Stocks/ISPR

ISPR

Ispire Technology Inc.
Consumer Defensive·Tobacco
$1.81
$104M market cap
Claude Rating
2/10SHORT
Revenue
$89.5M
Free Cash Flow
$-11.1M
Rev Growth
-28.7%
FCF Margin
-12.4%
P/FCF
--
EV/FCF
--
Fwd EV/EBITDA
--
Fair Value
$0.55
Upside
-69.6%

Ispire Technology Inc. manufactures e-cigarettes and cannabis vaping products. The company was founded in 2019 and is based in Los Angeles, California. Ispire Technology Inc. operates as a subsidiary of Pride Worldwide Investment Limited

2-Year Price History

$1.81-74.6%
$2.0$3.0$4.0$5.0$6.0$7.0$8.0volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q325.0-2.0---3.8---1.5-0.518,019----------
Est2028-Q228.0-0.8---2.8---1.4-0.618,021----------
Est2028-Q130.00.0---2.4---2.4-0.818,022----------
Est2027-Q426.0-1.3---3.1---0.5-0.518,024----------
Est2027-Q321.0-3.2---5.3---2.1-0.318,025----------
Est2027-Q223.0-2.8---4.6---1.2-0.318,027----------
Est2027-Q125.0-2.5---4.5---3.8-0.518,028----------
Est2026-Q422.0-4.0---6.2---1.8-0.318,032----------
Act2026-Q318.7-8.8-9.5-9.52.01.7-0.318,0343,81257.3-1.0%-100.8x--
Act2026-Q220.3-5.8-6.9-6.6-4.0-4.0-0.117.65.757.3-484.1%-57.7x--
Act2026-Q130.4-2.4-2.7-3.3-12.5-12.3-0.222.76.357.3-171.1%-21.5x--
Act2025-Q420.18.1-14.6-14.84.73.6-1.124.47.157.2-829.7%----
Act2025-Q326.2-10.1-10.6-10.9-12.5-12.3-0.223.67.657.0-560.2%-313.3x--
Act2025-Q241.8-6.8-7.4-8.0-3.2-3.4-0.234.42.856.7<-999%----
Act2025-Q139.3-4.8-5.3-5.63.43.3-0.137.73.156.6-452.5%----
Act2024-Q437.3-1.8-3.4-3.4-1.4-2.4-1.035.13.456.5-152.9%----
Act2024-Q330.0-5.6-5.7-6.03.43.0-0.339.54.054.4-212.4%----
Act2024-Q241.7-3.6-3.9-4.0-7.4-8.4-1.126.84.354.3-363.6%----
Act2024-Q142.9-0.6-0.9-1.3-13.1-13.9-0.834.94.654.3-76.5%----
Act2023-Q432.6-0.9-0.9-1.5-10.7-11.2-0.549.43.954.2-90.0%----
Act2023-Q324.1-2.7-2.7-2.3-6.8-6.8-0.033.64.553.1-38.6%----
Act2023-Q231.90.30.3-0.16.16.0-0.284.33.653.12.6%----
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
20245.03-7.6%-12n/mn/mn/m2.3×
20252.80-16.1%-10.7%-14n/mn/mn/m1.1×
TTM1.81-38.2%-10.0%-90.0×0.0×
2027E1.81+6.2%-0.1%-00.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude2/10SHORTFV: $0.55

Ispire is a technically insolvent micro-cap operating as a captive distributor for its CEO's private Chinese manufacturing entity, with 91% supplier concentration creating an extreme conflict of interest. Revenue has declined ~29% YoY as the company abandoned its U.S. tobacco market and shed cannabis clients, while 43% of gross receivables are uncollectible. The bull case rests entirely on speculative future catalysts - IKE Tech age-gating FDA approval (no timeline), Malaysian manufacturing ramp, and Vapor ODM launch - none of which are de-risked. With negative stockholders' equity of -$16.2M, $73.2M in related-party liabilities, massive credit losses, and a promotional management team, the risk/reward is deeply unfavorable. The company's survival depends on the CEO's private entity continuing to defer $35M in payables.

