Stocks/KRP

KRP

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
Energy·Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
$15.01
$1.5B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$327.8M
Free Cash Flow
$241.0M
Rev Growth
-6.7%
FCF Margin
73.5%
P/FCF
6.1x
EV/FCF
7.8x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
9.4x
Fair Value
$12.00
Upside
-20.1%

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, acquires and owns mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. As of December 31, 2021, it owned mineral and royalty interests in approximately 11.4 million gross acres and overriding royalty interests in approximately 4.7 million gross acres. The company's mineral and royalty interests are located in 28 states and include ownership in approximately 122,000 gross wells, including approximately

2-Year Price History

$15.19+9.9%
$11$12$13$14$15volMay 24Sep 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q176.051.7--16.0--46.4-0.2403.2----------
Est2027-Q474.048.8--14.1--43.7-0.2356.8----------
Est2027-Q376.050.9--16.0--46.4-0.2313.1----------
Est2027-Q277.052.4--16.9--47.7-0.2266.8----------
Est2027-Q175.050.3--15.0--45.0-0.2219.0----------
Est2026-Q474.048.1--13.3--42.9-0.2174.0----------
Est2026-Q376.050.2--15.2--45.6-0.2131.1----------
Est2026-Q278.053.0--17.2--48.4-0.285.5----------
Act2026-Q184.263.934.56.649.449.4-0.037.2445.7119.118.8%7.8x7.7x
Act2025-Q476.433.132.621.857.256.8-0.444.0451.0118.117.6%3.6x7.3x
Act2025-Q380.660.028.919.762.862.7-0.140.0453.0118.215.3%6.1x8.9x
Act2025-Q286.668.337.826.372.372.1-0.234.5467.0122.918.0%7.6x8.1x
Act2025-Q190.364.833.623.154.2-168.8-223.035.6304.4128.015.6%9.8x8.6x
Act2024-Q470.9-6.8-38.7-32.556.656.5-0.034.2243.2116.2-20.6%-1.1x8.2x
Act2024-Q374.266.534.222.762.462.4-0.034.7253.9116.417.7%10.2x5.8x
Act2024-Q277.657.023.913.762.962.8-0.031.0268.1116.69.4%8.2x6.1x
Act2024-Q187.955.817.68.469.169.0-0.139.7287.272.17.5%7.6x6.3x
Act2023-Q484.562.926.613.559.358.8-0.631.0296.6115.412.3%8.4x6.7x
Act2023-Q371.848.425.314.636.4-409.6-446.039.5312.995.010.2%7.3x6.3x
Act2023-Q259.044.824.615.031.5-12.4-43.920.8272.283.017.5%7.1x5.8x
Act2023-Q157.953.433.323.347.146.7-0.319.1226.979.825.8%9.8x5.2x
Act2022-Q465.556.938.946.238.6-102.3-140.924.6235.769.929.3%14.4x6.4x
Act2022-Q374.058.746.038.351.651.5-0.016.6206.465.549.1%16.0x--
Act2022-Q279.859.843.936.340.440.4-0.114.1218.865.544.4%18.0x--
Act2022-Q165.722.48.1-9.036.136.0-0.010.6229.445.98.3%7.8x--

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $12.00

KRP is a well-managed mineral royalty company with an attractive asset base (85 rigs, 16% U.S. land market share) and high operating margins inherent to the royalty model. However, the stock is overvalued relative to its fundamentals: trading at ~26x P/E and 78x EV/FCF (TTM distorted by acquisition capex), with a debt load of ~$441M that constrains distribution growth and competes with unitholders for cash flow. The 10.8% yield is attractive but partially funded by debt reduction deferral, and 15% unit dilution in a single year is concerning. Organic growth is minimal (~1-2%), making KRP dependent on acquisitions to grow, yet it faces increasing competition from better-capitalized peers like VNOM and TPL. At current prices, the risk/reward is unfavorable — the yield provides a floor, but capital appreciation potential is limited without commodity price tailwinds or accretive M&A that is increasingly hard to find.

