Stocks/LCID

LCID

Lucid Group, Inc.
Consumer Cyclical·Auto - Manufacturers
$6.55
$2.1B market cap
Claude Rating
2/10SHORT
Revenue
$1.4B
Free Cash Flow
$-4.7B
Rev Growth
+20.2%
FCF Margin
-333.7%
P/FCF
--
EV/FCF
--
Fwd EV/EBITDA
--
Fair Value
$1.50
Upside
-77.1%

Lucid Group, Inc. a technology and automotive company, develops electric vehicle (EV) technologies. The company designs, engineers, and builds electric vehicles, EV powertrains, and battery systems. As of December 31, 2021, it operates twenty retail studios in the United States. Lucid Group, Inc. was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Newark, California.

2-Year Price History

$5.84-79.4%
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40volMay 24Sep 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q1780.0-429.0---561.6---819.0-312.0-6,333----------
Est2027-Q4880.0-440.0---572.0---880.0-334.4-5,514----------
Est2027-Q3750.0-487.5---615.0---900.0-315.0-4,634----------
Est2027-Q2650.0-520.0---650.0---910.0-292.5-3,734----------
Est2027-Q1520.0-520.0---624.0---858.0-260.0-2,824----------
Est2026-Q4600.0-570.0---660.0---930.0-270.0-1,966----------
Est2026-Q3510.0-586.5---663.0---892.5-244.8-1,036----------
Est2026-Q2420.0-588.0---651.0---882.0-231.0-143.1----------
Act2026-Q1282.5-870.7-951.6-1,028-1,186-1,439-253.2738.93,168328.3-84.8%-21.2x--
Act2025-Q4522.7-789.0-1,065-814.0-926.1-1,252-325.4997.8860.53,134-494.9%-35.8x--
Act2025-Q3336.6-847.9-942.0-978.4-756.8-955.6-198.82,3372,814312.2-133.9%-78.3x--
Act2025-Q2259.4-407.0-803.1-539.4-847.7-1,030-182.72,8262,741305.8-116.8%-17.1x--
Act2025-Q1235.1-257.7-691.9-366.2-428.6-589.9-161.23,6112,558303.6-90.9%-21.7x--
Act2024-Q4234.5-295.5-733.0-397.2-533.2-824.8-291.64,0312,477284.1-80.0%-28.8x--
Act2024-Q3200.0-914.0-770.5-992.5-462.8-622.5-159.73,4722,404232.4-128.2%-107.8x--
Act2024-Q2200.6-570.6-787.4-643.4-507.0-741.3-234.33,2162,416231.0-101.1%-85.5x--
Act2024-Q1172.7-604.3-729.9-680.9-516.8-714.9-198.23,9942,423230.2-75.6%-80.6x--
Act2023-Q4157.2-578.5-736.9-653.8-474.6-747.2-272.63,8602,428229.2-65.3%-74.4x--
Act2023-Q3137.8-566.4-752.9-630.9-513.6-706.1-192.54,4232,406228.4-59.2%-169.6x--
Act2023-Q2150.9-695.1-837.7-764.2-700.4-904.1-203.75,2492,367191.3-59.3%-103.9x--
Act2023-Q1149.4-716.6-772.2-779.5-801.3-1,043-241.82,9782,347183.2-93.0%-100.8x--
Act2022-Q4257.7-409.5-749.7-472.7-648.5-938.4-289.93,9132,348171.3-73.7%-50.7x--
Act2022-Q3195.5-466.4-687.5-530.1-569.5-859.5-290.13,3422,342169.1-93.2%-61.3x--
Act2022-Q297.3-165.8-559.2-220.4-513.6-823.5-309.84,2942,236168.7-66.9%-23.1x--
Act2022-Q157.7-30.9-597.5-81.3-494.7-679.7-185.15,3922,205168.2-69.3%-4.0x--

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude2/10SHORTFV: $1.50

Lucid is a structurally impaired equity where the investment thesis for common shareholders is essentially broken. The company burns roughly $3.5-4B annually against ~$1.5B in revenue, has accumulated $16.6B in losses, and survives solely through continuous capital injections from the Saudi PIF — each round massively diluting existing shareholders (981% annual dilution). Even if the underlying technology is excellent, the equity is being destroyed through a toxic cycle of losses → dilution → more losses. The Midsize platform (sub-$50K, 2027 launch) is the only realistic path to scale, but by the time it ramps, the share count will likely be 2-3x higher than today, meaning per-share value creation is near-impossible. The Gravity stop-sale, CEO departure, guidance suspension, securities litigation, and supplier quality issues compound the fundamental problem. At $6.25/share with 3.3B shares outstanding, the market is pricing in a successful Midsize launch and profitability — outcomes that are highly uncertain given execution history. This is a well-funded science project, not a viable equity investment.

