AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.Advanced Flower Capital, Inc. provides commercial real estate finance services. It primarily engages in originating, structuring, underwriting and managing senior secured loans and other types of loans for established companies operating in the cannabis industry in states. The company was founded by Leonard Mark Tannenbaum on July 6, 2020 and is headquartered in West Palm Beach, FL.
2-Year Price History
Quarterly Financials & Projections
| Period | Rev | EBITDA | OpIn | NI | OCF | FCF | CapEx | Cash | Debt | Shares | ROIC | IntCov | EV/EBITDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | 2028-Q1 | 12.5 | 5.8 | -- | 3.3 | -- | -7.5 | -0.0 | 108.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q4 | 12.0 | 5.4 | -- | 3.0 | -- | 3.4 | -0.0 | 116.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q3 | 11.5 | 5.1 | -- | 2.8 | -- | 3.5 | -0.0 | 112.6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q2 | 11.0 | 4.7 | -- | 2.4 | -- | 3.9 | -0.0 | 109.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2027-Q1 | 10.5 | 4.4 | -- | 1.9 | -- | -8.4 | -0.0 | 105.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q4 | 10.0 | 4.0 | -- | 2.0 | -- | 2.5 | -0.0 | 113.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q3 | 9.2 | 3.5 | -- | 2.0 | -- | 2.8 | -0.0 | 111.2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Est | 2026-Q2 | 8.5 | 3.0 | -- | 2.1 | -- | -4.3 | -0.0 | 108.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Act | 2026-Q1 | 9.8 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 11.4 | 6.3 | 6.3 | -0.0 | 112.7 | 202.5 | 23.5 | 24.0% | 8.0x | 32.7x |
| Act | 2025-Q4 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.9 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.0 | 38.6 | 97.3 | 22.7 | 9.4% | 1.8x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q3 | -0.8 | -11.7 | -3.1 | -12.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | -0.0 | 45.1 | 111.1 | 22.2 | -7.9% | -7.2x | -- |
| Act | 2025-Q2 | -9.7 | 0.0 | -12.0 | -13.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 | -0.0 | 3.4 | 99.3 | 22.1 | -47.9% | 0.0x | 23.7x |
| Act | 2025-Q1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 | -0.0 | 3.3 | 111.0 | 22.1 | 14.3% | 3.3x | 30.9x |
| Act | 2024-Q4 | 2.3 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -1.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | -0.0 | 103.6 | 188.6 | 20.9 | -1.8% | 0.0x | 90.8x |
| Act | 2024-Q3 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 2.6 | -0.0 | 122.2 | 148.5 | 20.8 | 15.7% | 2.0x | 85.8x |
| Act | 2024-Q2 | 22.7 | 0.0 | 16.9 | 16.5 | 10.3 | 10.3 | -0.0 | 170.3 | 123.3 | 20.4 | 33.8% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2024-Q1 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 2.3 | -0.1 | 6.4 | 6.4 | -0.0 | 82.3 | 148.2 | 20.4 | 3.9% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q4 | 3.8 | 0.0 | -1.3 | -9.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | -0.0 | 90.4 | 130.0 | 20.3 | -2.5% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q3 | 14.9 | -2.3 | -2.3 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | -0.0 | 73.2 | 87.9 | 20.3 | -4.9% | -1.5x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q2 | 15.6 | -3.1 | -3.1 | 12.1 | 5.2 | 5.2 | -0.0 | 82.1 | 87.7 | 20.3 | -6.5% | -2.0x | -- |
| Act | 2023-Q1 | 16.1 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 10.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | -0.0 | 80.6 | 87.6 | 20.5 | 21.4% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q4 | 11.6 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | -0.0 | 140.4 | 157.1 | 20.4 | 7.5% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q3 | 17.6 | 0.0 | 12.3 | 11.5 | 12.2 | 12.2 | -0.0 | 36.3 | 97.0 | 20.1 | 22.7% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q2 | 18.3 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 11.4 | 10.6 | 10.6 | -0.0 | 45.6 | 96.8 | 19.8 | 24.0% | 0.0x | -- |
| Act | 2022-Q1 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 10.2 | 4.7 | 4.7 | -0.0 | 63.6 | 96.7 | 19.6 | 18.7% | 0.0x | -- |
Multiples vs the company's own history — cheap or rich relative to itself? Historical fiscal years, then TTM, then forward projections (E). Forward rows hold today's price against projected earnings, so the multiple compresses if the company grows into it.
