Stocks/ASC

ASC

Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Industrials·Marine Shipping
$16.08
$656M market cap
Claude Rating
6/10SLIGHT BUY
Revenue
$324.1M
Free Cash Flow
$-37.0M
Rev Growth
+18.8%
FCF Margin
-11.4%
P/FCF
--
EV/FCF
--
Fwd EV/EBITDA
4.5x
Fair Value
$19.50
Upside
+21.3%

Ardmore Shipping Corporation engages in the seaborne transportation of petroleum products and chemicals worldwide. As of February 15, 2022, the company operated a fleet of 25 double-hulled product and chemical tankers. It serves oil majors, oil companies, oil and chemical traders, chemical companies, and pooling service providers. The company was founded in 2010 and is based in Pembroke, Bermuda.

2-Year Price History

$18.83-8.5%
$10$12$14$16$18$20volJun 24Oct 24Jan 25May 25Sep 25Jan 26May 26

Quarterly Financials & Projections

Quarterly Waterfall ($ M)
PeriodRevEBITDAOpInNIOCFFCFCapExCashDebtSharesROICIntCovEV/EBITDA
Est2028-Q178.020.3--10.9--14.0-3.1243.4----------
Est2027-Q480.022.4--12.8--16.0-2.8229.4----------
Est2027-Q385.026.4--16.2--19.6-2.7213.4----------
Est2027-Q288.029.0--18.5--22.0-2.6193.9----------
Est2027-Q182.024.6--14.8--18.0-2.9171.9----------
Est2026-Q490.031.5--20.7--24.3-2.7153.8----------
Est2026-Q3100.042.0--30.5--34.0-2.8129.5----------
Est2026-Q2115.059.8--46.0--48.3-2.995.5----------
Act2026-Q187.936.825.623.629.427.7-1.747.2105.140.922.0%17.6x8.3x
Act2025-Q482.924.024.012.426.224.3-1.946.8128.940.920.3%10.0x6.8x
Act2025-Q381.325.015.112.819.1-90.0-109.147.1118.240.712.2%14.4x5.9x
Act2025-Q272.119.910.59.612.71.1-11.649.528.640.710.6%19.1x4.3x
Act2025-Q174.014.814.86.326.323.9-2.447.524.040.615.2%15.8x3.4x
Act2024-Q482.019.312.46.923.020.0-3.047.044.241.812.1%17.5x4.3x
Act2024-Q396.133.426.324.139.938.6-1.347.630.042.424.3%30.3x4.8x
Act2024-Q2121.371.950.962.748.44.8-43.647.453.542.044.9%35.2x3.7x
Act2024-Q1106.349.142.339.249.236.0-13.248.672.041.939.5%19.4x4.0x
Act2023-Q498.937.630.727.018.710.8-8.046.894.041.828.9%13.8x3.6x
Act2023-Q386.930.930.921.242.035.8-6.250.8102.741.829.6%10.3x3.1x
Act2023-Q291.934.728.224.542.133.4-8.751.0131.241.725.6%12.3x3.0x
Act2023-Q1118.254.248.144.156.854.3-2.652.6153.841.742.3%18.9x2.9x
Act2022-Q4132.864.859.253.960.758.7-2.050.6184.641.550.9%31.8x2.8x
Act2022-Q3142.473.964.761.854.653.0-1.650.6244.040.154.5%16.2x--
Act2022-Q2107.141.635.329.714.614.5-0.045.4336.435.628.9%8.6x--
Act2022-Q163.44.74.4-7.0-5.70.0-5.753.3378.334.43.6%1.1x--
Historical Valuation

Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.

YearPriceRev GrEBITDA %EBITDAEV/EBITDAEV/FCFP/EP/S
202212.0841.5%1852.8×4.1×2.8×0.8×
202312.78-11.2%39.8%1573.6×4.3×4.5×1.3×
202411.74+2.5%42.8%1744.3×7.5×5.7×1.9×
202510.53-23.6%27.0%846.8×n/m11.9×1.6×
TTM16.08-13.2%32.6%1060.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×
2027E16.08+3.4%0.3%10.0×0.0×0.0×0.0×

EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.