Catalyst FDA authorization of IKE Tech age-gating PMTA could theoretically unlock partnerships with major tobacco companies for flavored vape products, but this remains highly speculative with no clear timeline. Malaysian facility ramp and ODM launch in July 2026 could provide modest near-term revenue support.
Risk The CEO's private entity (Shenzhen Yi Jia) controls 91% of supply and holds $73.2M in related-party claims against the company. If this entity demands payment or alters terms, Ispire faces immediate liquidity crisis and potential bankruptcy. The entire business model depends on this conflicted arrangement continuing.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
2/10
Quarter
2/10
Exp. Move
-15.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Ispire Technology's Q3 2026 earnings call marked a transition from corporate restructuring to strategic execution. The company reported revenue of $18.7 million, a seasonal dip that outperformed historical trends. Despite a net loss of $9.5 million—impacted by legacy returns and credit losses—the company achieved a sequential increase in cash to $18 million. Management projects becoming cash flow positive in H2 2026, driven by a 36% year-over-year reduction in operating expenses. Key growth drivers include the now-operational Malaysia manufacturing plant, which offers a 25% tariff advantage over China-based production, and the upcoming July launch of a Vapor ODM initiative. The company is also positioning its proprietary IKE Tech Age-Gating platform as a regulatory solution for the U.S. flavored vape market. Management noted a significant surge in interest from potential partners following recent FDA regulatory signals regarding digital leash software for nicotine products. By leveraging its non-China manufacturing footprint and continuous authentication technology, Ispire aims to capture a significant share of the global nicotine and compliance markets. Co-CEO Michael Wang emphasized that the company has moved past its "cleanup" phase and is now entering an upward trajectory for growth and profitability.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$1.81
Market Cap$104M
Enterprise Value$-14.1B
P/S Ratio1.2x
P/FCF--
EV/FCF--
FCF Margin (TTM)-12.4%
FCF Yield-10.7%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution0.5%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$89.5M
Net Income$-34.2M
Free Cash Flow$-11.1M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-28.7%
EBITDA Margin-10.0%
Net Margin-38.2%
FCF Margin-12.4%
CapEx % of Revenue1.8%
SBC % of Revenue1968.1%
ROIC-371.5%
WC Change % Rev-32573.2%
Interest Coverage-29.8x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$247.22
+13558.7% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$-57M
− Net Debt$-14.2B
= Fair Equity$14.2B
Revenue Growth19.8% → 3.0%
FCF Margin-12.4% → 5.0%
Discount Rate17.0%
Terminal EV/FCF6.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float5.1%
Short Shares1.0M
Days to Cover12.8
Change (vs Prior)+10.5%
Short % Float History
5.10%+1.80pp
3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0%5.5%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)214%
Put IV (ATM)230%
ATM Spread38.8%
Call $OI (near money)$8K
Put $OI (near money)$3K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$2.5
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50$0.05/$0.75107$0.45/$1.801
$5.00--/$0.750$2.50/$4.100
$7.50--/$0.300$5.00/$6.800
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+1.7%
Forward FCF Margin-9.6%
Forward EBITDA Margin-13.6%
Forward P/FCF--
Forward EV/FCF--
Forward Int. Coverage-26.0x
Model Risk Score9/10
Bankruptcy Odds35%
Est. Borrow Rate18.0%
Terminal EV/FCF6.0x
LT Growth3.0%
LT FCF Margin5.0%

Employees

Headcount98
Revenue / Employee$912,861
Gross Profit / Employee$133,287
2023: 69 → 2024: 98 → 2025: 81 (8% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

BALANCED

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are roughly balanced — bought 1.6% of float, sold 1.2%.

