NOMD
Nomad Foods LimitedNomad Foods Limited manufactures, markets, and distributes frozen food products in the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Sweden, Austria, Norway, Spain, and rest of Europe. The company offers fish products, including fish fingers, coated fish, and natural fish; vegetables, such as peas and spinach; and poultry and meat products comprising nuggets, grills, and burgers. It also provides meals products that include ready to cook noodles, pasta, lasagna, pancakes, and other ready-made meals; i
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 780.0 | 117.0 | -- | 35.1 | -- | 148.2 | -21.8 | 763.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 755.0 | 135.9 | -- | 52.9 | -- | 52.9 | -19.6 | 615.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 738.0 | 125.5 | -- | 44.3 | -- | 36.9 | -18.5 | 562.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 740.0 | 96.2 | -- | 25.9 | -- | 25.9 | -18.5 | 525.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 760.0 | 110.2 | -- | 26.6 | -- | 136.8 | -21.3 | 499.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 735.0 | 125.0 | -- | 42.6 | -- | 40.4 | -20.6 | 362.6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 718.0 | 111.3 | -- | 32.3 | -- | 21.5 | -18.0 | 322.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q1 | 725.0 | 83.4 | -- | 14.5 | -- | 18.1 | -18.9 | 300.6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 727.0 | 92.4 | 67.7 | 29.4 | 28.5 | -29.6 | -21.4 | 282.5 | 2,301 | 142.0 | 8.2% | 3.3x | 9.3x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 773.1 | -5.9 | 70.5 | -10.7 | 156.5 | 128.0 | -18.9 | 324.8 | 2,291 | 145.1 | 9.4% | -- | 10.6x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 752.4 | 129.8 | 93.6 | 57.6 | 54.0 | -7.1 | -22.5 | 193.6 | 2,106 | 147.7 | 11.3% | 4.4x | 9.0x |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 746.9 | 127.4 | 87.5 | 57.1 | 69.6 | 12.0 | -18.4 | 266.6 | 2,102 | 152.6 | 10.2% | 4.2x | 9.4x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 760.1 | 99.3 | 73.8 | 32.7 | 50.6 | -12.5 | -18.7 | 329.8 | 2,151 | 154.8 | 8.9% | 2.8x | 8.3x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 793.4 | 112.5 | 91.5 | 51.4 | 226.5 | 140.3 | -24.4 | 403.0 | 2,177 | 163.1 | 10.6% | 2.1x | 8.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 769.6 | 149.3 | 122.4 | 70.3 | 97.6 | 35.5 | -16.0 | 334.4 | 2,131 | 163.1 | 13.8% | 4.0x | 7.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 753.1 | 142.3 | 101.1 | 70.9 | 12.3 | -49.0 | -21.1 | 333.4 | 2,146 | 163.1 | 10.9% | 4.5x | 8.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 783.7 | 101.0 | 72.0 | 34.5 | 99.0 | 35.1 | -18.8 | 390.7 | 2,153 | 163.3 | 8.4% | 2.8x | 8.5x |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 760.8 | 125.4 | 66.7 | 24.7 | 181.9 | 98.9 | -23.3 | 412.7 | 2,148 | 164.4 | 5.9% | 2.5x | 7.7x |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 763.5 | 146.0 | 98.4 | 77.6 | 100.1 | 45.7 | -19.1 | 305.5 | 2,161 | 170.3 | 10.1% | 5.5x | 9.3x |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 745.1 | 120.9 | 95.7 | 49.2 | 93.5 | 28.2 | -19.4 | 354.7 | 2,170 | 173.7 | 10.7% | 3.3x | 9.8x |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 775.1 | 103.0 | 79.6 | 41.2 | 55.3 | -4.4 | -20.6 | 370.9 | 2,163 | 174.5 | 8.9% | 3.4x | 9.1x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 750.2 | 104.1 | 65.6 | 37.1 | 206.9 | 138.0 | -23.7 | 369.4 | 2,168 | 174.2 | 7.2% | 2.9x | 7.9x |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 759.6 | 143.5 | 108.8 | 82.1 | 21.6 | -25.2 | -21.5 | 194.3 | 2,340 | 174.1 | 10.4% | 8.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 697.0 | 138.1 | 113.4 | 74.6 | -2.9 | -43.3 | -13.5 | 220.7 | 2,285 | 174.1 | 11.4% | 7.3x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 732.9 | 109.7 | 87.6 | 56.0 | 78.2 | 33.8 | -20.4 | 255.8 | 2,242 | 174.4 | 9.4% | 7.1x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 15.75 | — | 16.9% | 495 | 8.7× | 41.5× | 9.9× | 0.8× |
