Stocks/GRDN

GRDN

Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc.
Healthcare·Medical - Distribution
$38.74
$2.5B market cap
Claude Rating
4/10UNDERWEIGHT
Revenue
$1.5B
Free Cash Flow
$70.0M
Rev Growth
+2.2%
FCF Margin
4.8%
P/FCF
35.0x
EV/FCF
34.6x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
20.0x
Fair Value
$28.00
Upside
-27.7%

Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc., a pharmacy service company, provides a suite of technology-enabled services designed to help residents of long-term health care facilities (LTCFs) in the United States. Its individualized clinical, drug dispensing, and administration capabilities are used to serve the needs of residents in lower acuity LTCFs, such as assisted living facilities and behavioral health facilities and group homes. The company's Guardian Compass includes dashboards created using data

2-Year Price History

$38.37+116.2%
$20$25$30$35volSep 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q1380.028.5--13.3--11.4-5.3237.1----------
Est2027-Q4405.040.5--21.5--34.4-4.9225.7----------
Est2027-Q3385.033.9--15.4--25.0-5.0191.3----------
Est2027-Q2370.030.3--13.7--21.5-4.8166.3----------
Est2027-Q1358.025.1--11.5--9.0-5.0144.8----------
Est2026-Q4380.037.2--19.0--30.4-4.6135.9----------
Est2026-Q3360.030.6--13.7--21.6-4.7105.5----------
Est2026-Q2345.027.6--12.1--19.0-4.883.9----------
Act2026-Q1336.623.717.713.36.11.0-5.064.936.963.721.3%153.6x21.9x
Act2025-Q4397.642.336.620.934.630.4-4.265.637.163.646.3%259.7x14.4x
Act2025-Q3377.423.616.49.828.223.0-5.236.540.863.419.8%147.5x16.2x
Act2025-Q2344.318.312.69.019.915.6-4.318.839.963.217.4%106.1x--
Act2025-Q1329.318.513.09.517.611.7-5.814.028.562.920.4%109.1x--
Act2024-Q4338.621.816.811.922.317.8-4.54.737.361.127.8%51.8x--
Act2024-Q3314.4-99.6-104.6-112.6-2.2-7.3-5.137.274.961.1-206.9%-97.1x--
Act2024-Q2300.016.917.010.629.126.1-3.11.576.060.872.4%15.9x--
Act2024-Q1275.412.67.92.88.75.0-3.70.00.060.8--16.5x--
Act2023-Q4281.120.015.512.014.611.8-2.80.869.260.889.8%27.1x--
Act2023-Q2253.429.625.321.523.920.1-3.80.765.560.8126.2%42.1x--
Act2023-Q1249.010.96.51.717.613.8-3.70.657.360.839.0%15.5x--
Act2022-Q4236.920.316.111.710.25.7-4.50.663.00.083.9%----
Act2022-Q3236.920.316.111.710.25.7-4.50.663.00.083.6%----

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude4/10UNDERWEIGHTFV: $28.00

Guardian Pharmacy Services is a well-managed roll-up play in the fragmented LTC pharmacy space, benefiting from the 'silver tsunami' demographic tailwind and demonstrating operational resilience through the IRA transition. However, the stock trades at ~48x earnings and ~32x FCF, pricing in near-flawless execution of both organic growth and M&A integration for years. With TTM FCF margins of only ~5%, SG&A growing far faster than revenue, heavy insider selling (founders liquidating 40%+ of stakes), and a business model that ultimately distributes commodity pharmaceutical products with thin margins, the risk/reward is unfavorable at current levels. The market needs GRDN to sustain 20%+ revenue growth with meaningful margin expansion just to justify the current price — a high bar for a pharmacy distribution business.