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+0.4% of float (net)
Bought 1.6% · Sold 1.2%
61 filers reported (last quarter: 58)

Ownership composition

Active
3.5%(-2.0% YoY)
48 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
4.4%(-2.0% YoY)
8 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.0%(-0.0% YoY)
3 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
2.6%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2023-062023-122024-062024-122025-062025-122026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
Yong Rong (HK) Asset Management Ltd$2.8M$8.62−$0−$0+7.0%$219M
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$2.3M$6.14−$46K−$73K-0.2%$5.69T
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$914K$8.33+$42K+$40K+2.3%$1.61T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$633K$6.41+$32K+$137K-0.2%$2.89T
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$365K$1.84+$365K+$365K$4.04T
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$278K$9.61+$10K−$34K-0.2%$755.34B
VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COPassive$215K$1.84+$215K+$215K$395.83B
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$207K$1.84+$207K+$207K$1.91T
UBS Group AG$161K$5.90−$12K−$35K-0.3%$562.11B
MORGAN STANLEY$141K$5.38−$71K+$54K-0.3%$1.65T
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$124K$4.50+$44K+$55K-0.2%$760.93B
Bank of New York Mellon Corp$102K$9.29+$6K+$5K-0.2%$543.21B
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$96K$2.23+$50K+$96K-0.2%$218.19B
Orion Porfolio Solutions, LLC$72K$2.40+$30K+$72K-0.2%$11.63B
MERCER GLOBAL ADVISORS INC /ADV$68K$1.84+$68K+$68K-0.0%$63.93B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$56K$11.41−$30K−$29K+0.7%$645.81B
Centiva Capital, LP$45K$1.84+$45K+$45K+0.5%$2.14B
Nuveen, LLC$45K$2.73+$0+$0+0.0%$368.63B
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P.$36K$6.98+$0+$6K-0.3%$307.70B
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$33K$8.26−$4K+$11K-0.1%$1.36T
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
+4.66%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
+4.88%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.10%
23 buyers · $0.00B in
Sellers (this Q)
+4.82%
15 sellers · $0.00B out
alpha coverage: 91% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-16.0%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
+0.4%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
+12.8%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
-18.3%
outflows — trims may be forced
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
-24.2%
Sellers shed AUM broadly — partly forced.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-5.0%
Holder mid (any stock)
-3.7%
Holder rally (any stock)
-24.3%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

0561K1.1M1.7M2.2M$1.84$4.41$6.99$9.56$122023-062023-122024-062024-122025-062025-122026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Yong Rong (HK) Asset Management Ltd1.5MMurchinson Ltd.MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd.9KAdvisorShares Investments LLCUBS Group AG87KMORGAN STANLEY77KCHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC31KBank of New York Mellon Corp55KMarex Group plcMirae Asset Global Investments Co., Ltd.

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
1
Buy: 1Consensus: Buy
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2025 Q132M-2M-7M$-0.12$-0.12 – $-0.121
2025 Q222M-2M-8M$-0.14$-0.14 – $-0.141
2025 Q330M-2M-6M$-0.10$-0.10 – $-0.101
2025 Q433M-2M-1M$-0.01$-0.01 – $-0.011
2026 Q123M-2M-1M$-0.02$-0.02 – $-0.021
2026 Q225M-2M-1M$-0.02$-0.02 – $-0.021
2026 Q327M-2M-1M$-0.01$-0.01 – $-0.011
2026 Q428M-2M-1M$-0.01$-0.01 – $-0.011
2027 Q129M-2M-1M$-0.01$-0.01 – $-0.011
2027 Q230M-2M-1M$-0.01$-0.01 – $-0.011