Catalyst Potential short squeeze given 30% short interest, or a PIF-led take-private at a premium to eliminate the public equity entirely — though this would likely be at a fraction of current price once dilution is factored in. The Midsize platform launch in 2027, if on-time and well-received, could also change the narrative.
Risk The PIF stops funding or demands conversion terms so dilutive that common equity is effectively wiped out. With 164M shares reserved for conversion and ongoing cash burn requiring multiple additional raises, the dilution flywheel is the existential risk — the company may survive but the equity won't.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
3/10
Quarter
2/10
Exp. Move
-15.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Lucid Group's Q1 2026 earnings call introduced incoming CEO Silvio Napoli, who is prioritizing capital discipline and operational simplification. A major highlight was the expansion of the Uber partnership to 35,000 robotaxis and $500 million in investment, alongside $550 million in new funding from the PIF. This brings total pro-forma liquidity to $4.7 billion, extending the company’s cash runway into late 2027. While vehicle production grew 149% year-over-year to 5,500 units, deliveries were flat at 3,093 due to a temporary Gravity stop-sale. Consequently, Lucid suspended its 2026 guidance pending a strategic review by the new CEO. The company’s long-term strategy remains centered on the 2027 launch of the Midsize platform, which targets a sub-$50,000 price point and is expected to drive the scale necessary for gross margin breakeven. Additionally, the robotaxi program with Uber and Nuro is on track for a late 2026 commercial launch. Despite a $1 billion net loss this quarter, management expressed confidence in their cost-reduction roadmap and the strategic advantage provided by their long-term shareholders.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$6.55
Market Cap$2.1B
Enterprise Value$4.5B
P/S Ratio1.5x
P/FCF--
EV/FCF--
FCF Margin (TTM)-333.7%
FCF Yield-224.6%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution8.1%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$1.4B
Net Income$-3.4B
Free Cash Flow$-4.7B

Revenue Growth (YoY)+20.2%
EBITDA Margin-208.0%
Net Margin-239.8%
FCF Margin-333.7%
CapEx % of Revenue68.5%
SBC % of Revenue7.6%
ROIC-207.6%
WC Change % Rev-48.2%
Interest Coverage-29.8x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$-16.49
-351.8% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$-54.1B
− Net Debt$2.4B
= Fair Equity$-5.4B
Revenue Growth30.0% → 8.0%
FCF Margin-333.7% → 5.0%
Discount Rate18.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float43.8%
Short Shares57.8M
Days to Cover2.1
Change (vs Prior)+43.3%
Short % Float History
43.80%-225.00pp
50.0%100.0%150.0%200.0%250.0%300.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)85%
Put IV (ATM)93%
ATM Spread0.51%
Call $OI (near money)$4.6M
Put $OI (near money)$20.4M
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$6.0
Major Expirations6
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.00$2.85/$4.850--/$0.340
$3.00$2.00/$3.402$0.02/$0.07504
$4.00$1.85/$2.2847$0.04/$0.37193
$5.00$1.17/$1.29339$0.42/$0.445,547
$6.00$0.71/$0.742,724$0.89/$0.9418,672
$7.00$0.41/$0.454,927$1.60/$1.687,260
$8.00$0.26/$0.2815,274$2.30/$2.5117,370
$9.00$0.13/$0.201,845$3.20/$3.50710
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+46.3%
Forward FCF Margin-173.8%
Forward EBITDA Margin-110.5%
Forward P/FCF--
Forward EV/FCF--
Forward Int. Coverage-27.0x
Model Risk Score10/10
Bankruptcy Odds25%
Est. Borrow Rate18.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth8.0%
LT FCF Margin5.0%

Employees

Headcount6,800
Revenue / Employee$206,060
Gross Profit / Employee$-196,997
2022: 7,200 → 2023: 6,500 → 2024: 6,800 → 2025: 9,000 (8% CAGR)

Cash Runway

1.9months
CRITICAL

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET SELLING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 10.9% of float, sold 13.7%. 2 filers moved >1% of shares (1 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
-2.8% of float (net)
Bought 10.9% · Sold 13.7%
247 filers reported (last quarter: 409)

Ownership composition

Active
116.1%(+116.1% YoY)
326 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
6.7%(+6.7% YoY)
6 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(+0.1% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
100.0%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2024-122025-062025-092025-122026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
PUBLIC INVESTMENT FUND$1.69B$23.79+$0+$1.69B-0.4%$12.01B
Uber Technologies, Inc$131M$23.79+$0+$131M-8.1%$3.60B
UBS Group AG$87.1M$15.99+$14.0M+$87.1M-0.3%$562.11B
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$59.7M$22.44+$2.0M+$59.7M-0.2%$5.69T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$25.4M$21.86+$2.1M+$25.4M-0.2%$2.89T
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$24.7M$23.13+$444K+$24.7M+2.3%$1.61T
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$21.1M$9.81+$21.1M+$21.1M-0.2%$218.19B
MORGAN STANLEY$21.0M$14.71−$21.8M+$21.0M-0.3%$1.65T
BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS$18.6M$16.60+$9.1M+$18.6M-0.2%$149.31B
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$18.3M$18.87+$1.8M+$18.3M-0.1%$1.36T
CITIGROUP INC$15.3M$12.14+$6.1M+$15.3M-0.3%$156.55B
BARCLAYS PLC$12.1M$20.89+$357K+$12.1M-0.1%$279.69B
MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.$11.1M$21.54+$2.4M+$11.1M+1.7%$73.71B
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$9.1M$23.79−$5.8M+$9.1M-0.4%$480.92B
Marex Group plc$8.8M$23.79−$872K+$8.8M-1.7%$9.64B
MARSHALL WACE, LLP$8.8M$23.05−$17.1M+$8.8M+0.7%$92.71B
FIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP$7.0M$22.91−$403K+$7.0M-0.9%$139.72B
Invesco Ltd.$6.7M$16.07+$2.0M+$6.7M-0.2%$652.04B
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$6.6M$20.90−$1.5M+$6.6M-0.2%$760.93B
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$6.3M$22.85+$429K+$6.3M-0.2%$755.34B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-1.45%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.82%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.04%
126 buyers · $0.07B in
Sellers (this Q)
+0.27%
70 sellers · $0.09B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-23.5%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-1.6%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-6.9%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+5.4%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+0.6%
Sellers' overall flow ~ flat.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-5.4%
Holder mid (any stock)
-3.1%
Holder rally (any stock)
-6.9%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

