KBDC
Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc invests in middle market companies located in the United States with an EBITDA of USD 10 - 150 million. The fund focuses on a broad range of sectors and industries. It provides financing in the form of senior secured loans and split-lien loans to buyout transactions.
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 55.0 | 25.3 | -- | 25.3 | -- | 22.6 | -0.0 | 14,496 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 55.5 | 25.8 | -- | 25.8 | -- | 23.9 | -0.0 | 14,474 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 55.0 | 25.3 | -- | 25.3 | -- | 23.1 | -0.0 | 14,450 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 54.5 | 24.8 | -- | 24.8 | -- | 21.8 | -0.0 | 14,427 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 54.0 | 24.3 | -- | 24.3 | -- | 20.5 | -0.0 | 14,405 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 55.0 | 25.3 | -- | 25.3 | -- | 23.1 | -0.0 | 14,385 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 55.5 | 26.1 | -- | 26.1 | -- | 22.2 | -0.0 | 14,361 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 56.0 | 26.9 | -- | 26.9 | -- | 25.2 | -0.0 | 14,339 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 46.1 | 36.5 | 36.5 | 17.2 | 39.8 | 39.8 | -0.0 | 14,314 | 1,123 | 67.1 | 0.0% | 1.9x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 61.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 305,706 | 305,706 | -0.0 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 70.3 | 0.0% | 0.0x | 12.5x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 46.4 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 24.6 | 25.6 | 25.6 | -0.0 | 16,360 | 1,141 | 70.4 | 5.2% | 1.3x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 44.0 | 25.2 | 25.2 | 24.9 | 16.1 | 16.1 | -0.0 | 14.0 | 1,042 | 70.9 | 5.4% | 1.4x | 17.9x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 39.7 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 22.2 | 20.5 | 20.5 | -0.0 | 17.4 | 1,003 | 71.2 | 4.8% | 1.4x | 17.0x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 48.4 | 36.2 | 36.2 | 35.5 | 21.3 | 21.3 | -0.0 | 22.4 | 848.1 | 71.0 | 8.5% | 2.3x | 14.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 48.0 | 37.6 | 37.6 | 37.6 | -23.7 | -23.7 | -0.0 | 39.1 | 779.5 | 71.1 | 9.1% | 2.5x | 15.7x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 40.9 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | -217.3 | -217.3 | -0.0 | 20.3 | 612.6 | 71.1 | 8.4% | 2.5x | 18.3x |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 44.3 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 324.7 | 324.7 | -0.0 | 33.4 | 653.4 | 65.0 | 9.5% | 1.9x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 37.6 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 25.0 | 25.0 | -0.0 | 46.9 | 689.3 | 71.1 | 8.4% | 1.7x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 28.4 | 13.9 | 13.9 | 13.9 | 13.8 | 13.8 | -0.0 | 12.4 | 592.7 | 65.0 | 5.6% | 1.1x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 34.8 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 21.0 | -0.8 | -0.8 | -0.0 | 12.9 | 635.1 | 65.0 | 8.4% | 1.7x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 31.7 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 19.4 | -76.9 | -76.9 | -0.0 | 26.4 | 659.1 | 65.0 | 7.9% | 1.8x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 27.7 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 20.1 | 20.1 | -0.0 | 8.5 | 571.6 | 65.0 | 8.0% | 2.1x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 20.7 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 12.2 | 12.2 | -0.0 | 20.0 | 459.2 | 65.0 | 8.1% | 2.9x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7.8 | -0.0 | 11.8 | 337.2 | 65.0 | 6.4% | 3.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 11.9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 6.1 | -0.0 | 8.8 | 236.9 | 65.0 | 9.4% | -- | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | — | — | 68.1% | 49 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | — | +85.5% | 58.2% | 77 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 14.67 | +37.1% | 73.1% | 133 | 14.7× | 18.6× | 8.5× | 6.2× |