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$19.7M
Incentive & Other$18.0M
Total Compensation$37.7M
% of Revenue9.9%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$30K
5 txns · 1 insider · 13,000 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$89K
5 txns · 2 insiders · 33,546 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-03-02BUYWang Michael Xueofficer: Co-Chief Executive Officer3,000$2.38$7K$1.11M
2026-02-27BUYWang Michael Xueofficer: Co-Chief Executive Officer2,000$2.41$5K$1.12M
2026-02-26BUYWang Michael Xueofficer: Co-Chief Executive Officer2,000$2.40$5K$1.11M
2026-02-25BUYWang Michael Xueofficer: Co-Chief Executive Officer4,000$2.33$9K$1.07M
2026-02-24BUYWang Michael Xueofficer: Co-Chief Executive Officer2,000$2.21$4K$1.01M
2026-02-17SELLPryzbyla Steven P.officer: CLO and Secretary3,000$3.22$10K$1.26M
2026-02-13SELLPryzbyla Steven P.officer: CLO and Secretary3,000$3.23$10K$1.27M
2026-02-12SELLPryzbyla Steven P.officer: CLO and Secretary3,000$3.41$10K$1.35M
2025-11-20SELLFargis Johndirector7,500$1.95$15K$76K
2025-09-26SELLPryzbyla Steven P.officer: CLO and Secretary17,046$2.64$45K$1.06M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

42.3%retail-7.4pp
11.9%dark+4.3pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%50%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Geography (2026-Q3)
Europe$11.8M-11%
North America$3.3M-63%
Asia Pacific$2.8M-6%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Ispire Technology Inc.: CEO-Owned Supply Chain and Technical Insolvency

Overall Risk
9/10
Fraud
8/10
Dilution
7/10
Insolvency
9/10
Earnings Overstated
8/10
Hidden Liabilities
6/10
Legal
8/10
Audit Warnings
5/10
Hidden Upside
2/10
Contextually Acceptable
2/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In May 2026, Ispire reported a significant Q3 2026 earnings miss, with a net loss of $0.17 per share—missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a $0.02 loss by 750%. Revenue for the quarter plummeted 28.6% year-over-year to $18.7 million, well below the $32.8 million analysts had previously expected. The company cited a $2.2 million impact from product returns by legacy cannabis customers and a staggering $11.5 million in credit loss expenses during the nine-month period ending March 31, 2026 (MarketBeat, Zacks, PRNewswire).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on a five-year pattern of worsening losses (averaging 62.8% annually) and a deteriorating balance sheet featuring a $16.2 million stockholders' deficit as of May 2026. Skeptics argue the company's 'age-gating' bull thesis is stalling; management initially targeted FDA approval by early 2026, but as of May 7, the PMTA remains in review with no clear timeline, leaving the company's growth largely dependent on a shrinking legacy business and speculative future technologies (Seeking Alpha, Simply Wall St).

🚩 Red Flags

Financial red flags include a massive negative return on equity (ROE) of 2,383.89% and a negative net margin of 36.6%. The company's reliance on 'one-time' inventory write-downs ($2.4 million) and high allowances for credit losses ($21.5 million) suggest poor quality of earnings and potential issues with customer creditworthiness. Additionally, the stock has been labeled a 'Strong Sell' by some technical analysts due to a persistent falling trend and extreme daily volatility, which reached 31.5% in early May 2026 (Intellectia AI, Stock Titan).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

ISPR operates in the bottom 7% of industry sectors (Tobacco/Vaping), facing intense pressure from larger, well-capitalized tobacco giants. While ISPR touts a manufacturing move to Malaysia to avoid a 25% China tariff, it remains a micro-cap player in a $73 billion global market where organic revenue actually fell 20% over the last year. Competitors with established FDA-authorized products pose a high barrier to ISPR's entry into the restricted flavored vape market (Zacks, Simply Wall St).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment among professional analysts remains cautious, with a 'Hold' consensus and warnings that the stock is 'highly speculative.' Market sentiment is weighed down by the company's inability to translate revenue into earnings, with some critics noting that the low Price-to-Sales ratio (1.6x) is 'justified' by the company's lack of fundamental stability rather than being a sign of undervaluation (Seeking Alpha, MarketBeat).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q3 • 2026-05-08

