Stocks/NOMD

NOMD

Nomad Foods Limited
Consumer Defensive·Packaged Foods
$10.14
$1.4B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$3.0B
Free Cash Flow
$103.4M
Rev Growth
-4.4%
FCF Margin
3.4%
P/FCF
11.9x
EV/FCF
31.5x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
7.6x
Fair Value
$10.50
Upside
+3.6%

Nomad Foods Limited manufactures, markets, and distributes frozen food products in the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Sweden, Austria, Norway, Spain, and rest of Europe. The company offers fish products, including fish fingers, coated fish, and natural fish; vegetables, such as peas and spinach; and poultry and meat products comprising nuggets, grills, and burgers. It also provides meals products that include ready to cook noodles, pasta, lasagna, pancakes, and other ready-made meals; i

2-Year Price History

$10.27-37.2%
$10$12$14$16$18volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall (EUR M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2027-Q4780.0117.0--35.1--148.2-21.8763.2----------
Est2027-Q3755.0135.9--52.9--52.9-19.6615.0----------
Est2027-Q2738.0125.5--44.3--36.9-18.5562.2----------
Est2027-Q1740.096.2--25.9--25.9-18.5525.3----------
Est2026-Q4760.0110.2--26.6--136.8-21.3499.4----------
Est2026-Q3735.0125.0--42.6--40.4-20.6362.6----------
Est2026-Q2718.0111.3--32.3--21.5-18.0322.2----------
Est2026-Q1725.083.4--14.5--18.1-18.9300.6----------
Act2026-Q1727.092.467.729.428.5-29.6-21.4282.52,301142.08.2%3.3x9.3x
Act2025-Q4773.1-5.970.5-10.7156.5128.0-18.9324.82,291145.19.4%--10.6x
Act2025-Q3752.4129.893.657.654.0-7.1-22.5193.62,106147.711.3%4.4x9.0x
Act2025-Q2746.9127.487.557.169.612.0-18.4266.62,102152.610.2%4.2x9.4x
Act2025-Q1760.199.373.832.750.6-12.5-18.7329.82,151154.88.9%2.8x8.3x
Act2024-Q4793.4112.591.551.4226.5140.3-24.4403.02,177163.110.6%2.1x8.7x
Act2024-Q3769.6149.3122.470.397.635.5-16.0334.42,131163.113.8%4.0x7.9x
Act2024-Q2753.1142.3101.170.912.3-49.0-21.1333.42,146163.110.9%4.5x8.9x
Act2024-Q1783.7101.072.034.599.035.1-18.8390.72,153163.38.4%2.8x8.5x
Act2023-Q4760.8125.466.724.7181.998.9-23.3412.72,148164.45.9%2.5x7.7x
Act2023-Q3763.5146.098.477.6100.145.7-19.1305.52,161170.310.1%5.5x9.3x
Act2023-Q2745.1120.995.749.293.528.2-19.4354.72,170173.710.7%3.3x9.8x
Act2023-Q1775.1103.079.641.255.3-4.4-20.6370.92,163174.58.9%3.4x9.1x
Act2022-Q4750.2104.165.637.1206.9138.0-23.7369.42,168174.27.2%2.9x7.9x
Act2022-Q3759.6143.5108.882.121.6-25.2-21.5194.32,340174.110.4%8.7x--
Act2022-Q2697.0138.1113.474.6-2.9-43.3-13.5220.72,285174.111.4%7.3x--
Act2022-Q1732.9109.787.656.078.233.8-20.4255.82,242174.49.4%7.1x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202215.7516.9%4958.7×41.5×9.9×0.8×
202315.48+3.6%16.3%4958.4×24.7×12.6×0.8×
202415.85+1.8%16.3%5059.5×29.7×13.3×1.0×
202512.35-2.2%11.6%35111.4×33.3×14.9×0.7×
TTM10.14-2.5%11.5%3440.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2026E10.14-2.0%0.1%40.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E10.14+2.5%0.2%50.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $10.50

Nomad Foods is a declining market share leader in European frozen foods trading at an optically cheap 5x P/FCF, but this cheapness is a trap. The business faces structural headwinds from private label competition, eroding brand loyalty, and a leveraged balance sheet (3.5x EBITDA) with EUR 4.57B in goodwill vulnerable to impairment. Management's 'transition year' framing for 2026 after already disappointing in 2025 suggests the turnaround timeline keeps extending. The 2025 tax rate of 5.9% (vs 18.3% prior year) artificially flattered earnings, and normalization will create a significant headwind. Buybacks exceeding FCF are unsustainable balance sheet consumption masquerading as shareholder returns. While the frozen food category is growing, Nomad is losing share within it — the worst possible combination for a branded consumer staple. At current prices the stock is roughly fairly valued given the risk profile; there are better places to deploy capital in European consumer staples.

