000 in annual recurring revenue grew to 861, up 1% year-over-year. More importantly, the ARR from this cohort, including our largest, most strategic customers increased to 72% of total ARR. Customers with ARR over $1 million increased to 79, up 10% year-over-year. This shift towards larger, stickier enterprise relationships is central to our long-term growth thesis. Moving to profitability, GAAP net income was $11 million, our third consecutive quarter of GAAP profitability. We're continuing our progress on the path to sustained GAAP profitability. Dollar-based net retention was 98%, impacted by lower gross retention, as we had anticipated going into the quarter. However, we have implemented specific programmatic renewal initiatives and strengthened customer management to reverse this trend. We expect gross retention to improve in Q1 with steady progress through the year. Consequently, we expect DBNR to stabilize in Q1 and increase gradually throughout the year. Total paid customers grew to 15,351, representing a 2% increase year-over-year. Free and paid companies on our platform grew to over 35,000, an increase of approximately 14% year-over-year, providing a healthy funnel for future conversion. Continuing with Q4 results, non-GAAP gross margin was 87%, exceeding the high end of our 84% to 86% target range. Non-GAAP operating income was $30 million or 24% of revenue compared to $22 million or 18% of revenue in the same quarter last year. The outperformance is not accidental. It reflects our rigorous focus on efficiency and operational execution. In terms of cash flow, cash from operations was $25 million or 20% of revenue and free cash flow was $23 million or 18% of revenue. This strong cash generation gives us the financial flexibility to invest in our go-to-market transformation and AI product development, while maintaining our commitment to shareholder returns. Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with $470 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments. During the quarter, we repurchased 8 million shares for $99 million. We view our current valuation as a compelling opportunity, and we're utilizing our cash position to reduce share count. On a trailing 12-month basis, billings were nearly $496 million, an increase of 2% compared to a year ago. At the end of Q4, total RPO was approximately $449 million, increasing 2% year-over-year. Of this amount, approximately $314 million or 70% is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months. $106 million or 24% over months 13 to 24 and the remainder thereafter. For the full fiscal year, revenue was nearly $493 million, up 5% year-over-year. Gross margin was 86%, in line with the year ago period. GAAP net income was $174 million. This includes a onetime income tax benefit of $169 million from the release of a valuation allowance. Operating income was $121 million or 25% of revenue compared to $83 million or 18% of revenue a year ago. This marks our fourth consecutive year of increased non-GAAP profitability, and we are closing in on our long-term non-GAAP operating margin target of 30%. Operating cash flow was approximately $115 million or 23% of revenue compared to $118 million or 25% of revenue in the year ago period. Free cash flow was nearly $103 million or 21% of revenue compared to $108 million or 23% of revenue in the year ago period. In terms of metrics that we provide on an annual basis, ARR from customers using two or more paid products was 66%, up from 65% in FY '25. ARR contribution from incident management was 70% of the total, in line with FY '25. Validating our enterprise focus, the contribution from our $100,000 cohort was 72%, up from 71% in FY '25. We have made sustainable operational progress by transitioning customers to flexible usage-based pricing and programmatic renewal management, which we expect to improve retention. While overall paid users on our platform increased modestly year-over-year, we anticipate that the macro trends around seat compression will impact some of our customers in the near term. Our fiscal 2027 outlook reflects a prudent view of this environment. However, the early adoption of our Operations Cloud usage-based pricing and our new AI products gives us confidence that we will partially offset seat compression and drive gradual ARR improvement through the year, as customers transition and scale. Essentially, we are transitioning the business model to be less reliant on seats and more driven by consumption and value. As a result, for the year, the midpoint of our revenue guide represents essentially flat growth, but with a higher quality of earnings and continued margin expansion. We're expecting modest operating margin improvements and an 8% increase in EPS. For the first quarter fiscal 2027, we expect revenue in the range of $118 million to $120 million, with the midpoint essentially flat year-over-year and net income per diluted share attributable to PagerDuty, Inc. in the range of $0.23 to $0.25. This implies a non-GAAP operating margin of 19% to 20%. For the full fiscal year 2027, we are initiating guidance with revenue in the range of $488.5 million to $496.5 million with the midpoint essentially flat year-over-year. Net income per diluted share attributable to PagerDuty, Inc. in the range of $1.23 to $1.28. This implies a non-GAAP operating margin of 24% to 25%. Before moving to questions, I would like to provide assistance with modeling FY '27. On cash flow, we expect free cash flow margin to be approximately 2 to 4 percentage points lower than FY '26, primarily due to lower interest income, higher facilities CapEx and timing of payments. Our EPS guidance now incorporates a non-GAAP tax rate of 20% for each quarter of FY '27. The fundamentals of our business are strong. We have a durable balance sheet, expanding operating margins and a clear strategy to navigate AI taking center stage. The go-to-market changes we've made, combined with our product innovation in AI operations positions us to capture the significant opportunity ahead. In FY '27, we are laser-focused on steady improvement in retention, reaccelerating ARR growth, expanding margins and achieving full year GAAP profitability. I'm confident in our people and super excited about the future for PagerDuty. With that, I will open up the call for Q&A.