Catalyst A material accretive acquisition ($200M+) at attractive multiples, or a sustained move in WTI above $80/bbl that would accelerate operator drilling activity and boost production volumes on KRP's acreage. The Barnett-Woodford formation development by Conoco and Oxy represents free upside optionality.
Risk Commodity price decline to WTI $55-60 range would compress revenues 20%+, stress the 1.6x leverage covenant, and force distribution cuts — creating a negative spiral given the partnership's reliance on yield-seeking investors for its valuation support.
Trend
STABLE
Mgmt
6/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
-2.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) delivered a strong first quarter for 2026, surpassing production guidance with 25,522 BOE/day and reporting $82.9 million in revenue. The company’s active rig count reached 85, representing a substantial 16% share of total U.S. land rigs. This operational success translated into an 11% increase in the quarterly distribution to $0.41 per unit, reflecting an annualized tax-advantaged yield of approximately 11%. KRP maintained strict cost control, with cash G&A expenses coming in below guidance. The company’s capital allocation strategy remains balanced, utilizing 75% of cash available for distribution for dividends and the remaining 25% for debt reduction and opportunistic unit repurchases, including 500,000 units bought back this quarter. Management affirmed 2026 guidance, expressing optimism that current oil prices around $91 will accelerate drilling activity and DUC conversions, particularly in the Permian Basin. Despite some macro volatility affecting M&A timing, KRP remains a leading consolidator in the $850 billion U.S. royalty sector. With a leverage ratio of 1.6x and significant liquidity, KRP is well-positioned to capitalize on industry dislocations and continue its growth trajectory in a favorable commodity environment.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$15.01
Market Cap$1.5B
Enterprise Value$1.9B
P/S Ratio4.5x
P/FCF6.1x
EV/FCF7.8x
FCF Margin (TTM)73.5%
FCF Yield16.3%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution-6.9%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$327.8M
Net Income$74.4M
Free Cash Flow$241.0M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-6.7%
EBITDA Margin68.7%
Net Margin22.7%
FCF Margin73.5%
CapEx % of Revenue0.2%
SBC % of Revenue7.6%
ROIC17.4%
WC Change % Rev3.9%
Interest Coverage11.4x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$8.58
-42.9% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$1.4B
− Net Debt$409M
= Fair Equity$1.0B
Revenue Growth0.0% → 1.5%
FCF Margin73.5% → 55.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float1.8%
Short Shares1.5M
Days to Cover1.7
Change (vs Prior)+20.2%
Short % Float History
1.80%+0.10pp
1.0%1.2%1.4%1.6%1.8%2.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)22%
Put IV (ATM)23%
ATM Spread2.3%
Call $OI (near money)$135K
Put $OI (near money)$11K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$15.0
Major Expirations1
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$7.50$7.20/$8.200--/$0.250
$10.00$4.80/$5.7012--/$0.1056
$12.50$2.40/$3.0029--/$0.15663
$15.00$0.50/$0.851,776$0.35/$0.45183
$17.50--/$0.1015$2.00/$2.700
$20.00--/$0.104$4.40/$5.300
$22.50--/$0.253$6.80/$7.700
$25.00--/$0.056$9.30/$10.300
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-7.6%
Forward FCF Margin60.0%
Forward EBITDA Margin66.5%
Forward P/FCF8.1x
Forward EV/FCF10.4x
Forward Int. Coverage5.5x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds4%
Est. Borrow Rate7.5%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth1.5%
LT FCF Margin55.0%

Employees

Headcount23
Revenue / Employee$14,251,731
Gross Profit / Employee$13,419,797
2022: 27 → 2023: 29 → 2024: 28 → 2025: 29 (2% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 7.0% of float, sold 2.3%. 1 filer moved >1% of shares (1 buying, 0 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+4.7% of float (net)
Bought 7.0% · Sold 2.3%
201 filers reported (last quarter: 191)