AI Analysis

LLM Evaluations

Claude6/10SLIGHT BUYFV: $19.50

Ardmore Shipping is a well-managed, mid-cap product/chemical tanker operator benefiting from an extraordinary geopolitical tailwind that has pushed rates to multi-year highs. The company has a modern fleet, low cash breakeven ($10,800/day), minimal near-term drydocking, and substantial operating leverage to elevated rates. The doubling of the dividend payout ratio signals confidence and returns capital effectively. However, the stock at ~$18.86 already prices in a strong near-term environment, and the core risk is that tanker rates are inherently mean-reverting — current rates reflect crisis premiums from Hormuz/Red Sea disruptions that could normalize. With ROCE below industry average (5.7% vs 8.7%), limited scale vs. peers like STNG/TRMD, and high cyclicality, ASC is fairly valued at current levels with modest upside if elevated rates persist but meaningful downside if geopolitical tensions ease. The newbuild orders for 2028 delivery add long-term optionality but also capital commitment risk.

Catalyst Sustained Strait of Hormuz disruption keeping MR rates above $40,000/day through H2 2026; fleet aging/scrapping accelerating beyond expectations; potential takeover bid from larger operators seeking ASC's modern chemical-capable fleet.
Risk Resolution of Middle East geopolitical tensions (Hormuz reopening, Red Sea normalization) causing a rapid collapse in spot tanker rates back toward $15,000-20,000/day, which would compress margins to single digits and pressure the dividend.
Trend
IMPROVING
Mgmt
7/10
Quarter
8/10
Exp. Move
+6.0%

Latest Earnings Call

Transcript Summary

Ardmore Shipping's Q1 2026 earnings call showcased a company operating at peak efficiency amidst global trade disruptions. Reporting adjusted earnings of $0.58 per share, the company doubled its dividend payout ratio to 66% of adjusted earnings, declaring a $0.39 per share dividend. This reflects management's confidence following a heavy capital expenditure cycle in 2025. The fleet is benefiting significantly from Middle East volatility; MR tanker rates spiked from $33,700 in Q1 to over $52,000 for the start of Q2, nearly five times the cash breakeven. Strategically, Ardmore is refreshing its fleet by selling an older 2014 MR tanker for $35.5 million and ordering two sophisticated, versatile Handysize newbuildings for $44.9 million each. These new ships will handle diverse cargoes, from fuels to chemicals, enhancing operational flexibility. Management remains bullish, citing the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz and structural changes in global refining as catalysts for sustained high ton-mile demand. With a low order book for the Handysize segment and half the global MR fleet approaching 20 years of age, Ardmore is positioned to leverage its modern, efficient fleet against long-term supply constraints and immediate market tightness.

Valuation & Metrics

Market Stats

Price$16.08
Market Cap$656M
Enterprise Value$714M
P/S Ratio2.0x
P/FCF--
EV/FCF--
FCF Margin (TTM)-11.4%
FCF Yield-5.6%
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.4%
Annual Dilution0.6%
CurrencyUSD

TTM Financial Snapshot

Revenue$324.1M
Net Income$58.3M
Free Cash Flow$-37.0M

Revenue Growth (YoY)+18.8%
EBITDA Margin32.6%
Net Margin18.0%
FCF Margin-11.4%
CapEx % of Revenue38.4%
SBC % of Revenue0.0%
ROIC16.3%
WC Change % Rev-1.3%
Interest Coverage14.6x

DCF Fair Value Estimate

$8.79
-45.3% upside
Fair Enterprise Value$417M
− Net Debt$58M
= Fair Equity$359M
Revenue Growth-14.5% → 1.5%
FCF Margin-11.4% → 15.0%
Discount Rate15.0%
Terminal EV/FCF7.0x

Forward Outlook & Risk

Short Interest

Short % of Float5.6%
Short Shares2.0M
Days to Cover3.2
Change (vs Prior)-11.7%
Short % Float History
5.60%-1.90pp
6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%04-3007-1509-1511-1401-1504-30

Options

Call IV (ATM)35%
Put IV (ATM)48%
ATM Spread4.0%
Call $OI (near money)$935K
Put $OI (near money)$93K
ATM ExpiryJuly 17, 2026 (56D)
ATM Strike$20.0
Major Expirations3
Near-money chain · July 17, 2026
StrikeCall Bid/AskCall OIPut Bid/AskPut OI
$10.00$8.00/$10.6061--/$0.7567
$12.50$5.50/$8.10155--/$0.7563
$15.00$3.20/$4.80379$0.15/$1.30101
$17.50$1.65/$2.05800$0.30/$1.45221
$20.00$0.25/$1.001,032$1.25/$2.80208
$22.50--/$0.7523$3.20/$5.003
$25.00--/$0.4052$5.30/$7.300
$30.00--/$0.750$9.60/$13.400
Snapshot: 2026-05-22