| Year | Price | Rev Gr | EBITDA % | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | EV/FCF | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7.06 | — | 0.0% | 0 | — | 10.9× | 9.0× | 5.1× |
| 2023 | 6.29 | -20.7% | -10.8% | -5 | n/m | 12.6× | 10.9× | 4.5× |
| 2024 | 7.48 | -17.6% | 7.7% | 3 | 90.8× | 13.4× | 12.1× | 4.9× |
| 2025 | 2.85 | -94.9% | -146.3% | -3 | n/m | 12.8× | n/m | 40.5× |
| TTM | 3.73 | -85.0% | 78.8% | 5 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
| 2027E | 3.73 | +654.6% | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× | 0.0× |
EBITDA in reporting-currency $M. Historical multiples use year-end market cap (split-adjusted price history); TTM & forward years use today's.
AI Analysis
LLM Evaluations
AFCG is a deeply distressed micro-cap BDC attempting to reinvent itself after its cannabis lending niche deteriorated severely. The legacy portfolio carries 23.5% non-accruals, the dividend has been slashed 85%, and the market prices equity at a 64% discount to stated NAV—reflecting justified skepticism about Level 3 asset marks. While the pivot to LMM private credit is strategically sound in concept, AFCG is a tiny, undiversified player entering a crowded market against hundreds of better-capitalized, better-known BDCs. The management fee structure—which pays incentive fees on non-cash PIK interest without clawback—represents a severe governance red flag. Near-term catalysts are limited to potential cannabis rescheduling tailwinds and Justice Grown recovery, both highly uncertain. The stock trades near fair value given realistic recovery assumptions on legacy assets, and the risk/reward is unfavorable given the execution risk of the strategic pivot.
Latest Earnings Call
Transcript Summary
Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFC) successfully transitioned to a Business Development Company (BDC) in Q1 2026, pivoting its strategy from cannabis real estate toward lower middle market (LMM) private credit. The firm committed $90 million to two non-cannabis deals in the healthcare and retail services sectors, signaling a push for diversification. AFC reported net investment income of $0.21 per share and an increased NAV of $7.90 per share. Management highlighted a strong pipeline of over $1.5 billion, focusing on cash-flowing companies with $5 million to $50 million in EBITDA. While legacy cannabis loans still impact the books—specifically Justice Grown, which entered maturity default—repayments of $41.2 million during the quarter provided liquidity for new LMM deployments. The company expanded its credit facility to $80 million and initiated a $5 million share buyback. Despite federal rescheduling news in the cannabis sector, AFC intends to prioritize the LMM, where they see a 'compelling vintage' characterized by higher yields and stricter covenants compared to the upper middle market. Future growth is expected to lean on this diversified private credit strategy as the cannabis portfolio continues to wind down through repayments and liquidations.
Valuation & Metrics
Market Stats
TTM Financial Snapshot
DCF Fair Value Estimate
Forward Outlook & Risk
Short Interest
Options
| Strike | Call Bid/Ask | Call OI | Put Bid/Ask | Put OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | $0.75/$1.45 | 247 | --/$0.20 | 56 |
| $5.00 | $0.05/$0.10 | 780 | $1.25/$2.00 | 22 |
| $7.50 | --/$0.20 | 32 | $3.50/$4.70 | 10 |
Forward Projections & Estimates
Institutional Ownership
Headline & net flow
In Q1 2026 so far (quarter still filing), institutions are net sellers — bought 5.0% of float, sold 17.8%. 2 filers moved >1% of shares (0 buying, 2 selling).
