Stocks/NGL

NGL

NGL Energy Partners LP
Energy·Oil & Gas Midstream
$17.10
$2.1B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$3.2B
Free Cash Flow
$291.1M
Rev Growth
-41.3%
FCF Margin
9.2%
P/FCF
7.3x
EV/FCF
18.1x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
7.8x
Fair Value
$8.50
Upside
-50.3%

NGL Energy Partners LP engages in the transportation, storage, blending, and marketing of crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products / renewables, and water solutions. The company operates in three segments: Water Solutions, Crude Oil Logistics, and Liquids Logistics. The Water Solutions segment transports, treats, recycles, and disposes produced and flowback water generated from oil and natural gas production; aggregates and sells recovered crude oil; disposes solids, such as tank bottoms

2-Year Price History

$18.11+231.1%
$4.0$6.0$8.0$10$12$14$16$18volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q3910.0200.2--54.6--77.4-86.5549.2----------
Est2028-Q2660.0181.5--46.2--112.2-36.3471.9----------
Est2028-Q1600.0168.0--66.0--30.0-30.0359.7----------
Est2027-Q4820.0176.3--32.8--73.8-69.7329.7----------
Est2027-Q3880.0184.8--48.4--61.6-88.0255.9----------
Est2027-Q2640.0169.6--38.4--102.4-38.4194.3----------
Est2027-Q1580.0156.6--58.0--17.4-31.991.9----------
Est2026-Q4850.0165.8--29.8--68.0-68.074.5----------
Act2026-Q3909.8174.5109.147.2182.345.7-136.66.53,151125.213.8%2.8x6.1x
Act2026-Q2674.7155.694.329.3155.0117.2-37.98.73,027127.312.5%2.4x5.8x
Act2026-Q1622.2158.597.568.933.211.1-22.15.42,999132.013.0%2.5x6.1x
Act2025-Q4971.1150.8109.013.7155.0117.2-37.913.63,112132.014.0%2.2x6.6x
Act2025-Q31,549148.575.513.5153.895.4-58.45.73,204132.09.3%2.2x6.6x
Act2025-Q21,353134.377.72.56.7-82.9-89.64.53,231132.39.6%2.0x7.0x
Act2025-Q1759.2142.282.19.7-18.1-78.0-59.95.33,122132.510.5%2.1x6.8x
Act2024-Q41,549148.575.513.5155.0117.2-37.938.92,951132.510.1%1.6x6.4x
Act2024-Q31,353134.377.72.5153.895.4-58.40.72,788132.59.5%2.4x6.3x
Act2024-Q2759.2142.282.19.76.7-82.9-89.62.72,880131.99.9%2.4x5.8x
Act2024-Q11,616144.272.019.356.220.4-35.87.82,903131.98.7%2.4x5.7x
Act2023-Q42,049100.730.5-33.5238.3212.9-25.45.42,950132.83.6%2.1x5.3x
Act2023-Q32,139199.9102.758.5238.5210.1-28.44.53,311134.510.9%2.6x6.0x
Act2023-Q22,009136.468.83.5-34.2-87.1-53.04.53,548130.76.9%2.0x7.5x
Act2023-Q12,497152.887.322.92.5-38.5-41.00.83,495130.79.0%2.3x7.8x
Act2022-Q42,53393.938.5-29.4178.9144.1-34.93.83,467130.33.8%1.4x10.6x
Act2022-Q32,172113.549.1-18.934.85.1-29.75.53,537129.85.0%1.7x--
Act2022-Q21,754128.164.8-1.5-2.7-33.7-31.15.53,554129.66.5%1.9x--
Act2022-Q11,48916.4-69.3-134.9-5.2-51.9-46.82.53,516129.6-7.0%0.2x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
20221.214.4%35210.3×57.2×n/m0.0×
20235.57+9.4%6.8%5905.9×11.6×9.9×0.1×
20244.99-39.3%10.8%5696.2×23.4×13.2×0.1×
202510.00-12.2%12.4%5766.7×74.7×19.3×0.2×
TTM17.10-39.0%20.1%6390.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E17.10-8.1%0.2%70.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $8.50