| 2025 | 14.32 | +5.7% | 38.0% | 73 | 12.5× | 0.0× | 13.0× | 4.8× |
| TTM | 14.79 | +12.1% | 43.8% | 87 | — | — | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 14.79 | +10.4% | 0.5% | 1 | — | — | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
KBDC is a well-managed, defensively positioned BDC trading at ~0.93x NAV with an 8.6% dividend yield that appears sustainable near-term. However, the investment case is challenged by rising non-accruals (1.4% to 2.5%), deteriorating earnings quality (PIK income surging 1,296% YoY to 15% of NII), and inevitable NII compression as rates decline. The value lending strategy with minimal software exposure is genuinely differentiated, but NAV erosion of 1-3% annually will offset much of the dividend yield, resulting in a mid-single-digit total return that doesn't adequately compensate for the credit cycle risk embedded in a portfolio that is 96% Level 3 assets. At current prices near NAV, there is limited margin of safety if credit losses accelerate beyond management expectations. The stock is fairly priced but offers below-average risk-adjusted returns relative to alternatives in the BDC space.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Kayne Anderson BDC (KBDC) delivered solid first-quarter 2026 results, featuring NII of $0.43 per share and a strong dividend coverage of 108%. NAV per share saw a modest decline to $16.23, influenced by portfolio markdowns and realized losses, though mitigated by $21.4 million in share repurchases. The company's non-accrual rate rose to 2.5% following the addition of Score and Regiment, while Arborworks returned to accrual status. Management emphasized the fund's defensive 'value lending' approach, highlighting its minimal 2% exposure to the volatile software sector and its focus on established industries with tangible value. With 93% of the portfolio in first-lien investments and a weighted average yield of 10.1%, KBDC remains well-positioned. Leverage ended the quarter at a conservative 1.05x, with $569.7 million in liquidity available for opportunistic deployment. During the analyst session, executives noted widening spreads in the core middle market and a robust Q2 deal pipeline. They reiterated a commitment to maintaining leverage at the lower end of their target range to guard against macro uncertainty. The firm continues to successfully phase out its remaining broadly syndicated loan exposure, focusing capital on higher-yielding private credit opportunities.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Forward Projections & Estimates
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are roughly balanced — bought 3.6% of float, sold 3.6%.
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koch, Inc. | $167M | $14.41 | −$0 | +$167M | -10.3% | $922M |
| STATE TREASURER STATE OF MICHIGAN | $90.1M | $14.32 | +$0 | +$90.1M | -0.1% | $18.93B |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | $76.4M | $14.32 | +$2.0M | +$53.8M | -0.1% | $1.36T |
| HF Capital, LLC | $32.2M | $14.32 | −$37K | +$32.2M | +14.0% | $239M |
| Pathstone Holdings, LLC | $15.3M | $13.19 | −$3.2M | +$13.9M | -0.8% | $25.10B |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | $10.3M | $14.03 | +$1.7M | +$9.2M | -0.2% | $403.03B |
| UBS Group AG | $8.9M | $14.22 | +$970K | +$6.9M | -0.3% | $562.11B |
| Requisite Capital Management, LLC | $8.6M | $14.53 | −$970K | +$3.4M | -0.2% | $536M |
| VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP | $8.2M | $14.32 | −$3.1M | +$8.2M | +0.8% | $133.17B |
| Russell Investments Group, Ltd. | $7.6M | $13.93 | +$4.9M | +$7.6M | +1.5% | $93.03B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $6.3M | $14.15 | +$790K | +$4.9M | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| Sage Mountain Advisors LLC | $5.7M | $14.42 | −$5.2M | −$1.7M | +0.5% | $1.40B |
| KENNEDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $5.4M | $13.72 | +$5.4M | +$5.4M | -1.5% | $4.72B |
| Corient Private Wealth LLC | $4.8M | $14.76 | −$395K | −$2.8M | -0.9% | $69.47B |
| Callodine Capital Management, LP | $4.0M | $13.45 | −$1.5M | −$631K | -0.3% | $1.42B |