052.9M105.8M158.7M211.6M$9.53$13$17$20$242025-092025-122026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
PUBLIC INVESTMENT FUND177.1MUber Technologies, Inc13.7MMILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC244KUBS Group AG9.1MMARSHALL WACE, LLP924KMORGAN STANLEY2.2MMIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.1.2MMarex Group plc924KBANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/1.9MBARCLAYS PLC1.3M

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (6 analysts)$7.331190.0%
Last Year (11 analysts)$9.835010.0%
Current Price$6.55

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$170.7M
Incentive & Other$29.6M
Total Compensation$200.3M
% of Revenue6.9%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Major holders (≥10% beneficial owners)
Buys ($, 12mo)
$17
2 txns · 1 insider · 55,001 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-04-28BUYPUBLIC INVESTMENT FUNDdirector, 10 percent owner: 55,000$0.00$0$0
2025-11-25BUYPUBLIC INVESTMENT FUNDdirector, 10 percent owner: 1$16.99$17$17

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

43.9%retail+7.7pp
15.4%dark-0.4pp
week of 2026-04-27
10%20%30%40%50%25-0925-1025-1126-0126-0226-0326-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2025-Q4)
Regulatory Credits$84.4MNEW
By Geography (2025-Q4)
North America$437.0M+142%
UNITED STATES$429.4MNEW
Middle East$80.7M+64%
SAUDI ARABIA$80.4MNEW

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Lucid Group (LCID): Sovereign-Funded Life Support Masking Catastrophic Burn and Massive Imminent Dilution

Overall Risk
9/10
Fraud
4/10
Dilution
10/10
Insolvency
9/10
Earnings Overstated
5/10
Hidden Liabilities
7/10
Legal
8/10
Audit Warnings
5/10
Hidden Upside
3/10
Contextually Acceptable
3/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In April 2026, Lucid pre-announced a massive Q1 revenue miss ($280M–$284M vs. $433.8M expected) and a quarterly operating loss nearing $1 billion. To stay afloat, the company executed a $1.05 billion capital raise, including a $300 million public stock offering and $550 million from Saudi-backed Ayar. Additionally, Lucid announced a 12% workforce reduction (~800 employees) in February 2026 and confirmed that long-time CEO Peter Rawlinson stepped down, replaced by Silvio Napoli (Source: Bloomberg Law, StocksToTrade, MarketBeat).

🐻 Bear Case

The core bear thesis rests on unsustainable cash burn and systemic delivery failures. Lucid burned approximately $3.8 billion in 2025, and with only $700M in cash by April 2026, its survival is entirely dependent on continuous dilution or Saudi PIF bailouts. Despite producing 5,500 vehicles in Q1 2026, it delivered only 3,093—a massive 44% gap that suggests 'demand destruction' rather than just logistics. Some analysts (e.g., TipRanks) now flag a serious risk of bankruptcy by 2027 if the Gravity SUV fails to achieve massive scale (Source: TipRanks, Electric-Vehicles.com).

🚩 Red Flags

A 29-day halt in Gravity SUV shipments due to faulty second-row seat welds from supplier Camaco led to a recall of over 4,000 vehicles, exposing poor quality control during a critical product ramp. Furthermore, the company is under a 2026 WARN Act investigation for potential labor law violations following its Newark, CA layoffs. Ongoing securities fraud litigation (Kessler Topaz) alleging the board knowingly misled investors about 2022 production targets has recently moved into fact discovery (Source: Strauss Borrelli PLLC, MLQ.ai, KTMC).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Lucid is losing its 'tech-lead' advantage as legacy luxury brands (BMW, Audi, Cadillac) flood the market with EVs that benefit from established service networks and brand loyalty. The expiration of federal EV tax credits in late 2024 has significantly raised the effective price for Lucid’s high-end consumers compared to competitors who have better managed their cost structures. Even with the Uber 'robotaxi' partnership, Lucid faces an uphill battle against Tesla's scale and Rivian’s relative momentum (Source: WardsAuto, Public.com).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment is souring as early adopters of the $80k+ Gravity SUV face delivery delays and immediate safety recalls. The 'supplier quality' excuse for seat-belt anchor failures has damaged the brand's 'luxury engineering' image. Prospective buyers on enthusiast forums increasingly cite concerns over the company's long-term viability and the potential for a 'reverse stock split' (1-for-10 planned for 2025/2026) as reasons to avoid the brand (Source: Stocktwits, WardsAuto).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-05