Catalyst Omnicare bankruptcy/sale process could create meaningful acquisition opportunities at distressed prices, accelerating market share gains. Potential bipartisan dispensing fee legislation for LTC pharmacies would provide direct margin uplift not currently in estimates.
Risk Valuation compression — at ~48x P/E for a pharmacy distribution company with 5% FCF margins, any stumble in growth or margin trajectory (integration issues, payor pushback, labor cost inflation) could cause a significant de-rating, potentially 30-40% downside.
Trend
IMPROVING
Mgmt
7/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
-3.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Guardian Pharmacy Services delivered a solid performance in Q1 2026, marking its successful transition into the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) framework. Despite a 60% price reduction on IRA-affected branded drugs, the company grew revenue by 2% to $336.6 million and gross profit by 19% to $76 million. Proactive negotiations with payors effectively mitigated a projected $10 million IRA headwind. Script and resident volumes both increased by 10%, highlighting strong organic growth and the benefits of recent acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDA reached $29.8 million, including $3 million in discrete benefits, leading management to raise the full-year EBITDA guidance to $123M-$127M. The company navigated operational complexities introduced by the Medicare Transaction Facilitator and a temporary working capital reset. Management emphasized the advantage of scale in managing these shifts compared to smaller competitors. Looking ahead, Guardian remains focused on its M&A pipeline and assisted living market share expansion. While monitoring risks like fuel costs and labor expenses, the company maintains a bullish outlook supported by aging demographics and the constructive resolution of the Omnicare process, which may offer further market opportunities.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$38.74
Market Cap$2.5B
Enterprise Value$2.4B
P/S Ratio1.7x
P/FCF35.0x
EV/FCF34.6x
FCF Margin (TTM)4.8%
FCF Yield2.9%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution1.2%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$1.5B
Net Income$53.1M
Free Cash Flow$70.0M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+2.2%
EBITDA Margin7.4%
Net Margin3.6%
FCF Margin4.8%
CapEx % of Revenue1.3%
SBC % of Revenue0.7%
ROIC26.2%
WC Change % Rev-0.8%
Interest Coverage166.2x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$19.46
-49.8% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$1.2B
− Net Debt$-28M
= Fair Equity$1.2B
Revenue Growth6.7% → 5.0%
FCF Margin4.8% → 7.5%
Discount Rate14.0%
Terminal EV/FCF16.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float5.3%
Short Shares2.7M
Days to Cover8.2
Change (vs Prior)+7.0%
Short % Float History
5.30%+3.40pp
1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)54%
Put IV (ATM)50%
ATM Spread9.2%
Call $OI (near money)$12K
Put $OI (near money)$54K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$40.0
Major Expirations1
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$20.00$16.50/$20.600--/$0.750
$22.50$14.20/$18.200--/$2.303
$25.00$11.90/$15.900--/$0.751
$30.00$7.20/$11.002--/$2.804
$35.00$3.60/$7.006$0.20/$3.60252
$40.00$0.95/$4.5026$2.05/$5.400
$45.00--/$2.8013$5.40/$8.800
$50.00--/$2.350$10.00/$13.600
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-0.9%
Forward FCF Margin5.5%
Forward EBITDA Margin8.4%
Forward P/FCF30.7x
Forward EV/FCF30.3x
Forward Int. Coverage--
Model Risk Score6/10
Bankruptcy Odds1%
Est. Borrow Rate5.0%
Terminal EV/FCF16.0x
LT Growth5.0%
LT FCF Margin7.5%

Employees

Headcount3,400
Revenue / Employee$428,227
Gross Profit / Employee$89,611
2024: 3,400 → 2025: 3,600 (6% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 19.7% of float, sold 3.4%. 4 filers moved >1% of shares (4 buying, 0 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+16.3% of float (net)
Bought 19.7% · Sold 3.4%
105 filers reported (last quarter: 129)