| Activest Wealth Management | $3.4M | $14.23 | +$529K | +$3.4M | +0.2% | $569M |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $3.3M | $13.00 | −$2.9M | +$3.2M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| HB Wealth Management, LLC | $3.2M | $14.46 | +$240K | +$863K | -0.5% | $15.41B |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN | $3.1M | $14.23 | +$392K | +$2.9M | -0.2% | $497.71B |
| AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC | $2.8M | $13.72 | +$2.8M | +$2.8M | -2.7% | $270M |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 75.8%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3 | 52M | 36M | 27M | $0.40 | $0.37 – $0.41 | 5 |
| 2026 Q4 | 53M | 37M | 27M | $0.40 | $0.39 – $0.41 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 51M | 35M | 27M | $0.40 | $0.39 – $0.41 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 51M | 35M | 27M | $0.40 | $0.38 – $0.41 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 1 |
| 2028 Q1 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 2 |
| 2028 Q2 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 2 |
| 2028 Q3 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 2 |
| 2028 Q4 | 50M | 35M | 26M | $0.39 | $0.38 – $0.40 | 2 |
Corporate
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | BUY | MARUCCI GEORGE E JR | director | 9,000 | $13.74 | $124K | $137K |
| 2026-03-04 | BUY | MARUCCI GEORGE E JR | director | 1,000 | $13.96 | $14K | $14K |
| 2025-09-29 | BUY | Smith Rhonda Scott | director | 365 | $13.68 | $5K | $22K |
| 2025-05-28 | BUY | ROBO JAMES L | director | 164,706 | $15.84 | $2.61M | $27.53M |
| 2025-05-28 | SELL | Rabil Albert | director | 43,020 | $15.84 | $681K | $0 |
| 2025-05-23 | SELL | Rabil Albert | director | 30,000 | $15.68 | $470K | $1.91M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.: Masking Portfolio Deterioration with Non-Cash PIK Accruals and Aggressive Buybacks
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
As of May 11, 2026, KBDC reported a sequential decline in Net Asset Value (NAV) to $16.23 per share from $16.32 at the end of 2025, driven by $11.3 million in combined realized and unrealized losses (GuruFocus). Total investment income fell 7.4% sequentially to $57.3 million due to declining reference rates and lower fee income. Additionally, RBC Capital Markets recently cut its price target on KBDC from $17 to $16, signaling reduced expectations for capital appreciation (Tiger Brokers).
The bear case centers on 'credit normalization' as the portfolio seasons. Non-accruals jumped significantly from 1.4% to 2.5% of the debt portfolio at fair value (and 4.1% at cost) in the first quarter of 2026 (Seeking Alpha). Critics argue that because BDCs must distribute nearly all income, they cannot build loan-loss reserves, making further NAV erosion inevitable as defaults rise toward the 8% industry forecast cited by Morgan Stanley. Furthermore, while NII covers the current dividend, the GAAP payout ratio is reportedly stretched at 120.3%, suggesting sustainability risks if credit losses accelerate (MarketBeat).
A major red flag is the $2.0 million realized loss recognized in February 2026 following the debt restructure of Regiment Security Partners LLC, where senior debt was downgraded to a 'last out' tranche. Two new names, Score and Regiment, were added to non-accrual status this quarter (Motley Fool). Additionally, KBDC holds an exceptionally low GuruFocus 'GF Score' of 17/100, with a Financial Strength rating of only 3/10, indicating severe underperformance in historical growth and profitability metrics compared to the broader market.
KBDC face intense competition in the middle-market lending space from larger, more liquid players like Ares Capital and FS KKR. Management noted that wider market spreads and geopolitical headwinds are pressuring M&A activity, forcing BDCs to compete on tighter margins for quality deals. While KBDC touts its low 2% exposure to the volatile software sector as a defense, this concentration in 'staple' industrial and food sectors leaves it vulnerable if these traditional industries face cyclical downturns or structural disruption from automation (SEC/Seeking Alpha).