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Ispire Technology Q3 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to James Carbonara with Hayden Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
James Carbonara: Good afternoon, and welcome to Ispire Technology's fiscal third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact in its announcement are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the company in terms of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions, and expected future developments as well as other factors that the company believes are relevant. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown uncertainties, and many factors could cause the company's actual results or performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Further information regarding this and other risk factors are included in the company's filings with the SEC. The company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent or current events or circumstances or changes in expectations, except as may be required by law. I will now turn the call over to Michael Wang, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Ispire Technology. Michael, you may begin.
Michael Wang: Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining us. This quarter marked a turning point for Ispire. Our business has stabilized. Our operating model is sharper and more disciplined, and we ended the quarter with $18 million in cash, up $468,000 sequentially. This sequential cash growth is one of the clearest signs of progress in the quarter. It demonstrates the improving financial control and a more focused operating posture and reinforces our confidence in becoming cash flow positive in the second half of this calendar year 2026. The transition we set out to make is behind us. Now we are executing against a phased growth roadmap, multiple catalysts, each tied to billion-dollar markets where we have clear competitive advantages. The first and most immediate of these is Malaysia. Our Malaysia manufacturing platform is live today, and we believe this is one of the most strategically important developments in the company's history. In addition, Malaysia provides us with an estimated 25% tariff advantage over China, giving us both economic and strategic leverage as we pursue opportunities in the $73 billion global vape market. This is both a manufacturing milestone and a structural advantage that we believe can support margin improvement, customer acquisition, and long-term market relevance. Second, plans are underway to launch our Vapor ODM initiative in July. This initiative will initially serve small and mid-sized brands with larger brand opportunities targeted for 2027. We see this as another practical commercialization pathway that can convert our manufacturing, design, and regulatory capabilities into higher-value customer relationships. Beyond these near-term drivers, we continue to build long-duration optionality through differentiated technology. Through IKE Tech, we believe our Age-Gating platform has the potential to help unlock approximately $50 billion to $70 billion U.S. flavored vape market, a market that remains effectively inaccessible today under the current framework. In parallel, our G-Mesh Glass Technology is growing interest in a $24 billion plus legal global market, including licensing discussions with major tobacco participants. These are proprietary assets that could materially expand our strategic and financial opportunities beginning in 2027 and beyond. The accomplishments we achieved during the fiscal third quarter are clear. We strengthened liquidity, improved operating discipline, and advanced the roadmap with multiple high-value catalysts. We believe that combination gives Ispire a stronger foundation for both profitability and the long-term shareholder value creation as we move forward. I will now turn the call over to Jie for a more detailed review of our financial results. Jie?
Jie Yu: Thank you, Michael. For the fiscal third quarter ended March 31, 2026, Ispire reported revenue of $18.7 million compared with $26.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and $20.3 million in the prior quarter. The modest sequential decline primarily reflected seasonal factory downtime associated with Chinese New Year and represents the most resilient second to third quarter performance pattern in our history. Gross profit for the quarter was $2 million and gross margin was 10.7%. Importantly, gross profit was impacted by approximately $2.2 million of one-time product returns from legacy cannabis customer with whom we have ceased doing business. We view those returns as part of final cleanup associated with our strategic repositioning, not representative of the normalized earnings profile of the go-forward business. In that sense, we view this quarter as one in which reported margin observed a legacy headwind, while the underlying business mix continues moving in an improved direction. On the cost side, we continue to make meaningful progress. Total operating expenses, excluding credit loss were $5.9 million, down 36% year-over-year from $9.3 million, and down 3.7% sequentially from $6.1 million in the December quarter. This performance reflects the impact of