Operator: Thank you so much, Howard and Jennifer. We're going to turn to questions from the analysts joined into the call. We'll start with our representative from Morgan Stanley, Sanjit Singh. Sanjit, please go ahead.
Sanjit Singh: I wanted to get a sense on the flex space pricing, the consumption pricing. What's been the receptivity from your customers, particularly your larger ones? They also want to solve for predictability. And so I just want to get the feedback on the receptivity of the flex space pricing. And then do you have a -- as we think about this year, do you have a -- is there a way to think about what percentage of the base will be on the new pricing model by the end of the year?
Jennifer Tejada: Sure. Thanks for the question. Flex pricing has been received very positively by large enterprise. And I mentioned earlier the strength of large deals in the quarter and the $1 million-plus spend cohort growing in the teens. I think what is driving it is, one, those customers really appreciate the reduction of friction and access to new products. And by taking away the friction of counting heads or seats, they actually can go after new use cases. So we talked about a large semiconductor provider that's using us in their supply chain environment and their GPU utilization. We've had a very large manufacturer using us for manufacturing operations. And some of these really, really large enterprises that are somewhat asset-heavy are seeing opportunities to not just attack digital operations, but also traditional operations and AI operations, really anything that is software-enabled. In terms of the transition itself, you all have seen these types of transitions in the past. The leading indicators give us a lot of confidence. Those leading indicators are large deals, ARR improvement through the year, gross retention improvement that we expect through the year, success with AI natives, AI-first companies, large enterprise as well as new acquisition and expansion. And those are the measures on which I would track our progress and how we're tracking our progress in moving through the base in that transition. At the same time, we're acquiring very attractive new customers that are expanding with us regularly through the year. And we've talked about large frontier LLM model providers. We've talked about native AI applications, some of the folks in the AI infrastructure space, but again, continuing to win in enterprise. Finally, what I would say with regard to the pricing transition, we're getting much more practice with it. And as we scale that through the sales force, we expect it to continue to improve.
Sanjit Singh: Awesome. And then just more broadly, I'd love to get the team's perspective on what's the best way to create shareholder value from here and the strategy for that. So I guess what I'm alluding to is, is there is a view here that we're going to be focusing on $1 million customer cohorts, maybe get smaller from a customer base perspective, but focus on really just the high end and drive margins as you sort of laid out to 30% over time? I just want to understand like what the -- what your view is on how you create -- the best way to create shareholder value given where you are from a growth and margin and free cash flow.
Jennifer Tejada: Sure. Well, revenue and dollar-based net retention are lagging indicators. The leading indicators around growth, particularly in the segments we care about, large enterprise, the AI-first companies, AI natives, which are new, but they grow fast and they have a higher requirement for resilience and fidelity than the traditional software start-ups did. So we have a different moat in that segment than we had a traditional VC-backed software start-ups. So both those segments are important to us, and we see them as high value and high propensity to grow. Make no mistake about it, we are focused on reaccelerating growth, but being selective in those segments that we think are going to return value to shareholders and help build sticky value in the company. And at the same time, you can expect us to continue to execute with a high level of operational efficiency. So I think it's profitable growth. We're focused on the long-term opportunity around capturing this new category, we believe, is AI operations. And as I said, we have a lot of large enterprise customers that are still trying to get through digital transformation. Like they're not done with that and have moved on to all things AI. They actually are still trying to move towards a more efficient way of operating digitally. We're very excited about the products that we have out in the market. And frankly, software can be a little bit of a depressing place right now. There's a lot of people in Silicon Valley that are gloomy about the sort of rotation out of software. We are fired up. We just launched our spring release. We have PagerDuty on Tour happening in London today, and it will be rolling out to other cities. And we're out in the market with real Agentic products that work on a highly advantageous foundational data model that is very hard to replicate and performing at really solid gross margins as well as improving our operating margin. So it's a long game. And like I said, you should really measure us and judge the progress that we're making in reaccelerating growth on those large deals, ARR improvement through the year, gross revenue retention through the year, success with those AI natives and large enterprise customers and then the new logo acquisition and expansion where we saw a lot of momentum in the quarter.