Ownership composition
Top holders
| Fund | $ value | Cost basis | Δ QoQ | Δ YoY | α life | Fund AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC Financial, Inc. | $4.2M | $2.83 | +$2.4M | +$4.2M | +10.5% | $121M |
| GSA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP | $680K | $4.22 | −$342K | +$432K | -5.9% | $1.61B |
| JANE STREET GROUP, LLCMM | $646K | $3.25 | +$462K | +$646K | -0.1% | $92.10B |
| CITADEL ADVISORS LLC | $566K | $4.18 | +$202K | +$556K | -0.4% | $138.22B |
| MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. | $543K | $6.63 | −$37K | −$34K | +1.7% | $73.71B |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPPassive | $426K | $5.00 | −$526K | −$23K | -0.2% | $755.34B |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCPassive | $424K | $2.82 | +$424K | +$424K | — | $4.04T |
| SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLPMM | $407K | $4.43 | +$107K | +$310K | -0.6% | $77.14B |
| MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC | $361K | $5.43 | +$303K | +$361K | -0.5% | $127.40B |
| MORGAN STANLEY | $342K | $6.43 | −$46K | +$42K | -0.3% | $1.65T |
| Black Maple Capital Management LP | $313K | $2.82 | +$313K | +$313K | -1.8% | $130M |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | $275K | $8.15 | −$27K | −$384K | -0.3% | $118.02B |
| Cambria Investment Management, L.P. | $275K | $4.41 | −$37K | +$212K | -0.9% | $1.79B |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | $274K | $2.82 | +$236K | +$274K | -0.6% | $39.46B |
| RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC | $217K | $6.35 | +$52K | −$156K | +1.2% | $63.91B |
| Vident Advisory, LLC | $207K | $2.82 | +$207K | +$207K | -2.3% | $11.74B |
| Squarepoint Ops LLC | $172K | $3.63 | +$143K | +$141K | +0.4% | $46.27B |
| BlackRock, Inc.Passive | $169K | $8.61 | −$3.6M | −$4.7M | -0.2% | $5.69T |
| ADVISOR GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. | $159K | $4.16 | +$0 | +$148K | -0.3% | $67.63B |
| HighTower Advisors, LLC | $107K | $6.93 | +$29K | +$30K | -0.2% | $93.93B |
Trading behavior
▸ Compare to holder-profile behavior (across all their stocks)
Biggest decreases this quarter
New buyers this quarter
Top-5 holders · 58.3%
Top Holders Over Time
5-year share-count history (top 10 holders by peak, incl. exited) + price
Analyst Coverage
| Quarter | Revenue | EBITDA | Net Inc | EPS | EPS Range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 7M | 3M | 5M | $0.20 | $0.16 – $0.23 | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6M | 2M | 0M | $0.01 | $0.01 – $0.02 | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7M | 3M | 4M | $0.17 | $0.06 – $0.26 | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7M | 3M | 3M | $0.14 | $0.05 – $0.21 | 1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 8M | 3M | 3M | $0.13 | $0.05 – $0.22 | 1 |
| 2026 Q4 | 8M | 3M | 3M | $0.12 | $0.10 – $0.14 | 1 |
| 2027 Q1 | 7M | 3M | 2M | $0.10 | $0.09 – $0.12 | 1 |
| 2027 Q2 | 7M | 3M | 3M | $0.13 | $0.11 – $0.15 | 1 |
| 2027 Q3 | 8M | 3M | 3M | $0.14 | $0.12 – $0.17 | 1 |
| 2027 Q4 | 8M | 3M | 3M | $0.14 | $0.12 – $0.16 | 1 |
Corporate
Executive Compensation (2022-2024)
Insider Trading (last 12mo)
| Date | Side | Insider | Title | Shares | Price | Dollars | Owned $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 90,600 | $2.84 | $257K | $18.51M |
| 2026-03-31 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 29,040 | $2.76 | $80K | $17.74M |
| 2026-03-31 | BUY | Tannenbaum Robyn | officer: President and CIO | 7,000 | $2.80 | $20K | $633K |
| 2026-03-27 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 4,300 | $2.60 | $11K | $16.63M |
| 2026-03-26 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 19,729 | $2.60 | $51K | $16.62M |
| 2026-03-24 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 44,914 | $2.59 | $116K | $16.51M |
| 2026-03-23 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 14,366 | $2.59 | $37K | $16.39M |
| 2026-03-20 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 115,237 | $2.55 | $294K | $16.10M |
| 2026-03-19 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 60,600 | $2.59 | $157K | $16.05M |