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Lucid Group First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Please be advised that today's conference call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your speaker for today, Nick Twork, Vice President of Communications. Please go ahead.
Nick Twork: Thank you, and welcome to Lucid Group's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Joining me today are Silvio Napoli, incoming CEO; Marc Winterhoff, our Interim CEO; and Taoufiq Boussaid, our CFO. Before handing the call over to Silvio, let me remind you that some of the statements on this call include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. These include, without limitation, statements regarding the future financial performance of the company, production and delivery volumes, vehicles and products, studios and service networks, financial and operating outlook and guidance, macroeconomic, geopolitical, policy and industry trends, tariffs and trade policy, company initiatives, leadership changes and other future events. These statements are based on various assumptions, whether or not identified in this communication and on the predictions and expectations of our management as of today. Actual events or results are difficult or impossible to predict and may differ due to a number of risks and uncertainties. We refer you to the cautionary language and the risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on our Form 8-K and other SEC filings and the forward-looking statements on Page 2 of our quarterly earnings presentation available on the Investor Relations section of our website at ir.lucidmotors.com. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason, except as required by law. In addition, management will make reference to non-GAAP financial measures during this call. A discussion of why we use non-GAAP financial measures and information regarding reconciliation of our GAAP versus non-GAAP results is available in our earnings press release issued earlier this afternoon as well as in the earnings presentation. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Lucid's incoming CEO, Silvio Napoli. Silvio, please go ahead.
Silvio Napoli: Thank you, Nick. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining. This is my first earnings call with Lucid and as already had the opportunity to share with many of you, I'm extremely pleased to be here and part of the Lucid team. With not even a month with the company, I'm still at a very early stage, so I'll keep my remarks brief. Let me start by reiterating why I'm here. Lucid brings together state-of-the-art technology, a premium product platform and a unique opportunity to build a strong, enduring position in a transforming industry. And that combination is compelling. That is the reason that brought me here. Today, 3 weeks into the journey, I'm even more convinced that this is the case. In my first days, I've had the opportunity to meet with our teams in Newark, our headquarters and in some of our key markets. In fact, on the very first day, I traveled to visit a factory in Arizona, the heart of Lucid. Last week, I traveled to Saudi Arabia to witness a strong brand recognition in this fast-growing market and to see firsthand the progress of our new factory under construction. As you know, this manufacturing center is an essential part of our commitment to drive scale, profitability and to position Lucid on the world stage. While there, I've also been meeting with employees, shareholders and with local stakeholders. And everywhere I go, I'm focused on listening and beginning to understand where we are strongest and where we need to improve. And what stands out immediately is the incredible domain competence and outstanding motivation of the Lucid team and the strength of our product. At the same time, it's clear that realizing Lucid's full potential will require sharper focus and consistent execution, particularly around simplification, prioritization and speed. My near-term priorities are straightforward: recenter all our activities around our customers, ensure the organization operates with clarity and accountability, focus resources on the highest impact areas and embed a stronger culture of cost and capital discipline across the business. A central objective over time is to build a more self-sufficient company, one that progresses towards funding its own growth. And that means being rigorous in delivering on our commitments and how we allocate capital to few vital priorities. In simple words, this means making clear choices on where to invest and just as important, where not to. At the risk of stating the obvious, I'm not in the position to comment on results reached prior to my joining. Accordingly, I trust you will understand that today I will not comment on any specifics, including the outlook. My goal over the coming weeks is to deepen my understanding of the business so I can engage more fully with you in the future discussions. With that, I'll turn the call over to the team to walk you through the Q1 results. Thank you.
Marc Winterhoff: Thank you, Silvio, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me start with the key takeaways. We expanded our Uber partnership to at least 35,000 vehicles, raised over $1 billion in new capital and ended the quarter with a clear cost reduction program underway. The foundation is solid, and we are building on it. We have made meaningful progress on each of these fronts. Among the highlights. First, we expanded our partnership with Uber to provide a minimum of 35,000 robotaxis, up from 20,000 previously announced and increased their investment to $500 million, up from $300 million, improving our visibility into long-term demand and revenue in a new and growing market. Further reflecting the strengthening relationship between our companies, Sachin Kansal, Chief Product Officer at Uber, has been nominated for election to Lucid's Board of Directors. Second, we significantly strengthened our financial position, raising approximately $1.05 billion, including $550 million investment from the Public Investment Fund through a private placement, reaffirming their continued support and long-term commitment to Lucid. We maintained approximately $2 billion of undrawn commitment under the DDTL after drawing $500 million of cash in April, further enhancing our financial flexibility. Pro forma for the capital raise and the DDTL increase, liquidity at quarter end would have been $4.7 billion, providing ample flexibility to continue to support development of our Midsize platform and the continued build-out of M2. Third, we continue to execute to deliver scale and profitability, delivering $282 million in revenue. Despite the unforeseen geopolitical tensions and logistical obstacles in the region during Q1, our M2 construction never stopped, and we continue to install capital equipment and work towards start of production. The plan remains to ramp up Midsize vehicle production in 2027, and we launched an aggressive cost reduction program targeting cost savings across all areas of the organization in all geographies. Let me walk you through the key updates of the execution of our strategy in detail. Following the framework we laid out at our recent Investor Day, the Lucid Air and Gravity continue to anchor our near-term growth. And our focus here remains execution, quality, delivery and customer experience. Operationally, we produced 5,500 vehicles in Q1, up 149% year-over-year. Despite a temporary disruption, which elevated costs, we exited the quarter trending back toward our cost targets. We delivered 3,093 vehicles, which