Ownership composition

Active
31.3%(+2.5% YoY)
181 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
0.5%(-0.4% YoY)
3 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(+0.0% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
5.5%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
EnCap Investments L.P.$78.6M$14.47+$78.6M+$78.6M$905M
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$46.4M$12.61+$1.8M+$9.6M+0.3%$193.48B
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC$19.4M$14.10+$1.3M−$2.3M-0.0%$322.69B
ALGERT GLOBAL LLC$18.1M$14.13+$16.7M+$14.5M+0.1%$6.63B
MORGAN STANLEY$16.1M$12.14−$2.2M−$10.3M-0.3%$1.65T
MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC$14.4M$12.75+$12.1M+$12.0M-0.5%$127.40B
UBS Group AG$13.4M$12.60−$1.2M−$320K-0.3%$562.11B
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC.$13.0M$11.62+$699K+$13.0M+1.4%$58.02B
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP$12.2M$12.47+$4.1M+$12.2M+0.8%$133.17B
MARSHALL WACE, LLP$9.9M$13.31+$7.3M+$2.7M+0.7%$92.71B
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA$8.6M$13.13+$2.1M+$3.3M-0.2%$526.36B
PIN OAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS INC$8.4M$10.70−$39K−$440K-0.0%$141M
Qube Research & Technologies Ltd$7.8M$12.30+$2.7M+$4.3M+0.3%$70.36B
Yaupon Capital Management LP$7.5M$11.86+$267K+$942K+1.7%$2.03B
ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$7.4M$14.42+$7.0M+$7.4M+0.1%$184.72B
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN$7.1M$12.94+$915K−$1.7M-0.2%$497.71B
Point72 Asset Management, L.P.$6.8M$13.26+$3.4M+$6.8M+0.9%$54.88B
Orvieto Partners, L.P.$5.8M$13.51−$1.2M−$1.1M-3.3%$117M
CITADEL ADVISORS LLC$5.4M$11.99−$5.9M−$1.0M-0.4%$138.22B
ADAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS GP, L.L.C.$5.3M$11.43−$12.2M−$19.2M-0.1%$64.61B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BULLISH
Holders
-0.03%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.04%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.10%
96 buyers · $0.20B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.71%
43 sellers · $0.02B out
alpha coverage: 83% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-1.4%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-14.7%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
+6.3%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+1.6%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+1.2%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-4.6%
Holder mid (any stock)
-2.9%
Holder rally (any stock)
-5.7%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

04.0M8.0M11.9M15.9M$10$11$12$13$142021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Ridgemont Partners Management, LLCEnCap Energy Capital Fund VIII, L.P.EnCap Investments L.P.5.4MKohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P.AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC3.2MT. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.G.F.W. Energy XI, L.P.CIBC Private Wealth Group, LLCADAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS GP, L.L.C.365KMill Road Capital Management LLC221K

Related Stocks

Investors who own this also own

Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.

TickerNameCo-holdersScore
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation33.16×
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.32.27×

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Year (2 analysts)$17.001330.0%
Current Price$15.01

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$679K
4 txns · 2 insiders · 47,209 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-03-23SELLRhynsburger Blayneofficer: Controller6,609$14.48$96K$1.09M
2026-03-02SELLWynne Mitch S.director35,000$14.48$507K$3.97M
2025-09-04SELLRhynsburger Blayneofficer: Controller3,600$13.74$49K$600K
2025-05-28SELLRhynsburger Blayneofficer: Controller2,000$13.27$27K$627K

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

34.2%retail+6.3pp
16.8%dark-1.1pp
week of 2026-04-13
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Oil and Gas$82.9M-8%
Oil and Condensate$51.0M-2%
Natural Gas, Midstream$20.6M-20%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Kimbell Royalty Partners: Standard Administrative Filing Review