| 2026-03-18 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 90,600 | $2.59 | $235K | $15.90M |
| 2026-03-16 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 34,288 | $2.59 | $89K | $15.66M |
| 2026-03-13 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 15,018 | $2.60 | $39K | $15.63M |
| 2026-03-12 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 2,502 | $2.59 | $6K | $15.54M |
| 2026-03-10 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 2,000 | $2.57 | $5K | $15.41M |
| 2026-03-09 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 102,213 | $2.54 | $260K | $15.22M |
| 2026-03-06 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 1,270 | $2.47 | $3K | $14.55M |
| 2026-03-05 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 29,000 | $2.44 | $71K | $14.37M |
| 2025-12-11 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 25,000 | $3.05 | $76K | $17.88M |
| 2025-12-10 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 20,000 | $3.03 | $61K | $17.68M |
| 2025-12-09 | BUY | TANNENBAUM LEONARD M | director, 10 percent owner: | 24,000 | $2.83 | $68K | $16.46M |
Order Flow (FINRA, ~3w lag)
Filing Risk Analysis
Filing Risk Scores
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.: Strategic Pivot Masking Severe Credit Deterioration and Related-Party Entrenchment
Counter-Thesis
Counter-Thesis & Recent News
AFCG recently completed its conversion from a REIT to a Business Development Company (BDC) effective January 1, 2026. While Q1 2026 earnings (reported May 7, 2026) showed an EPS beat of $0.21, the company's Q4 2025 performance was dismal, reporting a loss of $0.12 per share against estimates of a $0.06 gain. Most notably, the company slashed its quarterly dividend from $0.33 in 2024 to a mere $0.05 per share as of April 2026, representing an 85% reduction that has alienated income-focused investors (Sources: MarketBeat, Seeking Alpha).
The bear case centers on a deteriorating core portfolio and a risky strategic pivot. AFCG is struggling with three major loans on non-accrual status, including a significant $79.2M exposure to 'Justice Grown' (Private Co. G) and a liquidating position in 'Private Company A.' To compensate for cannabis-sector decay, management is diversifying into non-cannabis lower-middle-market loans, but CEO Daniel Neville warned that overall portfolio yields are expected to decline into the 'low double-digits' as they move toward higher-quality, more competitive credits. This transition effectively strips AFCG of its high-yield niche appeal while exposing it to broader market competition (Sources: Seeking Alpha, Investing.com).
Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with Weiss Ratings maintaining a 'Sell (d)' rating and Zacks Research recently labeling it a 'Strong Sell' (Rank #5) in March 2026. Financial red flags include a negative net margin of 70.17% reported in early 2026 and a $17.9 million decline in interest income throughout 2024. Additionally, the company is carrying a $29.9M Credit Loss Reserve (CECL), which represents nearly 10% of its total loans at carrying value, signaling deep internal concerns about further defaults (Sources: MarketBeat, Zacks, Datainsightsmarket).
The 'moat' around cannabis lending is evaporating. Management admitted in May 2026 that the industry is 'more competitive than it was 5 years ago.' Recent data shows that 40% of traditional financial institutions now offer lending programs to cannabis operators, increasing price competition and driving down the yields AFCG can demand. Furthermore, by pivoting to general lower-middle-market lending as a BDC, AFCG is now directly competing with hundreds of established, better-capitalized BDCs with longer track records (Sources: MG Magazine, Seeking Alpha).
Borrower sentiment and credit health are strained; the primary 'customers' (cannabis operators) are frequently defaulting or seeking forbearance. The company is currently taking a 'legal-and-remedies' posture against major borrowers like Justice Grown following a maturity default. This shift from a 'partner' to a 'litigant' suggests a breakdown in borrower relationships and a desperate focus on capital recovery over growth (Source: Seeking Alpha, Investing.com).