sustained cost discipline and a more focused operating structure. It also reinforced our belief that profitability is increasing a matter of near-term execution and scale. Credit loss in the quarter was $5.6 million, down roughly $500,000 year-over-year. This improvement is another indication that the financial cleanup tied to legacy activity is moving in the right direction. And we are committed to continued discipline around receivables and working capital management. Net loss for the quarter was $9.5 million compared with $10.9 million in the year ago period and $6.6 million in the prior quarter. While the quarter still reflects transition-related pressure, the broader trend is encouraging. We have materially reduced our cost base while positioning the company for higher quality revenue streams and better operating leverage over time. We ended the quarter with $18 million in cash, an increase of approximately $468,000 sequentially. This sequential cash growth is a meaningful achievement in the context of an ongoing repositioning. It strengthens our balance sheet, support our near-term growth investments, and underpin our confidence in reaching cash flow positive performance in the second half of this calendar year 2026. From a financial perspective, the foundation for improved profitability has been built. The company is leaner, more disciplined, and better aligned with high-value growth markets. I will now turn the call back to Michael.
Michael Wang: Thank you. This quarter marks the beginning of a new phase for Ispire. The transition in our business reflects reduced exposure to low-quality revenue and is now about converting that reset into a stronger earnings model, a stronger cash profile, and a stronger strategic position in global nicotine and compliance technology markets. Our priorities are clear. First, we are focused on profitability and the path to becoming cash flow positive in the second half of this calendar year 2026. We intend to build on the momentum we have established this quarter through operating discipline, working capital management and the ramp of new revenue catalysts. Second, we are focused on winning from a position of strategic advantage. Our licensed manufacturing presence in Malaysia gives us a highly differentiated foothold in a critical geography with regulatory exclusivity and tariff advantages that we believe can translate into both commercial and financial benefits over time. Malaysia is a platform for expansion. And finally, we are building a company with multiple avenues for value creation, near-term scale commercialization through Vapor ODM, and longer-term upside through Age-Gating and G-Mesh. Together, these initiatives create a diversified roadmap that we believe is unusual in our industry and compelling from an investor perspective. Thank you for your time and continued support. Operator, please open the line for questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] And today's first question comes from Nick Anderson with ROTH Capital Partners.
Nicholas Anderson: Congrats on the quarter. First for me, just on the vape news and the recent flavored approval, there was discussion around the digital leash software, which maybe was the reason the FDA viewed that application favorably. I guess 2 questions off that. Do you believe proximity-based restrictions will be the path the FDA takes? And if so, do you have the capability to incorporate that tech into your -- do you have the ability to incorporate that into your tech if you don't have it already?
Michael Wang: Nick, thank you. The first part of the question, actually, I will go straight to the second part. Yes, we do have that built into our solution. And from day 1, that was the key differentiation between our technology and other solutions out there. So more importantly, our platform is now moving out of the old app model more into a platform model. So this, again, reinforced the continuous authentication capabilities. And more importantly, because it's a platform, we would allow for brands to customize and set their own, I guess, performance parameter, you can say, really brand -- from brand to brand, we provide that capability because we also want to make sure brands in dealing with different regulations across the world, they can set the parameters differently country by country depending on regulations, too. So the simple answer is, yes, we have the continuous authentication capability, and it's in our solution. And the advantage really is, so many solutions out there, especially solutions developed years ago tend to be either having the device turned on after initial age verification and then stay on forever, which is, of course, highly undesirable from a regulatory point of view or they would have a periodic reauthentication or verification. That also creates gaps where potential misuse of the device could happen. So that's why from day 1, our solution was continuous authentication and that proved to be very important to regulators, not only with the FDA, but outside the U.S. as well. Nick, I hope I answered your question.