Ownership composition

Active
36.1%(+28.0% YoY)
153 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
5.0%(+3.7% YoY)
5 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.3%(+0.3% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
15.9%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2024-092025-032025-092026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
FMR LLC$88.9M$37.65+$88.8M+$88.8M+0.3%$1.89T
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP$66.5M$25.93+$24.2M+$49.0M+0.1%$533.98B
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$66.1M$23.90+$509K+$46.0M-0.2%$5.69T
Woodline Partners LP$49.2M$22.38+$9.5M+$33.3M-0.1%$26.42B
BROWN ADVISORY INC$47.4M$20.57−$14.2M−$12.9M-0.5%$60.79B
Valiant Capital Management, L.P.$44.7M$26.76−$1.7M+$44.7M-1.9%$1.27B
TimesSquare Capital Management, LLC$40.6M$23.50+$1.1M+$40.6M-1.3%$5.80B
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.$38.7M$37.66+$38.7M+$38.7M-1.3%$145.22B
Boston Partners$38.4M$25.32−$1.4M+$38.4M+0.5%$95.40B
FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC$35.9M$19.52−$1.4M+$8.1M-0.2%$403.03B
LOOMIS SAYLES & CO L P$35.1M$32.50+$11.1M+$35.1M-0.2%$73.82B
JENNISON ASSOCIATES LLC$31.0M$36.59+$26.6M+$31.0M+2.7%$145.31B
BOONE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$23.8M$37.66+$23.8M+$23.8M-1.1%$326M
DRIEHAUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$22.2M$21.47+$3.1M+$7.0M+0.3%$13.60B
CITADEL ADVISORS LLC$21.8M$28.39+$18.9M+$21.8M-0.4%$138.22B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$21.1M$24.61+$2.6M+$13.4M+2.3%$1.61T
Nuveen, LLC$20.2M$21.91−$4.0M−$19.4M+0.0%$368.63B
STATE STREET CORPPassive$19.2M$24.96+$1.8M+$13.9M-0.2%$2.89T
Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC$18.7M$23.13−$3.5M+$18.7M-1.6%$1.61B
MARSHALL WACE, LLP$15.7M$33.65+$10.5M+$15.2M+0.7%$92.71B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BULLISH
Holders
-0.16%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.17%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.10%
94 buyers · $0.42B in
Sellers (this Q)
-2.77%
50 sellers · $-0.00B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior (holder profile)source: holder
On big dips (−10%+)
-8.9%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
+8.2%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-11.4%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+15.4%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+32.1%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

03.0M6.1M9.1M12.1M$17$22$27$32$382024-092025-032025-092026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
FMR LLC2.4MWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP1.8MBROWN ADVISORY INC1.3MWoodline Partners LP1.3MValiant Capital Management, L.P.1.2MTimesSquare Capital Management, LLC1.1MT. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.1.0MBoston Partners1.0MJ. Goldman & Co LP160KFRANKLIN RESOURCES INC953K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (2 analysts)$39.0070.0%
Last Year (6 analysts)$34.67-1050.0%
Current Price$38.74

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$3.7M
Incentive & Other$2.4M
Total Compensation$6.1M
% of Revenue0.2%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$100K
1 txn · 1 insider · 3,370 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$112.32M
8 txns · 4 insiders · 4,480,709 sh
Major holders (≥10% beneficial owners)
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$544.37M
13 txns · 5 insiders · 21,421,692 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-03-20SELLAckerman Johndirector1,103,364$29.68$32.75M$10.24M
2026-03-20SELLBindley Capital Partners I, LLC10 percent owner3,570,677$29.68$105.99M$132.66M
2026-03-20SELLBurke Freddirector, officer: See Remarks671,432$29.68$19.93M$24.95M
2026-03-20SELLCardinal Equity Fund, L.P.other: Member of 10% owner group275,728$29.68$8.18M$10.24M
2026-03-20SELLForbes Kendallofficer: See Remarks346,672$29.68$10.29M$13.45M
2026-03-20SELLMorris David Kdirector, officer: See Remarks187,855$29.68$5.58M$7.55M
2026-03-20SELLPharmacy Investors, LLCother: Member of 10% owner group827,636$29.68$24.57M$30.75M
2026-03-20SELLSalentine Thomas J Jrdirector, 10 percent owner: 3,570,677$29.68$105.99M$132.66M
2026-03-20SELLBINDLEY WILLIAM Edirector, 10 percent owner: 3,570,677$29.68$105.99M$132.66M
2025-12-03BUYCOSLER STEVEN Ddirector3,370$29.61$100K$740K
2025-05-28SELLCardinal Equity Fund, L.P.other: Member of 10% owner group50,305$20.16$1.01M$3.02M
2025-05-28SELLSalentine Thomas J Jrdirector, 10 percent owner: 651,454$20.16$13.13M$39.11M
2025-05-28SELLPharmacy Investors, LLCother: Member of 10% owner group150,998$20.16$3.04M$9.06M
2025-05-28SELLBINDLEY WILLIAM Edirector, 10 percent owner: 651,454$20.16$13.13M$39.11M
2025-05-28SELLBurke Freddirector, officer: See Remarks138,705$20.16$2.80M$8.33M
2025-05-28SELLAckerman Johndirector201,303$20.16$4.06M$3.02M
2025-05-27SELLAckerman Johndirector1,084,276$20.16$21.86M$4.03M
2025-05-27SELLBINDLEY WILLIAM Edirector, 10 percent owner: 3,508,905$20.16$70.74M$52.24M
2025-05-27SELLBurke Freddirector, officer: See Remarks747,102$20.16$15.06M$11.12M
2025-05-27SELLCardinal Equity Fund, L.P.other: Member of 10% owner group270,958$20.16$5.46M$4.03M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