Catalyst Analyst Day multi-year roadmap could restore confidence if targets are credible, or successful pricing pass-through in H2 2026 demonstrating brand pricing power still exists
Risk Goodwill impairment — only EUR 529M headroom on EUR 4.57B of intangibles, with a 0.7% discount rate increase triggering a write-down that could devastate equity value and potentially breach debt covenants
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
4/10
Quarter
3/10
Exp. Move
-8.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Nomad Foods defined 2026 as a transition year characterized by temporary net sales declines due to fish-related cost inflation, retailer negotiation delays, and internal restructuring. CFO Ruben Baldew noted that while pricing actions are being taken, volume will likely suffer in the short term as the market adjusts to the pricing lag of competitors. CEO Dominic Brisby remains highly optimistic about the company’s post-2026 prospects, announcing that both he and the CFO will personally purchase significant amounts of Nomad stock to signal confidence. The company plans to provide a more comprehensive multi-year strategy during an Analyst Day later this year, targeting a return to growth in 2027 and 2028. Management highlighted the underlying strength of the frozen food category, which continues to outpace general food growth in Europe. To maintain its market-leading position against private labels, Nomad is investing in product innovation, superior packaging, and enhanced point-of-sale visibility. Capital allocation remains focused on business reinvestment and opportunistic share buybacks, with management asserting that the stock is currently undervalued. Despite near-term disruption from pricing lags and organizational changes, leadership maintains that the strategic shifts being implemented will create a more efficient and competitive Nomad Foods in the coming years.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$10.14
Market Cap$1.4B
Enterprise Value$3.3B
P/S Ratio0.4x
P/FCF11.9x
EV/FCF31.5x
FCF Margin (TTM)3.4%
FCF Yield8.4%
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.7%
Annual Dilution-8.3%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$3.0B
Net Income$133.4M
Free Cash Flow$103.4M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-4.4%
EBITDA Margin11.5%
Net Margin4.4%
FCF Margin3.4%
CapEx % of Revenue2.7%
SBC % of Revenue-0.2%
ROIC9.8%
WC Change % Rev-0.7%
Interest Coverage3.9x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$1.98
-80.5% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$2.3B
− Net Debt$2.0B
= Fair Equity$241M
Revenue Growth2.6% → 1.5%
FCF Margin3.4% → 8.0%
Discount Rate14.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float1.4%
Short Shares1.6M
Days to Cover1.7
Change (vs Prior)-5.3%
Short % Float History
1.40%+0.40pp
1.0%1.2%1.4%1.6%1.8%2.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)33%
Put IV (ATM)32%
ATM Spread8.8%
Call $OI (near money)$231K
Put $OI (near money)$123K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$10.0
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50$6.50/$8.800--/$0.950
$5.00$4.60/$6.600--/$0.751
$7.50$1.45/$4.000--/$0.250
$10.00$0.25/$1.15116$0.30/$0.4040
$12.50--/$0.2010$1.05/$3.800
$15.00--/$0.950$3.40/$6.100
$17.50--/$0.950$6.70/$8.100
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-2.0%
Forward FCF Margin7.4%
Forward EBITDA Margin14.6%
Forward P/FCF5.7x
Forward EV/FCF15.0x
Forward Int. Coverage3.4x
Model Risk Score6/10
Bankruptcy Odds8%
Est. Borrow Rate7.5%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth1.5%
LT FCF Margin8.0%

Employees

Headcount6,864
Revenue / Employee$436,970
Gross Profit / Employee$116,262
2022: 7,535 → 2023: 7,894 → 2024: 7,788 → 2025: 7,752 (1% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET SELLING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 8.3% of float, sold 9.5%. 2 filers moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 2 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
-1.1% of float (net)
Bought 8.3% · Sold 9.5%
194 filers reported (last quarter: 197)