Operator: Next, we'll be joined by -- joining us from CGF, Kingsley Crane.
William Kingsley Crane: Many of us saw the news earlier this week about the all-hands meeting AWS related to reliability concerns in large part due to AI coding. So as enterprises are shipping faster but with AI, but potentially breaking more, this seems like this should play directly into your strengths. But the question is, I guess, like where are customers at regarding that right now? Has this dawned on them yet? And then has the impending onset of these issues affected how they view your strategic value?
Jennifer Tejada: Yes. I agree with you, and I've said this in the past, I'm going to keep saying it. With AI, the environments that our customers have to deliver products and services in are becoming increasingly more complex and less manageable by human beings, right? So automation, automated detection, intelligent orchestration of issues and challenges and auto remediation is becoming increasingly more important because human teams simply can't manage the scale. And we do believe that it is very much a tailwind for the business. We are seeing that in some of these larger deals that we're doing, but it's not well reflected in a seat-based pricing model. So the transition of moving to a platform model that also benefits from the consumption of more and more of our new products and easier access to those products across new use cases is important. And that's where we're seeing those leading indicators like new customer acquisition and expansion improving meaningfully from Q3 to Q4, and we think they will continue to improve over the course of the year. To your point, when you ask where customers are, I would say there's still an underestimation of how hard it is going to become to deliver enterprise resilience that customers, regulators and others expect. I was with a customer at a large bank, a large global bank the other day, and they were talking about how they're trying to bring together both enterprise resilience, operational resilience and technological resilience, and they have different manual efforts across all 3, but they're sort of colliding as you see complexity enter every function within a business, cyber threats going up, et cetera. So having a platform that can help manage all of that, but also get you to more autonomous remediation or recovery, I think, is going to become increasingly important. And those large enterprises, they tend to want one strategic partner who's best at this, but also who can demonstrate resilience in the face of this complexity. And that's where we have an architectural advantage. We've proven over time that despite public service failures, significant failures in different parts of industry and different parts of the world, we're still able to provide for our customers what they need and then business has just turned 16. We've never had a maintenance window. We've never said, oh, we're going to be down for the next several hours, while we ship something new.
Howard Wilson: And I think I would also just add to that, Kingsley, today, we made an announcement around our AI ecosystem. And three of the partners that Jen mentioned in that are really focused very much on how do you using the model context protocol of agent-to-agent interaction or else even some of these products, whether it's Anthropic, Claude or Cursor or LangChain being able to, ahead of code being deployed, have it actually be tested for a risk score so that you're actually getting into the cycle of fixing problems before they happen. And that's really what PagerDuty is all about, is being able to help companies have the resilience that they need regardless of what stage in the life cycle the issue could occur. So those are really exciting developments. And the work that we've done around the AI ecosystem is because we recognize the need for the shift left, if you like, in the developer life cycle so that you can, in fact, build for resilience. So we're certainly well aligned to that, not only when something goes wrong, but actually helping support the prevention of any issues.
William Kingsley Crane: Yes. That's helpful. I mean, it does seem like reliability is getting harder to ignore.
Howard Wilson: It's definitely.
William Kingsley Crane: And just -- but just one more, just to bridge that into pricing since you mentioned it, and it was nice to hear that you signed several multiyear deals with flexible pricing. Just curious on pacing and the strategy around that. Like could you be more aggressive? Or is there potentially a wholesale shift away from seats toward a like-for-like consumption model? I realize that could be difficult to pull off.
Jennifer Tejada: Yes. We're not going to talk about timing per se because it really -- a lot of it depends on how customers demonstrate readiness to go. But what was encouraging in Q4 coming out of our launch of flexible pricing in previous quarter is that we're seeing large customers that might otherwise have downgraded based on their seat license requirements actually expand meaningfully because of the access to new products and services and the ability to allow different parts of the organization to deploy PagerDuty against new use cases. So we will be working very aggressively to get that in the hands of our larger customers. And then at the same time, I wouldn't say seats are entirely dead. We have small customers that want a really simple pricing model. They want a way to be able to frictionlessly get on the platform and get going, and that's still available to them. But what the flexible pricing platform has enabled us to do is start with the full operations cloud. And a big part of the draw, which is creating the leading indicator momentum there is the fact that they're able to immediately get access to our Agentic SRE, immediately access PagerDuty Advance and start to get the benefit of the MCP protocol, the server and agent-to-agent engagement. The other thing that I would say is fidelity and resilience and the way our platform operates continues to serve us well in terms of creating moat that makes it harder for smaller players or less technical players to come into the enterprise space. And we continue to invest in that as well. And our team puts up with our development team and our infrastructure team is under a lot of stress to constantly deliver that high level of resilience. But what's different is we've seen small AI companies raise their standard because the trust around how their products and services work, making sure their AI doesn't thrift, there isn't hallucination. It works the way it's supposed to. Their agents are operating reliably. That is a whole use case for the platform.
Howard Wilson: Yes. And Kingsley, I'd make just a couple of comments because as we mentioned before, we were -- with any pricing transition, we've been very thoughtful in terms of engaging our customers and understanding what their requirements are. So Q4 was the first time that we were specifically targeting customers with our flexible pricing model. And the response has been really positive. One, as Jen said, it's giving people access across the whole platform. But certainly, the momentum that we're seeing there is strong. And we will -- that will be our first port of call in terms of how we address with large customers, how they expand and grow with us. And we would -- we anticipate by the end of this fiscal year that a meaningful portion of our ARR will be under the new licensing model.
Operator: Excellent. Thank you, team. We do have some additional hands raised. [Operator Instructions]  Next from Truist, we'll hear from Miller Jump.
William Miller Jump: So I guess maybe just pivoting to the go-to-market side a little bit. Now we've had a full quarter with Todd as CRO. I'm wondering kind of where we stand on execution changes there and kind of time line to impact? And then if you could share anything on incentive changes for the year ahead.
Operator: You're on mute, Jen.
Jennifer Tejada: The old you're on mute gets you every time. I'll start and Howard, if you want to jump in, that's great. I'm really pleased with how the go-to-market organization has really risen to the occasion here, both in embracing the new flex pricing model because it's a big change and really taking that to customers proactively, not waiting to be asked and more programmatically getting in front of customers 3, 4 quarters out around their renewals so that there aren't surprises if the customer is going through their own business transition and needs a different type of offering from us. And importantly, really focusing on large strategic platform deals. And you see that in Q4, really not just the ability to compose these opportunities with customers and find some of these new use cases, but to convert them and then build on them. So that transformation, which, to some extent, started before Todd, but has accelerated under his leadership is something that I'm really pleased with. And we are really trying to incent our customer success and post-sale organization to focus on gross retention, while incenting our go-to-market organization to focus on growth. You'll recall, we also took our PagerDuty Online or what we would call our product-led growth business and moved it under Katherine Calvert, and that business is performing well. That part of our business is also driving a lot of the new logo acquisition by getting some of our new products and services in front of prospective customers right away. So I mentioned in prepared remarks, we're seeing better free-to-paid conversion. The free-to-paid -- the free numbers are up, but we're converting them more effectively. So that part of the funnel, I think, is performing better and we're also converting new logos more effectively than we have in the past by having those two teams focused on different things, but moving towards improving gross retention over the year, improving ARR over the year and continuing to build on the momentum we're seeing in new logos and in expansion. I would say that we put the organization through a lot of change, and I'm really proud of how the employees are rising to the occasion. It leaves me very energized and encouraged and frankly, inspired. And to have -- you can go on YouTube and see our SRE agent at work. Our new products, our first-class chat experience that we announced in our spring release today, they're all out there. You can watch them. They're real. This is not something that we're talking about doing someday, and they're deeply integrated into the platform.