NGL Energy Partners is executing a credible strategic pivot toward becoming a pure-play water midstream company in the Delaware Basin, with growing volumes and improving EBITDA. However, the investment case for common unitholders is deeply challenged by a punishing capital structure: $3B+ in debt, $1.5B+ in preferred equity with distributions that consume essentially all net income, and leverage still above 4x. The common units are effectively a highly levered call option on continued EBITDA growth and successful deleveraging. After a 130%+ rally, the stock trades at an elevated P/E near 300x and a P/FCF of ~5x that looks optically cheap but masks the reality that FCF accrues primarily to creditors and preferred holders. Customer concentration (top 10 = 73% of Water Solutions revenue), governance concerns (management aviation guarantees, private unit buybacks), and the $36M legal judgment add further risk. While the Water Solutions franchise has genuine value, the risk/reward at current prices skews unfavorably for common unitholders given the structural subordination and execution risk remaining in the deleveraging journey.

Catalyst Successful retirement of a significant portion of Class D preferred equity (reducing the ~$125M annual distribution drain) and/or reinstatement of common unit distributions would re-rate the stock. Achieving sub-3.5x leverage and demonstrating FY2027 EBITDA above $700M would validate the transformation thesis.
Risk Oil price decline below $55/bbl triggering reduced Delaware Basin drilling activity, which would directly impact Water Solutions volumes (85% of EBITDA) given 73% customer concentration among top 10 producers, potentially triggering covenant issues with 4x+ leverage.
Trend
IMPROVING
Mgmt
5/10
Quarter
5/10
Exp. Move
-4.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

NGL Energy Partners delivered a strong fiscal 2026 third quarter, driven by record volumes in its Water Solutions business. The partnership reported an adjusted EBITDA of $172.5 million and reaffirmed its full-year guidance of $650 million to $660 million, despite temporary weather-related disruptions in January. Financial highlights included the redemption of 15% of Class D preferred equity and a significant reduction in common unit dilution, bringing leverage down to the low 4.0x range. Management expressed high confidence in fiscal 2027, projecting EBITDA to exceed $700 million. Strategically, NGL is pivoting toward technological innovation and sustainable water management. The company is leveraging AI to optimize its SCADA systems and has entered an MOU with Natura Resources to explore nuclear-powered desalination. This long-term strategy aims to transition produced water into a reusable resource for industrial and agricultural sectors. During the analyst session, management emphasized the firmness of their long-term contracts despite oil price volatility. While specific details on recent industry consolidation were withheld, the overall tone was bullish, focusing on the company’s evolution into a predominantly water-infrastructure-led entity with stable, growing cash flows.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$17.10
Market Cap$2.1B
Enterprise Value$5.3B
P/S Ratio0.7x
P/FCF7.3x
EV/FCF18.1x
FCF Margin (TTM)9.2%
FCF Yield13.6%
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.2%
Annual Dilution-5.2%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$3.2B
Net Income$159.1M
Free Cash Flow$291.1M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-41.3%
EBITDA Margin20.1%
Net Margin5.0%
FCF Margin9.2%
CapEx % of Revenue7.4%
SBC % of Revenue0.0%
ROIC13.3%
WC Change % Rev1.6%
Interest Coverage2.5x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$1.92
-88.8% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$2.4B
− Net Debt$3.1B
= Fair Equity$241M
Revenue Growth1.4% → 3.0%
FCF Margin9.2% → 10.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float3.3%
Short Shares3.7M
Days to Cover16.4
Change (vs Prior)-12.1%
Short % Float History
3.30%+0.90pp
2.4%2.6%2.8%3.0%3.2%3.4%3.6%3.8%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)57%
Put IV (ATM)66%
ATM Spread7.2%
Call $OI (near money)$604K
Put $OI (near money)$14K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$18.0
Major Expirations1
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$15.00$2.95/$4.301,124$0.05/$0.95114
$16.00$2.25/$3.80116$0.15/$1.550
$17.00$1.55/$2.9524$0.50/$1.9525
$18.00$1.10/$2.401,147$0.90/$2.500
$19.00$0.70/$2.400$1.40/$3.200
$20.00$0.35/$2.005$2.00/$3.900
$21.00$0.10/$1.650$2.65/$4.500
$22.00$0.05/$1.350$3.40/$5.300
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-7.2%
Forward FCF Margin8.5%
Forward EBITDA Margin22.9%
Forward P/FCF8.6x
Forward EV/FCF21.2x
Forward Int. Coverage2.7x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds12%
Est. Borrow Rate9.5%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth3.0%
LT FCF Margin10.0%