was flat compared to Q1 2025. When Gravity deliveries were temporarily impacted by a supplier issue, we acted quickly, resolved it and resumed deliveries with additional quality controls. As deliveries resumed, we saw improving momentum through the quarter, including the highest March deliveries in Lucid history, up 14% year-over-year. We also experienced a strong rebound in order intake, up 144% in North America in March from February, with Gravity driving the majority of demand. In March, we regained our position among the best-selling EVs in our segments. We also continue to make progress on our partnerships for our international distribution, including the official launch of our first retail partnership in Europe, which allows us to scale more quickly in a capital-efficient way. We expect the delivery trajectory to improve through the year. Near-term demand signals are mixed, but we see tailwinds building into the second half. Apart from seasonality, which historically drives greater deliveries in second half, there are numerous other factors which may deliver a lift, including high gas prices, which tilt demand towards vehicles with more attractive operating costs, competitive dynamics, including exits from the Air and Gravity segments, lease cycles, Lucid software updates, potential tariffs on European imports and potential improvements in macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions. As a result, we continue to expect a back-end weighted delivery profile for 2026, but are confident in the long-term trajectory of demand. Our priority now is consistent and predictable conversion of production into deliveries. Central to our framework to scale and drive profitable growth is the Midsize platform. The Midsize platform brings Lucid's signature range, efficiency and driving experience to a much larger TAM and broader set of customers and is key to unlocking scale, affordability and improved unit economics. At our recent Investor Day, we provided a clearer view of the future product portfolio with the expected pricing starting below $50,000, reinforcing Lucid's entry into a more accessible segment of the market. I'm pleased to be able to share that our BOM cost position remains favorable, still tracking below our initial cost estimates. During the quarter, construction on M2 and installation of capital equipment continued, and we remain on track for production ramp-up of the Midsize in 2027. Turning to our third priority, autonomy. In mid-April, we announced the expansion of our partnerships with Uber, increasing their total investment to $500 million and expanding the planned deployment to at least 35,000 robotaxi vehicles. This represents a meaningful increase in both scale and long-term visibility for the program, which generates a new revenue stream through a partnership approach that enables rapid speed to market in a new and rapidly growing market with minimal CapEx. I'm excited to share that we have met all milestones so far in our joint project with Nuro to provide autonomous Lucid Gravities to Uber for commercial launch by the end of the year, and remaining milestones are on track. We delivered 75 engineering vehicles and testing and mileage accumulation is ongoing in several cities throughout the U.S. Starting in mid-April, Uber and Nuro employees are now able to test the end-to-end customer experience, including ordering a robotaxi within the Uber app and choosing from select destinations for drop-off. Our partners at Nuro have also received approval from the California DMV for driverless testing of the Lucid Gravity in the state, making it one of the only a handful of vehicles that have received such approval. This is a key step in paving the way for launching commercial autonomous operations later this year. Looking forward, we are targeting the following milestones as we track toward commercial robotaxi operations in late 2026. This quarter, Lucid will start our production validation builds, which are intended to reflect our production intent design and some of the key robotaxi features like exterior beaconing for customers, interior cameras and consumer interfaces. This build is expected to be completed in Q3 and allows us to begin more comprehensive end-to-end testing with our partners as well as homologation testing and validation. And following the completion of testing in Q3, we anticipate starting regular production of robotaxi vehicles for commercial sale in early Q4 at M1. As you can see, we are well on our way to achieving our goals with our robotaxi program and commercial launch is on track for late 2026. In parallel, we continue to expand advanced driver assistance features across our consumer vehicles. Over time, we expect these features to become an increasingly important source of recurring revenue with subscription-based offerings being launched starting in 2027. In closing, Q1 highlighted areas where we still need to improve execution, and we are taking clear actions to address them. I'd like to close with a few personal words. It has been a privilege to serve as Interim CEO. We delivered 2 years of consecutive record quarters when it comes to deliveries until the end of 2025. We ramped the Gravity throughout 2025, resulting in a production increase of about 100% last year. We've navigated real headwinds and the team's ability to keep moving through them is something I'm proud of. We sharpened and expanded our strategy with a clear and capital-efficient approach to provide leading autonomy solutions, both for robotaxis and personally owned vehicles. We made meaningful progress across our partnerships, including expanded commitments from both PIF and Uber. I'm confident in this team and Silvio's leadership and in where Lucid is headed. And I'm looking forward to continue to contribute as Chief Operating Officer. With that, let me hand over to Taoufiq.
Taoufiq Boussaid: Thank you, Marc. I will walk you through the financial results for the quarter, the structural drivers behind them and how recent actions position us to execute against the framework we laid out at the Investor Day. Q1 was disrupted by a temporary stop sale, but the underlying business held and in March, orders and deliveries rebounded. With roughly similar units delivered and lower regulatory credit sales, revenue grew by approximately 20% year-over-year to $282 million in Q1, driven primarily by mix and pricing effects from Gravity. Let me give you the context that makes this number more useful for thinking about Q2 and the rest of the year. We produced 5,500 vehicles in the quarter but delivered 3,093. This gap reflects a combination of the impact of the temporary Gravity stop sale during which finished vehicles sat in inventory pending validation rather than converting to revenue and segment contraction. A key highlight of the quarter was Uber's expanded vehicle commitment and increased investment in Lucid. It matters for 3 reasons. It improves long-term revenue visibility. It derisks the volume ramp into the Midsize era, and it validates our vehicle platform as the reference point for commercial autonomy deployment. This is a durable addition to the capital structure and to the revenue outlook, not a onetime transaction. Gross margin for the quarter was negative 110.4% versus negative 80.7% in Q4 and negative 97.2% in Q1 a year ago. I want to be precise about the walk because the composition matters more than the headline. Three factors drove the sequential decline, lower delivery volume against a largely fixed manufacturing cost base, underabsorption of fixed cost and large regulatory credit revenue in Q4 that didn't repeat in Q1. Partially