| 2023 | 15.48 | +3.6% | 16.3% | 495 | 8.4× | 24.7× | 12.6× | 0.8× |
| 2024 | 15.85 | +1.8% | 16.3% | 505 | 9.5× | 29.7× | 13.3× | 1.0× |
| 2025 | 12.35 | -2.2% | 11.6% | 351 | 11.4× | 33.3× | 14.9× | 0.7× |
| TTM | 10.14 | -2.5% | 11.5% | 344 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2026E | 10.14 | -2.0% | 0.1% | 4 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 10.14 | +2.5% | 0.2% | 5 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
Nomad Foods is a declining market share leader in European frozen foods trading at an optically cheap 5x P/FCF, but this cheapness is a trap. The business faces structural headwinds from private label competition, eroding brand loyalty, and a leveraged balance sheet (3.5x EBITDA) with EUR 4.57B in goodwill vulnerable to impairment. Management's 'transition year' framing for 2026 after already disappointing in 2025 suggests the turnaround timeline keeps extending. The 2025 tax rate of 5.9% (vs 18.3% prior year) artificially flattered earnings, and normalization will create a significant headwind. Buybacks exceeding FCF are unsustainable balance sheet consumption masquerading as shareholder returns. While the frozen food category is growing, Nomad is losing share within it — the worst possible combination for a branded consumer staple. At current prices the stock is roughly fairly valued given the risk profile; there are better places to deploy capital in European consumer staples.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Nomad Foods defined 2026 as a transition year characterized by temporary net sales declines due to fish-related cost inflation, retailer negotiation delays, and internal restructuring. CFO Ruben Baldew noted that while pricing actions are being taken, volume will likely suffer in the short term as the market adjusts to the pricing lag of competitors. CEO Dominic Brisby remains highly optimistic about the company’s post-2026 prospects, announcing that both he and the CFO will personally purchase significant amounts of Nomad stock to signal confidence. The company plans to provide a more comprehensive multi-year strategy during an Analyst Day later this year, targeting a return to growth in 2027 and 2028. Management highlighted the underlying strength of the frozen food category, which continues to outpace general food growth in Europe. To maintain its market-leading position against private labels, Nomad is investing in product innovation, superior packaging, and enhanced point-of-sale visibility. Capital allocation remains focused on business reinvestment and opportunistic share buybacks, with management asserting that the stock is currently undervalued. Despite near-term disruption from pricing lags and organizational changes, leadership maintains that the strategic shifts being implemented will create a more efficient and competitive Nomad Foods in the coming years.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | $6.50/$8.80 | 0 | --/$0.95 | 0 |
| $5.00 | $4.60/$6.60 | 0 | --/$0.75 | 1 |
| $7.50 | $1.45/$4.00 | 0 | --/$0.25 | 0 |
| $10.00 | $0.25/$1.15 | 116 | $0.30/$0.40 | 40 |
| $12.50 | --/$0.20 | 10 | $1.05/$3.80 | 0 |
| $15.00 | --/$0.95 | 0 | $3.40/$6.10 | 0 |
| $17.50 | --/$0.95 | 0 | $6.70/$8.10 | 0 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 8.3% of float, sold 9.5%. 2 filers moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 2 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN ADVISORY INC | $62.6M | $17.51 | −$4.6M | −$18.5M | -0.5% | $60.79B |
| Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC | $52.2M | $19.72 | −$1.6M | −$13.1M | -0.7% | $59.61B |
| Boston Partners | $48.1M | $16.41 | −$36.6M | −$50.0M | +0.5% | $95.40B |
| River Road Asset Management, LLC | $36.7M | $16.91 | +$1.7M | −$891K | -0.6% | $8.82B |
| MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES CO /MA/ | $33.8M | $14.72 | +$6.9M | +$3.0M | -0.4% | $297.48B |