Employees

Headcount607
Revenue / Employee$5,235,115
Gross Profit / Employee$1,244,234
2022: 842 → 2023: 638 → 2024: 607 → 2025: 569 (-12% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 8.8% of float, sold 4.5%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (1 buying, 2 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+4.3% of float (net)
Bought 8.8% · Sold 4.5%
105 filers reported (last quarter: 99)

Ownership composition

Active
40.1%(+27.5% YoY)
96 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
0.0%(+0.0% YoY)
0 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.2%(+0.2% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
4.4%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
Invesco Ltd.$241M$6.06−$130K+$153K-0.2%$652.04B
MORGAN STANLEY$121M$3.67−$28.3M−$22.1M-0.3%$1.65T
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$102M$4.89−$25.5M−$10.0M-0.1%$1.36T
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$100M$5.74+$7.4M+$35.4M-0.2%$760.93B
TPG GP A, LLC$73.2M$12.33+$73.2M+$73.2M-2.4%$3.32B
ING GROEP NV$65.5M$6.03+$1.7M+$49.1M-0.2%$16.35B
CITIGROUP INC$37.4M$6.15+$5.6M+$5.1M-0.3%$156.55B
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO$37.0M$3.33+$409K−$29.2M-0.2%$1.47T
NOMURA HOLDINGS INC$27.2M$9.97+$13.1M+$23.6M-0.4%$9.84B
PRESCOTT GROUP CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.$12.7M$2.69+$493K+$11.2M-0.3%$993M
Fractal Investments LLC$10.3M$5.16+$0+$0+2.3%$845M
BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS$7.6M$6.31+$3.9M+$7.5M-0.2%$149.31B
NATIXIS$6.1M$4.66−$2.1M−$3.0M+0.1%$24.76B
UBS Group AG$3.5M$4.67+$976K−$3.2M-0.3%$562.11B
HighTower Advisors, LLC$3.4M$4.10+$0+$0-0.2%$93.93B
Mariner, LLC$3.2M$5.74+$43K+$783K-0.1%$85.47B
Cetera Investment Advisers$3.1M$5.80+$79K−$343K-0.2%$93.23B
ALPS ADVISORS INC$2.9M$11.62+$2.0M+$2.9M+0.2%$21.23B
BROWN ADVISORY INC$2.8M$2.22+$0+$0-0.5%$60.79B
STEPHENS INC /AR/$2.3M$4.87+$0+$493K-0.1%$7.96B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
-0.35%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.36%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-1.18%
33 buyers · $0.16B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.27%
25 sellers · $-0.03B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-13.4%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
+7.1%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-1.2%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+8.5%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+2.2%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-3.7%
Holder mid (any stock)
-2.4%
Holder rally (any stock)
-2.5%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

016.6M33.1M49.7M66.2M$1.21$3.99$6.77$9.55$122021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Invesco Ltd.19.6MMORGAN STANLEY9.8MBANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/8.3MGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC8.1MTPG GP A, LLC5.9MING GROEP NV5.3MJPMORGAN CHASE & CO3.1MANGELO GORDON & CO., L.P.CITIGROUP INC3.0MNOMURA HOLDINGS INC2.2M

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
6
9
2
Buy: 6Hold: 9Sell: 2Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2025 Q4804M78M20M$0.16$0.16 – $0.161
2026 Q1942M92M23M$0.18$0.18 – $0.181
2026 Q2745M73M19M$0.15$0.15 – $0.151
2026 Q3767M75M24M$0.19$0.19 – $0.191
2026 Q4910M89M30M$0.24$0.24 – $0.241
2027 Q1900M88M29M$0.23$0.23 – $0.231
2027 Q2695M68M23M$0.18$0.18 – $0.181
2027 Q3715M70M30M$0.24$0.24 – $0.241
2027 Q4857M83M38M$0.30$0.30 – $0.301
2028 Q1846M82M39M$0.31$0.31 – $0.311

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$580K
1 txn · 1 insider · 100,000 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2025-09-12BUYCOLLINGSWORTH JAMES Mdirector100,000$5.80$580K$4.23M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

29.5%retail+0.1pp
16.9%dark+4.8pp
week of 2026-04-13
0%20%40%60%80%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q3)
Product$716.5MNEW
Service$193.3MNEW
By Geography (2013-Q2)
UNITED STATES$1.1BNEW
CANADA$45.2MNEW

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

NGL Energy Partners LP: The Preferred Burden and the Aviation Perk

Overall Risk
7/10
Fraud
4/10
Dilution
6/10
Insolvency
7/10
Earnings Overstated
5/10
Hidden Liabilities
5/10
Legal
3/10
Audit Warnings
4/10
Hidden Upside
4/10
Contextually Acceptable
4/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

NGL reported a significant earnings miss for Q3 fiscal 2026 on February 3, 2026, posting an EPS of $0.10 against analyst estimates of $0.16, leading to a 9% after-hours stock plunge. This followed a previous major miss in Q3 fiscal 2025 (reported October 2025) where EPS was -$0.12 vs. a forecast of $0.19. Consequently, Zacks Research downgraded NGL from 'Strong Buy' to 'Hold' in February 2026, citing profitability concerns despite revenue growth (MarketBeat, ChartMill).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on excessive leverage and a fragile balance sheet, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 5.35 and projected adjusted leverage of 5x for 2025. Additionally, the partnership has not yet reinstated common unit distributions, frustrating income-seeking investors. Critics also point to extreme customer concentration, where the top 10 customers account for 73% of Water Solutions revenue, making the company highly vulnerable to the drilling budgets of a few major producers in the Delaware Basin (S&P Global, Seeking Alpha).

🚩 Red Flags

NGL faces persistent legal and regulatory overhangs, including a $36 million judgment in the LCT Capital LLC lawsuit which was affirmed by the Delaware Supreme Court in May 2024, with ongoing disputes over post-judgment interest. Furthermore, the company recorded a pipeline safety violation with PHMSA in 2025. InvestingPro data suggests the stock is currently 'overvalued' following a 130%+ rally, trading at a P/E ratio near 300, which bears label as unsustainable given recent earnings volatility (Justia, Violation Tracker, Investing.com).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

In its Liquids Logistics segment, NGL is battling 'aggressive pricing by competitors' and reduced demand for propane and refined products, which has compressed margins. It also faces significant competition from larger, better-capitalized MLPs like Energy Transfer (ET), which analysts note offers a more attractive valuation and a more reliable distribution profile (Tiger Brokers, MarketBeat).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment is dampened by 'reduced customer demand' in the Liquids Logistics segment, which management attributed to unfavorable weather and competitive shifts. In the Water Solutions segment, while volumes remain high, the heavy reliance on a small group of upstream producers creates a 'hostage' dynamic where any shift in customer drilling activity directly threatens 85% of NGL's EBITDA (GuruFocus, Seeking Alpha).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q3 • 2026-02-03