Ownership composition

Active
57.8%(-98.0% YoY)
175 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
1.0%(-1.0% YoY)
8 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(-0.1% YoY)
2 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
15.5%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BROWN ADVISORY INC$62.6M$17.51−$4.6M−$18.5M-0.5%$60.79B
Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC$52.2M$19.72−$1.6M−$13.1M-0.7%$59.61B
Boston Partners$48.1M$16.41−$36.6M−$50.0M+0.5%$95.40B
River Road Asset Management, LLC$36.7M$16.91+$1.7M−$891K-0.6%$8.82B
MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES CO /MA/$33.8M$14.72+$6.9M+$3.0M-0.4%$297.48B
Doma Perpetual Capital Management LLC$32.1M$11.97+$4.7M+$32.1M-1.1%$372M
RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$29.1M$14.95+$1.7M−$4.7M+1.2%$63.91B
ROYCE & ASSOCIATES LP$28.3M$14.56+$4.4M+$23.6M-0.9%$10.09B
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.$23.1M$13.27+$33K+$20.6M-0.3%$118.02B
FMR LLC$22.5M$16.06+$3.3M−$121M-0.0%$1.89T
STOREBRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT AS$21.3M$12.35+$0+$21.3M-1.4%$34.78B
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$20.2M$12.97+$11.4M+$12.7M-0.9%$117.03B
Polaris Capital Management, LLC$20.2M$17.57−$2.2M+$682K+0.1%$1.22B
Invenomic Capital Management LP$18.8M$14.31+$2.7M+$16.8M-1.9%$2.17B
ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$17.1M$12.70+$1.1M+$16.9M+0.1%$184.72B
Mount Capital Ltd$17.1M$18.70+$0+$0-1.1%$248M
SYSTEMATIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LP$16.6M$15.55+$1.2M+$2.4M-0.6%$4.33B
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP$15.4M$17.25−$723K−$2.2M-0.3%$533.98B
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$15.1M$14.34+$2.4M+$1.4M-0.1%$1.36T
ATLANTIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.$12.8M$11.01+$7.6M+$12.8M-0.1%$172M
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-0.36%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.31%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.22%
48 buyers · $0.05B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.18%
74 sellers · $0.25B out
alpha coverage: 98% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-15.9%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-22.5%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-15.4%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+1.2%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
-1.9%
Sellers shed AUM broadly — partly forced.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-4.0%
Holder mid (any stock)
-4.4%
Holder rally (any stock)
-7.2%

Top-5 holders · 27.6%

BROWN ADVISORY INC--
Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC--
Boston Partners--
River Road Asset Management, LLC--
MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES CO /MA/--
Put / call ratio: 2.71 (+206.0% QoQ) net bearish options

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

018.3M36.7M55.0M73.3M$9.61$12$15$18$212021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP1.6MFMR LLC2.3MBoston Partners5.0MWELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN57KAllspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC5.5MALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P.Ninety One UK LtdPRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/BROWN ADVISORY INC6.5MT. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.1.2M

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (1 analysts)$12.001830.0%
Last Year (5 analysts)$17.607360.0%
Current Price$10.14
Analyst Ratings
10
3
Buy: 10Hold: 3Consensus: Buy
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2026 Q3745M106M72M$0.51$0.50 – $0.513
2026 Q4775M111M67M$0.47$0.46 – $0.471
2027 Q1739M105M41M$0.29$0.29 – $0.291
2027 Q2731M104M53M$0.37$0.37 – $0.381
2027 Q3756M108M74M$0.52$0.52 – $0.531
2027 Q4786M112M71M$0.50$0.49 – $0.501
2028 Q1736M105M44M$0.31$0.30 – $0.311
2028 Q2724M103M54M$0.38$0.37 – $0.381
2028 Q3755M108M88M$0.62$0.61 – $0.621
2028 Q4786M112M79M$0.56$0.55 – $0.561

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$9.16M
5 txns · 4 insiders · 964,731 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-05-15BUYBRISBY DOMINICdirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer150,000$9.79$1.47M$6.63M
2026-05-14BUYBALDEW RUBENdirector, officer: Chief Financial Officer14,731$9.71$143K$3.29M
2026-05-13BUYASHKEN IAN G Hdirector100,000$9.13$913K$1.07M
2026-05-12BUYGottesman Noamdirector, other: Co-Chair200,000$9.23$1.85M$68.42M
2026-05-11BUYGottesman Noamdirector, other: Co-Chair500,000$9.57$4.79M$68.99M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