Nicholas Anderson: Yes, that's perfect and very encouraging. Second for me, just on partnerships. This PMTA announcement also validated Age-Gating positioning and getting flavors to market. I know this is maybe too early, but what have you seen with discussions with potential partners in terms of potentially accelerating off of this approval? What has changed in the last few days in terms of the clients you're talking to?
Michael Wang: You're right. Indeed, in the last 48 hours, up to 72 hours, the ground was moving per se. So that's really encouraging to us. President Trump's pressure on the FDA, obviously, went a long way for the industry. And the immediate approval of the 4 additional SKUs for glass sent a strong signal to the industry. So I think all the key players in the industry are familiar with the pros and cons of different solutions. Collectively, we have shared consensus that our solution is most advanced versus other technologies. So with the news over the last couple of days, certainly, we got accelerated existing conversations with brands. In a couple of situations we actually have even moved one step further discussing using our technology in some of their existing PMTAs through a so-called supplemental PMTA to accelerate the approval of their flavored products. So it's clear the industry recognize the flood gate is opening and Age-Gating is the only way to get flavored approval. And lastly, with everybody's understanding for our solution being far ahead of competition. So we are absolutely getting -- I would say, yesterday, put it this way, I worked for 17 hours. That's much longer than my typical day of 12 hours. So it says a lot about the effort we put into entertaining those conversations.
Nicholas Anderson: That's great to hear. If I could squeeze just one more in on the state-by-state structures. With regulators becoming more constructive around vape, how do you anticipate states will respond? Several markets still have banned flavors, some have banned foreign imports. How do you see the state landscape changing as potentially more flavors come to market, in the legal market?
Michael Wang: I think from a flavor ban point of view, those, I think, 5, 6 states literally are aligned with FDA's flavor ban. So they are just reinforcing these bans accordingly. So from that point of view, there is consistency. I certainly hope with FDA feeling comfortable with Age-Gating Technology and start approving flavors, those states would align as well, would support approved flavors. But of course, we all know the general flavor ban in place right now is really trying to minimize the impact of black market from selling devices to underaged users. So that was a real goal by those states. So I think from that point of view, there is a perfect alignment with the FDA. I certainly hope the state would follow FDA's lead in terms of supporting approved flavors. But regarding other state-by-state situation, Texas, for example, is driving toward banning China-made vaping devices. So that is absolutely supporting our strategy of producing our product in Malaysia. So I think that's a plus for us. But some other state-by-state restrictions, I think, involved in probably banning disposables. We all know disposables are not environmentally friendly approach to vaping. So I think the industry is moving further, further into pod systems versus disposable. And California, I think, as we know, ban online sales to further protect consumers. So I don't think that is going to change. That is the right policy because online sales is so hard to regulate and verify, certify. But ultimately, the true solution in protecting under-aged consumers or people and to protect adult consumers from using risky dangerous product is by FDA approving flavored devices with age-gating built in. So I think I'm happy for the industry, knowing to us devices were approved, and this is a new beginning for the industry. I'm happy for consumers. And certainly, this is a major win for the regulators as well. Instead of doing nothing for flavored products, finally, this is the right thing to do, using technology here to solve the problem. Nick, that's my answer.
Nicholas Anderson: Congrats.
Operator: And this concludes today's question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Michael Wang for any closing remarks.
Michael Wang: Thank you, operator. Obviously, this quarter is a low quarter in terms of revenue for us, but it's not a surprise. Q3 has always been a low quarter due to the Chinese New Year shutdown of the factories. But generally, from Q2 to Q3, we saw over 30% drop in business. For this time, it's only 8% drop. That's really, as Jie indicated, the lowest drop in history. So -- but I do believe from top line and bottom line point of view, Q3 was a low point. And we feel very strongly, as Jie stated, our foundation is set solidly. We have a lot of work to do, certainly to prove to investors that we're over the hump and we are now on an upward trajectory. So I look forward to sharing more performance and developments with investors in the coming months. Certainly, we are here to show what we can accomplish this current quarter and the September quarter. I hope there will be a trend to regain some of the investors' trust and confidence, and we'll never look back again. So thanks again to everybody on today's call. This concludes it all. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.