Overall Risk
3/10
Fraud
1/10
Dilution
4/10
Insolvency
2/10
Earnings Overstated
1/10
Hidden Liabilities
1/10
Legal
2/10
Audit Warnings
1/10
Hidden Upside
1/10
Contextually Acceptable
10/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In May 2026, KRP reported a sharp decline in Q1 net income to $6.9 million, down from $25.9 million in the prior year, primarily driven by $18.7 million in realized/unrealized hedge losses. Total revenue including derivatives dropped to $65.5 million from $84.2 million YoY. Additionally, KeyBanc downgraded the stock from Overweight to Sector Weight in late 2025, citing 'choppy' oil prices and minimal expected growth in the Permian Basin for 2026 (Source: Investing.com, Stock Titan).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on KRP's 'acquisition treadmill' and overvaluation. Unlike peers with cleaner balance sheets, KRP carries significant debt (~$441M), resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of ~57-72%, which is riskier than Black Stone Minerals (BSM) or Dorchester Minerals (DMLP). KRP's P/E ratio of ~26x is nearly double the industry average of 14.6x, leaving it highly vulnerable to a rerating if production growth remains flat or commodity prices soften (Source: Seeking Alpha, Sahm Capital).

🚩 Red Flags

Persistent insider selling remains a major concern, with directors selling shares as recently as April 2026, which has historically capped price breakouts. Furthermore, the partnership is currently diverting 25% of its available cash flow to debt repayment rather than distributions, a defensive move that signals balance sheet stress and limits the yield potential for unit holders (Source: Seeking Alpha, Webull).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

KRP is being outmuscled in the M&A market by larger, better-capitalized peers like Viper Energy (VNOM) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL). These competitors possess a lower cost of capital and a more aggressive appetite for high-quality Permian minerals, making it increasingly difficult and expensive for a smaller player like KRP to find accretive deals to offset natural asset depletion (Source: KeyBanc, Investing.com).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Negative sentiment among operators (KRP's customers) is rising due to stringent new 2025 Permian Basin wastewater regulations and EPA flaring rules. These directives, effective June 2025, impose tighter permitting for saltwater disposal and 'zombie' well assessments, increasing operational costs for drillers on KRP’s acreage and potentially slowing down the rig activity that KRP relies on for royalty income (Source: World Oil, Citadel Financial).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-07