William Miller Jump: So I know I'm having a little bit of a connection problem. So hopefully, this comes through. But I do want to double click. I know it's not at the high, high end, but the $100,000 customers that did churn off in that mid-level you've talked about, first of all, was that full churn or partial churn? And then second of all, do you have insight into where they're going to?
Jennifer Tejada: Yes. It's always a mix in that midrange. You have some segments of the market that are under a lot of pressure there, where headcounts are really coming down. And so that drives some of the seat-based downgrades. Also, as a result of being under pressure, they become more and more price sensitive, right? If they have more basic requirements, they can choose to go to a lower cost provider because they don't care as much about the resilience per se, although I think that is starting to change. And we can be more aggressive there as well from a pricing perspective. We've got room in our gross margin. And one of the things we talk about is taking a more offensive stance there. But to be clear, I think the value to be had and the drivers of growth for the business are really around driving that platform into large enterprise and continuing to demonstrate that we are the operations platform of choice for AI natives and AI first.
Operator: From R-E-S-E-A-R-C-H A-R-M-S, hope I'm getting it. George McGreehan.
George McGreehan: It's George McGreehan on for Koji Ikeda at Bank of America. I wanted to kind of double-click on the expectation for gross revenue retention to stabilize. I guess, could you maybe share like any color you have in terms of how customer conversations are sounding regarding their hiring plans for this year?
Jennifer Tejada: Their hiring for this year will matter less and less as we move to more of the platform and consumption-based licensing. I mean, interestingly enough, we have customers that are hiring software developers. So -- and we see the mix of software developers on our platform increasing. And I think what the role is changing to some extent. But it's really less about what they're hiring for us and more about how do they prioritize enterprise resilience, how are they thinking about continuing to build automation. And we're hearing a lot from customers wanting to shift left. They want to go from simply responding to small events and minor incidents faster to preventing them from even consuming people's time. So they're using -- like when I look at our usage metrics on the platform, more incident workflows, more events flowing through the platform, et cetera. So you can see that demand there. I would also say, like when I talk to executives, they're in a pinch, right? They've got boards saying use more and more AI, but they've also got their regular saying, you better use that AI responsibly. And so they're really looking for partners, who can help them manage both delivering on that upside opportunity using AI in their products and services and internally themselves, but doing it in a way that's responsible. And when something does go wrong, they can minimize that blast radius, right? That is more of the kind of conversation that we're having. And when Todd came on board, he and I saw over 100 customers in his first 90 days here. And one of the things he said to me was our customers want to do more with us. So continue to consolidate things like event management, event consolidation, orchestration, automation, runbook automation, workflow automation and now auto remediation with our Agentic solution is a big part of that strategy. So they can start consolidating some of their operational requirements on to us. The other thing is looking at those new use cases. And that's really been led by our largest customers saying, I need to figure out how to solve this problem, and we'd like to solve it with you.
George McGreehan: And -- that all makes sense. And kind of just on the -- as we move to consumption-based pricing and understanding that that's a smaller piece of the business today. But if you could maybe provide color on how underlying usage trends look for PagerDuty and maybe how that's contemplated in 2027 revenue guidance?
Jennifer Tejada: Yes. So Howard mentioned this in his comments, our 2027 revenue guidance is conservative. And because we're going through this pricing transition, the leading indicators are somewhat clouded by the lagging indicators in that transition, and we're still operating in a pretty volatile macro environment. So we've tried to be really thoughtful about that. But coming back to your question around like how does GRR improve over the course of the year, a lot of the work that we've already done is going to serve us. So one, moving customers to multiyear agreements. It means that we have less revenue available to renew in any quarter going forward through the year. Two, giving customers the option of flex pricing and moving them to products and services that have a very clear ROI. When you start to actually be able to automate work that required people, teams, operations centers to do, it gets easier for executives to show the hard cost savings. And then also, we're seeing this realization that resilience is not just a risk that needs to be -- that resilience isn't just about mitigating risks of things going wrong and not responding to them well, but it's also about unlocking value and growth. And that's certainly true for the AI natives and the AI-first companies that see like if we can demonstrate trust in these products and services, we can sell more.