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Full Earnings Call Transcript — Q1 • 2026-05-07
Operator: Good morning, and welcome to Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s first quarter 2026 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. I would now like to turn the call over to Gabriel A. Katz, Chief Legal Officer. Please go ahead. Gabriel A. Katz: Good morning, and thank you all for joining Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s earnings call for the quarter ended 03/31/2026. I am joined this morning by Robyn Tannenbaum, our President and Chief Investment Officer; Leonard Tannenbaum, our Chairman; Daniel Neville, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brandon Hetzel, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I would like to note that this call is being recorded. Replay information is included in our April 2026 press release and is posted on the Investor Relations portion of Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s website at advancedflowercapital.com, along with our first quarter 2026 earnings release and investor presentation. Today's conference call includes forward-looking statements and projections that reflect the company's current views with respect to, among other things, market developments, anticipated portfolio yield, and financial performance and projections in 2026 and beyond. These statements are subject to inherent uncertainties in predicting future results. Please refer to Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s most recent periodic filings with the SEC, including our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed earlier this morning, for certain conditions and significant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and projections. Today's call will begin with Robyn providing an overview of our results. Len will then provide commentary on the lower middle market, and then Dan will provide an overview of our portfolio and pipeline. Finally, Brandon will conclude with a summary of our financial results before we open the lines for Q&A. With that, I will now turn the call over to our President, Robyn Tannenbaum. Robyn Tannenbaum: Thanks, Gabe, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us to discuss Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s first quarter earnings. Before turning to earnings, we are pleased to have completed our first quarter operating as a BDC. The conversion to a business development company has expanded Advanced Flower Capital Inc.'s investment flexibility, which has allowed us to pursue opportunities beyond real estate-backed loans. We believe that this expanded opportunity better positions Advanced Flower Capital Inc. to diversify its exposure across industries and credit risk profiles. During the quarter, we closed two non-cannabis deals in the lower middle market, totaling approximately $90 million in new commitments. Additionally, we received $41.2 million in cannabis loan repayments during the quarter. For Q1 2026, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. had net fundings of $39.1 million. The two lower middle market deals are similar to other transactions in our pipeline and have many of the characteristics we look for: cash-flowing operating businesses backed by experienced sponsors. Turning to earnings, for the first quarter of 2026, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. generated net investment income of $0.21 per basic weighted average share of common stock. Additionally, the Board of Directors declared a first quarter distribution of $0.05 per share, which was paid on 04/15/2026 to shareholders of record on 03/31/2026. Before turning the call over to Len, I would like to note that the Board of Directors has put a $5 million share buyback program in place. We view the share buyback authorization as a flexible component of our capital allocation strategy designed to enhance long-term shareholder value. Now I will turn it over to Len to discuss the state of the middle market. Leonard Tannenbaum: Thank you, Robyn, and good morning, everyone. I want to explain why we are excited about private credit and why we believe the timing is particularly compelling. As private credit experienced meaningful reductions in net inflows, many lenders have exited the lower middle market in favor of moving upmarket to support their existing portfolios. This reduction in capital and resulting shift upmarket has created a sizable opportunity for a small, nimble lender like us to capture what we consider to be an exceptional vintage in the lower middle market. In this part of the market, we are seeing better risk-adjusted returns with absolute yields running approximately 100 to 300 basis points higher than they were just six months ago. Our ideal sweet spot is in the $5 million to $50 million EBITDA range, largely below the threshold where the larger private credit platforms operate. We believe that the lower middle market assets that we are currently underwriting carry a meaningful distinction from the covenant-light structures common in the upper market, where lenders often rely solely upon a liquidity covenant. Our deals typically include a cash flow measure and a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, so we are not allowing the aggressive EBITDA add-backs endemic to larger deals. This is a further indicator of the strong underlying credit quality opportunity available in the lower middle market. Strategically, we are actively expanding our pipeline and continuing to diversify our portfolio. We believe this vintage offers an attractive opportunity, and we are positioning ourselves to capture it thoughtfully and at scale. I will now turn it over to Daniel Neville to discuss the state of our portfolio and our pipeline. Daniel Neville: Thanks, Len. I will begin with an update on our expansion into private credit outside of the cannabis space, followed by an update on our portfolio. As Len described, we feel good about the supply and demand dynamics in lower middle market lending and are excited about the opportunities we are seeing. Since expanding our