11.8%retail+7.9pp
32.7%dark-0.0pp
week of 2026-04-13
0%10%20%30%40%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Corporate Segment$336.6M+2%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc.: Institutional Roll-up Strategy Masked by Insider Liquidity Events and Softening Cash Conversion

Overall Risk
5/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
4/10
Insolvency
2/10
Earnings Overstated
4/10
Hidden Liabilities
4/10
Legal
5/10
Audit Warnings
2/10
Hidden Upside
6/10
Contextually Acceptable
7/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In March 2026, Guardian Pharmacy Services (GRDN) completed an upsized underwritten public offering of 6,900,000 shares at $31.00 per share. While the company characterized the offering as 'non-dilutive' due to a synthetic secondary repurchase of 1,020,000 shares, the bulk of the transaction involved a massive exit by selling stockholders, including founders and institutional partners like Bindley Capital. Following this offering, the company officially lost its 'controlled company' status under NYSE rules, necessitating a transition in corporate governance (Source: Business Wire, Investing.com).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on a significant valuation disconnect; as of May 2026, GRDN trades at a P/E ratio of approximately 48.1x, nearly double the broader healthcare sector average of 24.9x and far exceeding the 'Fair Ratio' of 22.4x estimated by Simply Wall St. Short interest surged by 48.8% in March 2026, reaching nearly 7% of the float, as some market participants bet against the stock's 45% one-year rally. DCF models suggest an intrinsic value of $34.43, indicating the stock is trading at a premium to its fundamental cash flow potential (Source: MarketBeat, Sahm Capital, Simply Wall St).

🚩 Red Flags

Heavy insider selling is a primary red flag: in March 2026, key insiders including Kendall Forbes and Director Thomas J. Salentine Jr. offloaded millions of shares, cutting their ownership stakes by roughly 43-44%. Additionally, employee reviews on platforms like Indeed highlight 'toxic work environments,' 'severe lack of communication,' and 'high employee turnaround' at various pharmacy locations, which may threaten the high-touch service model the company prides itself on (Source: MarketBeat, Indeed).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

The Long-Term Care (LTC) pharmacy market remains highly fragmented and competitive. A significant threat is the legal right of residents in many facilities to choose their own pharmacy providers, which prevents GRDN from maintaining exclusive captive audiences within its partner facilities. The company faces ongoing pressure from both large-scale national pharmacy chains and local specialized providers that can offer more aggressive pricing or localized clinical support (Source: IPOScoop, Morningstar).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Customer sentiment is mixed, with some localized complaints regarding 'slick' sales tactics and delays in prescription fulfillment. While some facility partners report satisfaction, Better Business Bureau (BBB) profiles for individual locations show unaccredited statuses and unresolved grievances. The high employee turnover noted in staff reviews suggests a risk of service inconsistency that could alienate long-term care facility (LTCF) administrators over time (Source: BBB, Indeed).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-06