Operator: Greetings. Welcome to NGL Energy Partners 2026Q3 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Brad Cooper, CFO at NGL Energy Partners. You may begin. 
Brad Cooper: Good afternoon, and thank you to everyone for joining us on the call today. Our comments today will include plans, forecasts, and estimates that are forward-looking statements under U.S. Securities law. These comments are subject to assumptions, risks, and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements. Please take note of the cautionary language and risk factors provided in our presentation materials and our other public disclosure materials. We delivered another strong quarter highlighted by record water disposal volumes in Water Solutions and continued execution on our financial strategy. For the quarter, adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $172.5 million, up from $158 million a year ago, a 9.2% increase. On the financial strategy front, we executed on two of our priorities: reducing higher-cost preferred equity and repurchasing common units. During the quarter, we redeemed an additional 15% of the original Class D outstanding. On the common units, we repurchased 1.6 million units during the quarter and have now repurchased approximately 8.7 million units since program inception, which is almost 7% of the outstanding units at an average price of $5.70 per unit. We have almost fully exhausted the board-approved common unit repurchase plan. At current unit price levels, we are primarily focused on eliminating the Class D preferred units. With the water growth projects we have line of sight into, and the Class D preferreds, we will be targeting these two over the next fiscal year. Doug will provide prepared remarks shortly, but in early January, we eclipsed 3.5 million barrels per day of disposal volumes, which is a record for the partnership. We experienced a few days in mid-January when volumes were under 3 million barrels a day due to the extreme cold weather most of the Midwest and Southeast experienced. We do not expect this to have a material impact on our full-year guide for fiscal 2026 due to the nature of how we contract. Recall that over 1.5 million barrels per day of our water disposal volume is under MVC or CBC, which allows us to get paid on volumes even if they are not disposed of. The new contracted volumes that Mike mentioned on the previous earnings call are coming online, and we anticipate a strong close to fiscal 2026. We are still guiding our full-year EBITDA to a range of $650 to $660 million. These new contracted volumes that have recently come online set us up for a strong start to fiscal 2027, where we are still projecting to exceed $700 million of EBITDA for the first time in the history of the partnership. In 2026, the Water Solutions segment generated adjusted EBITDA of $154.5 million versus $132.7 million in the prior year third quarter, an increase of 16.5%. Again, we set a physical disposal volume record, processing 3.07 million barrels per day of physical produced water versus 2.6 million barrels per day in the prior year third quarter, an increase of 17.1%. Total volumes we were paid to dispose of, including deficiency volumes, were 3.13 million barrels per day in the third quarter, versus 2.91 million barrels per day in the prior year third quarter. So total volumes we were paid to dispose of were up approximately 7% in 2026 over 2025. Operating expenses for the quarter were $0.18 per barrel due to nonrecurring expense reductions. Crude Oil Logistics adjusted EBITDA was $15.4 million in 2026, versus $17.3 million in the prior year's third quarter. Physical volumes on the Grand Mesa pipeline averaged approximately 85,000 barrels per day, up significantly from 61,000 barrels per day in the prior year quarter. Margins for barrels on Grand Mesa were lower in 2026 compared to the prior year's third quarter due to lower oil prices as well as a reduction in volumes from committed producers with higher contracted tariffs. Liquids Logistics adjusted EBITDA was $15.2 million in 2026, versus $18.6 million in the prior year's third quarter. Strategically, we executed a significant repositioning in April 2025 with this segment. We sold our wholesale propane business and 17 NGL terminals, exited the refined products business, and wound down our biodiesel marketing business. Today's liquid platform is more focused and anchored by our Centennial butane blending business. The streamlined footprint is performing as expected for the full year. I will turn the call over to Doug White. Doug?
Doug White: Thank you, Brad. As Brad mentioned earlier, we entered into several volume commitment contracts in the Delaware Basin that included a large amount of asset development. Our development team executed these projects ahead of schedule and under budget. We are happy to report the water volumes associated with these projects are flowing and have been at or above our expectations. The capital investment included the Western Express pipeline expansion of 27 miles of 24-inch pipeline, further expanding our reach into our customer footprint and providing flexibility to transport water to areas of underutilized capacity and away from areas burdened by seismicity and pore pressure constraints. I want to thank the operations team for their successful execution of these projects. In the quarter, we achieved an all-time daily record of approximately 3.3 million barrels of water, and on January 16, we received over 3.5 million barrels of water in a single day. This reflects the capacity increase from the capital investment I just mentioned. Our ability to execute large growth projects at attractive multiples over the last several years, combined with our operational capabilities, is allowing us to deliver consistent economic results. We continue to engage our producer customers with opportunities, and we are working to secure additional disposal contracts in fiscal year 2027. We continue to improve the business, and as an example, we are in our second year of development of our AI machine-based learning project, which will begin to contribute to operational efficiencies in this calendar year. We are utilizing the millions of data points collected through our SCADA system, automated electric power consumption meters, and system flow models, which are fed into our proprietary AI model. It is identifying opportunities to increase revenues and decrease expenses. We are excited to continue to grow this project over time and increase the AI impact on our business. As an update to our large-scale produced water treatment strategy in the Delaware Basin, we recently entered into an MOU with Natura Resources, a leading advanced modular nuclear reactor developer. We are pursuing a combination of nuclear power applied to thermal desalination technology in Reeves County, Texas, where our outfall for the TPDES discharge permit is located. We are progressing toward a final draft of that permit this month and expect to receive an issued permit early this year. These steps lead us closer to realizing our medium to long-term goals of large-scale disposition of produced water. I will now turn the call over to our CEO, H. Michael Krimbill.