27.1%retail-0.2pp
32.9%dark+2.0pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%50%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Geography (2023-Q4)
ITALY$194.9M+100%
Rest Of Europe$193.3MNEW
GERMANY$182.3M+69%
FRANCE$103.8M+80%
CROATIA$73.8M+107%
SWEDEN$68.1M+80%
NORWAY$62.8M+99%
AUSTRIA$60.8M+78%
SERBIA$57.8M+83%
SPAIN$41.3M+100%
SWITZERLAND$40.9MNEW

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Nomad Foods Ltd.: Financial Engineering and Tax Windfalls Masking Organic Revenue Decay

Overall Risk
5/10
Fraud
4/10
Dilution
3/10
Insolvency
4/10
Earnings Overstated
7/10
Hidden Liabilities
5/10
Legal
5/10
Audit Warnings
2/10
Hidden Upside
3/10
Contextually Acceptable
6/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

Nomad Foods (NOMD) reported a significant miss in its Q4 2025 earnings (Feb 2026), leading to an immediate 11% stock decline. For the full year 2025, revenue dropped 2.2% and adjusted EPS fell 7% to €1.66. Analysts at Zacks Research downgraded the stock to a 'Strong Sell' in March 2026, while BTIG, Mizuho, and Barclays slashed price targets to as low as $13.00 citing 'disappointing' 2026 guidance, which forecasts a further 2-5% drop in organic sales (MarketBeat, Seeking Alpha, Bitget News).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on NOMD's status as a 'value trap' underperforming a growing European frozen food market. While the category is expanding (4-5% CAGR), Nomad is losing value market share—down 190 bps since 2021—as volumes and margins contract simultaneously. Management has labeled 2026 a 'transition year,' signaling further earnings erosion (Adjusted EPS down 4-13%) and margin pressure as the company attempts to reset pricing and organizational structure amidst declining brand loyalty (Seeking Alpha, Simply Wall St).

🚩 Red Flags

Financial health is deteriorating with gross margins contracting by 250 bps in 2025 due to unrecovered supply chain inflation. Net debt has ballooned to approximately €1.9 billion, pushing leverage to 3.5x EBITDA. Furthermore, the company is using aggressive share buybacks (€348M in 2025) that exceed free cash flow, effectively 'eating into the balance sheet' to support the stock price during a period of operational decline (Seeking Alpha, Intellectia.AI).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

The primary threat is the aggressive rise of private-label brands in the UK and Europe, which are successfully capturing price-sensitive consumers. Major retailers like Iceland Foods and giants like Nestlé are intensifying competition. Additionally, structural shifts toward fresh and ready-to-eat meal alternatives (growing at 5.2% CAGR) are siphoning demand away from Nomad's core frozen staples like Birds Eye and Findus (Future Market Insights, Porters Five Forces Analysis).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Consumer sentiment is increasingly negative due to 'down-trading' as high inflation forces households toward cheaper supermarket brands. Skepticism is rising regarding Nomad's 'pricing power'; the company's inability to raise prices in 2025 without triggering massive volume losses suggests brand equity is eroding. Additionally, impending UK regulatory restrictions on HFSS (High Fat, Sugar, Salt) food advertising by 2026 pose a structural risk to the visibility of key product lines like Goodfella’s pizza (The Guardian, The Grocer).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q4 • 2026-02-26

