Stocks/CNX

CNX

CNX Resources Corporation
Energy·Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
$33.69
$4.8B market cap
Claude Rating
5/10HOLD
Revenue
$2.4B
Free Cash Flow
$557.4M
Rev Growth
+28.2%
FCF Margin
22.9%
P/FCF
8.6x
EV/FCF
13.1x
Fwd EV/EBITDA
4.7x
Fair Value
$36.00
Upside
+6.9%

CNX Resources Corporation, an independent natural gas and midstream company, acquires, explores for, develops, and produces natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates in two segments, Shale and Coalbed Methane. It produces and sells pipeline quality natural gas primarily for gas wholesalers. The company owns rights to extract natural gas in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio from approximately 526,000 net Marcellus Shale acres; and approximately 610,000 net acres of

2-Year Price History

$35.31+39.1%
$25$30$35$40volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q1680.0462.4--238.0--149.6-142.81,098----------
Est2027-Q4620.0409.2--210.8--161.2-105.4948.4----------
Est2027-Q3580.0371.2--174.0--116.0-104.4787.2----------
Est2027-Q2660.0455.4--237.6--158.4-138.6671.2----------
Est2027-Q1640.0428.8--211.2--128.0-140.8512.8----------
Est2026-Q4580.0377.0--185.6--145.0-98.6384.8----------
Est2026-Q3540.0334.8--151.2--97.2-97.2239.8----------
Est2026-Q2620.0421.6--217.0--136.4-136.4142.6----------
Act2026-Q1782.7603.5469.7348.2277.5107.6-169.96.22,537154.531.2%14.9x3.5x
Act2025-Q4655.2411.5269.1196.3297.1122.6-174.40.82,451154.520.7%9.8x4.8x
Act2025-Q3452.1458.0111.8202.1233.8158.2-75.54.72,801171.86.0%10.7x7.0x
Act2025-Q2540.7767.7346.7432.5282.5168.9-113.63.42,734171.819.0%16.3x8.9x
Act2025-Q1610.6-109.8432.5-197.7215.784.2-131.52.62,794147.838.3%-2.5x43.6x
Act2024-Q4327.2-60.8150.1-144.6268.8163.3-105.517.22,292151.313.7%-1.7x14.9x
Act2024-Q3334.7223.0155.565.5170.255.4-114.71.32,404179.111.8%5.9x4.5x
Act2024-Q2307.1138.2299.5-18.3191.839.9-151.93.92,411152.625.2%3.6x4.8x
Act2024-Q1376.8184.1200.26.9185.116.9-168.22.02,405156.216.7%4.9x3.1x
Act2023-Q4350.6777.4178.9514.0161.153.4-107.80.42,365186.79.6%20.8x2.2x
Act2023-Q3302.5162.2138.421.4206.00.4-205.68.72,333190.712.4%4.2x1.6x
Act2023-Q2295.9671.4271.6475.0198.72.7-196.022.82,327193.015.7%17.8x1.6x
Act2023-Q1513.71,060317.5710.4248.778.7-170.02.82,382197.119.8%29.7x2.0x
Act2022-Q4860.81,406636.71,175442.3269.1-173.221.32,388207.062.1%39.9x13.0x
Act2022-Q31,179-93.1988.5-427.1264.4130.8-133.61.62,487187.5122.5%-2.7x--
Act2022-Q21,072206.7878.933.4192.055.3-136.70.22,454224.4106.7%6.7x--
Act2022-Q1812.5-1,118620.8-922.9336.4214.1-122.38.62,271199.980.0%-41.3x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202216.8410.2%40113.0×7.8×n/m0.7×
202320.00-62.7%182.6%2,6712.2×43.0×2.0×2.4×
202436.67-8.0%36.0%48514.9×26.2×n/m3.7×
202536.77+67.8%67.6%1,5274.8×13.6×7.6×2.1×
TTM33.69+53.9%92.2%2,2410.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E33.69+2.9%0.7%170.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude5/10HOLDFV: $36.00