Operator: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to Guardian Pharmacy Services First Quarter 2026 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Ashley Stockton. Please go ahead.
Ashley Stockton: Good afternoon. Thank you for participating in today's conference call. My name is Ashley Stockton, Vice President, Investor Relations for Guardian Pharmacy Services. I'm joined on today's call by Fred Burke, President and Chief Executive Officer; and David Morris, Chief Financial Officer. After the close today, Guardian posted its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is available on the company's Investor Relations website. Please note that today's discussion will include certain forward-looking statements that reflect our current assumptions and expectations, including those related to our future financial performance and industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. We encourage you to review the information in today's press release and quarterly report on Form 10-Q as well as the specific risk factors and uncertainties discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. On today's call, we will also use certain non-GAAP financial measures when discussing the company's financial performance and condition. You can find additional information on these non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in today's press release, which again is available on our Investor Relations website. And now I will turn it over to Fred for commentary on the first quarter results.
Fred Burke: Thank you, Ashley, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate your continued interest in Guardian as we report our first quarter results; and importantly, our first full quarter operating under the new IRA framework. I'm pleased to report that we delivered solid results. Before David walks through the financials, I'd like to take a few minutes to discuss our transition under the IRA as it has driven more change in our industry in a single quarter than we've seen in decades. Let me start with the revenue impact. Across the industry, pricing on IRA selected drugs for 2026 declined meaningfully. For our book of business, we experienced an approximately 60% decline in pricing across our branded drug mix that was impacted by the IRA. Despite this, we were able to deliver a 2% increase year-over-year in reported revenue. Absent the government-mandated price declines, we would have grown revenues by low double digits. On gross profit, as we outlined previously, absent our mitigation efforts, the IRA would have represented approximately a $10 million headwind. Throughout the course of last year, we proactively took coordinated firm-wide actions, including direct negotiations with our payor partners to offset this impact. Those efforts were realized in the quarter, allowing us to deliver double-digit gross profit growth, reinforcing the effectiveness of our approach and giving us confidence in our forward momentum. Beyond pricing and reimbursement, the IRA introduced meaningful changes to the operational mechanics of how transactions are processed across the system as well as the timing and synchronization of cash flows. For instance, post adjudication, all IRA branded drugs are now further processed through the Medicare Transaction Facilitator, an online platform established by CMS. This has introduced additional steps into the transaction life cycle and led to a delay in the timing of certain payments. Data submission formats also varied across manufacturers, adding even more complexity to the end-to-end process. Our team navigated these changes very effectively. Lastly, the IRA created a onetime working capital reset as it altered how and when cash moves through the system, resulting in long-term care pharmacies temporarily carrying higher receivables with less offsetting payables as the system rebalanced. This was fully within our capacity to manage given the strength of our balance sheet. We believe dynamics like these may prove far more challenging for smaller operators who lack the necessary systems and access to capital, further highlighting the advantage of scale in our model. Overall, as it pertains to the IRA, I can now say with confidence and clarity that the business performed in line with our expectations. Pricing is flowing through as we forecasted, reimbursement is tracking in line and the new payment processes, while complex, are functional. We also maintained strong service levels, preserved customer relationships and delivered on our financial objectives. Just as importantly, we demonstrated our ability to anticipate outcomes and execute on our strategy. Successfully forecasting this complicated and unprecedented environment speaks to the expertise of our teams and the strength of our data and analytics capabilities, which gives us greater confidence in how we manage and predict the business. Across the broader industry, there has been no legislative resolution to the unintended consequences of the IRA, and we expect continued pressure on our peers as they adjust. While there is still discussion around potential legislative relief, including a bipartisan bill proposing a dispensing fee to support long-term care pharmacies, we view the likelihood of any near-term action as uncertain at best. Returning to our quarterly performance, results were driven by strong underlying fundamentals, including solid resident and script volume growth with a portion attributable to items not reflective of the core operating run rate. Results included approximately $3 million of discrete benefits to our gross profit from favorable payer dynamics and a manufacturer inventory credit associated with the IRA. These flow through at a full incremental margin to adjusted EBITDA. Consistent with our commentary last quarter, items such as these cannot be forecasted as recurring in our underlying quarterly run rate. Looking ahead, one area of uncertainty for both us and the broader market is fuel. Given the current geopolitical backdrop, there is potential for continued volatility. While fuel is not a dominant cost for us, it is meaningful and can represent a headwind of up to a few million