H. Michael Krimbill: Thanks, Doug, and good afternoon, everyone. I have some just brief comments. With respect to current operations, you have heard that we achieved another great quarter exhibiting continued growth. There are several takeaways worth mentioning. One, we continue to move towards a predominantly water solutions company as we grow our water footprint and shed non-water assets. Two, this effectively eliminates the seasonality of our cash flows and improves the consistency and predictability of those cash flows. And three, we already have significant growth contracted for fiscal 2027 beginning April 1. So now let's look at our capital allocation priorities first. Our capital must finance internal growth projects for our producer customers. As we discussed on the previous quarter's earnings call, our growth capital increased by over $100 million in the second and third quarters of this fiscal year as new opportunities presented themselves. And as Doug said, these projects are currently in service. Next, we focused on redeeming the Class D. As Brad said, we have redeemed about 15% of the outstanding preferreds. But importantly, our leverage has declined to the low 4.0 times area. So we will be looking to take out a significant portion of the remaining Class D's in the very near future. So stay tuned for that. Finally, we look at our common units, opportunistically to purchase and retire them at attractive prices. The board and management team have acted proactively to eliminate dilution and actually reduce the common unit count outstanding. So going back to November '24, you may remember we purchased 23.3 million long-term common unit warrants that had strike prices from $13.50 to about $17.50. We paid $6.9 million. These purchases eliminated approximately 18% of future dilution. Currently, we have reduced the outstanding, as Brad said, by nearly 7% through our board-approved unit repurchase plan. So combined, we should not lose sight. We have eliminated dilution of our common by approximately 25%. We will continue taking advantage of attractive common unit prices while balancing liquidity and leverage requirements. In closing, we believe the future of our business five to twenty-plus years from now is not dependent upon drilling more and more SWDs. That is our situation presently and in the near future. But ultimately, we must treat the produced water to a quality that can be released on the surface for irrigation, industrial, and municipal use. We are closer to that goal. The Natura agreement and the anticipated discharge permit are two of the steps in that direction. Not all of our initiatives on this journey will work, but time and technology are on our side. I think with that, we open it up for questions.
Operator: Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. Before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. And the first question today is coming from Eric Whitfield from Texas Capital.
Eric Whitfield: Good afternoon, guys. Derrick Whitfield with Texas Capital. So congrats on your quarter and also on the strong operating performance of your water business. Maybe just starting there on the macro environment, given the volatility in crude prices, can you speak to the firmness of the growth projects you highlighted in 2Q and really speak to the appetite of producers to further address and commit to future water disposal needs given the volatility we are currently seeing in crude prices?
H. Michael Krimbill: Yeah. Derrick, I mean, I think Mike hit on it. I mean, the projects and the capital spend that we outlined in the last call, those projects are online here at the beginning of this calendar year. Doug, you want to kind of take what you are seeing maybe into this current year and maybe through the end of next fiscal year for us?
Doug White: Yeah. Eric, when we look at the projects that we have completed, you know, those came with volume commitments and those were for the long term. So those are very financially firm. You know, as we see the oil price fluctuate, even when it dipped down to, you know, the $55 range, we really did not see a big change from our customers as the consolidations happen, certainly in the Delaware Basin. We saw some more of that announced today. That consolidation has created more of a level activity level versus what it may have been, you know, a few years ago when there was a lot more private equity type of producers in the basin. But as it has matured, we are seeing our customers and our large customers just on a continuous, drilling forward and, you know, frac spreads, etcetera. The other real big driver for us is, you know, asking about what does it look like, you know, prospectively. The other big driver is there is such a large wedge of foundational volumes of produced water in the Delaware Basin that when we saw, for an example, you know, we hit that record on Friday, the sixteenth in January, that was right before the storm. We saw some people drop some frack crews or pause some frack crews. The uptick of water that happens when there is even a small slowdown is reflective positive for our business. You know, we are not active recyclers like some others are. When that recycling may slow down because it does not have, you know, a frac crew to send water to, all of that produced water has to go somewhere, and that comes to us. So we are continuing to see large opportunities for large-scale projects prospectively and expect to, you know, nail down some of those firmly in the coming months.
Eric Whitfield: Terrific. And specific to Natura's release this morning, it seems the market was concerned about the near-term capital obligations for a project that might not be material for several quarters, if not years? I guess, a, how would you characterize this water treatment opportunity and volume and values? And then b, how material is the current CapEx obligation?