offsetting these were IEEPA tariff refunds and the lower inventory write-down versus the prior quarter. These costs were tied directly to the stop sale. With that resolved, they don't carry forward. What remains and what we are focused on is the structural trajectory, which includes, as shared at Investor Day, an average of 50% to 60% reduction in unit cost over the coming years. While we saw unit cost spike during the quarter driven by temporary disruption, it trended back towards the targeted trajectory in March. As volume scale into the second half and with the launch of the Midsize vehicle platform, we expect continued structural improvement in unit economics. I want to be clear, the underlying midterm trajectory of unit cost improvement that we described at Investor Day remains intact, and Q1 does not alter it. Turning to operating expenses. This totaled approximately $678 million for the quarter. R&D was $336 million, down sequentially from $361 million, reflecting program level sequencing even as we continue to fund the Midsize platform and our autonomy stack. SG&A increased $22 million sequentially to $304 million, primarily driven by discrete items, including a prior quarter provision reversal. Excluding these items, underlying SG&A was broadly stable. Year-over-year, SG&A increased $92 million with the comparison impacted by a $35 million noncash benefit in the prior year related to the reversal of stock-based compensation. These numbers also don't yet capture the $500 million in savings expected from our recently announced headcount actions over the next 3 years with the near-term impact most significant. Taken together, our posture on operating expenses is straightforward: protect the investments that build long-term competitive advantage, Midsize, autonomy, software and drive discipline everywhere else. Net loss for the quarter was approximately $1 billion compared to $366 million in the first quarter of 2025. The increase reflects the gross margin dynamics we discussed, continued investment in the business, particularly the Midsize platform and higher SG&A with the year-over-year comparison impacted by a discrete benefit in the prior year. Importantly, a significant portion of the year-over-year change is driven by noncash and nonoperating items, including a $274 million unfavorable change in the fair value of derivative liabilities related to movements in our stock price as well as lower interest income and higher interest expense. And as mentioned, it does not reflect the benefits of our recent headcount actions no more recently launched cost takeout initiatives. Net loss in any quarter reflects noncash and nonoperating items that move significantly with our stock price. The operating loss and cash consumption metrics give a cleaner read on trajectory. Our focus remains on improving operating leverage as we scale volumes and continue to drive cost discipline across the business. Turning to liquidity and capital structure. We ended the quarter with approximately $700 million in cash and cash equivalents and total liquidity of approximately $3.2 billion. Subsequent to quarter end, we executed a series of transactions that strengthened our balance sheet, $200 million of equity investment of common stock from Uber, $300 million from a registered common stock offering and $550 million in convertible preferred stock from PIF. In addition, PIF and Lucid announced an amendment to our delayed draw term loan, providing greater flexibility and approximately $2 billion of available liquidity following a $500 million draw on April 1. Giving effect to the capital raise and DDTL increase, total liquidity would have been approximately $4.7 billion at quarter end. This extends our operating runway into the second half of 2027 and gives us the flexibility to fund Gravity ramp, M2 construction and launch preparation and continued investment in the Midsize program and autonomy stack. On the question of dilution, which I know is on investor minds, the recent financing was structured deliberately to balance liquidity needs against dilution considerations. The convertible preferred structure with PIF reflects that balance as does the sizing of the common equity component. We will continue to evaluate all financing options, including the public markets when the appropriate conditions materialize. And our bias is toward disciplined capital deployment and with opportunistic raises. The strategic stockholder base around this company, anchored by PIF and now meaningfully reinforced by Uber gives us a structural advantage in how we think about capital over the medium term. Now on working capital and inventory. We also expect to see benefits to cash flow driven by improvements to working capital. Inventory stood at approximately $1.47 billion at quarter end, up from approximately $1.1 billion at the prior quarter and elevated by the stop sale buildup. As deliveries normalize through the year and we draw down that inventory, you should expect a higher conversion into cash. Beyond the stop sell normalization, we are tightening production to delivery alignment as an ongoing operating discipline. The new production reporting methodology, which I will cover in a moment, supports that by improving transparency on the conversion step. We took over $200 million in inventory impairments in Q1. Going forward, we expect those to decline. And as inventory reduces through the year, we expect to benefit from impairment releases. Now I mentioned our new production reporting methodology. I want to take a moment on this change to how we report production. Starting this quarter, we are moving our production metric to a process complete definition, meaning we count a vehicle once it has completed the factory gating process, regardless of whether it ships as a complete unit or in a semi-knockdown form. This change better reflects true quarterly production and reduces the volatility that the prior methodology introduced due to shipment logistics. It has no impact on inventory or days on hand reporting, both of which remain based on finished deliverable vehicles. The effect for investors is greater comparability with peers and a cleaner signal on underlying operational cadence. Under the new methodology, the normal auto industry seasonality, Q2 strongest based on working days, Q1 and Q4 softer due to holidays and planned shutdowns will appear more visibly in our reported numbers. Now let me address our outlook and guidance. With Silvio now on board and conducting his review of the business, we are suspending our prior guidance and we provide a full updated outlook at our Q2 earnings call. I want to be clear, this is a governance decision. Near-term demand conditions remain uneven, and we are managing our production cadence accordingly. Our 2026 objective is unchanged. We continue to work to closely align production with demand to avoid excess inventory. We are not constrained on capacity. We are constrained by our own discipline not to build inventory ahead of demand. As market conditions develop, we will scale production accordingly. We have launched a company-wide program to sharpen operational efficiency, reduce costs and concentrate capital on the highest-return opportunities. Q1 cash performance was affected by the stop sell action and the associated inventory reset, which we expect to normalize as we move forward. We are focused on restoring consistent cash generation and building a more durable operating foundation. Production of our first Midsize vehicle is expected to ramp throughout 2027. And our Lucid Gravity robotaxi program in partnership with Uber and Nuro remains on schedule for launch in late 2026. In closing, to put the quarter in perspective, we strengthened our balance sheet, expanded the strategic partnership that improves long-term visibility and are implementing reporting changes that improve transparency. A temporary stop sale in February was resolved, and we have taken action to address the root cause. The Investor Day framework holds. The path to profitability runs through scale from Midsize cost reduction through M2 and improved mix and operating leverage. Q1 does not change that trajectory. It reinforces the importance of disciplined execution, and that is where our focus is. The fundamentals of this business, the technology, the product and the strategic position we have built are intact. We are managing this period with discipline, and we intend to emerge from it in a stronger competitive position. With that, let me turn it over to the operator for your questions.