| Doma Perpetual Capital Management LLC | $32.1M | $11.97 | +$4.7M | +$32.1M | -1.1% | $372M |
| RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC | $29.1M | $14.95 | +$1.7M | −$4.7M | +1.2% | $63.91B |
| ROYCE & ASSOCIATES LP | $28.3M | $14.56 | +$4.4M | +$23.6M | -0.9% | $10.09B |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | $23.1M | $13.27 | +$33K | +$20.6M | -0.3% | $118.02B |
| FMR LLC | $22.5M | $16.06 | +$3.3M | −$121M | -0.0% | $1.89T |
| STOREBRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT AS | $21.3M | $12.35 | +$0 | +$21.3M | -1.4% | $34.78B |
| TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $20.2M | $12.97 | +$11.4M | +$12.7M | -0.9% | $117.03B |
| Polaris Capital Management, LLC | $20.2M | $17.57 | −$2.2M | +$682K | +0.1% | $1.22B |
| Invenomic Capital Management LP | $18.8M | $14.31 | +$2.7M | +$16.8M | -1.9% | $2.17B |
| ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | $17.1M | $12.70 | +$1.1M | +$16.9M | +0.1% | $184.72B |
| Mount Capital Ltd | $17.1M | $18.70 | +$0 | +$0 | -1.1% | $248M |
| SYSTEMATIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LP | $16.6M | $15.55 | +$1.2M | +$2.4M | -0.6% | $4.33B |
| WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP | $15.4M | $17.25 | −$723K | −$2.2M | -0.3% | $533.98B |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | $15.1M | $14.34 | +$2.4M | +$1.4M | -0.1% | $1.36T |
| ATLANTIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | $12.8M | $11.01 | +$7.6M | +$12.8M | -0.1% | $172M |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
Top-5 holders · 27.6%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3 | 745M | 106M | 72M | $0.51 | $0.50 – $0.51 | 3 |
| 2026 Q4 | 775M | 111M | 67M | $0.47 | $0.46 – $0.47 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 739M | 105M | 41M | $0.29 | $0.29 – $0.29 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 731M | 104M | 53M | $0.37 | $0.37 – $0.38 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 756M | 108M | 74M | $0.52 | $0.52 – $0.53 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 786M | 112M | 71M | $0.50 | $0.49 – $0.50 | 1 |
| 2028 Q1 | 736M | 105M | 44M | $0.31 | $0.30 – $0.31 | 1 |
| 2028 Q2 | 724M | 103M | 54M | $0.38 | $0.37 – $0.38 | 1 |
| 2028 Q3 | 755M | 108M | 88M | $0.62 | $0.61 – $0.62 | 1 |
| 2028 Q4 | 786M | 112M | 79M | $0.56 | $0.55 – $0.56 | 1 |
Corporate
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | BUY | BRISBY DOMINIC | director, officer: Chief Executive Officer | 150,000 | $9.79 | $1.47M | $6.63M |
| 2026-05-14 | BUY | BALDEW RUBEN | director, officer: Chief Financial Officer | 14,731 | $9.71 | $143K | $3.29M |
| 2026-05-13 | BUY | ASHKEN IAN G H | director | 100,000 | $9.13 | $913K | $1.07M |
| 2026-05-12 | BUY | Gottesman Noam | director, other: Co-Chair | 200,000 | $9.23 | $1.85M | $68.42M |
| 2026-05-11 | BUY | Gottesman Noam | director, other: Co-Chair | 500,000 | $9.57 | $4.79M | $68.99M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| ITALY | $194.9M | +100% |
| Rest Of Europe | $193.3M | NEW |
| GERMANY | $182.3M | +69% |
| FRANCE | $103.8M | +80% |
| CROATIA | $73.8M | +107% |
| SWEDEN | $68.1M | +80% |
| NORWAY | $62.8M | +99% |
| AUSTRIA | $60.8M | +78% |
| SERBIA | $57.8M | +83% |
| SPAIN | $41.3M | +100% |
| SWITZERLAND | $40.9M | NEW |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
Nomad Foods Ltd.: Financial Engineering and Tax Windfalls Masking Organic Revenue Decay
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
Nomad Foods (NOMD) reported a significant miss in its Q4 2025 earnings (Feb 2026), leading to an immediate 11% stock decline. For the full year 2025, revenue dropped 2.2% and adjusted EPS fell 7% to €1.66. Analysts at Zacks Research downgraded the stock to a 'Strong Sell' in March 2026, while BTIG, Mizuho, and Barclays slashed price targets to as low as $13.00 citing 'disappointing' 2026 guidance, which forecasts a further 2-5% drop in organic sales (MarketBeat, Seeking Alpha, Bitget News).