Forward Projections & Estimates

NTM Revenue Growth+19.4%
Forward FCF Margin32.2%
Forward EBITDA Margin40.8%
Forward P/FCF5.3x
Forward EV/FCF5.7x
Forward Int. Coverage19.9x
Model Risk Score7/10
Bankruptcy Odds1%
Est. Borrow Rate5.5%
Terminal EV/FCF7.0x
LT Growth1.5%
LT FCF Margin15.0%

Employees

Headcount56
Revenue / Employee$5,787,821
Gross Profit / Employee$1,793,607
2022: 56 → 2023: 56 → 2024: 56 → 2025: 940 (156% CAGR)

Cash Runway

15.3months
WATCH

Institutional Ownership

Headline & net flow

NET BUYING

In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net buyers — bought 18.6% of float, sold 5.1%. 4 filers moved >1% of shares (4 buying, 0 selling).

Net flow · Q1 2026still filing
+13.5% of float (net)
Bought 18.6% · Sold 5.1%
126 filers reported (last quarter: 185)

Ownership composition

Active
50.7%(+25.7% YoY)
179 filers
hedge / family / endowment
Retail funds
Fidelity, Schwab, 401(k)
Passive
14.0%(+4.8% YoY)
8 filers
Vanguard, iShares, SPDR
Market makers
0.5%(+0.3% YoY)
5 filers
Citadel, Susquehanna
Insiders
Form 4 — latest per insider
0%25%50%75%100%2022-062023-032023-122024-092025-062026-03
ActiveRetail fundsPassiveMarket makersRetail direct

Top holders

Fund$ valueCost basisΔ QoQΔ YoYα lifeFund AUM
BlackRock, Inc.Passive$48.5M$16.01+$8.0M+$9.7M-0.2%$5.69T
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPPassive$37.4M$9.87+$370K−$1.9M-0.4%$480.92B
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP$28.5M$12.81+$3.2M+$5.8M-0.3%$533.98B
RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$26.5M$13.22+$4.1M+$5.7M+1.2%$63.91B
AMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC$26.0M$14.46+$80K+$2.0M+0.7%$193.48B
Nuveen, LLC$22.7M$13.29+$15.7M+$22.2M+0.0%$368.63B
ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC$21.0M$13.33+$9.3M+$21.0M-0.5%$70.48B
PRIVATE MANAGEMENT GROUP INC$18.5M$9.91−$297K+$183K-0.6%$3.47B
Flat Footed LLC$15.3M$10.31−$3.7M+$15.3M+1.3%$300M
Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC$14.3M$11.77−$1.2M−$3.9M-1.6%$1.61B
Qube Research & Technologies Ltd$13.9M$13.14+$522K+$6.8M+0.3%$70.36B
RBF Capital, LLC$13.8M$3.77+$0+$0+0.1%$2.03B
CITADEL ADVISORS LLC$12.5M$12.20+$5.4M+$12.1M-0.4%$138.22B
TICINO WEALTH$11.5M$10.53−$240K+$11.5M+9.6%$288M
MORGAN STANLEY$11.5M$13.05−$1.1M+$3.6M-0.3%$1.65T
STATE STREET CORPPassive$9.5M$9.18−$279K−$1.4M-0.2%$2.89T
Hartree Partners, LP$7.9M$15.25+$7.9M+$7.9M+3.3%$461M
ARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$7.6M$12.25−$5.1M−$15.4M+0.1%$184.72B
Russell Investments Group, Ltd.$7.3M$12.81+$1.1M−$708K+1.5%$93.03B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCPassive$7.1M$12.56+$168K−$3.0M+2.3%$1.61T
Cost basis is a volume-weighted estimate from accumulation periods within our 13F history; holders who built their position before our window started will show a stale basis. % above the cost basis is the unrealized gain at the current price.