Operator: Greetings, everyone, and welcome to the Nomad Foods' Fourth Quarter of 2025 Q&A Conference Call. Please be aware that today's event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the floor over to your host, Jason English, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Jason English: Thank you. Hello, and welcome to Nomad Foods' Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Question-and-answer Session. We have posted the associated press release, prepared remarks and investor presentation on Nomad Foods website at nomadfoods.com. I hope you've all had a chance to review that. I'm Jason English, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Strategy. I'm joined by Dominic Brisby, our CEO; and Ruben Baldew, our CFO. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements about the performance that are based on our view of the company's prospects, expectations and intentions at this time. Actual results may differ due to risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in our press release, our filings with the SEC and our investor presentation, which includes cautionary language. We will also discuss non-IFRS financial measures during the call today. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be considered a replacement for and should be read together with IFRS results. Users can find the IFRS to non-IFRS reconciliations within our earnings release and in the appendices at the end of the slide presentation available on our website. Please note that certain financial information within this presentation represents adjusted figures. All adjusted figures have been adjusted primarily for, when applicable, share-based payment expenses and related employer payroll taxes, exceptional items and foreign currency translation charges and/or gains. Unless otherwise noted, today's comments from here will refer to those adjusted numbers. There it is, the fun part is out of the way. With that, operator, let's open the line to questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Jon Tanwanteng from CJS Securities.
Jonathan Tanwanteng: The first one I would ask, if you could, is what are the underlying components of volume and price in your guidance? And if you could go beyond that, perhaps what's your thoughts on net pricing versus inflation after the year?
Ruben Baldew: Yes. So we have a guidance. Thanks for the question, first of all, Ruben speaking here. So our overall guidance is a net sales guidance. We're not breaking it down in terms of volumes and in terms of price, but I can give you a bit more context. As you've heard this morning also in our prepared remarks, we are guiding for a negative decline. And the main reason for that is the following. Firstly, we're in the midst of our negotiations, our annual negotiation. And this is normal with -- as it is normal with negotiation, we're seeing some delay and disruption and retaliation. We think that's temporary, but that will have an impact on our guidance. Second bit is that big part of our inflation actually is in Fish. We're seeing cost inflation in Fish. So we will be taking pricing on Fish. We expect competition to follow. But as we've seen in the past, there might be a time lag, and that's actually the biggest contributor to our negative guidance. And thirdly, as Dominic shared, this will be a year where we will be driving change, change to make Nomad the better company in terms of driving opportunities, but with change does come disruption. Now the first 2 points links to your question on volume and price. We do expect price to be a contributor. But also when we talk about price, there's mix in there. We will be continuing to drive potatoes growth. So that will be a bit of an offset there. But we also expect negative volume because of the reasons I mentioned, especially on taking price in Fish and the price lag of our competition.
Jonathan Tanwanteng: Understood. Looking beyond '26, how should we expect normalized growth to look like, especially relative to the long-term targets you put out last year, especially if you take all these initiatives to improve your operating structure and efficiency?
Dominic Brisby: So this is Dominic. Thanks for the question. So first of all, to be clear, I fully expect us to return to growth in 2027 and 2028, and I see tremendous growth potential for this business. What I'm not going to do right now is to commit to specific numbers or ranges currently. We're currently in the process of putting together multiyear plans in terms of what we're going to deliver and how we're going to deliver them. And I'm excited to have the chance to share these with you at our Analyst Day later this year. At that time, we'll be much more specific in terms of what we're going to do, what our building blocks are and what our multiyear targets are. But just to put this in context, a measure of how much I believe in this business and how much Ruben believes in this business is the fact that over the coming weeks, we're both going to be making substantial share purchases in the company. So 2026 is a transition year. It's a year in which we're enacting a lot of change, but the long-term future in our mind looks very positive.
Operator: And our next question comes from John Baumgartner from Mizuho.
John Baumgartner: I wanted to ask, Dominic, in the prepared remarks, there was a reference to, I think, strengthening relationships with retailers and doing better at the point of purchase. And I'm curious, some of the commentary over the past 6 to 9 months from some of the larger retailers in Europe, it seems that they're focusing quite a bit more on fresh food. It seems as though they're focusing more on investing in private label quality as opposed to just, I guess, competing on price. How do you think about -- I guess, how do you see the retail environment changing? Are you seeing retailers managing these categories differently? And how do you think about the reinvestment required to get people back to that fresh food case -- the frozen food case, excuse me?