The bear case centers on NOMD's status as a 'value trap' underperforming a growing European frozen food market. While the category is expanding (4-5% CAGR), Nomad is losing value market share—down 190 bps since 2021—as volumes and margins contract simultaneously. Management has labeled 2026 a 'transition year,' signaling further earnings erosion (Adjusted EPS down 4-13%) and margin pressure as the company attempts to reset pricing and organizational structure amidst declining brand loyalty (Seeking Alpha, Simply Wall St).
Financial health is deteriorating with gross margins contracting by 250 bps in 2025 due to unrecovered supply chain inflation. Net debt has ballooned to approximately €1.9 billion, pushing leverage to 3.5x EBITDA. Furthermore, the company is using aggressive share buybacks (€348M in 2025) that exceed free cash flow, effectively 'eating into the balance sheet' to support the stock price during a period of operational decline (Seeking Alpha, Intellectia.AI).
The primary threat is the aggressive rise of private-label brands in the UK and Europe, which are successfully capturing price-sensitive consumers. Major retailers like Iceland Foods and giants like Nestlé are intensifying competition. Additionally, structural shifts toward fresh and ready-to-eat meal alternatives (growing at 5.2% CAGR) are siphoning demand away from Nomad's core frozen staples like Birds Eye and Findus (Future Market Insights, Porters Five Forces Analysis).
Consumer sentiment is increasingly negative due to 'down-trading' as high inflation forces households toward cheaper supermarket brands. Skepticism is rising regarding Nomad's 'pricing power'; the company's inability to raise prices in 2025 without triggering massive volume losses suggests brand equity is eroding. Additionally, impending UK regulatory restrictions on HFSS (High Fat, Sugar, Salt) food advertising by 2026 pose a structural risk to the visibility of key product lines like Goodfella’s pizza (The Guardian, The Grocer).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q4 • 2026-02-26
Operator: Greetings, everyone, and welcome to the Nomad Foods' Fourth Quarter of 2025 Q&A Conference Call. Please be aware that today's event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the floor over to your host, Jason English, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Jason English: Thank you. Hello, and welcome to Nomad Foods' Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Question-and-answer Session. We have posted the associated press release, prepared remarks and investor presentation on Nomad Foods website at nomadfoods.com. I hope you've all had a chance to review that. I'm Jason English, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Strategy. I'm joined by Dominic Brisby, our CEO; and Ruben Baldew, our CFO. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements about the performance that are based on our view of the company's prospects, expectations and intentions at this time. Actual results may differ due to risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in our press release, our filings with the SEC and our investor presentation, which includes cautionary language. We will also discuss non-IFRS financial measures during the call today. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be considered a replacement for and should be read together with IFRS results. Users can find the IFRS to non-IFRS reconciliations within our earnings release and in the appendices at the end of the slide presentation available on our website. Please note that certain financial information within this presentation represents adjusted figures. All adjusted figures have been adjusted primarily for, when applicable, share-based payment expenses and related employer payroll taxes, exceptional items and foreign currency translation charges and/or gains. Unless otherwise noted, today's comments from here will refer to those adjusted numbers. There it is, the fun part is out of the way. With that, operator, let's open the line to questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Jon Tanwanteng from CJS Securities. Jonathan Tanwanteng: The first one I would ask, if you could, is what are the underlying components of volume and price in your guidance? And if you could go beyond that, perhaps what's your thoughts on net pricing versus inflation after the year? Ruben Baldew: Yes. So we have a guidance. Thanks for the question, first of all, Ruben speaking here. So our overall guidance is a net sales guidance. We're not breaking it down in terms of volumes and in terms of price, but I can give you a bit more context. As you've heard this morning also in our prepared remarks, we are guiding for a negative decline. And the main reason for that is the following. Firstly, we're in the midst of our negotiations, our annual negotiation. And this is normal with -- as it is normal with negotiation, we're seeing some delay and disruption and retaliation. We think that's temporary, but that will have an impact on our guidance. Second bit is that big part of our inflation actually is in Fish. We're seeing cost inflation in Fish. So we will be taking pricing on