CNX is a well-managed, low-cost Appalachian gas producer with a disciplined capital allocation framework, aggressive buyback program, and long-term optionality from Deep Utica development and in-basin data center demand. However, the stock trades at a premium to analyst targets, faces significant dilution from convertible note settlement (~11% share expansion), has 14.7% short interest reflecting bearish sentiment, and its earnings are heavily distorted by mark-to-market derivative swings that obscure underlying economics. The majority of Wall Street analysts rate the stock a Sell/Reduce. While the long-term data center demand narrative is compelling, it remains 3-7 years out with significant infrastructure hurdles. At ~$39/share with a 28.6x EV/FCF multiple, the stock appears to price in much of the optimistic scenario, leaving limited margin of safety for a commodity-levered name.

Catalyst Significant in-basin demand materialization from data center/power generation contracts in Appalachia, confirmed 45Z tax credit guidance providing $30M+ annual FCF uplift, or a sustained move in Henry Hub above $4/MMBtu would validate the premium valuation and force short covering on the 14.7% short interest.
Risk A sustained decline in natural gas prices below $2.75/MMBtu would compress already volatile FCF margins, while the ~12M share dilution from convertible settlement and potential adverse outcomes in legacy coal indemnity litigation ($75M+ pension liabilities) could materially erode per-share economics.
Trend
STABLE
Mgmt
7/10
Quarter
6/10
Exp. Move
-3.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

CNX Resources reported a steady first quarter for 2026, highlighting a disciplined approach to capital allocation and debt management. The company is currently harvesting its Marcellus assets while gradually developing the Utica shale, with three new wells recently brought online. Management expects more definitive Utica performance data by late 2026. A significant portion of the call focused on the company's proactive balance sheet management, including the successful refinancing of 2029 notes and the upcoming conversion of $209 million in notes, resulting in a net issuance of 12 million shares. Looking forward, CNX is highly bullish on in-basin demand driven by large-scale data centers and power generation projects in Appalachia. They noted that tightening basis differentials in the 2028 market are allowing for opportunistic hedging. While waiting for final regulatory guidance on tech-related tax credits (45Z), the company remains confident in its diverse business lines. The leadership team emphasized that their extensive resource base and strong credit profile make them well-suited to satisfy the massive upcoming demand for natural gas in the region, regardless of whether that demand settles in Ohio or Pennsylvania.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$33.69
Market Cap$4.8B
Enterprise Value$7.3B
P/S Ratio2.0x
P/FCF8.6x
EV/FCF13.1x
FCF Margin (TTM)22.9%
FCF Yield11.7%
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.5%
Annual Dilution4.6%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$2.4B
Net Income$1.2B
Free Cash Flow$557.4M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+28.2%
EBITDA Margin92.2%
Net Margin48.5%
FCF Margin22.9%
CapEx % of Revenue21.9%
SBC % of Revenue0.8%
ROIC19.2%
WC Change % Rev3.1%
Interest Coverage13.0x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$20.54
-39.0% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$5.7B
− Net Debt$2.5B
= Fair Equity$3.2B
Revenue Growth6.7% → 2.5%
FCF Margin22.9% → 18.0%
Discount Rate14.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float14.2%
Short Shares19.3M
Days to Cover10.3
Change (vs Prior)+0.5%
Short % Float History
14.20%-5.20pp
12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)36%
Put IV (ATM)35%
ATM Spread0.99%
Call $OI (near money)$817K
Put $OI (near money)$160K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$35.0
Major Expirations4
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$32.00$3.20/$5.502$0.55/$0.803
$33.00$3.40/$3.701$0.80/$1.0541
$34.00$2.65/$3.105$1.05/$1.508
$35.00$2.10/$2.4515$1.45/$1.8059
$36.00$1.55/$1.9529$2.00/$2.3028
$37.00$1.15/$1.558$2.60/$2.9081
$38.00$0.85/$1.1517$3.30/$3.606
$39.00$0.65/$0.9028$4.10/$4.402
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth-2.1%
Forward FCF Margin21.3%
Forward EBITDA Margin65.6%
Forward P/FCF9.4x
Forward EV/FCF14.4x
Forward Int. Coverage10.9x
Model Risk Score6/10
Bankruptcy Odds2%
Est. Borrow Rate6.0%
Terminal EV/FCF10.0x
LT Growth2.5%
LT FCF Margin18.0%