Sentiment among 'customers' (portfolio companies) is showing signs of stress; 3.9% of interest income is now Payment-in-Kind (PIK) from Arborworks, indicating liquidity constraints at the borrower level that prevent cash payments. The rise in 'bad PIK' usage across the private credit industry—nearly tripling since 2021—suggests that KBDC's borrowers are increasingly struggling with the higher-for-longer interest rate environment despite recent rate moderations (CAIA/SEC).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-12
Operator: Hello, and welcome to Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.'s Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call (sic) [ First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call ]. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Andy Wedderburn-Maxwell, Senior Vice President. Andy Wedderburn-Maxwell: Good morning, and welcome to Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc.'s First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Today, I'm joined by Doug Goodwillie and Ken Leonard, co-CEOs of KBDC; Frank Karl, President; and Terry Hart, CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we will be available to take your questions. Today's call may include forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the company, our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs and opinions and our assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. We ask that you refer to the company's most recent filings with the SEC for important risk factors. Any forward-looking statements made today do not guarantee future performance, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements at any time. Our earnings release, 10-Q and supplemental earnings presentation are available on the Financial section of our website at kaynebdc.com. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Doug Goodwillie. Douglas Goodwillie: Good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to report another quarter of solid performance that demonstrates the resilience and consistency of our value lending approach despite the headwinds that the sector has faced this year. I will provide an overview of our quarter and share our thoughts around how KBDC's differentiated portfolio has managed to perform in a more challenging environment. Frank Karl will then provide a more detailed overview of our portfolio and performance before Terry Hart concludes with KBDC's financial results. For the first quarter of 2026, we generated net investment income of $0.43 per share, which represents strong coverage of our $0.40 quarterly dividend at 108%. While this was a slight decrease from the $0.44 per share we achieved in the fourth quarter, it reflects our disciplined approach to capital deployment in what continues to be an uncertain market environment. Our annualized return on equity for the quarter was a robust 10.6%, underscoring the effectiveness of our investment strategy. Our net asset value per share ended the quarter at $16.23, down 55 basis points from $16.32 in the last quarter. The small decline was due in part to some markdowns in the portfolio, which was offset in part by origination activity, some positive portfolio marks and by accretive share repurchase activity. I'm pleased to announce that our Board of Directors has declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share for the second quarter of 2026. This dividend will be payable on July 16 to stockholders of record as of June 30. Looking ahead, we remain confident in our ability to sustain our dividend throughout 2026, as we stated on our last earnings call. This confidence is grounded in several key factors: our portfolio's defensive positioning with 93% in first lien investments, our value lending philosophy that focuses on companies in stable and staple industries, which allows for a conservative average borrower leverage profile of just over 4x. The weighted average yield on our portfolio of 10.1% provides a solid foundation for consistent income generation, while our minimal exposure to volatile sectors like software and technology at just 2% positions us well relative to many of our peers. Our portfolio continues to demonstrate strong credit quality and resilience, particularly relative to the broader private credit market. As of March 31, 2026, nonaccrual investments represented 2.5% of our debt portfolio at fair value, up from 1.4% in the prior quarter. In terms of specific companies, we added Score and Regiment's last out tranches to the nonaccrual status during the quarter. We also moved Arborworks off nonaccrual, and we see a clear path to further improvement in the near term. While many BDCs have significant exposure to software and technology companies, often 15% to 25% of their portfolios, our consistent adherence to underwriting standards that stress disciplined industry and loan level diversification has proven prescient, as we're witnessing the private credit market's first