investable universe, our active pipeline remains strong, with over $1.5 billion of deals as of today. We are focused on sourcing deals and backing companies in the lower middle market across a variety of industries, including healthcare, consumer, manufacturing, and services. We are focused on deals where we have expertise or can add value and have no interest in stretching beyond our core competency. Our sweet spot is providing loans to cash-flowing borrowers with $5 million to $50 million of EBITDA. We are primarily participating in sponsored transactions, though we selectively engage in non-sponsored deals as well. The financings we are looking at are often used for expansion capital, acquisitions, refinancings, or recapitalizations. During Q1, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. closed two loans totaling $90 million, and subsequent to quarter end, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. closed an additional $5 million of loans. In January, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. closed on a $60 million senior secured credit facility to support the combination of STAT and the Mooresby Group, which is backed by Cambridge Capital. In February, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. committed $30 million to a $60 million senior secured term loan to support the acquisition and growth of a leading healthcare benefits platform tailored toward hourly and lower-wage employees. At closing, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. funded $20 million of this commitment, and the remaining $10 million was funded subsequent to quarter end. As I stated last quarter, we currently have three loans on non-accrual and are focused on receiving paydowns on these loans to redeploy that capital into performing credits that should contribute to current income. The receiver has continued the liquidation for our investment in Debbie Holdings. During Q1, we received a $6.2 million paydown, which brings the total paydown since Debbie entered receivership to $20.8 million. Lastly, I wanted to take a minute to touch on Justice Grown. The loan matured on 05/01/2026 and is in maturity default. Now that the loan has matured, we intend to exercise our rights and remedies under the credit agreement, including our rights under the shareholder guarantee and parent guarantee. As a reminder, our loan to Justice Grown is secured by the vertical asset in New Jersey, including an owned cultivation facility and three dispensaries, two of which are owned. In Pennsylvania, we are secured by three dispensaries and an owned cultivation facility, which is currently not operational. We remain laser focused on pursuing our rights and remedies under the credit agreement and realizing maximum value from this loan. Now I will turn it over to Brandon to discuss our financial results in more detail. Brandon Hetzel: Thank you, Dan. For the quarter ended 03/31/2026, we generated total investment income of $9.8 million and net investment income of $4.8 million, or $0.21 per basic weighted average share of common stock. We ended the first quarter of 2026 with $356.6 million of principal outstanding spread across 15 loans. As of 05/01/2026, our portfolio consisted of $370 million of principal outstanding across 17 loans. As of 03/31/2026, we had total assets of $394.9 million, total shareholders' equity of $185.8 million, and our net asset value per share was $7.90. This is an increase of $0.44 per share over the prior quarter. The increase in net asset value per share was primarily driven by net investment income of $0.21 per share and an increase in unrealized appreciation on investments of approximately $0.28 per share, offset by the Q1 dividend of $0.05 per share. During the first quarter, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. expanded its senior secured revolving credit facility to $80 million with an additional $30 million commitment from the facility's lead arranger, an FDIC-insured bank with over $75 billion of assets. The facility remains expandable to $100 million, subject to lender participation and our available borrowing base. During the three months ended 03/31/2026, we had an average balance drawn on the credit facility of approximately $22 million. Lastly, on 04/15/2026, we paid the first quarter dividend of $0.05 per common share outstanding to shareholders of record as of 03/31/2026. I will now turn it back over to the operator to start the Q&A. Operator: We will now open the call for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If your question has been answered and you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press star two. Our first question comes from Aaron Thomas Grey with AGP. Your line is open. Aaron Thomas Grey: Hi. Thank you for the question. First one from me. Thanks for some of the comments you provided on Justice Grown. How should we think about potential outcomes here given the other litigation that is pending? The loan is now officially in default, so I am trying to think about the different potential outcomes that could happen over the near term. Thanks. Robyn Tannenbaum: Hi, Aaron. I am going to pass that one over to our Chief Legal Officer, Gabe. Gabriel A. Katz: Sure. Yes, the loan has matured as you noted. We are pursuing all rights and remedies to obtain maximum value from the credit facility, but it is too early to make any predictions on outcomes in this litigation. Aaron Thomas Grey: Okay. So just to clarify, there are still questions in terms of being able to fully take it over as the other litigation is pending, even if it is currently in default now? Gabriel A. Katz: No. We are pursuing our strategies to obtain maximum value from the collateral. Aaron Thomas Grey: Okay. Alright. Great. Next question for me is on incremental loans in the pipeline. I know you have talked before about expected yields. I understand the April ones were a little bit smaller, but I just want to confirm that the ones in the pipeline are expecting similar yields that we have seen, kind of that mid- to high-teens, as we go forward for the year? Robyn Tannenbaum: Hi, Aaron. I will