Dominic Brisby: Yes. So first of all, thanks for the question. So I think the overall behavior of European retailers hasn't changed dramatically over recent months or even the past couple of years. What we do see, though, is a continuation of an existing trend. There's nothing new about retailers wanting to make sure their private label offerings are high quality. And the focus on fresh has been quite a big theme in Europe as well. Now some of this is retailer driven. Some of this is driven by us as well as a clear leader in frozen. And certainly, we see a few opportunities, a, to strengthen our position at the point of sale and to strengthen our position with retailers, but also to make sure that we're creating excitement and animation at the point of sale. That means making sure that we roll out some of our great innovations, for example, Chicken Shop, which is working well in the U.K. There's no reason why that can't work well across Europe, creating more animation and more excitement. Secondly, making sure we have more disruptive and exciting positions at the point of sale to drive people into the frozen aisle, but also to make sure when they're there, they have something exciting to look at and focus on. And in terms of investments, there are some areas where this will require investment, and we've factored significant investment within our plan for this year to drive greater strength at the point of sale. But there's some where it won't require great investment. They'll just require more smartness from our side. For example, making sure that our packaging is not only much better than private label, but much better than the competitors as well and much better than we've been before. And particularly when you're walking through the frozen food aisle, because of the nature of packaging because it's generally not transparent, we have an opportunity to communicate much more on the packaging than would be the case in other categories. So we see a chance to be much more aggressive there than we have been before. This is something we're working on significantly. But in terms of retailer behavior, we're not seeing any dramatic shift versus where retailer behavior has been over recent years.
Jason English: John, this is Jason. I would just add a comment about the opportunity to shift growth back out of fresh into frozen, at least that was my interpretation. I would just note that the frozen category is actually delivering very robust growth for our retailers. Throughout last year, it grew 2.4% across our overall footprint, which continues to track above overall food. So there are still healthy category tailwinds and step into some markets like Italy category growth of 3%; Germany, 4.5%. So we are fortunate to be in a category that is delivering growth for retail partners and that obviously affords us opportunities.
John Baumgartner: Okay. Okay. Great. And then just a follow-up on the supply chain side on the fish business. We've seen some reports in Europe about some, I guess, disruptions on the IT platform and some digital systems on illegal fishing catches. Are you seeing any disruptions on the inflow of trade at the ports in Europe at this point? Or is that a nonevent for Nomad?
Ruben Baldew: No, that's not an event for us. If you look at our ingredients and main items, we don't see that for our supply.
Jason English: There was disruption, John, as you noted, it was reported in the Financial Times. And the programs, the policies that were being put in place that caused those disruptions have been temporarily suspended until they can be resolved. So the disruption was short term in nature and not long enough to impact our business or frankly, we don't believe it impacted the category or any of our competitors either.
Operator: Our next question is a follow-up from John Tanwanteng from CJS Securities.
Jonathan Tanwanteng: I was just wondering if you could provide more detail on the pricing negotiations and when you expect them to conclude? Number one. And what the -- if that's going to be a rolling thing through the next few quarters or if it's going to be all over before Q2?
Dominic Brisby: So in the case of most European retailers, the price negotiations are happening right now. There are certain exceptions in certain markets and with certain customers. But for the most part -- there are a few exceptions, but for the most part, we expect most of that to be included -- to be concluded during the course of Q1.
Jonathan Tanwanteng: Got it. And as a follow-on to that, assuming your competitors do follow you, how do you expect share to change throughout the year? Is there a point where you expect volume or value share to start coming back to you guys as the year progresses?
Dominic Brisby: I mean, obviously, we have no idea what our competitors are doing in terms of pricing, although we monitor it carefully. The key point from our side, of course, we have a fairly meaningful differential in price versus private label. The key point from our side is to make sure we give consumers strong reasons to pay. There are a few ways that we do that. First is through making sure our products are superior. Our products always have been superior, but actually during the course of this year, they're going to be even more superior, for example, with the new coating on fish fingers, which we're rolling out. Secondly, to make sure that our brands are stronger. Again, our brands have always been stronger if you look at our brand equity metrics, but we see opportunities to be much more effective in terms of how we spend our A&P. And thirdly, it comes back to the point I made a second ago, making sure that at the point of sale, we're noticeably stronger, noticeably more noticeable and noticeably more disruptive than anyone else. And this is what we're going to be focusing on.
Jonathan Tanwanteng: Okay. Great. And then last of all, it's good to see you committing to open share repurchases, but I was wondering if there's any change to the corporate capital allocation plan and if repurchases remain the priority for you guys?
Dominic Brisby: So our top priority is to invest in the business to maximize our organic growth potential. And so we're very clear about that. Beyond that, our priority is going to depend on the circumstances. So as you know, buybacks have been a priority for us as we believe that our shares are trading well below their intrinsic value. And we continue to have an appetite to repurchase shares at current prices, but we're going to balance that carefully against our leverage ratio and our broader liquidity needs. We're also looking forward, M&A could potentially reemerge in the future if various conditions change, for example, if we're less cheap and deals are less expensive. The one thing I can assure you of and the one thing I want to be very clear about is that either way, we and the Board are absolutely intent on allocating capital in ways that we believe maximizes shareholder returns.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] And it's showing no additional questions at this time, I would like to turn the floor back over to Dominic Brisby for any closing comments.
Dominic Brisby: So thank you all for joining us today and for your interest in Nomad Foods. I very much look forward to meeting many of you in the days and weeks ahead. Thank you.
Operator: And with that, we'll conclude today's question-and-answer session. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.