prolonged stress test since the early stages of the COVID era. We remain focused on traditional stable industry sectors, including industrial services, distribution, food products and business services, companies with durable cash flows, substantial tangible enterprise value and disciplined leverage profiles. Turning to our investment activity for the quarter. We maintained our disciplined approach to capital deployment while continuing to find attractive opportunities that meet our stringent risk-adjusted return criteria. During the quarter, we made new private credit commitments totaling $93 million, demonstrating our ability to source quality deals even in a more selective market environment. The pricing environment for new originations remained favorable with our new floating rate loans averaging 549 basis points over SOFR during the first quarter, which was 20 basis points wider than in the fourth quarter. Our total fundings for the quarter were $99.1 million, which included both new investments and draws on existing unfunded commitments from our portfolio companies. We received $74.6 million in private credit repayments and $17.4 million in BSL sales during the quarter, resulting in net funded investment activity of $7.1 million. Our balance sheet remains exceptionally strong, and we continue to maintain a conservative risk profile. As of March 31, our debt-to-equity ratio stood at 1.05x, positioning us comfortably within our target leverage range of 1x to 1.25x. Our total liquidity position of $569.7 million provides substantial capacity for accretive capital deployment. This includes $32.7 million in cash and $537 million in undrawn debt capacity under our credit facilities. The private credit market is going through a period of bifurcation in terms of performance across different investment strategies and market segments. While presenting challenges for some participants, it's creating opportunities for disciplined lenders. Our selective approach means we're comfortable maintaining higher liquidity levels to be more tactically opportunistic as spreads widen. M&A activity has remained lower than forecasted at the start of the year, as geopolitical tensions have kept the cap on activity. However, we continue to see steady transaction flow in our core middle market segment with a noticeable uptick in activity over the past 4 to 6 weeks. The quality of deal flow remains solid and spreads have started to widen in Q1. I would be remiss if I didn't mention one of the bigger clouds hanging over our sector right now. The rapid advancement of AI and automation technologies has created significant uncertainty around business model durability and competitive positioning for many software companies. We're seeing several managers report pressure on net investment income per share, tighter dividend coverage and meaningfully declining NAV per share as they grapple with softening credit performance and increased markdowns on those positions. While we believe the general negative sentiment towards software loans is somewhat overblown, our minimal 2% exposure to the sector has insulated us from this pressure. Public BDC valuations have lagged business fundamentals with many quality managers trading at discounts to net asset value despite maintaining strong operational performance. As the market continues to differentiate between managers based on actual performance rather than just asset growth, we believe KBDC's consistent approach will be increasingly valued by both investors and the private equity sponsors who drive our deal flow. I will now pass the call over to Frank Karl to discuss our portfolio. Frank Karl: Thanks, Doug. As of March 31, our portfolio includes 105 companies with a fair value of $2.2 billion plus $289 million of unfunded commitments. Since quarter end, we have closed or are finalizing $150 million of new commitments as we've seen something of an uptick in activity in 2Q. Investments in KBDC's portfolio, excluding those on our watch list and opportunistic investments, have a weighted average leverage of 4.4x, interest coverage ratio of 2.4x and loan to enterprise value of approximately 43%. The weighted average EBITDA of our private middle market portfolio companies is $52.6 million, reflecting our focus on established middle market businesses with meaningful scale. Company count declined by 2, reflecting broadly syndicated loan rotation and realizations. The portfolio remains highly diversified, average position is approximately 1% of fair value and top 10 investments are only 20% of the portfolio. Our top 5 industry sectors, commercial services and supplies, health care distributors, food products and containers and packaging account for just over 50% of the portfolio and have remained consistent quarter-over-quarter as we focus on avoiding sector concentration risks. Approximately 95% of our debt investments are floating rate, matched by predominantly floating rate liabilities. Our only material fixed rate investment is the SG Credit loan at an 11% coupon, where we increased our commitment in Q1 given strong platform growth. Credit performance remains strong with 2.5% of debt investments at fair value on nonaccrual versus 1.4% last quarter. We do expect both Sundance and Regiment to come off nonaccrual over the next 1 to 2 quarters as Sundance is completing the final stages of its realization process, and Regiment is currently going through a sale. We look forward to providing an update on those credits on our next earnings call. As Doug mentioned, we also moved Arborworks off of nonaccrual this quarter, which did have the effect of increasing our total PIK income rate for the quarter to 7.5%, up 10 basis points from last quarter, given that we recognized some accrued interest associated with the name in income. Terry will provide more specifics. Weighted average yield was 10.1% on fair value, excluding nonaccruals, down slightly from 10.3% last quarter. We've achieved this with materially lower leverage than many peers, while continuing our rotation out of the BSLs into higher spread private credit. Remaining BSL exposure was $29.8 million at quarter end, and the sell-down is continuing in Q2. Activity has picked up in 2Q, but we have stayed selective, passing on deals where leverage asks pushed beyond our comfort or pricing was too aggressive. Against the backdrop of tariffs, AI risk and geopolitical tensions, we're looking to remain disciplined as always. We added a further $30 million delayed draw term loan to SG Credit, which now represents approximately 5% of the portfolio. That team has executed well. The position adds diversification and the 11% coupon offers an attractive return. Overall, outlook for investment activity looks healthy and our long-standing sponsor relationships continue to generate preferred lender status on attractive opportunities. With that, I'll turn it over to Terry. Terry Hart: Thank you, Frank. Let's first review our financial results. During the first quarter, we earned net income per share of $0.26 and net investment income per share of $0.43 compared to $0.44 in the prior quarter and $0.03 above our dividend. Total investment income for the first quarter was $57.3 million as compared to $61.9 million in the prior quarter. The decrease to investment income was primarily a result of lower average reference rates, some spread compression and $2.1 million less accelerated amortization of OID and prepayment fees related to realization activity, partially offset by $2.2 million of PIK interest income related to our investment in Arborworks, which moved to accrual status during the first quarter. Accelerated amortization of OID related to realization activity was approximately $0.5 million during the quarter, and PIK interest represented 7.5% of total interest income for the quarter, but it's worth noting that $2.2 million, or 3.9%, was related to PIK interest from Arborworks that had not been accrued since the fourth quarter of 2023. Additionally, the 20 basis point decrease to our portfolio yield was split evenly between lower reference rates and lower spreads. Total expenses for the first quarter were $28.4 million compared to $31.8 million for the prior quarter. The decrease was primarily the result of lower reference rates on borrowings, lower average borrowings during the first quarter, lower incentive fees and $0.5 million of excise taxes incurred in the fourth quarter. During the quarter, our incentive management fees were reduced by the 12-quarter look-back incentive fee cap. During the first quarter, we had $2.3 million of realized losses, mainly related to the restructure of our debt investment in Regiment Security Partners that resulted in a $2 million realized loss, and we recognized a $0.3 million realized loss due to the rotation out of one of our broadly syndicated loans. During the quarter, we had net unrealized losses on the portfolio of $9 million compared to unrealized losses of $7.2 million in the prior quarter. The unrealized losses were largely the result of negative fair value changes related to our investments in Score, Siegel Egg, Tempo and 4 Over. Additionally, we had deferred income tax expense of $0.4 million related to unrealized gains on equity investments held in our taxable subsidiary. As of March 31, total assets were $2.3 billion, and net assets were $1.1 billion. As of that date, our net asset value was $16.23 per share. The decrease of $0.09 from $16.32 per share as of December 31 was comprised of $0.17 per share related to net realized and unrealized losses, partially offset by $0.03 of net investment income in excess of our dividend and $0.05 related to accretive share repurchases during the first quarter. At the end of the first quarter, we had debt outstanding of $1.138 billion and our debt-to-equity ratio was 1.05x, which is a small increase from 1.02x at the end of the fourth quarter. On February 20, we closed the term extension of our largest credit facility