Fish. We expect competition to follow. But as we've seen in the past, there might be a time lag, and that's actually the biggest contributor to our negative guidance. And thirdly, as Dominic shared, this will be a year where we will be driving change, change to make Nomad the better company in terms of driving opportunities, but with change does come disruption. Now the first 2 points links to your question on volume and price. We do expect price to be a contributor. But also when we talk about price, there's mix in there. We will be continuing to drive potatoes growth. So that will be a bit of an offset there. But we also expect negative volume because of the reasons I mentioned, especially on taking price in Fish and the price lag of our competition. Jonathan Tanwanteng: Understood. Looking beyond '26, how should we expect normalized growth to look like, especially relative to the long-term targets you put out last year, especially if you take all these initiatives to improve your operating structure and efficiency? Dominic Brisby: So this is Dominic. Thanks for the question. So first of all, to be clear, I fully expect us to return to growth in 2027 and 2028, and I see tremendous growth potential for this business. What I'm not going to do right now is to commit to specific numbers or ranges currently. We're currently in the process of putting together multiyear plans in terms of what we're going to deliver and how we're going to deliver them. And I'm excited to have the chance to share these with you at our Analyst Day later this year. At that time, we'll be much more specific in terms of what we're going to do, what our building blocks are and what our multiyear targets are. But just to put this in context, a measure of how much I believe in this business and how much Ruben believes in this business is the fact that over the coming weeks, we're both going to be making substantial share purchases in the company. So 2026 is a transition year. It's a year in which we're enacting a lot of change, but the long-term future in our mind looks very positive. Operator: And our next question comes from John Baumgartner from Mizuho. John Baumgartner: I wanted to ask, Dominic, in the prepared remarks, there was a reference to, I think, strengthening relationships with retailers and doing better at the point of purchase. And I'm curious, some of the commentary over the past 6 to 9 months from some of the larger retailers in Europe, it seems that they're focusing quite a bit more on fresh food. It seems as though they're focusing more on investing in private label quality as opposed to just, I guess, competing on price. How do you think about -- I guess, how do you see the retail environment changing? Are you seeing retailers managing these categories differently? And how do you think about the reinvestment required to get people back to that fresh food case -- the frozen food case, excuse me? Dominic Brisby: Yes. So first of all, thanks for the question. So I think the overall behavior of European retailers hasn't changed dramatically over recent months or even the past couple of years. What we do see, though, is a continuation of an existing trend. There's nothing new about retailers wanting to make sure their private label offerings are high quality. And the focus on fresh has been quite a big theme in Europe as well. Now some of this is retailer driven. Some of this is driven by us as well as a clear leader in frozen. And certainly, we see a few opportunities, a, to strengthen our position at the point of sale and to strengthen our position with retailers, but also to make sure that we're creating excitement and animation at the point of sale. That means making sure that we roll out some of our great innovations, for example, Chicken Shop, which is working well in the U.K. There's no reason why that can't work well across Europe, creating more animation and more excitement. Secondly, making sure we have more disruptive and exciting positions at the point of sale to drive people into the frozen aisle, but also to make sure when they're there, they have something exciting to look at and focus on. And in terms of investments, there are some areas where this will require investment, and we've factored significant investment within our plan for this year to drive greater strength at the point of sale. But there's some where it won't require great investment. They'll just require more smartness from our side. For example, making sure that our packaging is not only much better than private label, but much better than the competitors as well and much better than we've been before. And particularly when you're walking through the frozen food aisle, because of the nature of packaging because it's generally not transparent, we have an opportunity to communicate much more on the packaging than would be the case in other categories. So we see a chance to be much more aggressive there than we have been before. This is something we're working on significantly. But in terms of retailer behavior, we're not seeing any dramatic shift versus where retailer behavior has been over recent years. Jason English: John, this is Jason. I would just add