Operator: We will now begin the question-and-answer session by taking questions submitted through the Say Technologies platform.
Nick Twork: Our first question comes from [indiscernible]. How does management plan to restore shareholder confidence and address concerns about bankruptcy or potential take-private scenario?
Marc Winterhoff: First, I want you to know that we hear your frustration and restoring your confidence is of our utmost importance to us. We are focused on rebuilding your confidence through disciplined execution, transparency and measurable progress against key operational and financial milestones. The business is moving from a period of heavy investment toward a phase where we can begin to leverage those assets at greater scale. We ended 2025 having scaled production, improved unit economics and maintained liquidity. And yes, we've been hit with an unforeseen operational disruption in Q1, which we solved and deliveries and orders have rebounded towards the end of the quarter. We are focused on translating operational progress into more predictable financial profile. To your specific concerns, we do not speculate on market rumors or hypothetical strategic alternatives. Our focus is on executing the plan we laid out, strengthening the company and creating long-term value for our shareholders.
Nick Twork: All right. Our next question comes from Robbie S. When is Lucid going to turn a profit? What is the plan?
Taoufiq Boussaid: At our Investor Day, we laid out a clear path to profitability. The target is gross margin breakeven in the midterm, building towards the mid-teens by late decade. And on cash flow, we expect to reach positive free cash flow on a similar horizon. The levers to get there are straightforward. It starts with improving fixed cost absorption as volume grow, continuing to bring down bill of material and manufacturing costs, scaling Gravity, launching the Midsize platform and developing higher-margin recurring revenue from software, ADAS and autonomy. On the Midsize platform specifically, this is a meaningful expansion of our addressable market. And importantly, it has been designed from day 1 with cost, scale and manufacturability at its core.
Nick Twork: All right. The next question comes from Crystal M. Based on your current cash burn rate, how many quarters of runway does Lucid have without raising additional capital? And what specific milestones must be met before then to avoid dilution?
Taoufiq Boussaid: Based on our current cash burn and the recent financing activities we have taken, including the capital raise and the extension of the DDTL, we have funding runway into the second half of 2027. That gives us adequate flexibility to support the Gravity ramp, progress M2 construction and continued targeted investments in both the Midsize platform and our autonomy software. During this period, our focus is on executing the operational milestones that moves us towards breakeven and reduce our reliance on dilutive capital. That means disciplined execution of the Gravity launch, continued manufacturing efficiency gains, measured advancement of M2 aligned with demand and sustained momentum on the Midsize program. At the same time, we are actively pursuing top line diversification through higher-margin software and services particularly around ADAS. On dilution, we are deliberate in how we approach capital raising. We have consistently favored structures that limit near-term dilution and preserve optionality. The use of preferred convertibles being a good example of managing both timing and impact. But ultimately, the strongest answer to dilution is accelerating our path to breakeven because this is what opens up a much broader range of financing alternatives.
Nick Twork: That concludes the questions from the Say Technologies platform. Now I'll turn it over to the operator for live questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Michael Ward with Citigroup.
Michael Ward: Can you share any volume targets for M2 for 2027? It sounds like it's going to be a gradual type launch throughout the year. And I'm just wondering if the launch is better than expected, does that liquidity take you into 2028?
Marc Winterhoff: The targets on the volume, we actually revealed at the Investor Day, and they have not changed. They have not changed. No, no. We are really laser-focused on that ramp.
Michael Ward: Okay. And then the second thing I would ask is, as it relates to the robotaxis, are the volume deliveries to Uber depending on them getting certified? Or is there some sort of a schedule for those volume numbers to start to accelerate?
Marc Winterhoff: Well, it's basically actually Nuro getting the certification. As we just mentioned, we make very good...
Michael Ward: Nuro?
Marc Winterhoff: Yes, very good progress on that. So we are on track with this. I mean still we have to have final certification to be able to do this, for instance, when we start in the Bay Area here in California. But so far, even all the development and the certifications are moving as we expected.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Percoco with Morgan Stanley.
Andrew Percoco: Maybe if I can start out on the free cash flow expectations and just your general commentary around having sufficient liquidity through or at least until the second half of 2027. Can you just maybe help provide a little bit more context around what some of the underlying assumptions are within that? I understand that you guys are pulling the delivery guidance for the year for some governance reasons, but there's anything you can kind of provide in terms of what your underlying assumptions are around demand, that would be super helpful.
Taoufiq Boussaid: Andrew, I think that the first answer to your question is that you need to recall that there is a typical seasonality in the company and that we see a significantly improved cash flows during or on the back end of the year. So we shouldn't do any read-through of the cash performance as of Q1 because of 2 specific events. The first one is the stop sales, so which has led to higher cash burn, and we are saying that we will be recovering that. And the second element that you need to take into account is the typical seasonality with a step-up in the sales towards Q3 and Q4, which is helping us to manage the cash burn. So we haven't guided specifically for the cash burn. We have guided for the runway. The statement still remains unchanged. So we will be providing more visibility on that when we reaffirm the guidance in Q2.