Trading behavior

Smart-money alpha (lifetime, %/qtr)BEARISH
Holders
+0.76%
avg per quarter
Holders (ex-self)
+0.67%
excl. this stock
Buyers (this Q)
+0.35%
86 buyers · $0.17B in
Sellers (this Q)
+5.94%
73 sellers · $0.00B out
alpha coverage: 99% of $ has a lifetime-alpha record
Holder behavior on this stocksource: stock
On big dips (−10%+)
-10.6%
how holders react when this stock falls
On quiet Qs
-10.1%
−10% to +10% baseline
On rallies (+10%+)
-13.2%
how they react when this stock rises
Holders' portfolio flow this Q
+1.8%
inflows — adds are organic
Sellers' portfolio flow this Q
+538.3%
Sellers grew AUM elsewhere — opinionated cut of this stock.
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Holder dip (any stock)
-4.9%
Holder mid (any stock)
-5.7%
Holder rally (any stock)
-9.0%

Top Holders Over Time

5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price

02.9M5.8M8.7M11.7M$3.77$8.08$12$17$212021-062022-062023-062024-062025-062026-03
hover the chart for per-quarter detailprice (right axis)
Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC939KRENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC1.7MWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP1.9MKingstone Capital Partners Texas, LLCARROWSTREET CAPITAL, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP496KPRIVATE MANAGEMENT GROUP INC1.2MAMERICAN CENTURY COMPANIES INC1.7MMILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC104KNuveen, LLC1.5MMORGAN STANLEY753K

Analyst Coverage

Analyst Coverage
Price Targets
Last Quarter (1 analysts)$19.001820.0%
Last Year (3 analysts)$15.67-250.0%
Current Price$16.08
Analyst Ratings
12
5
Buy: 12Hold: 5Consensus: Buy
Consensus Estimates
QuarterRevenueEBITDANet IncEPSEPS Range# Analysts
2027 Q396M30M2M$0.06$0.06 – $0.061
2027 Q497M30M9M$0.23$0.23 – $0.231
2028 Q198M31M22M$0.55$0.55 – $0.551
2028 Q2100M31M23M$0.57$0.57 – $0.571
2028 Q3101M32M24M$0.59$0.59 – $0.591
2028 Q4103M32M24M$0.60$0.60 – $0.601
2029 Q1104M33M24M$0.58$0.58 – $0.581
2029 Q2106M33M24M$0.60$0.60 – $0.601
2029 Q3107M34M25M$0.61$0.61 – $0.611
2029 Q4109M34M25M$0.62$0.62 – $0.621

Corporate

Insider Trading (last 12mo)

Open-market only (Form 4 P-Purchase + S-Sale). Excludes grants, option exercises, tax withholding, gifts.
Officers & directors
Buys ($, 12mo)
$0
0 txns · 0 insiders · 0 sh
Sells ($, 12mo)
$1.13M
9 txns · 5 insiders · 59,348 sh
Recent transactions
DateSideInsiderTitleSharesPriceDollarsOwned $
2026-05-18SELLMcWilliams Curtis Bdirector16,277$19.38$315K$1.18M
2026-05-15SELLMcWilliams Curtis Bdirector848$19.01$16K$1.46M
2026-05-15SELLde Jong Helen Johannadirector1,534$18.93$29K$469K
2026-05-13SELLMcWilliams Curtis Bdirector303$19.02$6K$1.48M
2026-05-12SELLMcWilliams Curtis Bdirector2,572$19.05$49K$1.49M
2026-05-12SELLO'Driscoll Aideen Siobhanofficer: SVP & Sr. Dir. of Corp. Svcs15,848$18.96$300K$372K
2026-05-12SELLTikka Kirsidirector12,000$18.93$227K$671K
2026-05-12SELLde Jong Helen Johannadirector1,966$19.02$37K$501K
2026-05-05SELLKelleher Bart Bofficer: President8,000$19.07$153K$1.14M

Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)

17.5%retail+1.1pp
19.5%dark-0.9pp
week of 2026-04-13
15%20%25%30%24-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-04retail (non-ATS)dark (ATS)
Off-exchange volume from FINRA. Retail = non-ATS (wholesaler PFOF + broker internalization). Dark = ATS (dark-pool crossing networks, institutional). Lit-exchange = remainder.