led by Wells Fargo, and reduced the interest rate on this facility by 20 basis points. And as mentioned earlier, during the quarter, we had share repurchases of $21.4 million at an average price to NAV per share of 86%, pursuant to our $100 million share repurchase program. On May 5, the program was extended for 1 year and the $100 million program amount was renewed starting May 25. Now turning to our distribution. On May 5, our Board of Directors declared a regular dividend for the second quarter of $0.40 per share to shareholders of record on June 30. As of March 31, our undistributed net investment income was approximately $0.25 per share. As we continue to execute during the remainder of 2026, we plan to complete the rotation out of our remaining lower-yielding BSL positions, gradually optimize our leverage within our target debt-to-equity range of 1x to 1.25x and stay focused on our value lending strategy. With that, operator, please open the line for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Cory Johnson from UBS. Cory Johnson: So you mentioned, I guess, passing on some deals because perhaps the terms weren't where you wanted them to be at. But I was just wondering because I've heard from some of the BDCs about how some of the terms on their things that they're looking at have actually strengthened so far. So I was just wondering, are you feeling any pressure possibly from upmarket? And I guess, similarly, are you seeing any opportunities given where you're at leverage-wise? And I guess, coming with a little bit of a cleaner balance sheet, any opportunities for you to either go upstream or just anything else that you're seeing in the market that you can take advantage of? Douglas Goodwillie: Sure. Thanks, Cory. This is Doug Goodwillie. And I would say just in general, as a backdrop, I think we always try to stay as disciplined as we can in any market in terms of leverage discipline as well as pricing discipline. And I think this quarter was not all that different for us in terms of that. I'd say the market in terms of M&A volume continues to be on a midrange, not fantastic, given what we've talked about geopolitical and other pressures on the market. But the opportunities that we have seen have still been good quality. And I think if you look at Q2, we've seen a slight uptick. I think we're tracking to almost $200 million of commitments for Q2 for the BDC. So we are using our balance sheet and liquidity to invest in what we think are attractive opportunities. In terms of the piece of the question regarding the upper mid-market potentially kind of coming down into the core mid-market, not really the case at all. I think at this point, what we're seeing is the start of a dislocation where some of the upper mid-market players, I think, given some of the redemptions on the private BDC side, haven't been putting as much capital to work. So the $400 million and $500 million upper mid-market deals are actually seeing some better pricing for the first time in a while. And we've seen some of those opportunities where you can play in a $75 million to $100 million EBITDA business, get a covenant and get some decent pricing. So I think that's been more of an opportunity at this point. We haven't seen enough stress around sell-offs around software portfolios, and do believe that we're unlikely to see that over the long term. But hopefully, that answers your question. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kenneth Lee from RBC Capital Markets. Kenneth Lee: I realize it's a little difficult to predict, but could you offer any kind of outlook around prepayments over the near term? Could you see it trending either lower or higher than a more normalized kind of environment there? Douglas Goodwillie: I'll start, and maybe, Frank, you can weigh in as well. I think it's been a relatively slow prepayment year and probably 2 to 3 years, I think just given the M&A market. So you've seen the average duration, which Ken and I have been doing this together 25 years. It's almost always, over the long term, around 3 years. And I think in a brisk M&A environment, it's going to 2.5, and I think we're seeing it closer to 4 for this post-COVID period. So this year, we're seeing -- and I'll toss it over to Frank, relatively kind of normal first half and projecting a pickup in Q4, but I'd say that's a bit dependent on the overall market. Frank Karl: Yes. I think we've got -- to Doug's point, we usually expect something of a back half more transaction volume, you'd expect a little bit of a pickup. That said, if you are in an environment where spreads are increasing 25, 50 basis points, maybe higher than that, that generally leads to something of a slightly more muted refinancing and transaction period of time. So I would argue we're probably expecting '26 to look maybe a little bit of a step up from '25. Kenneth Lee: Got you. Very helpful there. And just one more follow-up, if I may. Just in terms of the ongoing portfolio ramp, once