a comment about the opportunity to shift growth back out of fresh into frozen, at least that was my interpretation. I would just note that the frozen category is actually delivering very robust growth for our retailers. Throughout last year, it grew 2.4% across our overall footprint, which continues to track above overall food. So there are still healthy category tailwinds and step into some markets like Italy category growth of 3%; Germany, 4.5%. So we are fortunate to be in a category that is delivering growth for retail partners and that obviously affords us opportunities. John Baumgartner: Okay. Okay. Great. And then just a follow-up on the supply chain side on the fish business. We've seen some reports in Europe about some, I guess, disruptions on the IT platform and some digital systems on illegal fishing catches. Are you seeing any disruptions on the inflow of trade at the ports in Europe at this point? Or is that a nonevent for Nomad? Ruben Baldew: No, that's not an event for us. If you look at our ingredients and main items, we don't see that for our supply. Jason English: There was disruption, John, as you noted, it was reported in the Financial Times. And the programs, the policies that were being put in place that caused those disruptions have been temporarily suspended until they can be resolved. So the disruption was short term in nature and not long enough to impact our business or frankly, we don't believe it impacted the category or any of our competitors either. Operator: Our next question is a follow-up from John Tanwanteng from CJS Securities. Jonathan Tanwanteng: I was just wondering if you could provide more detail on the pricing negotiations and when you expect them to conclude? Number one. And what the -- if that's going to be a rolling thing through the next few quarters or if it's going to be all over before Q2? Dominic Brisby: So in the case of most European retailers, the price negotiations are happening right now. There are certain exceptions in certain markets and with certain customers. But for the most part -- there are a few exceptions, but for the most part, we expect most of that to be included -- to be concluded during the course of Q1. Jonathan Tanwanteng: Got it. And as a follow-on to that, assuming your competitors do follow you, how do you expect share to change throughout the year? Is there a point where you expect volume or value share to start coming back to you guys as the year progresses? Dominic Brisby: I mean, obviously, we have no idea what our competitors are doing in terms of pricing, although we monitor it carefully. The key point from our side, of course, we have a fairly meaningful differential in price versus private label. The key point from our side is to make sure we give consumers strong reasons to pay. There are a few ways that we do that. First is through making sure our products are superior. Our products always have been superior, but actually during the course of this year, they're going to be even more superior, for example, with the new coating on fish fingers, which we're rolling out. Secondly, to make sure that our brands are stronger. Again, our brands have always been stronger if you look at our brand equity metrics, but we see opportunities to be much more effective in terms of how we spend our A&P. And thirdly, it comes back to the point I made a second ago, making sure that at the point of sale, we're noticeably stronger, noticeably more noticeable and noticeably more disruptive than anyone else. And this is what we're going to be focusing on. Jonathan Tanwanteng: Okay. Great. And then last of all, it's good to see you committing to open share repurchases, but I was wondering if there's any change to the corporate capital allocation plan and if repurchases remain the priority for you guys? Dominic Brisby: So our top priority is to invest in the business to maximize our organic growth potential. And so we're very clear about that. Beyond that, our priority is going to depend on the circumstances. So as you know, buybacks have been a priority for us as we believe that our shares are trading well below their intrinsic value. And we continue to have an appetite to repurchase shares at current prices, but we're going to balance that carefully against our leverage ratio and our broader liquidity needs. We're also looking forward, M&A could potentially reemerge in the future if various conditions change, for example, if we're less cheap and deals are less expensive. The one thing I can assure you of and the one thing I want to be very clear about is that either way, we and the Board are absolutely intent on allocating capital in ways that we believe maximizes shareholder returns. Operator: [Operator Instructions] And it's showing no additional questions at this time, I would like to turn the floor back over to Dominic Brisby for any closing comments. Dominic Brisby: So thank you all for joining us today and for your interest in Nomad Foods. I very much look forward to meeting many of you in the days and weeks ahead. Thank you. Operator: And with that, we'll conclude today's question-and-answer session. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.