Filing Risk Analysis

Filing Risk Scores

Ardmore Shipping Corp: Strategic De-leveraging Meets High-CapEx Fleet Renewal

Overall Risk
3/10
Fraud
2/10
Dilution
2/10
Insolvency
1/10
Earnings Overstated
3/10
Hidden Liabilities
4/10
Legal
2/10
Audit Warnings
1/10
Hidden Upside
6/10
Contextually Acceptable
10/10

Counter-Thesis

Counter-Thesis & Recent News

📰 Recent News

In April 2026, Ardmore announced a major capital commitment, signing contracts for two 40,500 dwt product/chemical tankers at $44.9M each (deliveries late 2028). While the company doubled its dividend payout ratio to two-thirds of adjusted earnings starting Q1 2026, it simultaneously agreed to sell a 2014-built MR tanker for $35.5M to recycle capital. Seeking Alpha downgraded the stock to 'Hold' in March 2026, citing that the share price had surpassed fair value and noting that despite fleet growth, the dividend yield remains below some high-payout peers like TORM (TRMD).

🐻 Bear Case

The bear case centers on the potential normalization of currently elevated tanker rates. Much of ASC’s recent profit surge is tied to geopolitical disruptions in the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz; any resolution or 'normalization' of traffic could rapidly deflate spot rates. Additionally, analysts at Simply Wall St (Jan 2026) highlighted that ASC’s Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) of 5.7% significantly underperforms the industry average of 8.7%, suggesting the company is less efficient at compounding earnings than its competitors.

🚩 Red Flags

A notable technical red flag emerged in late April 2026, with Intellectia AI flagging ASC as a 'Strong Sell' candidate due to a falling short-term trend and several negative technical signals. Regulatory risks are also mounting; the company’s 2026 proxy statement and SEC filings highlight the expansion of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to include nitrous oxide and methane starting January 1, 2026, which may increase operational costs and compliance complexity for their fleet.

⚔️ Competitive Threats

ASC faces intense competition from larger-scale operators like Scorpio Tankers (STNG) and TORM (TRMD), who possess larger fleets and have historically offered more aggressive shareholder return policies. Analysts have noted that until ASC significantly improves its payout ratio and realizes its Net Asset Value (NAV), it remains a primary 'takeover target' for larger peers rather than a standalone market leader. Furthermore, any implementation of refined product export bans by China or the U.S. would disproportionately impact ASC’s core MR tanker segment.

💬 Customer Sentiment

Customer sentiment is currently characterized by high 'vetting' pressure and complex compliance requirements from oil majors and national oil companies. While ASC reported a shift toward more time charters to secure revenue, customers are increasingly demanding 'high-spec' IMO2 assets. The company's recent $4.4M impairment loss related to its investment in Element 1 Corp (reported in its 2025 20-F) signals potential friction or failed initiatives in providing the green-tech solutions that top-tier charterers are increasingly prioritizing.

Full Earnings Call Transcript

Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-07

Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Ardmore Shipping's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded, and an audio webcast and presentation are available in the Investor Relations section of the company's website, www.ardmoreshipping.com. [Operator Instructions] A replay of the conference call will be accessible any time during the next 2 weeks by dialing 1 (888) 660-6345 or 1 (646) 517-4150, and entering passcode 89653. At this time, I will turn the call over to Gernot Ruppelt, Chief Executive Officer of Ardmore Shipping. Please go ahead.
Gernot Ruppelt: Good morning, and welcome to Ardmore Shipping's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. First, let me ask our President, Bart Kelleher, to discuss forward-looking statements.
Bart Kelleher: Thanks, Gernot. Turning to Slide 2. Please allow me to remind you that our discussion today contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the first quarter 2026 earnings release, which is available on our website. And now I will turn the call back over to Gernot.
Gernot Ruppelt: Thank you, Bart. Let me outline the format of today's call, which you can see here on Slide 3. First, I'll give you a brief overview of our first quarter highlights and cover key strategic and capital allocation actions we have taken since our last call. I will then hand over to Bart, who will cover the market outlook and update you on our financial and operating performance. Thereafter, I will conclude the presentation before opening up the call for questions. But before we discuss our earnings, I'd like to take a moment to acknowledge the major disruption in the Middle East and the significant impact this has had on the maritime industry, in particular, on seafarers and their families. While Ardmore has not had any ships in the region since the beginning of the conflict, we express our solidarity with those currently living through this period of hardship and distress. And we continue to engage with and actively support industry organizations, such as The Mission to Seafarers, INTERTANKO and other industry partners who have been playing a vital role in working with the people directly affected by these recent events. Now turning to Slide 4 for earnings highlights. In addition to last week's activity update and TCE guidance, we report today adjusted earnings of $23.6 million or $0.58 per share. We are declaring a dividend of $0.39 per share, in line with our recently updated dividend policy of paying out 2/3 of adjusted earnings effective Q1. Disruption in the Middle East is adding further tightness to an already firm market. Our Q1 TCE performance reflects these market conditions and momentum is accelerating into the second quarter. Our MR tankers earned $33,700 per day for the first quarter and $52,100 per day so far in the second quarter with 55% booked. Our chemical tankers earned $22,300 per day for the first quarter and $32,500 per day so far in the second quarter with 65% booked. MR spot rates are, therefore, at levels nearly 5x our operating cash breakeven of $10,800 per day. And as we'll discuss in the next slide, we are executing on a clear and deliberate long-term strategy, targeted fleet investment, while simultaneously increasing the return of capital to shareholders in a meaningful manner. Moving to Slide 5. Here, we highlight 3 significant updates since our last call. First, we have ordered 2 highly efficient and versatile Handysize tankers at Wuhu Shipyard at a price of $44.9 million per vessel. This price includes a $3 million upgrade package to make the vessels fully IMO2 capable, as well as advanced MarineLine tank coatings. In addition, we are commissioning further performance and safety upgrades. Deliveries are scheduled from late 2028, and we have the option to acquire 2 additional vessels on the same terms. Second, we are doubling our quarterly dividend payout ratio to 2/3 of adjusted earnings. 2025 was a heavy CapEx year, which entailed an extensive dry docking program and significant vessel efficiency and commercial upgrades. This is now behind us. Importantly, we also invested over $100 million in 3 vessel acquisitions that have substantially increased in value since, arguably by about 30% to 35% on a like-for-like basis. And as always, dynamic in our approach to capital allocation, we increased our percentage dividend payout effective this quarter. We have also agreed the opportunistic sale of a 2014-built MR tanker for $35.5 million. At the time of agreement, the delivery window was about 3 months forward, allowing us to continue participating in the strong market with delivery to the buyer expected in June 2026. We believe this is an attractive transaction, not least in conjunction with the previous newbuilding announcement and in context of the aforementioned acquisitions. Overall, these decisions reflect our disciplined through-the-cycle approach to value creation, growing the business in a thoughtful way, investing in high-quality assets that match our strategy and unique organizational capabilities, all while enabling meaningful distribution of capital to shareholders. Moving to Slide 6 for a bit more detail on the newbuildings just mentioned. The vessels will be handysize product and chemical tankers built to full IMO2 specifications with MarineLine coatings. These upgrades will enable us to trade across a wide cargo slate from mainstream oil products to edible oils, renewable fuels and complex commodity chemicals. As a reminder, we upgraded our existing chemical fleet last year with MarineLine coatings, and we are capturing significant benefits through access to premium cargo options and shortened cleaning times. We have undertaken an extensive review of shipyards in China, Korea and Japan, and we believe Wuhu offers a compelling combination of high construction quality and value. In terms of funding, we have ample capacity under our existing revolving credit facilities and access to a wide range of alternative sources. With that, I'd like to hand it over to Bart.