dollars annually if prices remain elevated. Additionally, as we continue to scale, we expect to invest further in our organizational infrastructure, particularly at the regional level to build out our bench to support our growth. Hence, we continue to make targeted hires to support our expansion efforts. As such, labor costs are likely to trend modestly higher over the remainder of the year. While we are very pleased with our performance in the quarter, it remains early in the year, and our underlying outlook for the business remains unchanged. We believe it is appropriate to remain disciplined, particularly in light of potential fuel cost pressures and necessary investment in our leadership. That said, we're updating our full year adjusted EBITDA guidance to include the $3 million benefit recognized in the quarter. Our updated adjusted EBITDA guidance is $123 million to $127 million, up from $120 million to $124 million. Revenue guidance remains at $1.4 billion (sic) [ $1.40 billion ] to $1.42 billion. Before I close, I want to briefly touch on the ongoing Omnicare process. With another entity now identified as a stalking horse bidder, there is increasing clarity around our potential path forward. While the process may continue to evolve, the current backdrop appears constructive for Guardian. From our perspective, periods like this can create some dislocation and opportunity where the foundation we've built, consistent service and financial stability matters even more. In summary, this quarter reflects the work we did throughout the last several years to proactively position the business for successful implementation under the IRA. Our ability to navigate this transition underscores the strength of our platform and the advantages of scale, enabling us to effectively advocate for the value we deliver and ensure alignment with our partners, and we will continue to do so. Lastly, I want to recognize the work of our teams across the organization. I couldn't be more proud of the people driving this business forward every day at every level. With that, I'll turn it over to David to review the quarter.
David Morris: Thank you, Fred, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll now walk through our first quarter results in more detail. The underlying drivers of our business continued to perform well during the quarter. Total residents increased 10% year-over-year to approximately 207,000 at the quarter end with assisted living residents continuing to represent roughly 70% of our mix. Script volumes were also strong, increasing 10% year-over-year. Revenue for the quarter was $336.6 million, reflecting contributions from organic growth, acquisitions and continued plan optimization efforts. In addition, resident reenrollment drove a modest mix shift toward more favorable payors. Reported revenue was up 2%. Absent the government-mandated price declines from the IRA, revenues would have been up low double digits year-over-year. Gross profit was $76 million, up 19% year-over-year and up 14%, excluding the previously mentioned $3 million benefit. Reported gross margin was 22.7%. Excluding the $3 million benefit, gross margin was 22%. As we turn to SG&A, I wanted to highlight several items. This quarter includes a $3.2 million legal expense related to efforts that ensure appropriate reimbursement across our payor relationships. We actively advocate for fair payment for services we provide, which at times includes pursuing resolution through legal channels. Subsequent to quarter end, we reached a settlement related to this matter, resulting in an $8.5 million cash payment that will be recognized as other income in the second quarter and will not be included in our adjusted EBITDA. SG&A also included legal and financing costs associated with our secondary offering, a little under $1 million. Stock-based compensation was $1.9 million in the quarter. As a reminder, we expect SBC to run at approximately $3 million per quarter for the remainder of the year. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $29.8 million, representing 27% year-over-year growth and an 8.8% margin. Excluding the $3 million benefit, adjusted EBITDA grew 14% with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 8%. Acquisitions completed over the past 2 years are collectively contributing modest profitability in the quarter, but remaining well below our consolidated margin profile, dampening margins by approximately 80 basis points. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 26%, in line with our expectations and adjusted EPS was $0.29 per share. Turning to the balance sheet. Cash ended the quarter at $65 million, essentially flat with year-end. Strong operating cash flow funded normal course business activities typically associated with the first quarter, including annual bonus payouts and higher private pay AR balances. We also absorbed a onetime working capital impact associated with the IRA transition. Approximately half of the working capital used in the quarter was attributable to the IRA. Importantly, this reflects a temporary timing shift rather than a structural change and does not impact the underlying cash generation of the business. We expect working capital and cash conversion to normalize over the balance of the year. With a strong cash balance and minimal debt, our capital allocation priorities remain unchanged and on track with acquisitions and greenfield investments at the forefront. We're in active discussions with acquisition candidates we believe are a strong strategic fit and expect to continue our historical pace of acquisitions in 2026. Looking ahead, as Fred mentioned, our revenue guidance remains unchanged at $1.4 billion (sic) [ $1.40 billion ] to $1.42. We are updating our adjusted EBITDA guidance to reflect the pass-through of approximately $3 million of discrete benefits recognized in the quarter, bringing our updated range to $123 million to $127 million compared to the prior range of $120 million to $124 million. We remain confident in our underlying growth drivers and our visibility into the impact of the IRA. As the year progresses and we gain additional visibility, we will continue to assess our