pass that one to Daniel Neville. Daniel Neville: Aaron, we have a few loans in our disclosures, and you can look at those yield-to-maturities as a guidepost. Our overall target, and what we have said previously with the transition to the lower middle market, is that we would expect the yields to move down a touch into the low double-digit range on an overall basis, but we expect the quality of the borrowers and the counterparties on the sponsor side to improve significantly in the lower middle market relative to what is available today across the cannabis landscape. Aaron Thomas Grey: Mhmm. And just last question for me. With the recent rescheduling—currently FDA approved and if they are medical, legal, operations—does that change your outlook for the cannabis market, or are you still more broadly focused, maybe less focused on cannabis for the pipeline? Thank you. Daniel Neville: I will give a little color on the rescheduling side. It is great to see progress at the federal level finally after five years. The positives are it eliminates 280E liabilities for medical operators today and certainly decreases future uncertainty related to go-forward liabilities, given the path that we seem to be on at the federal level, with hearings related to adult use later this year as well. There is also potential relief of historical tax liabilities, at least for medical operators, as was highlighted in the actions over the last few weeks. The combination of those factors could potentially attract additional capital over time. The negatives are that none of the operators were really paying those taxes on a cash basis outside of GTI, and if you look at the cash flow statements for the last couple of years, that reflects a post-280E world on a cash basis today. Certainly, the industry is more competitive than it was five years ago, and it took a long time to get here. To the extent that additional capital is attracted to the industry, that would be positive for asset values—particularly medical asset values given that 280E is eliminated—and it could lead to better realizations for us on loans that we have on non-accrual. We are seeing better opportunities in the lower middle market today given the economics, the less competitive nature of the lending environment, and the quality of the borrowers and counterparties. So on a go-forward basis, while rescheduling is great and could be good for asset values and our loans on non-accrual, we are still focused on expanding into lower middle market lending generally. Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Pablo Zuanic with Zuanic and Associates. Your line is open. Pablo Zuanic: Yes. Good morning, everyone. You gave some color on the two large loans that you made in the first quarter to non-cannabis companies. Can you expand a little bit more? These are private companies, and we do not have access to their financials. Whatever additional color you can provide to understand better what those companies are doing and what their plans are for the proceeds from the loans would be helpful. Thank you. Daniel Neville: Sure, Pablo. As you mentioned, they are private companies; the majority of loans done in the BDC space are to private companies. We can give a bit of color on two of those businesses. For STAT, we put out a press release that described what the business does. They operate in the revenue recovery space related to suppliers into big retailers like Walmart, Target, and the Amazon ecosystem, and they recover deductions related to invoices for goods that are shipped into those retailers. If you think about the opportunity set there, Walmart has about $700 billion of sales, with cost of goods sold probably somewhere around $400 billion. On every invoice that goes into Walmart, you typically see deductions related to quantity mismatches, on-time in-full, and similar items. These folks work to recover those amounts, which represents a very large opportunity at scale for Walmart alone, and you expand that opportunity as you get to other retailers on the platform. The use of proceeds there was for a refinancing of an existing credit facility for the buyer as well as to partially finance the acquisition of the Mooresby Group. On the benefits platform borrower, that is a healthcare benefits platform that serves low-wage employees. In my previous life, I had 1,700 hourly employees and dealt with benefits, and one of the constant complaints is that regular-way healthcare insurance was too expensive, unaffordable, and honestly overkill for folks in the 18–35 age subset. This product provides a low-cost offering for virtual urgent care, primary care, and generic prescriptions, and it is good for the employee as a low-cost option and good for the employer as an avenue for some tax savings on FICA payroll taxes. The platform is seeing tremendous growth and is really attacking an interesting niche and unfilled need in the healthcare insurance market. Pablo Zuanic: Thank you. That is great color. My last question: you have the cash on the balance sheet that you reported for March plus the expanded credit facility. If I put all that together, do you see that you can deploy all of that this year? You have talked about the pipeline, but I am trying to think how we should model book loan growth from here to the end of the year. Robyn Tannenbaum: Pablo, it is Robyn. As we are entering the lower middle market, it is hard to provide guidance for the rest of the year as to what we are going to fund. We do have dry powder that we look to deploy over the course of the year, and as we get repayments, as we discussed this quarter, we will look to deploy that capital as well. Operator: I am not showing any further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to our CEO, Daniel Neville, for any further remarks. Daniel Neville: Thank you for joining us this morning, and we look forward to updating you on our continued transition to lower middle market lending on future calls. Operator: Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's presentation. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect, and have a wonderful day.