Andrew Percoco: Okay. Understood. And maybe just my follow-up is just around the commodity cost environment. A lot of your OEM peers are continuing to highlight some pressures there this year and into next year. Can you just maybe provide an update in terms of what you're seeing? I think you guys in the past have said that you've at least hedged or contracted out some of that commodity exposure. But to what extent are you seeing any kind of incremental pressure there? And might that impact that path to profitability?
Marc Winterhoff: Actually, right now, that is very limited. I mean yes, there have been increases over the last couple of months on certain raw materials like aluminum. But very recently, for instance, we haven't actually seen an increase. And the other topic is the DRAM, which hits the whole industry. But even that, I mean, is compared to the rest of the BOM cost of the vehicle, a small amount. So we don't see a major impact compared to where we ended end of last year right now.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Ben Kallo with Baird.
Ben Kallo: Just maybe the first one, could you maybe talk more about the sales partnerships, which I guess will be very important, especially as you introduce the Midsize vehicle. You mentioned one in Europe.
Marc Winterhoff: Yes. I mean what we're doing there is we're basically extending our approach there from a pure direct-to-consumer model into also partnering either with dealerships in an agency model, for instance, within Germany, so in areas where we already have a D2C network or with importers in new markets that we are entering right now. And we are in the midst of all this process and recently launched the first agent in addition to our D2C outlets in Germany, which gives one day to the other 2 additional cities to cover. And we have numerous LOIs. I think the recent number is like 12 LOIs that are -- we're pushing forward and hopefully get to a contract situation and launch very soon. But it allows us to much faster grow within the areas and the countries we are already in, for instance, in Germany or in the Netherlands or expand into new countries through an importership where you then use existing infrastructure and existing business relationships of those importers to scale much faster.
Ben Kallo: Great. And then just on the review, Silvio's review, could you maybe talk, if possible, just about the timing or when we should expect another update? Or is there not a lot of certainty in that for now?
Silvio Napoli: Thank you, Ben. I think at the moment, I'm getting to the position. I would say, as of Q2, we should start somehow getting a sense of where we are. Now in terms of by when I'll be ready to give a plan, et cetera, this, I think, is something I'll discuss with the Board at the earliest opportunity.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Andres Sheppard with Cantor Fitzgerald.
Andres Sheppard-Slinger: Congratulations on the quarter and just wanted to maybe take a brief moment to thank Marc and congratulate him on all his great efforts over the past 2 years. First question, I just wanted to clarify on the guidance. So just to be clear, you'll give us an update in Q2 regarding the production guidance as well as the CapEx guidance. But just to be clear as well, the Midsize timing, robotaxi timing and also the medium-term goals, those are all on track and unchanged. Just wanted to clarify.
Marc Winterhoff: On the Midsize, this is also what we guided before. So that is also subject to the suspension right now. But I think what is important to understand is that what really counts is the ramp-up in 2027, and that's what remains unchanged. As I said in the beginning, the volumes that we're looking at is unchanged. On the start of production, that's something that we will guide after review with Silvio and the team then by the end of Q2. I also want to point out that when we talk about the start of production, that is less impactful actually than the ramp. I mean we've seen this, you probably remember with the Gravity where we had an SOP, but then we weren't able to ramp as we intended to. And that is something that we definitely absolutely want to avoid, and that's why we want to review everything and make the right decision for the business.
Andres Sheppard-Slinger: Wonderful. Okay. That's super helpful. And maybe just as a quick follow-up. I wanted to touch again on the second production facility, the one in Saudi. Just given the geopolitical conflict still going on, do you foresee any bottlenecks or any issues to the time line for the construction there? Or is that on track? Just any update there would be helpful.
Marc Winterhoff: Well, so far, I mean, it is going and we have never stopped doing it. I mean we had a few delays when it comes to arrival of equipment to be installed, but our team was able to mitigate that. And so yes, on that as well, we will update at the end of Q2. But so far, we haven't seen any impact.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of James Picariello with BNP Paribas.
Thomas Scholl: This is Jake on for James. First, could you give us some idea of the split between the Gravity and Air deliveries in the first quarter? And approximately how many units were pushed from the first quarter into the second by the stop sale?
Marc Winterhoff: I mean as we said in the past, so the majority of our deliveries are now the Gravity. We don't give a direct projection on that. I mean on the average selling price, you maybe can reverse engineer the math somehow. When it comes to how many sales are being pushed into the second quarter, that's actually a number that I don't have handy right now. I mean the numbers of deliveries and orders rebounded in March significantly. But that exact number, I don't have handy.
Thomas Scholl: All right. And then thinking a little bit longer term, you guys are targeting breakeven free cash by the end of the decade. Right now, your $4.7 billion in liquidity gets you into the second half of 2027. Is there any way to think about your total liquidity need to get from the second half of 2027 until 2029 or 2030?
Taoufiq Boussaid: James, you asked us the same question during the Investor Day. I understand that it's a very important point for you. So again, the key data points that we have. So we have a trajectory of how we will be rebuilding the gross margin and how we'll be progressing over the years. So it's a very important data point for you to assess. We have also communicated the details around the different levers for us to reach the breakeven and the rough timing to get there. I think that our historical and future delivery of the key milestones will allow you to do a calibration of what it would mean, and it will help you estimate the additional capital requirement, which is required. Having said that, I would like to reemphasize 2 very important points. So what we have said is that the important component of the cash burn is related to the CapEx in M2. So we have also shared our trajectory in terms of CapEx reduction. We will have a steep decline after 2027. And as a consequence of that, we will see a significant reduction of the cash requirements that will be needed for the plan. So over time, the cash burn profile in itself will have to change and evolve. So again, I'm sharing some of the important data points. We have not historically been in a position to provide the exact quantification. We obviously have a plan. What is really important is the milestones and how we're executing against some of these important targets, milestones, be it in gross margin, be it in terms of reducing the CapEx and accelerating the trajectory to the breakeven.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, I'm showing no further questions in the queue. That concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.