outlook. Lastly, I want to acknowledge our nondilutive secondary offering priced in the quarter. The offering was for 6.9 million Class A shares, including the full exercise of the underwriters' overallotment option and was priced at $31 a share. This transaction enhanced the liquidity of our stock and broadened our investor base. It also fully utilized the capacity under our prior Form S-3. As normal course of business, today, we filed a new shelf registration statement to maintain flexibility to undertake additional offerings in the future. At this time, we do not have any plans to utilize the shelf. In closing, we delivered a solid start to the year, successfully transitioned into the new framework under the IRA and continue to execute against our long-term strategy. As always, I want to thank our teams across the organization for their continued execution and commitment and to our investors for their continued support of Guardian. Operator, we'll now open the line for questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Brian Tanquilut with Jefferies.
Brian Tanquilut: Congrats on a solid quarter. Maybe, Fred, I'll start with you. When I look at your balance sheet and you obviously have a good bit of cash still on the balance sheet there. You're generating pretty good free cash flow here. How do I think about capital allocation between M&A now and other priorities given how accretive these transactions are? And how should we be thinking about the pipeline that's in front of you for deals, both tuck-in and scaled?
Fred Burke: Brian, thank you very much. Appreciate it. Good to have you on the call. Yes, we do have a strong balance sheet. Our plan is to continue steady as we go. As Dave has mentioned, we have a very robust M&A pipeline. We intend to maintain the pace that you've seen recently, even in the balance of this year. And we will continue to evaluate other ideas and alternatives with respect to that cash.
Brian Tanquilut: Understood. And then maybe, Fred, as I think about -- obviously, you guys beat on the revenue line here, so good revenue performance. But when we think about the dynamics that we're seeing in senior housing, which underpins your business, obviously, for example, the largest player has seen occupancy declines 3 straight months now, kind of bottoming out in April. Just curious how -- what you're seeing in the market and then how that's translating into -- or how you're translating that into this upside or your relative strength versus what we're seeing occupancy-wise in terms of your revenue line?
Fred Burke: Brian, as you know, Q1 is generally for the industry, a challenge, and it can be exacerbated by weather, which we had a lot of in Q1. So yes, I think occupancy did not increase dramatically in Q1, but the underlying drivers remain absolutely intact. I mean we've got the "silver tsunami" occurring before our very eyes. And we are very, very positive and constructive on continuing the organic growth that we've always forecasted.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John Ransom with Raymond James.
John Ransom: I'm going to dazzle you with some SEC math, so David buckle up, big fella. So if I look at the quarter, you got the $3 million good guy, but then you also called out a $3 million legal fee. So I assume that was included in adjusted EBITDA. So the 2 of those things would have been a push. Is that right? Or am I missing something? Or did you add the $3 million of legal back to adjusted? I'm sorry. If you said that, I must have missed it.
David Morris: The $3.2 million of legal is added back.
John Ransom: Okay.
David Morris: And the $3 million good guy is included.
John Ransom: Okay. All right. Well, then thanks for clarifying that. And just secondly, Fred, just kind of stepping back, I know you talked about some of the second order impacts of the IRA on the competitive climate. But did this end up being a win, a tie or a loss in terms of your relationship with your PBMs? And I know I ask this all the time, but are we even -- having at least starting conversations around getting paid for some of the good value-based care work that you do with interdicting script problems. Did that -- did any of those conversations come? Are they in development? Or is it still as far as the eye can see, a dispensing fee and a reimbursement-driven model?
Fred Burke: John, I would characterize the discussions that we've had with our payors is very, very positive and constructive. As it turned out, the IRA offered an opportunity for us to have very open and frank conversations that led to a deeper understanding of the value add that we're bringing and also an ability to start talking about the very things that you asked about. So while in general, the reimbursement at the moment continues in the old model, we do have several things underway with respect to value-based reimbursement. And I'm very pleased and optimistic that as we move forward, we'll have more and more of that.
John Ransom: And just one other one. I know you've mentioned -- and we've tried to triangulate some work here, as you know. But I know you've mentioned that one of the changes is the migration of profit under the new arrangements is closer to your 90/10 split between generics or 92/8 split between generics and branded. Are there any -- just having the volumes and the gross profits more aligned, how do we think about that in terms of derisking the business model and aligning your efforts to support relatively low-cost scripts?
Fred Burke: Well, you've honed in on one of the objectives, I'll call it ancillary objectives that we had in this process and it's something we've been working on now for years, and it came to fruition in this round, whereby we would like to see the margin align more closely with the activity, i.e., the 90/10 that you mentioned. It's actually 92/8 for us. And we think that's important because the point that you made, it does mitigate risk associated with future initiatives to lower branded price such as MFP and of course, the most [ MFN ] as well. So -- and more importantly, it makes it a lot more straightforward to run a business when you align margin with activity and costs. So we're pleased with the progress we're making on that.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Allen Lutz with Bank of America.