again, just given the outlook, the macro conditions and obviously, what you're seeing, do you think you would lean for portfolio leverage to be closer to the lower end or the higher end of your target range there over the near term? Douglas Goodwillie: Thank you. I think we're comfortable with where we are between 1x to 1.1x. I think our view is -- we're kind of yet to see where this dislocation goes and whether it will be prolonged. And we'd like to certainly have a decent amount of liquidity going into the front end of a potential dislocation and certainly don't want to be at the upper end at 1.2x, 1.25x, and kind of dealing with potential borrowing base and things like that, that can occur if you really go into a prolonged dislocation. So I think we're pretty comfortable with where we are, and we're still seeing good opportunities, and we'll still deploy capital, but would not expect to get aggressive towards the 1.2x, 1.25x side on the leverage side. Operator: Our next question comes from Derek Hewett from Bank of America. Derek Hewett: It was nice to see the 20 basis points of improvement in spreads on a quarter-over-quarter basis. But like how are spreads trending today on deals that you're looking at? Douglas Goodwillie: Thanks, Derek. I'll start, and Ken and Frank, please weigh in. I think we've seen a slight uptick in the core mid-market, but something along the lines of potentially 20 basis points in our opportunity set, and I think that's translating into the core mid-market. I think you'd hear that in the upper mid-market, there has been slightly more than that, as I think you saw more of the start of the dislocation occurring there. We expect with capital coming out of the market, fundraising to be harder with a lot of the, whether it's right or wrong, negative press around private credit. So I think those factors bode well for spreads increasing, both in the upper mid-market as well as the core mid-market over the near term. Kenneth Leonard: Yes. The other thing I would add is we've talked to investment bankers, and the pipeline seems to be increasing. That's always the front end of our investment process. And so as more volume comes in the market, we think there will be opportunity to take spreads up. And so we remain hopeful that, that's going to continue as that's generally a pretty good leading indicator. Derek Hewett: Okay. And then in the prepared remarks, you guys had mentioned that the SG Credit add-on was on the delayed draw side due to just growth in that investment in general. So how should we think about maybe increasing your exposure on the equity side, just given that you're seeing strong growth overall in that vehicle? Frank Karl: Yes, I'll start there. I mean they're continuing to grow the book, obviously, one good way to do that and it's, over the long term, will support the valuation of our equity investment is via the incremental debt investment. We've talked about in the past, we do have an option to purchase the more equity in that vehicle. I think that, that's something that we will continually be discussing internally as that platform grows, we're not going to be on the phone next quarter saying, "Hey, we've made a substantially increased equity commitment to SG Credit." Derek Hewett: Okay. And then the last one for me is, in your prepared remarks, you guys had mentioned that the -- you were continuing to monetize the BSL portfolio. Is that expected to be done in the first quarter? Or are there maybe a couple of investments in that portfolio that may have experienced some dislocation over the past 3 to 5 months and might take a little bit longer to monetize? Douglas Goodwillie: I'll toss it to Frank, who's a little closer on the exact timing, but we're down to 4 credits, 3 or -- I think the average leverage across those is mid-2s. There's one that's slightly marked down, which Frank can hit on. But we do expect to monetize that largely during this quarter, but some may slip into Q3. Frank Karl: Not much to add, right? There's 4 names, about $30 million at cost, about $27 million at FMV. I think it will just depend on, to Doug's earlier point, around how we want to manage leverage, what the opportunities look like, et cetera. But 3 of those are trading right around our cost basis. And then you mentioned Tempo, that's Alight Solutions. That business has gotten knocked by some AI-related noise, although we do think it's more of a -- we don't think that's a fair characterization for that business, very small position that we are looking to unwind sooner rather than later. Operator: We have no further questions. I'd like to turn the call back over to Doug Goodwillie for closing remarks. Douglas Goodwillie: Well, with that, I would like to thank everyone for joining us for this KBDC earnings presentation and for your continued interest in KBDC and our platform. We look forward to speaking again in August at our next earnings call. Operator: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.