Employees

Headcount458
Revenue / Employee$5,307,190
Gross Profit / Employee$3,655,480
2022: 466 → 2023: 470 → 2024: 458 → 2025: 390 (-6% CAGR)

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 17.5% of float, sold 6.5%. 3 filers moved >1% of shares (2 buying, 1 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+10.9% of float (net)
Bought 17.5% · Sold 6.5%
299 filers reported (last quarter: 431)

Ownership composition

Active
61.6%(+6.4% YoY)
391 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
41.7%(+5.8% YoY)
12 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.4%(-0.0% YoY)
10 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
5.2%
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$694M$32.95+$46.0M−$37.5M-0.2%$5.69T
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$338M$25.25+$1.1M−$23.6M-0.4%$480.92B
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$279M$38.55+$279M+$279M$1.91T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$274M$24.66+$40.8M−$10.9M-0.2%$2.89T
Neuberger Berman Group LLC$266M$25.44−$8.0M−$68.7M-0.3%$131.37B
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive$236M$38.55+$236M+$236M$4.04T
D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.$214M$24.97−$32.9M+$70.7M-0.3%$118.02B
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$174M$24.76+$34.8M+$50.4M+0.7%$193.48B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$163M$33.18+$24.3M+$20.5M+2.3%$1.61T
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/$156M$27.17−$14.4M+$9.1M-0.1%$1.36T
SOUTHEASTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT INC/TN/$155M$20.15−$27.8M−$29.8M-2.6%$2.03B
Capital World Investors$152M$38.55−$88.1M+$152M$732.46B
ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$148M$27.52+$146M+$148M+0.1%$184.72B
Southeast Asset Advisors Inc.$93.0M$25.63−$216K+$160K-0.2%$913M
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC$91.8M$28.38+$13.9M+$33.6M-0.2%$760.93B
NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive$80.5M$35.23+$4.7M−$9.6M-0.2%$755.34B
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO$72.9M$24.90+$15.3M−$20.5M-0.2%$1.47T
MORGAN STANLEY$65.9M$22.39−$5.9M−$37.0M-0.3%$1.65T
UBS Group AG$64.7M$32.22+$34.7M+$24.2M-0.3%$562.11B
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC$55.7M$30.52+$3.0M−$21.0M+0.7%$645.81B
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)NEUTRAL
Holders
-0.09%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
-0.14%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.26%
214 buyers · $1.41B in
Sellers (this Q)
-0.12%
126 sellers · $0.28B out
alpha coverage: 89% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-20.5%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-16.5%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-13.7%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+2.9%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+10.5%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-4.8%
Holder mid (any stock)
-3.5%
Holder rally (any stock)
-5.9%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

011.2M22.4M33.7M44.9M$16$21$27$33$392021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
MFN Partners Management, LPSOUTHEASTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT INC/TN/4.0MNeuberger Berman Group LLC6.9MD. E. Shaw & Co., Inc.5.5MCapital Research Global Investors815KAMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC4.5MBANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/4.0MMACQUARIE GROUP LTDCapital World Investors4.0MARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP3.8M

Related Stocks

Investors who own this also own

Stocks held by the same active managers as this one, ranked by score — how much more often these appear together than random chance (1× = baseline). Excludes index ETFs and market makers; minimum 3 shared holders.