Allen Lutz: For either Fred or David, it's great to see the strong performance in the quarter despite all the IRA headwinds that you talked about, Fred. As we think about the competitive landscape and some of the smaller players that weren't able to go back to the PBMs and renegotiate the way that you were, I'm curious, I know it's very early. We're talking about 4 or 5 months in some of these IRA changes have gone in. But have any of the conversations you're having with prospects changed? Has there been more of an urgency from some of these competitors that might be looking to be acquired? I'm curious if any of that has changed at this point if it hasn't yet, would love to get a sense of your expectations on how this evolves over the rest of the year.
David Morris: Allen, it's David, and welcome. It's great to have you on here. Our pipeline, as Fred and I mentioned, continues to remain robust. I think it's early into the IRA process. And obviously, there are legislative activities that are going on, have been going on, and we're advocating for the industry at large. So I would say no dramatic shift, and it's sort of early. We're 1 quarter into the IRA implications and the pharmacies that may not have some of the analytic capabilities that we have are probably still analyzing the results and impact on their business. So we'll continue to monitor this as we go through this year.
Allen Lutz: Great. And then you raised EBITDA by $3 million. I think you called out that, that is really a reflection of the discrete benefits that you received in the quarter. Fred, you talked a little bit about some of the risk from higher fuel costs and some more employee costs. As we think about what's embedded in the current EBITDA guide, is it fair to assume that those assumptions are contemplated in the guide? Or is it something that if we get to the back half of the year and fuel costs remain high, that's something that could be a headwind? Just trying to get a sense of -- as we think about this updated guidance, what's included, what's not included?
Fred Burke: I think we can represent that our guidance includes our -- what we believe will be our ability to overcome the fuel headwind, but we'll have to be watching that carefully as we go. So we feel very comfortable with our guidance.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Grayson McAlister with Truist.
Grayson Joshua McAlister: This is Grayson on for Dave. I just wanted to follow up on the conversation around branded versus generic back to Ransom's question. When we think about your efforts in the back half of '25 to help get over some of the IRA impact and tie more of your economics to generics versus branded, can you just give us a sense of kind of where you are on that front? And how much more runway you think there is for that to help offset the IRA impact through the rest of '26?
Fred Burke: Grayson, it's a great question. We're partially the way there. We have more work to do, but we're currently involved in doing exactly that with other of our payor partners.
Grayson Joshua McAlister: Okay. And then just following up on kind of the M&A pipeline. When we think about the pipeline, could you just give like a -- maybe a ballpark percentage of -- what percent of the pipeline is driven by [ ALF ] partners in certain markets that might be asking for your capabilities or asking you to expand into that market? And just to kind of follow on there, would it be safe to assume that, that has moved higher over the last year or 2 as the value prop has really kind of played out?
David Morris: Grayson, obviously, our national accounts and their footprint and where they are asking for Guardian services plays a key role in our M&A activity and targeting markets. And that's what's driven in large part, our focus in the last couple of years and we will continue to do so -- and then we line that up with our pipeline of like-minded partners and target that and move from there. So that continues there. As we say, we've got 13% or 14% of the U.S. health market. So there continues to be a very large opportunity for us to continue to grow the business like we have historically. Your next question comes from the line of Raj Kumar with Stephens.
Raj Kumar: Maybe just kind of one on guidance and kind of appreciate the commentary on the kind of the M&A-related drag. And so as we kind of think about that cohort, maybe can you talk about what's embedded into guidance in terms of that 80 bps drag kind of being consistent throughout the year? Or kind of any expectation of that kind of improving as those operations continue to ramp?
David Morris: Raj, it's David. Good to have you on the call. Keep in mind that this quarter, it's dampening our EBITDA margins by about 80 basis points. But as the existing businesses and cohorts improve, we're going to be making additional investments and expanding contiguously. So while the existing platform is getting better, we're bringing on new operators who will depress. So whether it's 80 basis points, 90, 70, (sic) [ 90 basis points, 70 basis points, ] we see that trending on into '26 and '27, sort of a similar rate.
Raj Kumar: Got it. And then as I kind of think about the organic growth and seeing the kind of opportunity ahead, I guess, any callouts from a quarter perspective in terms of new senior housing facilities additions or kind of operational expansion in terms of growing the capacity at existing facilities? Just maybe kind of any color on that as some of these mature operations might kind of be reaching a kind of a threshold for operational expansion?
Fred Burke: I think it's steady as we go, continuing the initiatives that we've spoken about previously continue to bear fruit, and will continue to do that. There's, as David said, a lot of opportunity. We might be the leader in assisted living, but gee whiz at 14% market share, there's a lot of opportunity out there for us.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] We have no further questions in the queue. This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.