Doug White: Yeah. Good question. So we continue to explore the alternatives to injection based on, you know, seismicity, pore pressure, increasing, you know, just being prudent operators, we have continued for several years to be looking for other alternatives to injection. You know, you might remember, you know, our very successful desalination project in Pinedale, Wyoming. You know, we have a history and experience in the side of the desal part of the business. We know it takes several factors to come together for those projects to coalesce. You know, what has happened in the past year, you know, Texas has passed the water bill. Right? A billion dollars a year of support for new water in Texas. The federal government support of production of domestically sourced critical minerals, requests from our customers. You know, our customers are paying attention. What opportunities are there for the producers, and saying, hey. We are hey, NGL. Where are you going to take my water? Something different rather than, you know, Loving or Reeves County? You know, we have addressed a lot of that in the short to medium term. You know, and some percentages of the very long term with our Andrews County out-of-base assets. But then we have to look at and say, what does it take to create large-scale desalination, which we very, very firmly believe is part of the future in the portfolio going forward. Basic requirements for that, first, have to have produced water volumes that support an economic scaled plant. We check that box. Right? Our large system. There is a reason we applied for our outfalls on our TPDES permit in a particular location in Reeves County. That is because we can deliver, you know, 800,000 barrels a day of water to that location. You need those economies of scale to have an economic project. Second is an available energy source. You have to have this energy source for the treatment plant. Or as it goes with Natura, it becomes a means of treatment itself. And very interestingly, nuclear power generation produces about 60% waste heat of its energy. We would use that waste heat to be able to do thermal desalination of our water. It is not really even about the electricity, the 40% electricity that is produced. It is really about the waste heat. We will be taking waste heat and treating wastewater to create new water for the state of Texas, use the waste off of that process, which is condensed brine or concentrated brine, which has concentrated up the minerals within that brine. And then, you know, we are working on recovery of critical minerals through that. So you put all those pieces together, that is what it takes to get there. And our MOU with Natura, we are very excited about. While it will have no CapEx demand to NGL on the nuclear side, our plan has not changed. And our CapEx forecast and demand has not changed, we are looking forward to developing the scaled treatment, and that will come over time. We will not go straight to a giant scale treatment. Our TPDES discharge permit even has caps and ceilings on the amount of water you can discharge over certain periods of years. So for us to start, you know, maybe we start with a 50,000 barrel a day plant that is able to be scaled. Most likely, we will be using natural gas to power that plant. Not a heavy CapEx demand. And then as we move forward, we sign contracts with our customers. We sign contracts with downstream users of our new water. Then we can create the economics around a larger CapEx spend to scale the project. Natura, should that, you know, come to fruition, Natura has their own economics of their own capital spend around their project. But we would put the two projects together to really create a really unique and exciting project.
Eric Whitfield: Tremendously helpful. If I could just ask one more, only you piqued my interest on the AI and machine learning side. Maybe speak to the amount of value you have recovered to date and really, the amount of potential value you could recover as you see this starting to take root within the organization?
Doug White: Well, I think you can see in our OpEx numbers how they continue to improve. It is very hard to simply quantify that large move that we achieved this last quarter just down to the AI project. But, certainly, the AI project is having an influence on expenses. What most do not really focus on is the impact on revenues. The more water we can move more efficiently, utilizing, increasing our utilization of our existing assets, saves us capital. We do not have to drill new wells. We do not have to build new facilities. You know, that goes straight to the bottom line. Obviously, with helping out on reducing the capital spend, we increase our low multiple returns, which is great to pay back returns. If you are looking for just a dollar amount or a percentage, right now, I do not feel comfortable saying what that is. We are seeing increases in just efficiencies to start. As you know, these machine-based products, you know, they learn from themselves and start to continue to create more and more value. So as time goes on, Eric, I think as we see true, I guess, discernible returns on that or dollars, you know, we will be able to share that down the road.
Eric Whitfield: Fantastic. Great update.
Operator: Thank you. And once again, it will be star one on your phone at this time. The next question is coming from Tarek Hamid from JPMorgan. 
Nevin Mathew: Hi. Good afternoon. This is Nevin on for Tarek. You had mentioned consolidation a little earlier. So we were just wondering if you had any conversations with Devon following the deal announcement earlier this week. And if so, were there any takeaways on potential changes to activities or volume?
H. Michael Krimbill: We have been so busy with preparing for this call and running the business, Nevin, we have not had the opportunity to have those conversations with Devon.
Nevin Mathew: That's understandable. Alright. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. And there are no other questions in the queue at this time. I would now like to hand the call back to Brad Cooper for closing remarks.
Brad Cooper: Thanks, everyone, for joining today. We will catch up with you in June on our year-end call.
Operator: Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.