CNX
CNX Resources CorporationCNX Resources Corporation, an independent natural gas and midstream company, acquires, explores for, develops, and produces natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates in two segments, Shale and Coalbed Methane. It produces and sells pipeline quality natural gas primarily for gas wholesalers. The company owns rights to extract natural gas in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio from approximately 526,000 net Marcellus Shale acres; and approximately 610,000 net acres of
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 680.0 | 462.4 | -- | 238.0 | -- | 149.6 | -142.8 | 1,098 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 620.0 | 409.2 | -- | 210.8 | -- | 161.2 | -105.4 | 948.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 580.0 | 371.2 | -- | 174.0 | -- | 116.0 | -104.4 | 787.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 660.0 | 455.4 | -- | 237.6 | -- | 158.4 | -138.6 | 671.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 640.0 | 428.8 | -- | 211.2 | -- | 128.0 | -140.8 | 512.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 580.0 | 377.0 | -- | 185.6 | -- | 145.0 | -98.6 | 384.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 540.0 | 334.8 | -- | 151.2 | -- | 97.2 | -97.2 | 239.8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 620.0 | 421.6 | -- | 217.0 | -- | 136.4 | -136.4 | 142.6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 782.7 | 603.5 | 469.7 | 348.2 | 277.5 | 107.6 | -169.9 | 6.2 | 2,537 | 154.5 | 31.2% | 14.9x | 3.5x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 655.2 | 411.5 | 269.1 | 196.3 | 297.1 | 122.6 | -174.4 | 0.8 | 2,451 | 154.5 | 20.7% | 9.8x | 4.8x |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | 452.1 | 458.0 | 111.8 | 202.1 | 233.8 | 158.2 | -75.5 | 4.7 | 2,801 | 171.8 | 6.0% | 10.7x | 7.0x |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | 540.7 | 767.7 | 346.7 | 432.5 | 282.5 | 168.9 | -113.6 | 3.4 | 2,734 | 171.8 | 19.0% | 16.3x | 8.9x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 610.6 | -109.8 | 432.5 | -197.7 | 215.7 | 84.2 | -131.5 | 2.6 | 2,794 | 147.8 | 38.3% | -2.5x | 43.6x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 327.2 | -60.8 | 150.1 | -144.6 | 268.8 | 163.3 | -105.5 | 17.2 | 2,292 | 151.3 | 13.7% | -1.7x | 14.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 334.7 | 223.0 | 155.5 | 65.5 | 170.2 | 55.4 | -114.7 | 1.3 | 2,404 | 179.1 | 11.8% | 5.9x | 4.5x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 307.1 | 138.2 | 299.5 | -18.3 | 191.8 | 39.9 | -151.9 | 3.9 | 2,411 | 152.6 | 25.2% | 3.6x | 4.8x |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 376.8 | 184.1 | 200.2 | 6.9 | 185.1 | 16.9 | -168.2 | 2.0 | 2,405 | 156.2 | 16.7% | 4.9x | 3.1x |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 350.6 | 777.4 | 178.9 | 514.0 | 161.1 | 53.4 | -107.8 | 0.4 | 2,365 | 186.7 | 9.6% | 20.8x | 2.2x |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 302.5 | 162.2 | 138.4 | 21.4 | 206.0 | 0.4 | -205.6 | 8.7 | 2,333 | 190.7 | 12.4% | 4.2x | 1.6x |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 295.9 | 671.4 | 271.6 | 475.0 | 198.7 | 2.7 | -196.0 | 22.8 | 2,327 | 193.0 | 15.7% | 17.8x | 1.6x |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 513.7 | 1,060 | 317.5 | 710.4 | 248.7 | 78.7 | -170.0 | 2.8 | 2,382 | 197.1 | 19.8% | 29.7x | 2.0x |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 860.8 | 1,406 | 636.7 | 1,175 | 442.3 | 269.1 | -173.2 | 21.3 | 2,388 | 207.0 | 62.1% | 39.9x | 13.0x |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 1,179 | -93.1 | 988.5 | -427.1 | 264.4 | 130.8 | -133.6 | 1.6 | 2,487 | 187.5 | 122.5% | -2.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 1,072 | 206.7 | 878.9 | 33.4 | 192.0 | 55.3 | -136.7 | 0.2 | 2,454 | 224.4 | 106.7% | 6.7x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 812.5 | -1,118 | 620.8 | -922.9 | 336.4 | 214.1 | -122.3 | 8.6 | 2,271 | 199.9 | 80.0% | -41.3x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 16.84 | — | 10.2% | 401 | 13.0× | 7.8× | n/m | 0.7× |
| 2023 | 20.00 | -62.7% | 182.6% | 2,671 | 2.2× | 43.0× | 2.0× | 2.4× |
| 2024 | 36.67 | -8.0% | 36.0% | 485 | 14.9× | 26.2× | n/m | 3.7× |
| 2025 | 36.77 | +67.8% | 67.6% | 1,527 | 4.8× | 13.6× | 7.6× | 2.1× |
| TTM | 33.69 | +53.9% | 92.2% | 2,241 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 33.69 | +2.9% | 0.7% | 17 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
CNX is a well-managed, low-cost Appalachian gas producer with a disciplined capital allocation framework, aggressive buyback program, and long-term optionality from Deep Utica development and in-basin data center demand. However, the stock trades at a premium to analyst targets, faces significant dilution from convertible note settlement (~11% share expansion), has 14.7% short interest reflecting bearish sentiment, and its earnings are heavily distorted by mark-to-market derivative swings that obscure underlying economics. The majority of Wall Street analysts rate the stock a Sell/Reduce. While the long-term data center demand narrative is compelling, it remains 3-7 years out with significant infrastructure hurdles. At ~$39/share with a 28.6x EV/FCF multiple, the stock appears to price in much of the optimistic scenario, leaving limited margin of safety for a commodity-levered name.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
CNX Resources reported a steady first quarter for 2026, highlighting a disciplined approach to capital allocation and debt management. The company is currently harvesting its Marcellus assets while gradually developing the Utica shale, with three new wells recently brought online. Management expects more definitive Utica performance data by late 2026. A significant portion of the call focused on the company's proactive balance sheet management, including the successful refinancing of 2029 notes and the upcoming conversion of $209 million in notes, resulting in a net issuance of 12 million shares. Looking forward, CNX is highly bullish on in-basin demand driven by large-scale data centers and power generation projects in Appalachia. They noted that tightening basis differentials in the 2028 market are allowing for opportunistic hedging. While waiting for final regulatory guidance on tech-related tax credits (45Z), the company remains confident in its diverse business lines. The leadership team emphasized that their extensive resource base and strong credit profile make them well-suited to satisfy the massive upcoming demand for natural gas in the region, regardless of whether that demand settles in Ohio or Pennsylvania.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $32.00 | $3.20/$5.50 | 2 | $0.55/$0.80 | 3 |
| $33.00 | $3.40/$3.70 | 1 | $0.80/$1.05 | 41 |
| $34.00 | $2.65/$3.10 | 5 | $1.05/$1.50 | 8 |
| $35.00 | $2.10/$2.45 | 15 | $1.45/$1.80 | 59 |
| $36.00 | $1.55/$1.95 | 29 | $2.00/$2.30 | 28 |
| $37.00 | $1.15/$1.55 | 8 | $2.60/$2.90 | 81 |
| $38.00 | $0.85/$1.15 | 17 | $3.30/$3.60 | 6 |
| $39.00 | $0.65/$0.90 | 28 | $4.10/$4.40 | 2 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Employees
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 17.5% of float, sold 6.5%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (2 buying, 1 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $694M | $32.95 | +$46.0M | −$37.5M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive | $338M | $25.25 | +$1.1M | −$23.6M | -0.4% | $480.92B |
| VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $279M | $38.55 | +$279M | +$279M | — | $1.91T |
| STATE STREET CORPPassive | $274M | $24.66 | +$40.8M | −$10.9M | -0.2% | $2.89T |
| Neuberger Berman Group LLC | $266M | $25.44 | −$8.0M | −$68.7M | -0.3% | $131.37B |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $236M | $38.55 | +$236M | +$236M | — | $4.04T |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | $214M | $24.97 | −$32.9M | +$70.7M | -0.3% | $118.02B |
| AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC | $174M | $24.76 | +$34.8M | +$50.4M | +0.7% | $193.48B |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive | $163M | $33.18 | +$24.3M | +$20.5M | +2.3% | $1.61T |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | $156M | $27.17 | −$14.4M | +$9.1M | -0.1% | $1.36T |
| SOUTHEASTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT INC/TN/ | $155M | $20.15 | −$27.8M | −$29.8M | -2.6% | $2.03B |
| Capital World Investors | $152M | $38.55 | −$88.1M | +$152M | — | $732.46B |
| ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | $148M | $27.52 | +$146M | +$148M | +0.1% | $184.72B |
| Southeast Asset Advisors Inc. | $93.0M | $25.63 | −$216K | +$160K | -0.2% | $913M |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | $91.8M | $28.38 | +$13.9M | +$33.6M | -0.2% | $760.93B |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $80.5M | $35.23 | +$4.7M | −$9.6M | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | $72.9M | $24.90 | +$15.3M | −$20.5M | -0.2% | $1.47T |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $65.9M | $22.39 | −$5.9M | −$37.0M | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| UBS Group AG | $64.7M | $32.22 | +$34.7M | +$24.2M | -0.3% | $562.11B |
| CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC | $55.7M | $30.52 | +$3.0M | −$21.0M | +0.7% | $645.81B |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 35.3%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Related Stocks
Investors who own this also own
Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2028 Q1 | 639M | 280M | 219M | $1.42 | $1.22 – $1.62 | 2 |
| 2028 Q2 | 554M | 242M | 146M | $0.95 | $0.82 – $1.09 | 2 |
| 2028 Q3 | 564M | 247M | 146M | $0.94 | $0.81 – $1.08 | 2 |
| 2028 Q4 | 610M | 267M | 182M | $1.18 | $1.02 – $1.35 | 2 |
| 2029 Q1 | 1.1B | 478M | 254M | $1.64 | $1.42 – $1.88 | 1 |
| 2029 Q2 | 1.1B | 492M | 134M | $0.86 | $0.75 – $0.99 | 1 |
| 2029 Q3 | 1.2B | 506M | 152M | $0.98 | $0.85 – $1.13 | 1 |
| 2029 Q4 | 1.2B | 520M | 199M | $1.29 | $1.11 – $1.48 | 1 |
| 2030 Q1 | 1.2B | 535M | 247M | $1.60 | $1.38 – $1.84 | 1 |
| 2030 Q2 | 1.3B | 550M | 128M | $0.83 | $0.72 – $0.95 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2023-2025)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | SELL | Thorndike William N Jr | director | 28,800 | $38.25 | $1.10M | $16.32M |
| 2026-03-23 | SELL | Lally-Green Maureen | director | 23,631 | $39.52 | $934K | $6.70M |
| 2026-02-19 | SELL | LANIGAN BERNARD JR | director | 46,119 | $40.60 | $1.87M | $7.19M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Revenue Breakdown
Revenue Segments
| Natural Gas | $658.6M | +33% |
| NGLs | $60.1M | +11% |
| Oil and Gas, Purchased | $12.7M | +10% |
| Oil and Condensate | $3.4M | +77% |
| Utica Shale | $62.7M | -29% |
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
CNX Resources: Dilution Cliff Approaching Amidst Legacy Liability Litigation
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
CNX reported Q1 2026 earnings on April 30, 2026, which initially appeared strong but triggered a 2.06% premarket stock decline due to investor concerns over regulatory uncertainty and a massive $222 million realized loss on commodity derivatives. While the company beat revenue estimates ($722M vs. $545.8M expected), the market focused on tightening margins and production stability, with average daily production showing signs of a plateau compared to peak levels in mid-2025 (e.g., 1,693 MMcfe in Q1 2026 vs. 1,676 MMcfe in Q2 2025).
The bear case centers on CNX’s extreme sensitivity to volatile Appalachian Basin natural gas prices and a bearish analyst consensus. As of April 2026, the stock holds a 'Reduce' or 'Sell' rating from a majority of covering firms, including Barclays and Truist. Analysts at Bank of America recently lowered their price target to $34 (April 27, 2026), citing a downside risk of ~12% from current levels. Skeptics argue that CNX's heavy reliance on a complex hedging program, which resulted in significant realized losses in Q1 2026, makes it a 'management risk' play rather than a pure commodity play.
Significant insider selling occurred in Q1 2026: Director Bernard Lanigan Jr. liquidated approximately 20.65% of his position (over $1.8M) in February, followed by another sale by Director Maureen Lally-Green in March. Additionally, the company faces ongoing reputational risk following a February 2026 settlement with news outlet Capital & Main over a defamation suit, which reignited public scrutiny over past criminal 'no contest' pleas related to environmental misreporting and allegations of using legal depositions to 'punish' environmental advocates.
CNX faces intensifying competition for pipeline throughput and market share in the Appalachian Basin from larger rivals like EQT and Expand Energy. A critical threat is the pricing differential between regional Appalachian hubs and Gulf Coast LNG hubs; CNX's lack of direct LNG linkage often results in lower realized prices compared to peers with better coastal access. Furthermore, tightening methane regulations and rising compliance costs for 'Radical Transparency' monitoring are increasing operational overhead that smaller competitors or low-cost leaders may avoid.
Sentiment among ESG-focused institutional investors and local stakeholders is increasingly strained. In late 2025, a coalition of 40 environmental organizations and state legislators formally opposed CNX's inclusion in federal funding projects, labeling its 'Radical Transparency' program a 'cynical attempt' to undermine health-related research. This local pushback, combined with 'Reduce' ratings from the majority of Wall Street analysts, suggests a lack of confidence in the stock's ability to maintain its multi-year run-up.
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-04-30
Operator: Good day, and welcome to the CNX Resources First Quarter 2026 Q&A Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to hand the call to Tyler Lewis, Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead. Tyler Lewis: Thank you, and good morning, everybody. Welcome to CNX's first quarter Q&A conference call. Today, we will be answering questions related to our first quarter results. This morning, we posted to our Investor Relations website an updated slide presentation and detailed first quarter earnings release data such as quarterly E&P data, financial statements and non-GAAP reconciliations, which can be found in a document titled 1Q 2026 Earnings Results and Supplemental Information of CNX Resources. Also, we posted to our Investor Relations website our prepared remarks for the quarter, which we hope everyone had a chance to read before the call as the call today will be used exclusively for Q&A. With me today for Q&A are Alan Shepard, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Everett Good, our Chief Financial Officer; and Navneet Behl, our Chief Operating Officer. Please note that the company's remarks made during this call, including answers to questions, include forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors. A discussion of risks and uncertainties related to those factors in CNX's business is contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the release issued today. With that, thank you for joining us this morning. And operator, can you please open the call for Q&A at this time. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Leo Mariani of ROTH. Leo Mariani: I was hoping to hear a little bit more about the Utica. I see you guys brought 3 wells on here in the first quarter. Any comments on, kind of, well performance or costs? I know you've been working hard to kind of continue to improve the play over time. So I just wanted to see if there was kind of an update there. Alan Shepard: Leo, no, good question. We are continuing to develop the Utica program there. The most recent pad was a recent TIL towards the last part of the quarter. So we're a little ways off from providing any sort of production results from that. Everything we've seen so far, as we've mentioned on previous calls, very consistent with what our expectation of the reservoir is, and we're continuing to sort of, make progress on the cost side. But nothing new to update at this time. The way to think about it is probably towards the end of this year, we'll be in a position to provide more fulsome and we'll have a nice data set to provide to the market towards the end of '26, early '27 once these wells have had enough duration on. Leo Mariani: Okay. And would you envision that as you guys develop a more robust data set, if the play continues to progress nicely, could we see a little bit more allocation to the Utica versus the Marcellus in the next handful of years? Or do you guys think that the Marcellus still is probably going to be a little bit economically superior based on kind of the current rate? Alan Shepard: Yes. I think the Marcellus has the advantage of having the infrastructure already there, right? So we optimize for kind of the best economics per well, right? And right now, the Swift of Marcellus, you don't need to build new infrastructure for the most part because of all the legacy investment there. So you will see us kind of blend in more Utica over time as that's sort of the longer-term position for the company. But definitely, the Swift of Marcellus, we're in harvest mode there, and you're going to continue to see those for the next few years. Leo Mariani: Okay. That's helpful for sure. And I just wanted to ask on your new tech business here. Any kind of updates there on any of the other business lines other than the kind of environment and credit monetization, which you guys have been consistently doing, specifically anything on AutoSep or anything on like CNG or LNG business you guys have mentioned in the past? Alan Shepard: No, I think everything is consistent with where we thought it'd be at this point in '26. We're still waiting for, sort of, the final guidance on 45Z, but we don't think that's going to impact any of the projections we've made so far. So nothing new to update there, Leo. Operator: The next question comes from Jacob Roberts of TPH. Jacob Roberts: On hedging, you guys are typically transacting on a longer-term basis than a lot of your peers. And so given what seems to be the prevailing theory of an improving gas base in that, sort of, 2028 plus time frame, can you give some context on what you're seeing in that 2028 market? I think you added another 13 Bcf to the book with this update. Just curious what you're seeing on that longer-dated market at the moment. Everett Good: Yes. Yes. Again, on our longer-term hedges, we're certainly in a position to be more opportunistic maybe than we have in the past and patient. So as we see that price move up, and we've seen basis differentials tighten as well, and that's really helped us get to a better all-in realized price in kind of the Cal 28 market. So we're targeting to bring that up over time as we approach that year. Jacob Roberts: Okay. Perfect. I appreciate that. And then just kind of -- I know you made some changes to the balance sheet. Just curious what the next steps are from here on that front. Everett Good: Yes. We did a very positive refinancing of our 2029 notes at new 8-year notes at 5 and 7/8s in the quarter. I mean, generally, we've been very consistent in that we try to push out the maturities to make sure that we're at least 2, 3 years out before our next maturity. So the next one up for us is a 2030 maturity that we'll handle well ahead of time. And it's all about keeping the maturity profile extended and making sure that we don't have particular periods where we have large maturity towers in front of us. Operator: [Operator Instructions] And our next question will come from Michael Scialla of Stephens. Michael Scialla: I want to ask on in-basin demand. Some of your competitors are becoming a lot more confident on that, talking about that growing by more than 10 Bcf per day by the end of the decade. I want to see if you share that enthusiasm and anything you can share with us that the company may be doing to capture some of that demand? Alan Shepard: Yes. No, I would agree that we certainly see the same sort of long-term optimism on the demand side. Some of the announcements that come out are sort of mind-boggling when you think about a 9-gigawatt sort of power center plant, there have been multiple of those proposed. So we're like everyone else, right? We see the announcements, and we're watching, monitoring as RFPs come out for gas supply, we're participating in those. The magnitude of gas that's going to be demanded in-basin in Appalachia is going to need to be sourced by multiple producers. And if you think about the folks like ourselves that have the resource depth and sort of the creditworthiness to enter into long-term arrangements with these new demand sources, we're certainly going to benefit from that. So yes, we would share that optimism. The only question in my mind is timing, right? Is it 3 years? Is it 5 years? Is it 7 years? Michael Scialla: Alan, do you see that developing more on the Ohio side? It looks like it's maybe ahead of Pennsylvania, and can you participate as much over there if that is the case? Alan Shepard: Yes. I think for an Appalachian producer, just given the interconnectedness of the pipes, we're pretty agnostic to where it develops. You can wheel gas around here between the states pretty easily. Just as a sort of macro observation, Ohio has shown itself to be a little easier to do business with in terms of speed. It's a little bit flatter over there, too, for some of the data centers, and they have some of the intersection points with the long-haul pipelines like Clarington that make it very attractive. Pennsylvania is also being competitive though. I mean you've got the Homer City plant here and the NextEra projects that they're still working on site selection, but have indicated they're going to be in the Mon Valley area. Those will certainly be in our footprint. But bigger picture, like I said, we're agnostic. We're just excited about the growth in demand. And as Everett mentioned, you're starting to see differentials tighten up in the out years, and we hope that trend continues. Michael Scialla: Yes. Got it. I wanted to ask on your convertible notes. Can you say when during the quarter you expect that remaining, I think it's 209 million to convert? I'm just trying to estimate the diluted share count for the second quarter. Everett Good: Yes. That maturity is on May 1 of this week. So the shares will be issued about approximately 12 million shares net issuance later this week. Alan Shepard: Yes. And when we say net, that's included the effect of the capped call that we structured when we entered into the converts. So the 12 million is the net out the door. Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call over to Tyler Lewis for any closing remarks. Tyler Lewis: Great. Thank you again for joining us this morning. Please feel free to reach out if anyone has any additional questions. Otherwise, we look forward to speaking with everyone again next quarter. Thank you. Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.