Bart Kelleher: Thanks, Gernot. Turning to the market, starting with Slide 8 and some significant shifts in trade flows. This slide illustrates the rerouting of refined product cargoes as a result of the conflict in the Middle East. Shortages in the East are being filled long haul from the Atlantic Basin. Flows from the U.S., Europe and West Africa are replacing lost Middle East volumes with voyage lengths roughly doubling. As Gernot mentioned, unfortunately, there are approximately 130 product tankers currently trapped in the Middle East Gulf. This is having an impact on the available vessel supply. In addition, the recent Jones Act waiver is further supporting U.S. bicoastal trade flows. Moving to Slide 9 for more detail on current market drivers. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz is disrupting approximately 15% of the global oil product flows and 30% of crude flows. As a result, refining margins in the Atlantic have reached their highest level since the pandemic recovery, creating notable arbitrage. Asian refineries have needed to reduce throughput with replacement products sourced via long-haul imports from the Atlantic, boosting U.S. exports. Vessels bouncing back to the Atlantic Basin had a further layer of fleet inefficiency, tightening effective supply. This run-up in the Atlantic market has resulted in a lack of vessels in the East, accelerating rates in the Pacific in recent weeks. Product inventories have been significantly drawn down. Looking ahead, a substantial post-conflict restocking requirement should support elevated trading activity for an extended period, all while damaged refining capacity may take several years to restore with replacement volumes continuing to move on long-haul voyages. Turning to Slide 10. Looking beyond the immediate disruption and focusing on the longer-term fundamentals. Energy security is front and center, supporting long-term demand forecast. Meanwhile, refining capacity continues to shift east with closures in Europe and the U.S. adding to ton-mile demand. While the markets understandably pay attention to the situation in the Middle East, these fundamentals are driving the market over the long term. Moving to Slide 11 for the supply side. The chart on the left depicts how the MR fleet has continued to age during this century, while the current order book represents just 15% of the fleet. The Handysize segment is a connected market. But if we look at the Handy order book in isolation, it stands at just 5% against an average fleet age of 18 years. The chart on the right highlights the same story from a different angle. Within the next 5 years, half of the global MR fleet will be over 20 years old and approaching the scrapping window. As a reminder, even if these vessels are not initially scrapped as a result of strong market conditions, their utilization levels notably decline. Turning to Slide 13 and our capital allocation summary. As outlined in our late April press release and commentary today, we have been active across all pillars of our capital allocation policy. And this slide further highlights the numerous actions taken in recent quarters. We're dynamically investing in the business while returning capital to shareholders, including the doubling of our dividend payout ratio to 2/3 of adjusted earnings. Moving to Slide 14, where we detail our financial position. As always, Ardmore remains focused on optimizing TCE performance, closely managing costs and preserving a strong balance sheet. Our low cash breakeven level of $11,700 per day or $10,800 per day, excluding dry dock CapEx, gives us financial flexibility. Considering forward new build CapEx, which we can fund through our existing credit facilities or other alternatives, overall pro forma leverage remains at a modest level. Turning to Slide 15 for financial highlights. Ardmore is well positioned with strong operating leverage. Every $10,000 per day increase in TCE rates translates to an additional nearly $2 per share in annual earnings. For the first quarter, we are reporting adjusted EBITDAR of $37.3 million and as noted earlier, earnings per share of $0.58. We continue to frame EBITDAR as an important comparable valuation metric against our IFRS reporting peers. A full reconciliation is in the appendix alongside our second quarter guidance figures. Moving to Slide 16 for fleet operations. As a reminder, we have limited dry docking activity through 2027. Existing fleet capital expenditure is expected to decline significantly to approximately $8 million this year versus $30 million last year. We have our refreshed fleet on the water capturing the current market. With that, I'm happy to hand the call back to Gernot and look forward to answering any questions at the end.
Gernot Ruppelt: Great. Thank you, Bart. Moving to Slide 18. Allow me to summarize. On top of compelling long-term fundamentals, product markets continue to experience significant near-term disruption driving ton-mile demand as is reflected in our TCE performance on this slide. Commodity dislocation and product supply gaps, urgent inventory restocking needs as well as continued structural demand growth point to sustained strength. Ardmore continues to progress through a disciplined, deliberate and dynamic approach to capital allocation. We have made targeted investments in the fleet over the past years through value-focused newbuilding and secondhand acquisitions as well as upgrades to the existing fleet, all while increasing shareholder returns and maintaining responsible debt levels. As always, our investment decisions are guided by the company's strategy, strong corporate governance and a long-term value approach. We now welcome your questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Jon Chappell with Evercore.
Jonathan Chappell: I'll start with the dividend policy. I know you've spoken about it a little bit in the prepared remarks, but just trying to understand the timing and the thought process behind it. Again, I understand you've sold the vessel, you have far less capital commitments as it relates to fleet maintenance this year. But is this kind of a sign that investing in this part of the cycle where asset values where they are, just doesn't offer the same type of returns that you think a doubling of the capital return policy to the investors provides?