Howard Wilson: Yes. And George, just one comment from me is why this pricing change makes sense for us and for our customers is because more work is happening on the platform. The amount of work that happens on our platform compared to our competitors, there's no comparison. We do billions of events. We have nearly 1 billion incidences last year. We do millions of workflows each month. So our customers are using the platform more. And often, the discussions that we're having with our customers is that they, in fact, have had to make hard choices around head count. But PagerDuty has enabled them to do so because we're actually doing more of the work for them. We're automating work that was previously done by humans. Now when we start showing them how they can use our platform more broadly, then they have the opportunity to expand with us, but in fact, generate incremental savings for themselves and get to better levels of resilience. So it's an interesting conversation that we've had and the early conversations we've had with customers and the success we had in Q4 around the new licensing model have been super positive because there's a very clear correlation to how they're thinking about managing work in their organization, how they're thinking about resilience. So I think it's -- we'll continue to just see momentum build around that transition.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Next up, we are going to hear from Craig-Hallum. We have Vijay Homan.
Vijay Homan: This is Vijay on for Jeff. I just wanted to circle back to the go-to-market effort. Obviously, you guys have your leadership team set there. I'm just wondering, should we expect to see any jump in the spend commensurate with that sales motion? Or will the focus be on reallocating existing resources and potentially even seeing savings there?
Howard Wilson: Yes. So Vijay, it's certainly a case of us reallocating capital. We're still, as per our guide, looking at demonstrating improvements in terms of operating margin this next year. We've done a fair amount of work with Todd and Katherine on the sales and marketing front around how we can be more efficient as a business, how we can leverage AI ourselves, how we're able to organize our teams to be more effective with a very clear distinction in terms of the responsibilities across those teams. So we would expect to see, again, improvements in terms of sales and marketing efficiency as we go into this next year.
Vijay Homan: Great. And then just one more for me. As far as enterprise, I think it was the second consecutive quarter, the number of customers with more than $100,000 ARR kind of ticked down. Obviously, you're alluding to some potential improvement in the coming year. I was wondering if you could just elaborate on kind of the puts and takes in the pipeline there.
Howard Wilson: Sure. And I'll go first, and Jen, you can jump in. What we do see within that $100,000 cohort, we obviously had some customers, where there might have been a modest contraction, which took them down below the $100,000 mark. That has sometimes happened, particularly for maybe a mid-market customer, who has ended up in that cohort and is now under intense pressure from a cost perspective. But at the same time, we have others that matriculate into that category. A lot of our focus has been, though, on the top end of that cohort and making sure that we're putting in place contractual arrangements with our largest, most important customers in order to help them take more benefit of the platform, increase the value they're getting from PagerDuty and typically in large multiyear deals. So what we would expect to see is that, that cohort will continue to grow over time, but we're certainly going to be focusing a lot more of our attention on sort of the larger 6- and 7-figure customers and how do we help them mature and grow at a greater pace.
Operator: Okay. Thank you, team. It looks like that rounds us out for the day. Appreciate your time. Jennifer, we'll turn it over to you for any final remarks to close this out.
Jennifer Tejada: Thank you. AI is the new risk layer for enterprise. And as the control plane for AI operations, we are well positioned to support enterprise resilience across our customers' strategic digital and AI operations with both large enterprises and AI natives. The leading indicators in Q4 demonstrate the momentum from new customer acquisition and expansion, our pricing transition, our product velocity and expansion into cutting-edge use cases that continue to widen our competitive moat. We are energized by the opportunity AI presents for PagerDuty and confident in our ability to capture it. Before I close, I want to take a moment to recognize Howard Wilson's leadership. and his contribution to PagerDuty for nearly a decade. Together with our team, we've built the company from a single product, $50 million in revenue and a few thousand customers to the leading AI operations platform for enterprise, generating nearly $500 million in profitable revenue with over 35,000 customers. And while Howard has been our CFO since 2018, he has seen -- he's been a tremendous partner and visionary leader who has supported almost every function across our company at some point in time. His infinite passion for our mission, his advocacy for our customers as well as for our people and Howard's unwavering integrity leave an indelible legacy and a strong foundation for us to continue building on. His personal imprint in our business will continue to shine through the incredible team that he's built and the many capable leaders he has developed and mentored here. I know you all will join me in thanking Howard for his leadership and his stewardship of PagerDuty. Thank you all, and have a great day.