Stocks/ESNT

ESNT

Essent Group Ltd.
Financial Services·Insurance - Specialty
$57.89
$5.3B market cap
Claude Rating
7/10BUY
Revenue
$1.3B
Free Cash Flow
$818.6M
Rev Growth
+1.7%
FCF Margin
63.6%
P/FCF
6.5x
EV/FCF
-0.4x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
-0.4x
Fair Value
$72.00
Upside
+24.4%

Essent Group Ltd., through its subsidiaries, provides private mortgage insurance and reinsurance for mortgages secured by residential properties located in the United States. Its mortgage insurance products include primary, pool, and master policy. The company also provides information technology maintenance and development services; customer support-related services; underwriting consulting; and contract underwriting services. It serves the originators of residential mortgage loans, such as reg

2-Year Price History

$60.78+11.2%
$52$54$56$58$60$62$64volMay 24Sep 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q1335.0217.8--174.2--224.5-1.07,859----------
Est2027-Q4328.0208.3--164.0--216.5-1.67,635----------
Est2027-Q3330.0216.2--173.3--209.6-1.37,418----------
Est2027-Q2325.0211.3--169.0--208.0-1.37,209----------
Est2027-Q1320.0206.4--164.8--214.4-1.07,001----------
Est2026-Q4318.0197.2--155.8--209.9-1.66,786----------
Est2026-Q3315.0201.6--160.7--198.5-1.36,576----------
Est2026-Q2310.0195.3--156.6--201.5-1.26,378----------
Act2026-Q1329.6216.1206.7171.8192.0191.2-0.86,177495.694.624.1%26.5x--
Act2025-Q4312.4193.9184.5155.0229.1228.0-1.16,227562.696.720.6%23.8x0.7x
Act2025-Q3318.7208.7199.2164.2215.9210.6-5.391.4495.0101.222.1%25.3x7.7x
Act2025-Q2326.1240.7231.2195.3189.5188.8-0.76,059494.6101.126.6%29.5x0.5x
Act2025-Q1324.1216.5207.0175.4221.6221.4-0.26,090494.3104.023.7%26.6x0.0x
Act2024-Q4339.3204.5195.0167.9226.7216.0-10.76,008494.0106.122.8%25.1x1.3x
Act2024-Q3316.6220.5207.6176.2229.2228.7-0.56,060493.7106.623.3%19.3x0.3x
Act2024-Q2318.7248.5239.2203.6188.7187.6-1.15,652422.5106.829.9%31.7x1.1x
Act2024-Q1303.9223.0213.7181.7216.9212.5-4.55,533422.2106.827.9%28.4x0.6x
Act2023-Q4297.3212.3203.0175.4215.5213.3-2.2141.8421.9106.827.9%26.7x6.1x
Act2023-Q3296.1219.0209.4178.0195.1194.0-1.15,094421.7107.031.7%27.9x0.4x
Act2023-Q2260.1217.4209.3172.2167.7167.3-0.45,090421.4107.131.4%29.4x--
Act2023-Q1256.3208.9201.3170.8184.8184.4-0.45,019421.1107.632.0%30.1x--
Act2022-Q4230.0179.8173.0147.4172.4170.9-1.5333.3420.9107.429.9%29.8x3.9x
Act2022-Q3261.8216.1210.9178.1172.6171.7-0.9410.6420.6107.339.0%48.6x--
Act2022-Q2244.4279.4275.8231.863.362.3-0.9433.5420.3107.350.8%96.8x--
Act2022-Q1264.6331.4328.5274.2180.6179.9-0.7721.2420.1108.661.3%148.9x--

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude7/10BUYFV: $72.00

Essent is a high-quality, capital-light mortgage insurance franchise trading at an extraordinarily cheap 7x P/FCF with a 66% FCF margin and 23% ROIC. The business generates ~$850M in annual operating cash flow against a ~$6B market cap, and management is aggressively returning capital via 10% annual buybacks and a growing dividend. While the core MI business faces headwinds from FHA competition, credit normalization, and flat-to-modest NIW growth, the embedded portfolio value (84-86% persistency, 747 FICO, high home equity) provides a durable earnings floor. The stock is modestly undervalued given the exceptional capital return program, though the lack of near-term growth catalysts and insider selling temper enthusiasm. The P&C reinsurance diversification provides long-term optionality but is years from meaningfully contributing. At current prices, investors are essentially getting paid a double-digit FCF yield to wait for the housing cycle to turn.

Catalyst A decline in mortgage rates toward 5.5-6% would simultaneously drive a surge in origination volumes (new NIW) while persistency gradually normalizes, creating a volume-driven growth inflection. Additionally, the aggressive buyback program at 7x FCF is mathematically accretive and should drive meaningful per-share value growth even in a flat revenue environment.
Risk Credit normalization accelerates beyond expectations — if unemployment rises or home prices decline, the default rate (already up 47bps YoY to 2.54%) could spike materially, overwhelming the favorable reserve development cushion and compressing earnings. The Bermuda tax exemption expiring in 2029 adds a known ~15% earnings headwind.
Trend
STABLE
Mgmt
8/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
+2.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Essent Group Ltd. delivered a solid Q1 2026, earning $1.82 per diluted share. Mortgage insurance in force grew to $248 billion, while credit quality remained robust with a 747 average FICO and a 2.54% default rate. Persistency was strong at 84.7%, bolstered by a portfolio where half the loans have interest rates under 5.5%. The quarter marked a strategic pivot in the Reinsurance segment, with new P&C activities via Lloyd’s and a specialty quota share. Although these ventures currently run at higher combined ratios than the MI business, they provide capital diversification and leverage the company’s strong ratings. Management highlighted aggressive capital returns, including $200 million in year-to-date share repurchases and a $0.35 quarterly dividend. Cash flow remains a standout, with $827 million generated over the trailing twelve months. During the Q&A, CEO Mark Casale addressed consumer credit, stating that the borrower base remains resilient despite inflation. He noted Essent is willing to pass on lower-return MI business in favor of alternative investments or reinsurance opportunities. The title insurance business continues to integrate, awaiting a more favorable rate environment to fully scale as an MI adjacency.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$57.89
Market Cap$5.3B
Enterprise Value$-346M
P/S Ratio4.2x
P/FCF6.5x
EV/FCF-0.4x
FCF Margin (TTM)63.6%
FCF Yield15.3%
Dividend Yield (TTM)--
Annual Dilution-9.0%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$1.3B
Net Income$686.3M
Free Cash Flow$818.6M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+1.7%
EBITDA Margin66.8%
Net Margin53.3%
FCF Margin63.6%
CapEx % of Revenue0.6%
SBC % of Revenue-0.1%
ROIC23.4%
WC Change % Rev-10.6%
Interest Coverage26.3x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$155.41
+168.5% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$9.0B
− Net Debt$-5.7B
= Fair Equity$14.7B
Revenue Growth4.4% → 2.5%
FCF Margin63.6% → 55.0%
Discount Rate12.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float2.2%
Short Shares2.0M
Days to Cover3.1
Change (vs Prior)+5.8%
Short % Float History
2.20%+0.60pp
1.4%1.6%1.8%2.0%2.2%2.4%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)22%
Put IV (ATM)26%
ATM Spread1.3%
Call $OI (near money)$81K
Put $OI (near money)$2K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$60.0
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$45.00$14.30/$18.501--/$4.800
$50.00$9.50/$13.500--/$4.800
$55.00$4.80/$8.500--/$3.901
$60.00$2.30/$3.1081$1.55/$2.202
$65.00--/$4.8014$2.00/$6.501
$70.00--/$4.805$7.00/$11.000
$75.00--/$4.801$12.00/$16.200
$80.00--/$4.800$17.00/$21.200
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-1.9%
Forward FCF Margin65.3%
Forward EBITDA Margin63.4%
Forward P/FCF6.5x
Forward EV/FCF-0.4x
Forward Int. Coverage25.6x
Model Risk Score4/10
Bankruptcy Odds0%
Est. Borrow Rate4.8%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth2.5%
LT FCF Margin55.0%

Employees

Headcount555
Revenue / Employee$2,318,573
Gross Profit / Employee$2,018,995
2022: 346 → 2023: 536 → 2024: 625 → 2025: 514 (14% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

BALANCED

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are roughly balanced — bought 6.3% of float, sold 6.8%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 3 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
-0.5% of float (net)
Bought 6.3% · Sold 6.8%
355 filers reported (last quarter: 357)

Ownership composition

Active
50.5%(-7.4% YoY)
343 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
25.8%(-15.4% YoY)
6 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.8%(+0.2% YoY)
7 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
2.8%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$699M$61.79−$65.8M−$132M-0.2%$5.69T
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$313M$46.42−$2.3M−$2.2M-0.4%$480.92B
FMR LLC$298M$55.62+$4.3M−$44.6M+0.3%$1.89T
Capital World Investors$274M$36.70−$3.9M−$17.6M+0.3%$732.46B
STATE STREET CORPPassive$222M$47.39+$870K−$33.5M-0.2%$2.89T
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$162M$51.36−$17.7M−$11.2M+2.3%$1.61T
Polar Capital Holdings Plc$149M$41.82+$5.8M−$5.8M+1.5%$22.76B
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$123M$52.87+$32.6M+$75.9M+0.3%$193.48B
COOKE & BIELER LP$116M$49.40+$2.0M−$6.7M-0.8%$8.84B
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC.$97.9M$64.62−$60.5M+$97.9M+1.4%$58.02B
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD$97.4M$37.88+$0+$0-2.2%$406M
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC$91.2M$59.12−$17.7M+$41.7M-0.2%$218.19B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$83.0M$48.84+$901K−$7.3M+1.0%$645.81B
MORGAN STANLEY$74.2M$51.46+$13.0M+$18.7M-0.3%$1.65T
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$70.7M$51.46+$1.6M−$12.9M-0.2%$755.34B
VICTORY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC$68.2M$56.61+$543K+$11.4M-0.2%$156.12B
Invesco Ltd.$62.0M$51.56+$4.2M−$11.3M-0.2%$652.04B
TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP$59.2M$56.73+$25.5M+$46.3M-0.7%$117.03B
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC$55.2M$46.01−$572K−$43.1M-0.1%$430.96B
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC$53.4M$44.45+$7.7M−$6.8M-0.3%$186.29B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
+0.06%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
+0.01%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
-0.11%
98 buyers · $0.21B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.16%
155 sellers · $0.71B out
alpha coverage: 100% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
+11.9%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-7.2%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-17.0%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+0.9%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
-3.2%
Sellers shed AUM broadly — partly forced.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-5.9%
Holder mid (any stock)
-3.4%
Holder rally (any stock)
-3.9%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

08.7M17.5M26.2M34.9M$32$40$49$57$652021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Capital World Investors4.7MFMR LLC5.1MMACQUARIE GROUP LTDNOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC.1.7MCOOKE & BIELER LP2.0MPolar Capital Holdings Plc2.5MNORGES BANKCapital International Investors790KInvesco Ltd.1.1MSenvest Management, LLC

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (1 analysts)$62.00710.0%
Last Year (9 analysts)$65.561320.0%
Current Price$57.89

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$69.0M
Incentive & Other$43.4M
Total Compensation$112.4M
% of Revenue3.0%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$4.44M
15 txns · 7 insiders · 69,595 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-04-28SELLCASALE MARKdirector, officer: Chairman, CEO and President13,064$65.05$850K$144.31M
2026-04-28SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer4,250$65.01$276K$15.17M
2026-04-20SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer7,628$63.01$481K$14.97M
2026-04-17SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer872$63.00$55K$15.45M
2025-12-18SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer4,352$67.00$292K$15.94M
2025-11-14SELLKASMAR ROY JAMESdirector3,250$61.44$200K$1.45M
2025-11-11SELLDutt Adityadirector3,250$61.49$200K$1.77M
2025-09-18SELLBhasin Vijayofficer: SVP and Chief Risk Officer11,479$65.00$746K$12.80M
2025-09-18SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer4,000$65.00$260K$15.80M
2025-09-15SELLWEINSTOCK DAVID Bofficer: SVP and CFO2,500$63.33$158K$1.57M
2025-08-13SELLSPIEGEL WILLIAMdirector6,451$62.74$405K$1.65M
2025-08-12SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer3,760$62.00$233K$15.32M
2025-07-01SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer240$62.00$15K$15.55M
2025-06-23SELLGibbons Mary Lourdesofficer: SVP and Chief Legal Officer1,999$60.00$120K$15.06M
2025-06-16SELLWEINSTOCK DAVID Bofficer: SVP and CFO2,500$58.79$147K$1.61M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

10.1%retail+0.4pp
22.0%dark-1.4pp
week of 2026-04-13
5%10%15%20%25%30%35%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Mortgage Insurance Segment$265.3M-8%
Reinsurance Segment$36.0MNEW

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Essent Group Ltd.: Standard offshore structural footprint with minimal substantive disclosure in current filing

Overall Risk
3/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
1/10
Insolvency
1/10
Earnings Overstated
1/10
Hidden Liabilities
1/10
Legal
4/10
Audit Warnings
1/10
Hidden Upside
1/10
Contextually Acceptable
10/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

Essent Group reported a Q4 2025 earnings miss ($1.60 EPS vs. $1.74 consensus) and flat year-over-year revenue of $312.4 million, leading to a 6.3% stock drop in February 2026. In April 2026, CEO Mark Casale and CLO Mary Lourdes Gibbons executed multiple share sales, including a proposed sale of 250,000 shares via J.P. Morgan. While Q1 2026 earnings (May 8, 2026) showed an EPS beat of $1.83, the stock has struggled, trailing the S&P 500 significantly year-to-date (sources: MarketBeat, FinancialContent).

🐻 Bear Case

The core bear thesis rests on deteriorating credit metrics and slowing growth. Delinquency rates rose to 2.29% in late 2025 (up 47 bps YoY), and New Insurance Written (NIW) fell 3% in Q4 2025, while major competitors like Arch MI and Radian saw gains near 20%. Analysts at Barclays and JPMorgan have trimmed price targets to the $61-$64 range, citing margin compression from intense price competition and a 'normalization' of credit that suggests the era of ultra-low losses is over (sources: Investing.com, National Mortgage News).

🚩 Red Flags

A 'cluster' of insider selling activity occurred in April 2026, with the CEO selling 13,064 shares and the CLO executing multiple sales totaling over 12,750 shares. Additionally, the company's Title Insurance segment reported a $21 million pretax loss in 2024, and management expects reinsurance earnings to remain 'immaterial' in the near term, suggesting diversification efforts are not yet offsetting core mortgage insurance headwinds (sources: Perplexity/GuruFocus, National Mortgage News).

⚔️ Competitive Threats

Essent is losing significant market share to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which saw 9.4% YoY growth in its insurance-in-force compared to just 0.9% for private mortgage insurers (PMIs). Furthermore, within the PMI space, Essent's NIW volume underperformed the industry average in late 2025, and competitors with larger scale (Arch, MGIC) are better positioned to weather price wars for high-quality credits (sources: National Mortgage News, Porter's Five Forces analysis).

💬 Customer Sentiment

Broad consumer sentiment fell to record lows in May 2026 due to energy-driven inflation and high interest rates. Borrowers are increasingly price-sensitive, shifting toward government-backed FHA programs that offer more flexibility. Mortgage lenders (Essent's primary customers) are facing lower origination volumes, which pressures insurers like Essent to offer more aggressive pricing, further risking margin stability (sources: Morningstar, University of Michigan survey).

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-08

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Abby, I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Essent Group Ltd. First Quarter Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. Thank you. And I would now like to turn the conference over to Philip Stefano, Investor Relations. You may begin. Thank you, Abby.
Philip Stefano: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our call. Joining me today are Mark Casale, Chairman and CEO, and David Weinstock, Chief Financial Officer. Also on hand for the Q&A portion of the call is Chris Curran, President of Essent Guaranty. Our press release, which contains Essent Group Ltd.’s financial results for 2026, was issued earlier today and is available on our website at essentgroup.com.
Operator: [inaudible]
Mark Casale: Supply constraints and increasing pent-up demand will be positive for housing and our MI business when affordability improves. As of March 31, our mortgage insurance in force was $248 billion, a 1% increase versus a year ago. Twelve-month persistency was 84.7% reflecting the ongoing impact of the rate environment. Nearly 50% of our in-force portfolio carries a note rate of 5.5% or lower, a dynamic that we believe will support persistency at elevated levels. Credit quality of our insurance in force remains strong with a weighted average FICO of 747 and a weighted average original LTV of 93%. Our portfolio default rate was effectively flat quarter over quarter, and we continue to believe that the embedded home equity of our in-force book should mitigate ultimate claims. Outward reinsurance in our MI business continues to play an integral role in credit risk and capital. During 2026, we entered into an excess of loss transaction with a panel of highly rated reinsurers, providing forward protection for our 2027 business. We remain pleased with the execution of our reinsurance strategy, ceding a meaningful portion of our mezzanine credit risk and diversifying our capital sources. On the title front, we continue to transition the business from a stand-alone operation to an adjacency of our mortgage insurance franchise by leveraging our customer base and providing title solutions. The coordination between our MI and title teams continues to build momentum in expanding the number of Essent title customers, but we note this business is rate sensitive and results will continue to improve as origination volumes recover. On the Essent Re front, we expanded our P&C reinsurance platform in the first quarter. Our Lloyd’s program will generate approximately $120 million of written premium in 2026 against a $50 million deposit at returns comparable to our MI business. During the first quarter, we also executed a whole-account quota share covering a cedent’s casualty and specialty book, which will generate approximately $200 million of written premium in 2026. Combined, we expect that the near-term earnings impact will be immaterial, while over the longer term, growing income and the capital benefits of rating agency diversification will be key drivers in generating shareholder value. Our consolidated cash and investments as of March 31 totaled $6.6 billion, with an annualized aggregate yield for the first quarter of 4.2%. New money yields on our core portfolio in the first quarter were nearly 5%, holding largely stable over the past several quarters. We continue to operate from a position of strength with $5.7 billion in GAAP equity, access to $1.1 billion in excess of loss reinsurance, and $1.1 billion in cash and investments at the holding companies. With a trailing twelve-month operating cash flow of $827 million, our franchise remains well positioned from an earnings, cash flow, and balance sheet perspective. We remain committed to a measured and diversified capital strategy that looks to optimize shareholder returns over the long term while preserving optionality for strategic growth opportunities. With that in mind, year to date through April 30, we repurchased approximately 3.5 million shares for over $200 million. Furthermore, I am pleased to announce that our board has approved a common dividend of $0.35 for 2026. Now let me turn the call over to Dave.
David Weinstock: Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. Let me review our results for the quarter in a little more detail. For the first quarter, we earned $1.82 per diluted share, compared to $1.60 last quarter and $1.69 in the first quarter a year ago. Our consolidated net premium earned and operating expenses each increased from last quarter due to our P&C reinsurance activity, which began effective January 1. The consolidated provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses also includes amounts related to P&C activity. My comments today are going to focus primarily on our mortgage insurance segment results. There is additional information on our reinsurance segment and corporate and other results in Exhibits D, E, and O of the financial supplement. Our mortgage insurance portfolio ended the first quarter with insurance in force of $247.9 billion, essentially flat compared to December 31, and an increase of $3.2 billion, or 1.3%, compared to $244.7 billion at March 31, 2025. Persistency at March 31, 2026 was 84.7%, compared to 85.7% at December 31, 2025. Mortgage insurance net premium earned for the quarter was $216 million. The average base premium rate for the mortgage insurance portfolio for the first quarter was 41 basis points, consistent with last quarter, and the average net premium rate was 35 basis points, up 1 basis point from last quarter. Our mortgage insurance provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses was $37.6 million in the quarter, compared to $55.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $30.7 million in the first quarter a year ago. At March 31, the default rate on the mortgage insurance portfolio was 2.54%, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2025. Mortgage insurance operating expenses in the first quarter were $37.6 million and the expense ratio was 17.4%, compared to $34.3 million and 16.1% last quarter, and $40.9 million and 18.8% in the first quarter last year. Consistent with prior years, operating expenses in the first quarter of each year are typically higher due to payroll taxes on incentive compensation, as well as higher stock-based compensation expense. At March 31, Essent Guaranty’s PMIERs sufficiency ratio was strong at 174%, with $1.6 billion in excess available assets. Turning to our Reinsurance segment, net premium earned, provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses, and acquisition costs each increased from last quarter due to the P&C reinsurance activity, which began effective January 1. Consistent with Mark’s comments, the pretax earnings for our P&C activity were immaterial for the quarter, and the pretax earnings for the reinsurance segment in the first quarter predominantly reflect the underwriting results for our GSE and other mortgage risk share activity. Consolidated net investment income and our average balance of cash and available-for-sale investments in the first quarter were largely unchanged from last quarter due to the use of operating cash flows to repurchase shares. Income from other invested assets was $10.2 million in the quarter, compared to $3.9 million last quarter and $7.4 million in the first quarter a year ago. Higher results this quarter are primarily due to increased favorable fair value adjustments in the quarter. As Mark noted, our total holding company liquidity remained strong and includes $500 million of undrawn revolver capacity under our committed credit facility. At March 31, we had $500 million of senior unsecured notes outstanding, and our debt-to-capital ratio was 8%. At quarter end, Essent Guaranty’s statutory capital was $3.7 billion with a risk-to-capital ratio of 8.6 to 1. Note that statutory capital includes $2.6 billion of contingency reserves at March 31. As of April 1, Essent Guaranty can pay ordinary dividends of up to $330 million in 2026. In April, Essent Guaranty paid its first dividend of 2026 to its U.S. holding company of $50 million. During the first quarter, Essent Re paid a dividend of $100 million to Essent Group Ltd. Also in the quarter, Essent Group Ltd. paid cash dividends totaling $32.6 million to shareholders and we repurchased 2.6 million shares for $157 million. In April 2026, we repurchased 934 thousand shares for $57 million. Now let me turn the call back over to Mark.
Mark Casale: Thanks, Dave. In closing, Essent Group Ltd. is a well-capitalized, high-quality franchise with strong and consistent cash flow generation. Our core mortgage insurance business remains well positioned to serve our lenders throughout this period of housing market transition, and our Reinsurance segment continues to create value by deploying capital efficiently across both mortgage and non-mortgage risk. We remain confident in our ability to grow book value per share, return capital to shareholders, and invest in opportunities that build a stronger franchise for the long term. Now let us get to your questions. Operator?
Operator: Thank you. We will now open the call for questions. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you are called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your questions. Again, it is 1 to join the queue. Our first question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW. Your line is open.
Bose George: Hey, good morning, everyone. Actually, first, can we just talk about your updated thoughts on what you are seeing in terms of consumer credit? Any early signs of weakness on higher gasoline prices, or just things you are keeping an eye on?
Mark Casale: Hey, Bose. I would say right now, we are not seeing any real cracks. You are seeing it a little bit in the lower-end consumer. If you take a peek at the FHA delinquencies, keep in mind our book has much higher FICO, around a 747 average FICO, and average income of about $130 thousand per household. These are the consumers that are really driving the economy, along with significant AI spending. So we are not seeing it. When you think about our defaults having gone up, take a step back and really look at the seasoning of the book. At roughly 39 months, the book is seasoned; peak default is 36 to 60 months. So there is really a normalization of the credit. We are not seeing an acceleration of that against roughly 20 thousand defaults, and the book is not really growing in terms of policies. I would say the consumer is in good shape. When you mention inflation, again, that is much more likely to hit the lower-end consumer. It is certainly something we are watching.
Bose George: Okay. Great. Thanks. And then, on competitive trends in the market?
Mark Casale: No real differences in terms of competitive trends. You are starting to see, with the lack of affordability, some lenders starting to reach a little bit. On the MIs, it is a small market and the books are not growing, so you are starting to see a little reach here and there. There was a bid card that we passed on recently where we saw a little bit of an extension of credit and we priced for it and did not get it. You are seeing a little around the edges, but nothing alarming. The longer this pause is—this pause started probably back in 2022, then 2023, 2024, 2025, and now into this year—I think the industry has done a good job being patient and thoughtful. You are always going to see a crack here and there. From our standpoint, we look at it a little bit differently in terms of really focusing on the unit economics. When you look at where our NIW was for the quarter versus the number one mortgage insurer, the difference is relatively small. Our view is that additional NIW is probably at the lower end of our return hurdles, so we look at other options to allocate that capital. Lloyd’s is a good example. The Lloyd’s leverage and the returns there are comparable. I will also point you to our other invested assets. We were able to put money to work there in the first quarter that we think will be easily mid-teens returns over the next few years. So it is a choice. From a competitive standpoint, nothing alarming, and it remains a small market, so it is difficult to separate much when it is such a small market.
Bose George: Great. Thanks for the color.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Terry Ma with Barclays. Your line is open.
Terry Ma: Just wanted to follow up on credit. As we look at results for the quarter, anything to call out? New notices were at least sequentially a little bit more muted compared to the seasonality that you saw the last few years. Anything to call out there? And as we look out to the rest of the year, should we assume normal seasonality holds?
Mark Casale: I would. I would expect, Terry, as you and investors focus on it, that, given the seasoning of the portfolio and peak default being 36 to 60 months, you are going to see defaults continue to increase. I do not think the rate is accelerating; it is a seasoning aspect. Keep in mind, we paid about $13 million of claims in the first quarter. Going into default does not necessarily mean they are going to roll to claim. Big picture, 800 thousand policies and 20 thousand defaults is normal given the age for defaults to season and new notices to tick up a little bit.
Terry Ma: Great. And then just a housekeeping question. I think I missed it in the prepared remarks, but the provision on the reinsurance segment—that was related to the net premium written in the quarter, right? As we look forward, should that in a sense normalize compared to past few quarters?
Mark Casale: Yes, it is a big change this quarter because we wrote Lloyd’s, which hit in the first quarter. We also wrote the retro quota share, which we wrote in the first quarter but is effective back to January 1. These are run at higher combined ratios, and you are combining with mortgage, so modeling can be a little tricky; we can help you offline. Bottom line, it is not going to drive a lot of income in 2026, but it does set the stage for a little bit down the road. The counter to that is the mortgage book within Essent Re is not really growing. We have a pause for growth on the MI side. The GSEs are buying reinsurance higher up in the capital structure, and they are optimizing their capital model. There is less rate on line because there is less risk, and they are reinsuring less overall. If there is a change—think privatization of the GSEs and a more normal risk-share program—we could see that growth resume. Right now, it is going to be a little bit of P&C earnings replacing mortgage earnings over the next few years.
Terry Ma: Got it. Thank you.
Operator: As a reminder, it is star one if you would like to ask a question. Our next question comes from the line of Geoffrey Dunn with Dowling & Partners. Your line is open.
Geoffrey Dunn: Thanks. Unfortunately, I think you just said you would do this offline, but could you break down the loss ratio in the reinsurance business between the P&C and the mortgage business?
Mark Casale: High level, the loss ratio on mortgage is basically zero, so most of the losses are flowing through P&C. For modeling, I would look at mid- to high-90s for P&C together. It is Lloyd’s and quota share; the majority of it is specialty and casualty. There is a little property in there from Lloyd’s, but it is D&F, not property cat. The Lloyd’s combined ratio will probably be mid-90s, but the quota share is probably in the higher 90s, so it will balance out. For a company that writes at a 35% combined ratio in MI, it is an adjustment to write at those higher P&C levels, but there is different leverage. There is a lot more premium leverage within P&C, and when rates went up a couple of years ago, that leverage made a lot more sense. We are fortunate that we have the franchise in Essent Re to do it. The S&P capital model helps; our AAA access that we write to is on the order of about $850 million. So for us to write $200 million, there is really no additional capital, and it probably helps us from a capital diversification rate. We are not taking capital from repurchases and putting it in P&C; we are effectively double-levering the capital a bit within Essent Re, which over time will be accretive to earnings.
Geoffrey Dunn: That is helpful. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Mihir Bhatia with Bank of America.
Mihir Bhatia: Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I wanted to start by asking about the cure rate. I know the number of new defaults is up, but the cure rate really fell off a cliff this quarter, and I do not know if I am just missing something obvious.
David Weinstock: Hey, Mihir. Thanks for your question. I would not characterize it that way. If you look at the supplement and our data on how much of our new defaults are curing, it has been pretty consistent quarter after quarter, generally in the 30% range. It has been very consistent, I would say, quarter over quarter.
Mihir Bhatia: Okay. Maybe I will take that up offline.
Mark Casale: Mihir, I think you may be missing something there, so let us take that offline because it did not really fall off a cliff. It is actually relatively normal if you go back and look at our past.
Mihir Bhatia: Thank you. And then in terms of the reserve releases, they were close to zero. Given the commentary about stability and portfolio seasoning, what would have to change for the prior-period reserve releases to go down? What indicators should we be looking for that would suggest reserve releases will slow down?
Mark Casale: I would look at the unemployment rate. With an average FICO of about 745–747 and strong average incomes, this is a strong borrower unless they lose their job. You saw that in COVID. Employment is pretty strong, and I think it will continue to be strong. Also remember, home prices still provide a lot of embedded equity in the portfolio, especially in the pre-2022 book. Just because a loan goes into default does not mean it will roll to claim—again, we paid about $13 million of claims in the first quarter. Stepping back, the company’s cash flow generation over the last twelve months was $827 million. On a yield basis versus book value, the cash flow returns are high. We continue to have a lot of excess cash at the holdco, even after the share repurchases. We are in a good position, and capital begets opportunities. We are allocating capital within Essent Re and into other invested assets to improve returns and make it more accretive to shareholders. Title, which we do not talk a lot about, is starting to come into its own as an adjacency to the MI business. We have momentum around coordination between the MI platform and the title team, and we have seen some nice customer wins. You have to stack all that, just like we did when we built the MI business, and you clearly need rates to come down. We are starting to see some green shoots throughout the organization, and that is during a pause. Demographically, you have 4 to 5 million potential first-time homebuyers coming of age every year. Affordability is the issue. It will be solved with continued job and income growth and some moderation of rates, and there could be some changes in HPA. There are pockets of weakness, which I have said before I think are healthy. Big picture, we are in good shape. I would caution investors not to focus only on short-term metrics like defaults and new notices. Right now, this is a well-oiled cash flow machine, and we will look to allocate that capital effectively.
Mihir Bhatia: Got it. That is helpful for sure. And a follow-up on title—did you see intra-quarter benefits from lower rates early in the quarter, from a persistency and title perspective?
Mark Casale: You broke up a bit, but yes, we did. We saw a spike in the fourth quarter and in the first quarter, which we took advantage of, and we are better situated to take advantage as we build scale. We are putting in a new system, very similar to how we did it back in the MI days. The company we bought had outsourced IT, and you do not just drop that into our structure overnight, so we are investing in the system and being patient, and our expense efficiency allows us to invest. We are starting to see it. It is more important for the post-2022 book; I said half the book is at 5.5% and below, which is not likely to refinance. It will be the newer, higher-rate book that starts to refinance, which can drive renewed growth. I am not necessarily seeing rates come down this year given oil prices and inflation, but it is another potential tailwind if rates move.
Mihir Bhatia: Got it. Thank you for taking my question.
Operator: With no further questions, I will now turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.
Mark Casale: I would like to thank everyone for joining us today, and have a great weekend.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.