Gernot Ruppelt: Yes. Great question, Jon. I think we really want to look at dividend policy as a subset of returning capital to shareholders as part of our capital allocation policy, which we've been quite consistent with. If you go back to end of 2024, of course, we saw some opportunity in our stock price, and we did some buybacks, continue to pay dividends all throughout. But last year, we also saw some really interesting opportunities to reinvest in the fleet through the acquisitions we've mentioned, some really interesting retrofits, paid down the pref on top of the interesting refi, and we're able to also pay back some debt. So I think for us, this is really a way to reshift and rebalance, acknowledging, of course, that half of debt prices have moved up, but also not in any way, I think, taking away from this kind of rebalanced approach to capital allocation that you really need to see across quarters and across the whole game, which will continue to balance thoughtful and measured reinvestment in the fleet with returning capital to shareholders while maintaining healthy debt levels.
Jonathan Chappell: Okay. That makes sense. And then as it relates to fleet strategy, I know you have a couple of time charter outs right now. It feels like in the larger crude asset classes, time charter rates have spiked to all-time record highs, and there seems to be a pretty decent amount of liquidity, especially in the [ VEs ]. Is there a similar thing transpiring in the MR and chem market? And if there is, what's your appetite to kind of lock in at some of these really elevated rates with guaranteed cash flows versus maintaining that optionality in the spot market that you speak to?
Gernot Ruppelt: So time charter rates have definitely reacted and moved up significantly. We have not executed on those time charters in the past quarter because we don't quite feel that the value proposition is maybe as pronounced as you would see in crude tankers. And sometimes these things take some time to build just to the nature of the timing and the rhythm of the time charter markets. But we'll continue to monitor that. We, of course, do take note that a lot of the time charter interest right now is coming from oil majors, refiners and major traders, including some long-term interest, and we think that's really encouraging. And we have in the past, opportunistically engaged in time charters out and time charters in. But for now, we've been monitoring, and we're looking at it with great interest, of course.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Omar Nokta with Clarksons Securities.
Omar Nokta: Clearly, nice quarter, and it looks like definitely more to come. I just want to ask, you've got the MRs, which are historically and continue to be your biggest footprint. You've also got the chemical tankers or the handy chemical tankers. Can you just talk a little bit about those segments and how they performed in this market given the Hormuz disruption just in terms of the 37 and the 25 deadweight that you have? Are those capturing similar earnings together? Or would you say there's a detachment where the 37s are closer to the MRs and the 25s are separate? Any color you can give on how those are traded?
Gernot Ruppelt: Yes. I think this is actually a great question and maybe something we didn't highlight enough. For us, the order we committed to, these are handysize tankers that cover the full range of liquid products, which includes chemicals, but this is really all about creating trading options for these ships and for the company. It's not some fundamental philosophical leaning deeper into chemicals. For us, it's always been enabling the full range of oil products, which, of course, includes jet fuel and naphtha and all the other road fuels that are in extremely high demand. And equally then alternative cargoes, emerging cargoes because we think this offers really interesting long-term strategic perspectives for the business. And in the near term, it already offers substantial triangulation opportunities. So these ships that we have ordered and the way we're approaching our existing chemical tankers too, these ships are fully conversant in both markets. And we will basically continue to follow the money and just benefit from this added optionality. So right now, even our 25,000 toners that you mentioned, which make up the majority of our existing chemical fleet, half the size of an MR, and typically, under sort of normalized market conditions, they would probably trade 90% in non-CPP cargoes, but we have been redirecting those ships where they now trade almost exclusively CPP because that's where the money is. So really, for us, about trading options, not trading obligations, and continuing to be very versatile players across the full spectrum of products and nonproduct cargoes.
Omar Nokta: Okay. That's quite detailed and helpful. And I guess then just as you place those orders and you look to be something that you're looking to be a bit more opportunistic on as you see an opportunity there, as we kind of think about then your footprint going forward, not necessarily saying you're going to potentially deemphasize MRs because clearly, that's your main market, but should we kind of think about you potentially pivoting into maybe expanding more within that business or maybe bringing them both together in size over the long term?
Gernot Ruppelt: Yes. I think very important, the way we treat these ships already is in a very integrated fashion where we don't have a separated sort of product or separated chemical part of the business, very much the relationships, cargo flows, market insights are used in a very integrated fashion. So for us, it's really just continued progress along this product and chemical space. For us, we felt like these ships really are terrific strategic fit given our current and our forward strategy. We will continue to follow all sources of deal flow, of course, as we have in the past. It felt that last year, there was a much stronger value in secondhand MRs where we saw values drop by arguably 20%, 25% on the back of concerns on tariffs and what that could mean for the global economy, liberation day and the likes. And we then acted very decisively on MRs. And of course, that was money well spent, given the fact that they are under money by 30%, 35%. And we now saw the value proposition much clearer on these very forward-looking, very versatile fuel-efficient assets. If you compare the price between the 12-year-old MR we just sold to the newbuildings, we're committing to the delta on a like-for-like basis is less than $10 million. So again, it is a combination of strategic fit on one hand, which is products, products with full versatility and flexibility to trade into more complex cargoes, but of course, there's a strategic fit and then there's opportunity and just relative value and being opportunistic at times when we have that -- when the market gives us that chance.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.