TickerNameCo-holdersScore
JNJJohnson & Johnson33.30×
BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.32.49×

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (1 analysts)$34.0090.0%
Last Year (14 analysts)$36.64880.0%
Current Price$33.69
Analyst Ratings
14
20
7
Buy: 14Hold: 20Sell: 7Consensus: Hold
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2028 Q1639M280M219M$1.42$1.22 – $1.622
2028 Q2554M242M146M$0.95$0.82 – $1.092
2028 Q3564M247M146M$0.94$0.81 – $1.082
2028 Q4610M267M182M$1.18$1.02 – $1.352
2029 Q11.1B478M254M$1.64$1.42 – $1.881
2029 Q21.1B492M134M$0.86$0.75 – $0.991
2029 Q31.2B506M152M$0.98$0.85 – $1.131
2029 Q41.2B520M199M$1.29$1.11 – $1.481
2030 Q11.2B535M247M$1.60$1.38 – $1.841
2030 Q21.3B550M128M$0.83$0.72 – $0.951

Corporate

Executive Compensation (2023-2025)

Direct Pay$114.7M
Incentive & Other$23.9M
Total Compensation$138.6M
% of Revenue2.6%

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$3.91M
3 txns · 3 insiders · 98,550 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-05-04SELLThorndike William N Jrdirector28,800$38.25$1.10M$16.32M
2026-03-23SELLLally-Green Maureendirector23,631$39.52$934K$6.70M
2026-02-19SELLLANIGAN BERNARD JRdirector46,119$40.60$1.87M$7.19M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

17.1%retail-6.8pp
28.3%dark+5.6pp
week of 2026-04-13
5%10%15%20%25%30%35%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Revenue Breakdown

Revenue Segments

By Product (2026-Q1)
Natural Gas$658.6M+33%
NGLs$60.1M+11%
Oil and Gas, Purchased$12.7M+10%
Oil and Condensate$3.4M+77%
By Geography (2019-Q3)
Utica Shale$62.7M-29%

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

CNX Resources: Dilution Cliff Approaching Amidst Legacy Liability Litigation

Overall Risk
6/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
9/10
Insolvency
4/10
Earnings Overstated
5/10
Hidden Liabilities
7/10
Legal
7/10
Audit Warnings
3/10
Hidden Upside
5/10
Contextually Acceptable
6/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

CNX reported Q1 2026 earnings on April 30, 2026, which initially appeared strong but triggered a 2.06% premarket stock decline due to investor concerns over regulatory uncertainty and a massive $222 million realized loss on commodity derivatives. While the company beat revenue estimates ($722M vs. $545.8M expected), the market focused on tightening margins and production stability, with average daily production showing signs of a plateau compared to peak levels in mid-2025 (e.g., 1,693 MMcfe in Q1 2026 vs. 1,676 MMcfe in Q2 2025).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on CNX’s extreme sensitivity to volatile Appalachian Basin natural gas prices and a bearish analyst consensus. As of April 2026, the stock holds a 'Reduce' or 'Sell' rating from a majority of covering firms, including Barclays and Truist. Analysts at Bank of America recently lowered their price target to $34 (April 27, 2026), citing a downside risk of ~12% from current levels. Skeptics argue that CNX's heavy reliance on a complex hedging program, which resulted in significant realized losses in Q1 2026, makes it a 'management risk' play rather than a pure commodity play.

🚩 Red Flags

Significant insider selling occurred in Q1 2026: Director Bernard Lanigan Jr. liquidated approximately 20.65% of his position (over $1.8M) in February, followed by another sale by Director Maureen Lally-Green in March. Additionally, the company faces ongoing reputational risk following a February 2026 settlement with news outlet Capital & Main over a defamation suit, which reignited public scrutiny over past criminal 'no contest' pleas related to environmental misreporting and allegations of using legal depositions to 'punish' environmental advocates.

⚔️ Competitive Threats

CNX faces intensifying competition for pipeline throughput and market share in the Appalachian Basin from larger rivals like EQT and Expand Energy. A critical threat is the pricing differential between regional Appalachian hubs and Gulf Coast LNG hubs; CNX's lack of direct LNG linkage often results in lower realized prices compared to peers with better coastal access. Furthermore, tightening methane regulations and rising compliance costs for 'Radical Transparency' monitoring are increasing operational overhead that smaller competitors or low-cost leaders may avoid.

💬 Customer Sentiment

Sentiment among ESG-focused institutional investors and local stakeholders is increasingly strained. In late 2025, a coalition of 40 environmental organizations and state legislators formally opposed CNX's inclusion in federal funding projects, labeling its 'Radical Transparency' program a 'cynical attempt' to undermine health-related research. This local pushback, combined with 'Reduce' ratings from the majority of Wall Street analysts, suggests a lack of confidence in the stock's ability to maintain its multi-year run-up.

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-04-30

Operator: Good day, and welcome to the CNX Resources First Quarter 2026 Q&A Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to hand the call to Tyler Lewis, Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead.
Tyler Lewis: Thank you, and good morning, everybody. Welcome to CNX's first quarter Q&A conference call. Today, we will be answering questions related to our first quarter results. This morning, we posted to our Investor Relations website an updated slide presentation and detailed first quarter earnings release data such as quarterly E&P data, financial statements and non-GAAP reconciliations, which can be found in a document titled 1Q 2026 Earnings Results and Supplemental Information of CNX Resources. Also, we posted to our Investor Relations website our prepared remarks for the quarter, which we hope everyone had a chance to read before the call as the call today will be used exclusively for Q&A. With me today for Q&A are Alan Shepard, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Everett Good, our Chief Financial Officer; and Navneet Behl, our Chief Operating Officer. Please note that the company's remarks made during this call, including answers to questions, include forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors. A discussion of risks and uncertainties related to those factors in CNX's business is contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the release issued today. With that, thank you for joining us this morning. And operator, can you please open the call for Q&A at this time.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Leo Mariani of ROTH.
Leo Mariani: I was hoping to hear a little bit more about the Utica. I see you guys brought 3 wells on here in the first quarter. Any comments on, kind of, well performance or costs? I know you've been working hard to kind of continue to improve the play over time. So I just wanted to see if there was kind of an update there.
Alan Shepard: Leo, no, good question. We are continuing to develop the Utica program there. The most recent pad was a recent TIL towards the last part of the quarter. So we're a little ways off from providing any sort of production results from that. Everything we've seen so far, as we've mentioned on previous calls, very consistent with what our expectation of the reservoir is, and we're continuing to sort of, make progress on the cost side. But nothing new to update at this time. The way to think about it is probably towards the end of this year, we'll be in a position to provide more fulsome and we'll have a nice data set to provide to the market towards the end of '26, early '27 once these wells have had enough duration on.
Leo Mariani: Okay. And would you envision that as you guys develop a more robust data set, if the play continues to progress nicely, could we see a little bit more allocation to the Utica versus the Marcellus in the next handful of years? Or do you guys think that the Marcellus still is probably going to be a little bit economically superior based on kind of the current rate?
Alan Shepard: Yes. I think the Marcellus has the advantage of having the infrastructure already there, right? So we optimize for kind of the best economics per well, right? And right now, the Swift of Marcellus, you don't need to build new infrastructure for the most part because of all the legacy investment there. So you will see us kind of blend in more Utica over time as that's sort of the longer-term position for the company. But definitely, the Swift of Marcellus, we're in harvest mode there, and you're going to continue to see those for the next few years.
Leo Mariani: Okay. That's helpful for sure. And I just wanted to ask on your new tech business here. Any kind of updates there on any of the other business lines other than the kind of environment and credit monetization, which you guys have been consistently doing, specifically anything on AutoSep or anything on like CNG or LNG business you guys have mentioned in the past?
Alan Shepard: No, I think everything is consistent with where we thought it'd be at this point in '26. We're still waiting for, sort of, the final guidance on 45Z, but we don't think that's going to impact any of the projections we've made so far. So nothing new to update there, Leo.
Operator: The next question comes from Jacob Roberts of TPH.
Jacob Roberts: On hedging, you guys are typically transacting on a longer-term basis than a lot of your peers. And so given what seems to be the prevailing theory of an improving gas base in that, sort of, 2028 plus time frame, can you give some context on what you're seeing in that 2028 market? I think you added another 13 Bcf to the book with this update. Just curious what you're seeing on that longer-dated market at the moment.
Everett Good: Yes. Yes. Again, on our longer-term hedges, we're certainly in a position to be more opportunistic maybe than we have in the past and patient. So as we see that price move up, and we've seen basis differentials tighten as well, and that's really helped us get to a better all-in realized price in kind of the Cal 28 market. So we're targeting to bring that up over time as we approach that year.
Jacob Roberts: Okay. Perfect. I appreciate that. And then just kind of -- I know you made some changes to the balance sheet. Just curious what the next steps are from here on that front.
Everett Good: Yes. We did a very positive refinancing of our 2029 notes at new 8-year notes at 5 and 7/8s in the quarter. I mean, generally, we've been very consistent in that we try to push out the maturities to make sure that we're at least 2, 3 years out before our next maturity. So the next one up for us is a 2030 maturity that we'll handle well ahead of time. And it's all about keeping the maturity profile extended and making sure that we don't have particular periods where we have large maturity towers in front of us.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] And our next question will come from Michael Scialla of Stephens.
Michael Scialla: I want to ask on in-basin demand. Some of your competitors are becoming a lot more confident on that, talking about that growing by more than 10 Bcf per day by the end of the decade. I want to see if you share that enthusiasm and anything you can share with us that the company may be doing to capture some of that demand?
Alan Shepard: Yes. No, I would agree that we certainly see the same sort of long-term optimism on the demand side. Some of the announcements that come out are sort of mind-boggling when you think about a 9-gigawatt sort of power center plant, there have been multiple of those proposed. So we're like everyone else, right? We see the announcements, and we're watching, monitoring as RFPs come out for gas supply, we're participating in those. The magnitude of gas that's going to be demanded in-basin in Appalachia is going to need to be sourced by multiple producers. And if you think about the folks like ourselves that have the resource depth and sort of the creditworthiness to enter into long-term arrangements with these new demand sources, we're certainly going to benefit from that. So yes, we would share that optimism. The only question in my mind is timing, right? Is it 3 years? Is it 5 years? Is it 7 years?
Michael Scialla: Alan, do you see that developing more on the Ohio side? It looks like it's maybe ahead of Pennsylvania, and can you participate as much over there if that is the case?
Alan Shepard: Yes. I think for an Appalachian producer, just given the interconnectedness of the pipes, we're pretty agnostic to where it develops. You can wheel gas around here between the states pretty easily. Just as a sort of macro observation, Ohio has shown itself to be a little easier to do business with in terms of speed. It's a little bit flatter over there, too, for some of the data centers, and they have some of the intersection points with the long-haul pipelines like Clarington that make it very attractive. Pennsylvania is also being competitive though. I mean you've got the Homer City plant here and the NextEra projects that they're still working on site selection, but have indicated they're going to be in the Mon Valley area. Those will certainly be in our footprint. But bigger picture, like I said, we're agnostic. We're just excited about the growth in demand. And as Everett mentioned, you're starting to see differentials tighten up in the out years, and we hope that trend continues.
Michael Scialla: Yes. Got it. I wanted to ask on your convertible notes. Can you say when during the quarter you expect that remaining, I think it's 209 million to convert? I'm just trying to estimate the diluted share count for the second quarter.
Everett Good: Yes. That maturity is on May 1 of this week. So the shares will be issued about approximately 12 million shares net issuance later this week.
Alan Shepard: Yes. And when we say net, that's included the effect of the capped call that we structured when we entered into the converts. So the 12 million is the net out the door.
Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call over to Tyler Lewis for any closing remarks.
Tyler Lewis: Great. Thank you again for joining us this morning. Please feel free to reach out if anyone has any additional questions. Otherwise, we look forward to speaking with everyone again next quarter. Thank you.
Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.