Stocks/EXFY

EXFY

Expensify, Inc.
Technology·Software - Application
$1.17
$99M market cap
Claude Rating
2/10SHORT
Revenue
$140.0M
Free Cash Flow
$13.7M
Rev Growth
-5.8%
FCF Margin
9.8%
P/FCF
7.2x
EV/FCF
1.3x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
134.7x
Fair Value
$0.65
Upside
-44.4%

Expensify, Inc. provides a cloud-based expense management software platform to individuals, small businesses, and corporations in the United States and internationally. The company's platform enables users to manage corporate cards, pay bills, generate invoices, collect payments, and book travel. It also offers track and submit plans for individuals. The company was founded in 2008 and is based in Portland, Oregon.

2-Year Price History

$1.14-21.4%
$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.0$3.5volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q134.00.9---1.5--1.2-0.293.9----------
Est2027-Q434.51.0---1.4--1.7-0.292.7----------
Est2027-Q334.00.7---1.7--1.2-0.290.9----------
Est2027-Q233.50.5---1.8--1.0-0.289.8----------
Est2027-Q133.00.0---2.3--0.3-0.288.7----------
Est2026-Q433.50.3---2.2--1.0-0.288.4----------
Est2026-Q333.0-0.3---2.6--0.7-0.287.4----------
Est2026-Q233.50.2---2.5--0.5-0.286.8----------
Act2026-Q134.00.4-2.0-2.30.10.0-0.186.35.693.7-10.5%----
Act2025-Q435.2-1.2-3.9-7.12.21.7-0.563.15.192.8-22.6%----
Act2025-Q335.1-1.9-2.3-2.34.23.1-1.161.55.992.6-12.1%----
Act2025-Q235.8-8.3-10.3-8.88.98.9-0.060.56.192.3-53.8%----
Act2025-Q136.10.5-1.5-3.24.84.3-0.559.66.391.5-7.8%--37.2x
Act2024-Q437.02.40.5-1.37.46.5-0.948.86.589.61.7%4.5x20.5x
Act2024-Q335.42.10.3-2.23.71.9-1.839.26.688.21.2%----
Act2024-Q233.31.90.2-2.89.37.3-2.053.229.286.60.7%7.1x--
Act2024-Q133.5-0.4-1.8-3.83.50.6-2.849.329.285.1-9.7%-0.4x--
Act2023-Q435.2-4.7-6.0-7.2-0.5-3.0-2.547.529.683.7-34.5%-27.8x--
Act2023-Q336.5-13.8-14.9-17.0-5.1-7.4-2.389.165.682.5-58.4%-5.8x--
Act2023-Q238.9-8.2-9.6-11.3-0.6-1.0-0.597.865.282.0-36.3%-6.0x--
Act2023-Q140.1-1.3-2.7-6.07.66.7-0.9111.267.481.8-9.8%-0.9x--
Act2022-Q443.50.6-0.7-3.47.27.1-0.1103.867.881.6-2.6%3.3x--
Act2022-Q342.5-4.4-5.7-8.2-0.9-1.6-0.6106.268.380.9-21.5%-1.9x--
Act2022-Q243.2-2.4-4.0-8.015.915.9-0.1105.568.880.5-15.3%-1.2x--
Act2022-Q140.4-3.7-4.8-7.411.210.6-0.7101.169.480.2-20.0%-4.1x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
20228.83-5.8%-10n/m37.9×n/m7.3×
20232.47-11.1%-18.6%-28n/mn/mn/m1.8×
20243.35-7.6%4.3%620.5×7.6×n/m1.2×
20251.51+2.1%-7.7%-11n/m5.8×n/m1.1×
TTM1.17-1.3%-7.9%-110.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E1.17-3.6%0.0%00.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude2/10SHORTFV: $0.65

Expensify is a deteriorating SaaS business facing an existential combination of threats: declining core subscription revenue, a Nasdaq delisting notice, massive SBC-driven dilution at sub-$1 prices, a dramatically weakened competitive position versus free-software fintech competitors (Ramp, Brex, Navan), and a costly platform migration that is failing to stem user churn. While the company has $86M in cash providing near-term liquidity, the annual burn rate is accelerating and the legal settlement adds further cash drain. The 'super app' vision and AI narrative lack credible evidence of commercial traction. SBC running at 17.5% of revenue on a sub-$100M market cap company with declining revenue is fundamentally dilutive and value-destructive. The reverse stock split is a band-aid on a structural problem. This is a value trap masquerading as a turnaround story.

Catalyst A successful New Expensify migration driving user growth inflection, or a strategic acquisition by a larger fintech player looking for the installed base and card infrastructure at distressed valuations. Alternatively, a dramatic improvement in interchange revenue from card adoption could shift the revenue mix positively.
Risk Nasdaq delisting leading to institutional forced selling, liquidity collapse, and a death spiral of further dilution at sub-penny prices. The competitive moat is virtually nonexistent against well-funded competitors offering free alternatives.
Trend
DETERIORATING
Mgmt
4/10
Quarter
3/10
Exp. Move
-12.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Expensify reported Q1 2026 revenue of $34 million, a 6% year-over-year decline, alongside a 4% decrease in paid members. Despite these headwinds, the company maintained profitability, generating $2.5 million in free cash flow, which would have been $5 million excluding a one-time legal settlement. A key growth driver was interchange revenue from the Expensify Card, which rose 10% to $5.5 million. CEO David Barrett highlighted the ongoing migration to "New Expensify," an AI-centric platform, noting that 60% of customers have already transitioned. The strategy focuses on reducing adoption friction through the "Bring Your Own Card" (BYOC) initiative and expanding the partner ecosystem with new ERP and travel integrations. Management remains optimistic about a potential inflection point, citing an increase in paid members to 641,000 in April and upcoming AI feature launches in June. However, Barrett acknowledged that performance speed remains a challenge for larger clients on the new platform. The company is prioritizing long-term product refinement and organic "pull" migration over aggressive sales tactics, reiterating full-year free cash flow guidance of $6 million to $9 million.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$1.17
Market Cap$99M
Enterprise Value$18M
P/S Ratio0.7x
P/FCF7.2x
EV/FCF1.3x
FCF Margin (TTM)9.8%
FCF Yield13.9%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution2.4%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$140.0M
Net Income$-20.6M
Free Cash Flow$13.7M

Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.8%
EBITDA Margin-7.9%
Net Margin-14.7%
FCF Margin9.8%
CapEx % of Revenue1.2%
SBC % of Revenue17.5%
ROIC-24.8%
WC Change % Rev0.2%
Interest Coverage--

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$1.23
+4.7% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$34M
− Net Debt$-81M
= Fair Equity$115M
Revenue Growth2.3% → 1.0%
FCF Margin9.8% → 8.0%
Discount Rate16.0%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float5.9%
Short Shares3.6M
Days to Cover6.4
Change (vs Prior)-15.6%
Short % Float History
5.90%+4.70pp
1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)--
Put IV (ATM)141%
ATM Spread--
Call $OI (near money)$3K
Put $OI (near money)$126
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$2.5
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$2.50--/$0.05287$1.00/$1.751
$5.00--/$0.750$3.40/$4.400
$7.50--/$0.500$5.90/$6.900
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-5.0%
Forward FCF Margin1.9%
Forward EBITDA Margin0.1%
Forward P/FCF39.5x
Forward EV/FCF7.2x
Forward Int. Coverage--
Model Risk Score8/10
Bankruptcy Odds8%
Est. Borrow Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF8.0x
LT Growth1.0%
LT FCF Margin8.0%

Employees

Headcount115
Revenue / Employee$1,217,357
Gross Profit / Employee$603,965
2022: 138 → 2023: 133 → 2024: 115 → 2025: 1,000 (94% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 10.1% of float, sold 6.5%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (2 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+3.6% of float (net)
Bought 10.1% · Sold 6.5%
56 filers reported (last quarter: 108)

Ownership composition

Active
17.2%(-61.0% YoY)
90 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
10.3%(-8.2% YoY)
10 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.1%(-4.2% YoY)
4 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
4.9%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$3.5M$2.41−$67K+$2.4M-0.2%$5.69T
Palogic Value Management, L.P.$2.2M$1.76+$974K+$1.8M-2.6%$226M
Verition Fund Management LLC$2.0M$1.05+$2.0M+$2.0M-0.4%$9.73B
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$2.0M$0.87+$2.0M+$2.0M$4.04T
ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC$1.9M$3.00+$35K+$687K-0.5%$70.48B
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$1.7M$0.87+$1.7M+$1.7M$1.91T
CastleKnight Management LP$1.5M$2.39+$0+$837K+1.2%$2.13B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$1.2M$6.13−$27K+$699K+2.3%$1.61T
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.$1.1M$3.89−$27K−$665K-0.3%$118.02B
MARSHALL WACE, LLP$795K$6.32−$454K−$656K+0.6%$92.71B
FORMULA GROWTH LTD$774K$3.48−$9K−$96K-2.5%$220M
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$719K$2.13+$579K+$719K-0.2%$218.19B
RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$631K$4.85+$39K−$185K+1.2%$63.91B
STATE STREET CORPPassive$629K$6.80+$9K+$433K-0.2%$2.89T
IEQ CAPITAL, LLC$477K$15.15+$57K+$72K-0.9%$21.54B
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd.$439K$3.21−$414K−$367K+0.6%$43.38B
Pale Fire Capital SE$418K$0.87+$418K+$418K+0.7%$1.14B
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$364K$6.25+$0+$262K-0.2%$755.34B
VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COPassive$339K$0.87+$339K+$339K$395.83B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$331K$7.59−$59K+$62K+0.7%$645.81B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-0.47%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.45%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.25%
34 buyers · $0.01B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.15%
35 sellers · $0.01B out
alpha coverage: 85% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-10.0%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-12.7%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-8.0%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+1.7%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+2.8%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-6.2%
Holder mid (any stock)
-6.1%
Holder rally (any stock)
-8.7%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

05.6M11.2M16.8M22.4M$0.87$5.10$9.33$14$182021-122022-092023-062024-032024-122025-092026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
OpenView Management, LLCHall Kathryn A.Capital Research Global InvestorsDurable Capital Partners LPLIGHT STREET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCBAILLIE GIFFORD & COFMR LLC33KJANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLCMASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES CO /MA/Invesco Ltd.44K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Analyst Ratings
4
4
1
Buy: 4Hold: 4Sell: 1Consensus: Buy
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2026 Q334M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.013
2026 Q434M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.011
2027 Q134M-1M2M$0.02$0.02 – $0.021
2027 Q234M-1M2M$0.02$0.02 – $0.021
2027 Q334M-1M2M$0.02$0.02 – $0.021
2027 Q434M-1M2M$0.02$0.02 – $0.021
2028 Q133M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.011
2028 Q233M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.011
2028 Q333M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.011
2028 Q433M-1M1M$0.01$0.01 – $0.011

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$21.1M
Incentive & Other$0.6M
Total Compensation$21.7M
% of Revenue5.1%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$57K
1 txn · 1 insider · 40,000 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$854K
54 txns · 6 insiders · 511,323 sh
Major holders (≥10% beneficial owners)
Buys ($, 12mo)
$2.13M
5 txns · 1 insider · 2,263,444 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-05-01SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer30,000$1.08$32K$1.36M
2026-04-28SELLAlvarez Divo Carlos Eduardodirector30,728$1.01$31K$257K
2026-03-11BUYMcLaughlin Steven J.10 percent owner500,000$0.84$420K$10.25M
2026-03-09BUYMcLaughlin Steven J.10 percent owner455,911$0.95$433K$11.11M
2026-03-06BUYMcLaughlin Steven J.10 percent owner480,389$0.96$462K$10.81M
2026-03-04BUYMcLaughlin Steven J.10 percent owner327,144$1.02$335K$11.03M
2026-03-03BUYMcLaughlin Steven J.10 percent owner500,000$0.97$485K$10.13M
2026-03-02SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer30,000$0.90$27K$1.16M
2026-02-02SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer30,000$1.45$44K$1.91M
2026-01-02SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer30,000$1.50$45K$2.02M
2025-12-31SELLAlvarez Divo Carlos Eduardodirector6,504$1.50$10K$479K
2025-12-30SELLMills Jason Fahrdirector3,821$1.52$6K$740K
2025-12-30SELLVidal Danieldirector2,825$1.52$4K$556K
2025-12-30SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer14,463$1.52$22K$323K
2025-12-30SELLAlvarez Divo Carlos Eduardodirector2,468$1.52$4K$495K
2025-12-30SELLSchaffer Ryandirector, officer: Chief Financial Officer3,923$1.52$6K$310K
2025-12-17SELLBarrett David Michaeldirector, officer: Chief Executive Officer2,544$1.55$4K$329K
2025-12-17SELLMills Jason Fahrdirector5,853$1.55$9K$755K
2025-12-17SELLMuralidharan Anuradhadirector, officer: Chief Operating Officer523$1.55$811$121K
2025-12-17SELLSchaffer Ryandirector, officer: Chief Financial Officer2,632$1.55$4K$316K

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

39.2%retail-7.6pp
19.5%dark-0.6pp
week of 2026-04-13
10%20%30%40%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Subscription Fees$30.9MNEW
Interchange$5.5M+11%
Product and Service, Other$0.1MNEW
Cashback Rewards$-2.6M--
By Geography (2026-Q1)
UNITED STATES$30.9M-7%
Non-US$3.0M+2%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Expensify, Inc.: Terminal Dilution and Listing Risks Outpace Shrinking Core Revenue

Overall Risk
8/10
Fraud
3/10
Dilution
9/10
Insolvency
5/10
Earnings Overstated
4/10
Hidden Liabilities
6/10
Legal
7/10
Audit Warnings
6/10
Hidden Upside
2/10
Contextually Acceptable
3/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

Expensify reported a disappointing Q1 2026 with a 6% YoY revenue decline to $34M, missing analyst estimates. On April 17, 2026, the company received a Nasdaq delisting notice as shares traded below $1.00 for 30 consecutive days. To address this, the board is seeking shareholder approval for a reverse stock split (1-for-15 to 1-for-25) at the May 2026 annual meeting. Additionally, the company reached a $9.5M agreement-in-principle to settle a long-standing securities class action lawsuit alleging IPO-related misrepresentations (Source: Stock Titan, TipRanks).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case rests on a 'death spiral' of core metrics: paid members fell 4% YoY in Q1 2026, and revenue has stagnated or declined for several consecutive quarters. Free cash flow guidance for FY 2026 was slashed to a range of $6M-$9M, a sharp drop from the $19.9M generated in FY 2025. Bears argue that Expensify's attempt to pivot into a 'super-app' with New Expensify is failing to offset the churn of its legacy user base, leading to sustained margin compression (Source: Simply Wall St, Seeking Alpha).

🚩 Red Flags

Internal instability is a major concern, highlighted by the resignation of COO Anuradha Muralidharan and her subsequent filing to sell 27k shares. The company's heavy reliance on 'interchange revenue' (up 10%) is a double-edged sword, as it forces a push into low-margin card processing to hide the decay of its high-margin SaaS subscriptions. The pending reverse split is a classic sign of a distressed micro-cap attempting to maintain institutional eligibility (Source: MarketBeat, Simply Wall St).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Expensify is losing the 'war of the stack' against integrated fintechs like Ramp, Brex, and Navan. Unlike Expensify’s standalone fee-per-user model, these rivals offer free software bundled with corporate cards, making Expensify's $5-$9/user monthly cost look increasingly predatory to SMBs. Competitors are leveraging superior real-time API integrations, whereas Expensify still suffers from 24-48 hour latencies on non-proprietary card feeds (Source: Sage Expense Management, FyleHQ).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment in professional accounting communities (e.g., r/Accounting) has soured significantly. Power users report 'horrible' experiences with the 'Concierge' support system, citing slow response times and 'impossible' hurdles when trying to cancel or modify subscriptions. There is a growing perception that Expensify utilizes 'rigid' contract terms to trap customers, leading many to migrate to more flexible, modern alternatives (Source: Reddit, Sage Expense Management).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-09

Niki Wallroth: Hello, and thank you for joining us for Expensify's Q1 2026 Earnings Call. I'm going to start off with the legal disclosure and then hand off to Ryan Schaffer, our CFO; and David Barrett, our Founder and CEO. Please note that all the information presented on today's call is unaudited. And during the course of this call, management may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in the earnings release that we issued today, along with the comments on this call, are made only as of today and will not be updated as actual events unfold. Please refer to today's press release and our filings with the SEC for a detailed discussion of the risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied in any forward-looking statements made today. Please also note that on today's call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. While we believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information for investors, the presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to today's press release or the investor presentation for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP measures. And with that, I'll hand it over to Ryan.
Ryan Schaffer: Thank you, Niki, and thanks, everyone, for joining today's call. Let's start with the Q1 financials. Revenue for the quarter was $34 million, down 6% year-over-year. Average paid members were 632,000, down 4% year-over-year. Total interchange revenue was $5.5 million, up 10% year-over-year. While we continue to see pressure on the top line, we are really focused on the fundamentals of the business and focusing our efforts on returning to growth. Operating cash flow was $0.1 million and free cash flow was $2.5 million. The difference in those numbers is largely driven by the timing of customer payments. Our GAAP net loss was $2.3 million. Our non-GAAP net income was $3.6 million and adjusted EBITDA was $6.2 million. So while revenue has declined, profitability is still strong, and that's a key theme for the business right now. As mentioned, we generated $2.5 million in free cash flow this quarter. It's worth noting that we also had a onetime legal payment of $2.6 million related to the class action lawsuit we've since settled. Absent that payment, we would have seen roughly $5 million of free cash flow this quarter. With that said, we remain conservative in our outlook and are reiterating our full year 2026 free cash flow guidance of $6 million to $9 million. As always, we'd like to provide a look into the performance of next quarter's paid active member number. For April 2026, we had 641,000 paid active members, which is an improvement from our Q1 average and what we think is an encouraging sign for the quarter. In conclusion, we are focusing on maintaining strong fundamentals in the business, investing in long-term growth opportunities, migrating customers to new Expensify and iterating quickly on their feedback. And with that, I'll hand it over to David for a product update.
David Barrett: Thanks, Ryan. I think the simplest way to frame Q1 is this. We're building a more durable, more profitable business today while setting ourselves up for a much stronger growth story tomorrow. The numbers show the transition, but the product tells you where we're going and how far we've actually come. In Q1, we made meaningful progress in both distribution and product adoption. A major focus was accelerating our Bring Your Own Card strategy. Historically, companies often had to change cards to get the full value of expense automation. With BYOC, they can keep the corporate cards they already have, connect them to Expensify and automatically import transactions as expenses. That removes a major adoption barrier and lets us meet customers where they already are. We also expanded our partnership footprint. We renewed our referral program with ANZ and Kiwibank and partnered with the Institute of Commercial Payments, giving us stronger visibility across the banking and commercial payments ecosystem. At the same time, we broadened the commercial ecosystem around Expensify with new ERP relationships with Campfire and Rillet, plus a travel integration with American Airlines. The goal is simple, make Expensify fit naturally into the systems businesses already use. On the product side, Q1 was a strong shipping quarter with more than 30 improvements across the app. In January, we focused on practical finance workflows, better top spending visibility, receipt rotation, automatic approval routing, bulk card assignment, bank account sharing, clear card status labels and Uber for Business discounts. In February, we launched a new Home tab, upgraded insights, made Concierge available in more places and added merchant and itemized receipt rules. These are important because they move Expensify from simply capturing expenses to actively helping users manage spend, automate coding and resolve issues faster. In March, we continued that momentum with account-related client workspaces, GPS miles tracking, expanded insights charts, stronger virtual card controls, mobile receipt cropping, faster report creation, bulk expense selection, inline editing, CSV member imports and smarter Home tab alerts. Taken together, these updates make new Expensify faster, more automated and more useful for both individual employees and finance teams. Stepping back, Q1 is about strengthening the foundation while setting up the next phase of growth. The Expensify Card continued to perform well with interchange revenue growing to $5.5 million, up 10% year-over-year. We also continue to generate cash, producing positive operating cash flow and $2.5 million of free cash flow in the quarter. At the same time, we're seeing encouraging growth signals. April paid active users increased to 641,000 above Q1 average of 632,000. Combined with product velocity you just saw, the expansion of BYOC and major AI capabilities coming in June, we believe the business is positioned for a potential inflection point. So our focus remains consistent, keep improving new Expensify, reduce adoption friction, expand distribution and turn the product momentum we're seeing into durable growth. With that, thank you to everyone for joining. Let's hop into Q&A.
Niki Wallroth: Perfect. Mark, I believe you're on the line, if you want to open us up for the Q&A.
Unknown Analyst: Can you hear me okay?
Ryan Schaffer: Yes.
Unknown Analyst: Dave, just a question on a comment in your prepared remarks. You mentioned that you believe that the business was poised for an inflection point. I was wondering if you could just dig into that a little bit more.
David Barrett: Sure. I mean I think that this isn't a new thing. We've been talking for a long time. The whole strategy behind new Expensify is to shift away from kind of a more traditional expense management solution towards a more modern collaborative AI-focused solution. And so we knew this was going to be a huge investment. We knew it's going to take a long time, and we're at the tail end of that. So we've been migrating users over. And I think we're just extremely pleased with the reaction we're getting from traditionally classic customers moving to new Expensify, seeing new capabilities, the AI, the collaboration, all that. And so I think on one hand, it's just a lot of kind of mostly anecdotal, but really positive evidence coming from customers migrating over. Also just seeing the excitement from new customers, kind of what we refer to as new native customers, customers who've never seen Expensify Classic. They're just coming to the product, and they really just get it and they like it and they really value it. And so it's validated a lot of our design decisions, and I think we feel really confident in that. And then, of course, there's just kind of the green shoot indicators like April was pretty good from a paid member growth perspective as we saw. And so again, a lot of this is nothing new. This is the story we've been telling for a very long time. But the story has always involved basically making a kind of difficult, but big swing on what we think is still a massive, massive opportunity out there. Like when I think that there's nothing that fundamentally has changed about the market in the sense that I still think there's something like 100 to 1,000x more opportunity out there than this traditional opportunity has ever seen. New Expensify is designed to go out and get it. I think we're more and more confident that we can. It's not going to happen overnight, but we're a long-term business. We've always said that. And I think we just feel very excited and have a lot of conviction in that long-term strategy.
Unknown Analyst: Great. And then as a follow-up, maybe if you could just update us on the percentage of your classic customers that have migrated to the new platform.
David Barrett: I think it's about 60%, I would say. The main thing -- the migration is going well. The nice thing about migration is we control the time line of it, and we are migrating customers over and then paying very close attention to any feedback they have. I would say the most important feedback we've had is simply performance. The functionality is great, and it's reliable, but it's just not fast enough for the larger customers. And so we never want to migrate over a customer that we're not confident is going to have a great experience. And so we're -- I'd say just in general, a lot of our engineering has shifted away from big sort of capital projects and more towards just rapidly integrating with the specific features that customers request, responding to feedback and so forth. And so right now, I would say a big thrust of our engineering is simply on hardening and improving the performance of our existing functionality and new.
Unknown Analyst: And then along with that, to date, your migration strategy for the new Expensify platform has relied mainly on carrots rather than sticks and with about 60% migration so far, do you plan to shift that approach to move the rest over?
David Barrett: I mean I don't think so. I think the carrots work pretty well. They've been working well for us. And again, we have the ability to maintain Classic. And so we don't -- we're not backed into a corner in a sense like we don't have to push people over. We do it because we think we can give them a better experience. And so there's no reason to, I guess, threaten anyone. It's -- we want to pull them over with honey rather than vinegar. Is that how that saying goes. And so I think that we got plenty of time to do that. I think we have plenty of good opportunity or super exciting functionality to pull them over. In fact, I would say one of the challenges is we have larger customers that want to come over and we're like, look, I know the functionality is really powerful. I know that it does all this new stuff, but the performance just isn't there yet. And so I would say I think we're experiencing a bit of the opposite problem where we have enthusiasm to come over, and it's just not quite there from a performance perspective. And so that's where a lot of our attention is at.
Niki Wallroth: Just a confirmation that we were double booked. So we will speak to our other analysts offline with everyone we have live on the call right now.
David Barrett: Great. Well, thank you, everyone, for dialing in. It's definitely an exciting time for us. I think we're super excited about where this is going. And so I appreciate your time.
Ryan Schaffer: Thank you.