Operator: Greetings, and welcome to the Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Rick Black. Thank you. You may begin.
Rick Black: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to the Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP conference call to review financial and operational results for the first quarter, which ended 03/31/2026. This call is also being webcast and can be accessed through the audio link on the events and presentations page of the IR section of kimbellrp.com. Information recorded on this call speaks only as of today, 05/07/2026, so please be advised that any time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate as of the date of any replay listening or transcript reading. I would also like to remind you that the statements made in today's discussion are not historical facts, including statements of operational expectations or future events, or future financial performance, and are considered forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We will be making forward-looking statements as part of today's call, which by their nature are uncertain and outside of the company's control. Actual results may differ materially. Please refer to today's earnings press release for our disclosure on forward-looking statements. These factors and other risks and uncertainties are described in detail in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management will also refer to non-GAAP measures, including adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution. Reconciliations to the nearest GAAP measures can be found at the end of today's earnings release. Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. I would now like to turn the call over to Bob Ravnaas, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP Chairman and CEO.
Bob Ravnaas: Thank you, Rick, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us this morning. With me today are several members of our senior management team, including Davis Ravnaas, our President and Chief Financial Officer; Matthew S. Daly, our Chief Operating Officer; and Blaine Rinesberger, our Controller. To start off, we are pleased to report strong first quarter results and robust drilling activity across our acreage. Our production exceeded the midpoint of our guidance, demonstrating once again the resilience of our high-quality, diversified, and low-decline production base. Our active rig count remains strong with 85 rigs drilling across our acreage, representing a market share of U.S. land rigs at 16%. This favorable first quarter performance allowed us to declare a Q1 2026 distribution of $0.41 per common unit, up 11% from Q4 2025, as we continue to focus on returning value to unitholders. This distribution reflects an annualized tax-advantaged yield of approximately 11% based on yesterday's closing price. As we look to the remainder of 2026, higher oil prices should support a modest uptick in activity across our oil-weighted basins. Many operators are likely to accelerate the completion of DUCs to capture improved pricing while gradually increasing rig counts over time. While oil prices have been volatile in recent weeks due to macro uncertainty stemming from the Middle East conflict, they remain elevated when compared to historical levels, and we believe the current forward strip is conducive to incremental activity. We remain bullish about the U.S. oil and natural gas royalty industry and our role as a leading consolidator in the sector. We are encouraged by the opportunities in front of us and look forward to continuing our growth as we strive to expand our industry-leading portfolio of assets. I would like to thank all of our employees for their hard work and dedication in driving Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP forward and for their role in helping to generate long-term unitholder value. I will now turn the call over to Davis.
Davis Ravnaas: Thanks, Bob. Good morning, everyone. As Bob mentioned, this is another strong quarter for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. I will now start by reviewing our financial results for the first quarter. Oil, natural gas, and NGL revenues totaled $82.9 million during the first quarter, and run-rate production was 25,522 BOE per day, which exceeded the midpoint of our guidance. On the expense side, first quarter general and administrative expenses were $9.4 million, $5.3 million of which was cash G&A expense, or $2.31 per BOE, well below our guidance range, a reflection of our continued operational discipline and positive operating leverage. Total first quarter consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $68 million. You will find a reconciliation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution at the end of our news release. This morning, we announced a cash distribution of $0.41 per common unit for 2026. We estimate that approximately 72% of this distribution is expected to be return of capital and not subject to dividend taxes, further enhancing the after-tax return to our common unitholders. This represents a cash distribution payment to common unitholders that equates to 75% of cash available for distribution, and the remaining 25% will be used to pay down a portion of the outstanding borrowings under Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP's secured revolving credit facility. I would also like to point out that during the first quarter, we repurchased and canceled 500 thousand units of the company's common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7.3 million at an average price of $14.60 per unit. This reflects our confidence in the underlying strength of the business and our view that the shares were trading below intrinsic value, making the repurchase an efficient use of capital while maintaining balance sheet discipline. Moving now to our balance sheet and liquidity. At 03/31/2026, we had approximately $440.9 million in debt outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility, which represented a net debt to trailing twelve-month consolidated adjusted EBITDA of approximately 1.6 times. We also had approximately $184.1 million in undrawn capacity under the secured revolving credit facility as of 03/31/2026. We continue to maintain a conservative balance sheet and remain very comfortable with our strong financial position and enhanced flexibility. Today, we are also affirming our financial and operational guidance ranges for 2026. As a reminder, 2026 guidance outlook was included in the Q4 2025 earnings release. We remain confident about the prospects for continued development in 2026 given the number of rigs actively drilling on our acreage, especially in the Permian, as well as our line of sight wells exceeding our maintenance well count. In closing, we are excited about our position as a leading consolidator in the highly fragmented U.S. oil and natural gas royalty sector, which we estimate exceeds $850 billion in size. Long-term demand for U.S. energy is expected to continue to grow, and we are well positioned to benefit through our diversified portfolio of high-quality royalty assets across the leading U.S. basins. With that, operator, we are now ready for questions.
Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. You may press 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. The first question is from Timothy A. Rezvan from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Timothy A. Rezvan: Good morning, folks. Thank you for taking our questions. I know about two thirds of your line-of-sight wells are in the Permian, and there is sort of a group think that that will be the basin that would be the first mover, given the call for oil globally. I was curious what you are seeing elsewhere in your portfolio. Are you seeing any increases in other places such as the Mid-Con where there are less natural gas constraints?
Davis Ravnaas: Absolutely. We are seeing activity. Strangely enough, we are seeing an uptick in the Bakken for the first time in a while. We are seeing activity in the Eagle Ford. Yes, on the Mid-Con, which is, on a relative basis, a larger contributor to our overall portfolio. We would expect to see the preponderance of increased activity in the Permian.
Timothy A. Rezvan: Good to know. Thank you. When I last spoke with you all in March, you gave the comments that your peers have echoed that higher oil prices should bring sellers to the table and help with M&A. We saw a large peer announce a sizable transaction earlier this week. Can we get your lay of the land on the M&A front, what you are seeing, and what has you excited?
Davis Ravnaas: Great question. There are a couple of packages in the market now. We try to look at everything that we can. We would like to believe that we get a look at pretty much every sizable acquisition out there. Nothing imminent to report, but we are actively evaluating opportunities. I would say that the increase in oil price, to your point, makes sellers more willing to transact. At the same time, working against that to a certain extent is the volatility. We have seen a few groups walk away because they have a more bullish view on what oil prices are going to do versus others. I think what we will see happen is once we reach some sort of minimized level of volatility and people have a little bit more of an agreement between the buy side and the sell side on where the new equilibrium is, that is when you will start seeing a larger volume of transactions occur.
Timothy A. Rezvan: That makes sense. If I could sneak one last one in: we noticed the repurchases in the first quarter. If we see where the stock is today, it has been a tough month for the industry. It is trading below the average of the first quarter repurchase price, and we also see WTI at $91 here. How are you thinking about repurchases versus debt paydown in the next couple of quarters?
Davis Ravnaas: Great question. We want to be opportunistic. We have seen periods of time where our stock has traded down for inexplicable reasons, and we had a conversation at the management and board level about putting a program in place. Obviously, we started with a relatively modest repurchase, but we do have the authorization to do something more meaningful. So we will be opportunistic over time, trying to take advantage of inefficiencies and dislocations in our stock price where we believe that our shareholders would benefit on a long-term basis from a repurchase. I will say that we do not intend to divert the 75% payout to our dividends for repurchases. It would be a trade-off between debt paydown and repurchases of our stock with the 25% component of our free cash. That is what we are going to be weighing going forward.
Timothy A. Rezvan: Appreciate the answers. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Nicholas Armato from Texas Capital. Please go ahead.
Nicholas Armato: Good morning, all, and thanks for taking my questions. For my first one, on your outlook for the remainder of the year, you delivered a strong quarter on both the oil and gas side, which puts you roughly at the midpoint for the full-year guide. Do you think there is some upside to this given your strong performance in the first quarter and the stronger commodity environment that we are seeing?
Davis Ravnaas: I do. I would like to believe that you will see increased activity. We are certainly hearing from other operators in their comments this quarter that they expect some improvement in drilling rates over the course of this year. I think some are more in a wait-and-see approach, others are being a little bit more aggressive. We are hearing from private operators that they are going to be more aggressive than the public operators, which has traditionally been the case historically. So, yes, we try to be conservative when issuing guidance and when reaffirming it, but given the precipitous rise in oil prices this year, all things being equal, we could expect to see increased drilling activity across our portfolio.
Nicholas Armato: Perfect. Thanks for all the color. For my follow-up, how do you generally think about the cycle times for the conversion of DUCs to production and permits to DUCs? More specifically, do you think the stronger commodity environment will change those timelines versus maybe six months ago?
Davis Ravnaas: That is a great question. Historically, we have seen DUCs come online on average within six months, and permits up to a year on an average basis. In a higher price environment, at least in the past, we have seen those timelines accelerate. We have also seen more rapid permitting activity in higher-priced environments. Our net DUC and permit inventory, by the way, does not even include our minor properties, which may contribute up to an additional 20% to our inventory. So we feel very good about the near-term line of sight on development on the properties and feel even better in today’s higher oil price environment that those numbers could improve and that the timelines could accelerate. But, Bob, anything you would add on development cadence in this environment?
Bob Ravnaas: I agree with everything you said.
Nicholas Armato: Perfect. Super helpful. Thanks for taking my questions. I will turn it back to the operator.
Operator: Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Bob Ravnaas for closing comments.
Bob Ravnaas: We thank you all for joining us this morning, and we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. This completes today’s call.
Operator: This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines.